Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear KP Group astrologers, It has been toooo much on KSK's 66 edition. Mr. Dhanabalan learned kp system from me 3,4 years back. He learned many more systems from n number of people. He is so knowledge thirsty he never leaves any meeting on astrology. He is an M.E.,and been a Chief Engineer in Neyveli Lignite corp.and free now. There was a time some astrologers were talking about the original versions of KP editions and asked K.Hariharan for a copy,at Salem. He promptly said he doesnt have. I and a Prof in Tamil went thro the remains of Professor's father after his demise and came out with the second part of the Predictive Stellar Astrology book by Sagar Pub.. One another astrologer Mrs.Sowtha Ramamurthy dug out a copy of part.I. All of us have gone thro them and many have concluded that they were superseeded. Now Dhanabalan though he doesnt practice,no need for him to practice,he goes on line by line made me wonder. Inspite of seniors and stalwarts repeatedly insisting to go ahead with the 6 readers,there is no ponit in favouring the old editions. I hope Mr.Dhanabalan would get into more deeper fields to explore sparing 66 editions. It is not meant to offend him. Thanks and Regards tkp ghopal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear Gopal 1) How do you say that I am not practicing. How do you say that there is no need for me to practice. What do you want to convey to others. Please do not go into the personal matters of others. 2) I have not learned k.p. from you. Since you were all confusing with k.p, just I took guidelines from you and I have studied myself from books. Teaching is different and guiding is different. 3) You might have gone through the original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati but you have not studied. Studying is different, gone through is different. 4) In my opinion those Readers were not written by Mr.KSK and I am giving evidence in support of my contention. When I have the doubt on Mr.KSK and his sons, there is no need to beleive the words of seniors and stalwarts without sufficient evidence. R.Dhanabalan --- On Sat, 8/2/08, Tkp Ghopal <astrogopalji_tkp wrote: Tkp Ghopal <astrogopalji_tkp Call it a day for 66 publication Date: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 1:28 PM Dear KP Group astrologers, It has been toooo much on KSK's 66 edition. Mr. Dhanabalan learned kp system from me 3,4 years back. He learned many more systems from n number of people. He is so knowledge thirsty he never leaves any meeting on astrology. He is an M.E.,and been a Chief Engineer in Neyveli Lignite corp.and free now. There was a time some astrologers were talking about the original versions of KP editions and asked K.Hariharan for a copy,at Salem. He promptly said he doesnt have. I and a Prof in Tamil went thro the remains of Professor's father after his demise and came out with the second part of the Predictive Stellar Astrology book by Sagar Pub.. One another astrologer Mrs.Sowtha Ramamurthy dug out a copy of part.I. All of us have gone thro them and many have concluded that they were superseeded. Now Dhanabalan though he doesnt practice,no need for him to practice,he goes on line by line made me wonder. Inspite of seniors and stalwarts repeatedly insisting to go ahead with the 6 readers,there is no ponit in favouring the old editions. I hope Mr.Dhanabalan would get into more deeper fields to explore sparing 66 editions. It is not meant to offend him. Thanks and Regards tkp ghopal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Dear Dhanabalan ji/ Ghopal ji, The discussion that we are having is important one. I request you not to take it to personal level, otherwise we will deviate from original discussion. PLEASE NO FURTHER POSTS IN THIS THREAD. Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey Moderator On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote: Dear Gopal 1) How do you say that I am not practicing. How do you say that there is no need for me to practice. What do you want to convey to others. Please do not go into the personal matters of others. 2) I have not learned k.p. from you. Since you were all confusing with k.p, just I took guidelines from you and I have studied myself from books. Teaching is different and guiding is different. 3) You might have gone through the original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati but you have not studied. Studying is different, gone through is different. 4) In my opinion those Readers were not written by Mr.KSK and I am giving evidence in support of my contention. When I have the doubt on Mr.KSK and his sons, there is no need to beleive the words of seniors and stalwarts without sufficient evidence. R.Dhanabalan --- On Sat, 8/2/08, Tkp Ghopal <astrogopalji_tkp wrote: Tkp Ghopal <astrogopalji_tkp Call it a day for 66 publication Date: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 1:28 PM Dear KP Group astrologers, It has been toooo much on KSK's 66 edition. Mr. Dhanabalan learned kp system from me 3,4 years back. He learned many more systems from n number of people. He is so knowledge thirsty he never leaves any meeting on astrology. He is an M.E.,and been a Chief Engineer in Neyveli Lignite corp.and free now. There was a time some astrologers were talking about the original versions of KP editions and asked K.Hariharan for a copy,at Salem. He promptly said he doesnt have. I and a Prof in Tamil went thro the remains of Professor's father after his demise and came out with the second part of the Predictive Stellar Astrology book by Sagar Pub.. One another astrologer Mrs.Sowtha Ramamurthy dug out a copy of part.I. All of us have gone thro them and many have concluded that they were superseeded. Now Dhanabalan though he doesnt practice,no need for him to practice,he goes on line by line made me wonder. Inspite of seniors and stalwarts repeatedly insisting to go ahead with the 6 readers,there is no ponit in favouring the old editions. I hope Mr.Dhanabalan would get into more deeper fields to explore sparing 66 editions. It is not meant to offend him. Thanks and Regards tkp ghopal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.