Guest guest Posted August 1, 2008 Report Share Posted August 1, 2008 Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan:o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan:o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan:o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan:o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator”. Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method” It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204,205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…” is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is stronger”. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:”sublord of meridian in the constellation of..” page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma.orgDhanabalan R <r.dhanabalankpsystem groups Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator†. Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method†It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…†is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is strongerâ€. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:â€sublord of meridian in the constellation of..†page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear Ramesh Every astrologer claims that their prediction is 100% accutate but it is not true. The public may accept those words because they do not know the astrology. Since we are astrologers, we can judge easily. Again I repeat that if the formula is correct then only the result will be correct. If the formula is wrong then the result also will be wrong. If anyone uses the wrong formula and claims that his answer is correct then something wrong with the person. Whether you are getting the result or not is not the question. I do not want to test your ability. Some k.p.astrologers are giving predictions by blending vedic, nadi, jayamuni and cuspal interlink. So prediction differ from person to person. Mr.Raichur has compared the old edition of Reader III and the new edition of Reader III. Please go through that. Being an elderly person, having vast knowledge in k.p., etc. he commented as, "This casts a serious doubt whether even 1971 edition contained text not written by KSK". I am telling that the whole Reader III was not written by Mr.KSK and it was written by somebody in the name of Mr.KSK. There are lot of vital changes were made in subsequent editions. Assuming that the Reader III was written by Mr.KSK, further correction in KSK's articles should not be done by others. If done, the originality of Mr.KSK will lost. The same thing was done in Reader III. The beginners thing that the entire content of the Reader III belongs to Mr.KSK. The reply for the mail of tw853 will continue from me. Now I have sent only a part reply. I have asked some clarifications from tw853. Let him give clarifications. Thank you R.Dhanabalan--- On Sat, 8/2/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Cc: r.dhanabalanDate: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 3:18 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma.org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalankpsystem groups Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator” . Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method” It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…” is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is stronger”. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:”sublord of meridian in the constellation of..” page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear Members,100% success is not possible not only in astrology but in any other subject / science. Is every doctor, every lawer etc., are 100% successful ?Moreover Astrology as I understand is mostly a science of probability. Astrologer can tell what likely may happen but God only can tell what exactly will happen. Astrologer's foretelling / prediction may happen or may not happen. The success rate depends not simply upon amount of knowledge possed but mainly on his application skills and intuition. Application skills can not be acquired from books but only thru his own experience. Thus Astrology, like any other science is both science and art. The scientific aspect only is passed on from amn to man thru books and thru teaching by gurus. The artistic part of the subject can be acquired only thru his own personal experience which can not be passed on from one individual to another. It is purely individualistic and it dies with the individual.Besides above, Astrology since is a Devine science, the astrologer should possess some personal qualities - trikaran sudhi, some Devi / Devatha upasana. In some cases it is a God's gift I mean some astrologers are born astrologers and are not made. Intuitive skills do not have any defined formula/s.Amara shilpi Jakkana, the renowned shilpi, just by hammering the stone by his wand, declared unsuitability of the stone to make idol of God, since the stone has some frog inside it. Every one including the King was shocked and surprised when it was proved by breaking the stone and the frong inside. No amount of bookish knowledge alone will help this. It is the personal skill and intuition that helped in this case.Naidu KP Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591.--- On Sat, 2/8/08, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote:Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalanRe: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III"kpsystem groups" Cc: "Ramesh" <ram_t_1968Saturday, 2 August, 2008, 9:57 AM Dear Ramesh Every astrologer claims that their prediction is 100% accutate but it is not true. The public may accept those words because they do not know the astrology. Since we are astrologers, we can judge easily. Again I repeat that if the formula is correct then only the result will be correct. If the formula is wrong then the result also will be wrong. If anyone uses the wrong formula and claims that his answer is correct then something wrong with the person. Whether you are getting the result or not is not the question. I do not want to test your ability. Some k.p.astrologers are giving predictions by blending vedic, nadi, jayamuni and cuspal interlink. So prediction differ from person to person. Mr.Raichur has compared the old edition of Reader III and the new edition of Reader III. Please go through that. Being an elderly person, having vast knowledge in k.p., etc. he commented as, "This casts a serious doubt whether even 1971 edition contained text not written by KSK". I am telling that the whole Reader III was not written by Mr.KSK and it was written by somebody in the name of Mr.KSK. There are lot of vital changes were made in subsequent editions. Assuming that the Reader III was written by Mr.KSK, further correction in KSK's articles should not be done by others. If done, the originality of Mr.KSK will lost. The same thing was done in Reader III. The beginners thing that the entire content of the Reader III belongs to Mr.KSK. The reply for the mail of tw853 will continue from me. Now I have sent only a part reply. I have asked some clarifications from tw853. Let him give clarifications. Thank you R.Dhanabalan--- On Sat, 8/2/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in>Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III@gro ups.comCc: r.dhanabalan@ Saturday, August 2, 2008, 3:18 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma. org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >kpsystem groups <@gro ups.com>Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator†. Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method†It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…†is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is strongerâ€. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:â€sublord of meridian in the constellation of..†page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Hi I have experienced 100% accuracy in the sub lord theory and I am applying KP original ayanamsha only. I had applied the same method in 1988 and predicted that on 11th November 1992 i wil get name fame and prosperity which proved very accurate and my prediction proved very true as on the same date S.Bangarappa rewsigned for th Chief Minister post of Karnataka. My prediction was published in local papers Samachar/Star of Mysore/Mysooru mitra on 4th,5th and 7th Nov 1992. On 15th February 2005 i have faced ill-health even though i was very much precaution as my student predicted danger to my life as the question was "What is my longivity?' Analysis was guided by me and compared with my natal chart and both indicated some major health problem related to throat as Ketu in the sub of the MOOn who is lord of 6th in the 8th. USE KP ORIGINAL AYANAMSHA WHICH PROVES ASTROLOGY IS SCIENCE. SAHHASRA SAAGARA--- On Sat, 2/8/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Cc: r.dhanabalanDate: Saturday, 2 August, 2008, 8:48 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma. org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >kpsystem groups <@gro ups.com>Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator†. Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method†It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…†is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is strongerâ€. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:â€sublord of meridian in the constellation of..†page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2008 Report Share Posted August 2, 2008 Dear Sirs, Since I joined this forum many friends put a number of problems before us. Predictions were given by other friends. But we are nt able to know to what extent our predictions are correct. I would request my friends who find the predictions correct or otherwise to the forum or the person who predicted it. So that we shall be able to correct ourselves and improve the science of astrology. We will be sure which rules are applicable in what situation etc. Thanking you all. I may not be misunderstood. Dr. Luther Sagar S <ssagar86 Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2008 8:20:07 AMRe: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Hi I have experienced 100% accuracy in the sub lord theory and I am applying KP original ayanamsha only. I had applied the same method in 1988 and predicted that on 11th November 1992 i wil get name fame and prosperity which proved very accurate and my prediction proved very true as on the same date S.Bangarappa rewsigned for th Chief Minister post of Karnataka. My prediction was published in local papers Samachar/Star of Mysore/Mysooru mitra on 4th,5th and 7th Nov 1992. On 15th February 2005 i have faced ill-health even though i was very much precaution as my student predicted danger to my life as the question was "What is my longivity?' Analysis was guided by me and compared with my natal chart and both indicated some major health problem related to throat as Ketu in the sub of the MOOn who is lord of 6th in the 8th. USE KP ORIGINAL AYANAMSHA WHICH PROVES ASTROLOGY IS SCIENCE. SAHHASRA SAAGARA--- On Sat, 2/8/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in>Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III@gro ups.comCc: r.dhanabalan@ Saturday, 2 August, 2008, 8:48 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma. org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >kpsystem groups <@gro ups.com>Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator” . Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method” It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…” is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is stronger”. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:”sublord of meridian in the constellation of..” page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 1. Of course, there are modification, deletion and addition etc making the KP Readers more useful than the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes. 2. Regarding the KP Reader III, only the Old Edition of 1971 version is published by Guruji KSK and the New Edition is a little bit revised by the next publisher, and so only the Old Edition is the proper version to compare. There are "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE AUTHOR", the pictures of Guru ji KSK receiving the Sothida Mannan and a gold medal on 29-6-70 for the outstanding service (giving lectures to the public) done in the Steller Astrology, not for the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes as a thesis or correct predictions. 3. Only the issues or rules are meaningful, helpful and applicable for KP practitioners with the back of research other than who wrote the KP Readers. It also needs to have the overall view than sticking to this or that sentence only. 4. Regarding some questions, 1) it is to crow about his success only some time after the publication of the KP 2 volumes. The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87 "As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory, the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him success. These have all now become history and only people ilke me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at that time, have complete knowledbge in this matter." -KP Kuppu Ganapathi (05-12-2005) 2) the evolution of horary no from 108 to 249 can be read in the Reader VI.. , Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote:>> Dear tw853> > > I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004.> With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub's star theory. I like to supplement your findings> 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol.. 1 pp 475-533 > R.Dhanabalan: o.k. > 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; > R.Dhanabalan:o.k> 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan:o.k> 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan:o.k.> 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. > R.Dhanabalan:o.k.> 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. > R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word "significator". Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. "According to k.p…..According to my method" It was not written by KSK.> 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. > R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204,205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original.> what about 269 to 312? > Page 298 "Professor Krishnamoorthy says…" is addition. > Page 303 "Moon sign is stronger". > Page 304,306 western aspect. > Page 309 cuspal interlink.> 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation.> R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. > Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. > Why it was not included in the original. > Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. > Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. > Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. > When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub.> 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and > R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:"sublord of meridian in the constellation of.." > page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification > Addition 349-386. > Page 387 navamsa. > Page393-398 addition.> 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). > R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub's star> 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator.> 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 .> R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date > 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k.> 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end.> Page 434-444 cusp sub's star write up.> 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k.> > 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III> pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition)> 43 153 sign was replaced with sub's star> 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord> 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord> 64 172 date changed> 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord> 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11> 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification > 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup> 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord> 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord> R.Dhanabalan> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Dear SagarThanks for yr contribution. @ examples do not make using OLD KP Ayanams a RULE.I request you to cast 100 pairs of charts, using OLD KP ayanams, and same chart using NEW KP Ay. find out in how many cases the SUB LORDS ARE changed. This will help determine which is supposedly more accurate.raichur anant mumbai--- On Sat, 8/2/08, Sagar S <ssagar86 wrote:Sagar S <ssagar86Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Date: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 8:50 PM Hi I have experienced 100% accuracy in the sub lord theory and I am applying KP original ayanamsha only. I had applied the same method in 1988 and predicted that on 11th November 1992 i wil get name fame and prosperity which proved very accurate and my prediction proved very true as on the same date S.Bangarappa rewsigned for th Chief Minister post of Karnataka. My prediction was published in local papers Samachar/Star of Mysore/Mysooru mitra on 4th,5th and 7th Nov 1992. On 15th February 2005 i have faced ill-health even though i was very much precaution as my student predicted danger to my life as the question was "What is my longivity?' Analysis was guided by me and compared with my natal chart and both indicated some major health problem related to throat as Ketu in the sub of the MOOn who is lord of 6th in the 8th. USE KP ORIGINAL AYANAMSHA WHICH PROVES ASTROLOGY IS SCIENCE. SAHHASRA SAAGARA--- On Sat, 2/8/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in>Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III@gro ups.comCc: r.dhanabalan@ Saturday, 2 August, 2008, 8:48 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!RegardsRameshhttp://www.amma. org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >kpsystem groups <@gro ups.com>Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub’s star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word “significator” . Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. “According to k.p…..According to my method” It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 “Professor Krishnamoorthy says…” is addition. Page 303 “Moon sign is stronger”. Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:”sublord of meridian in the constellation of..” page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub’s star 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub’s star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub’s star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Dear K.P. Naidu Whatever u wrote is correct word by word. I appriciate and fully agree with your views Regards Dr Sheetal On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:30 PM, K. P. Naidu <konathalan wrote: Dear Members,100% success is not possible not only in astrology but in any other subject / science. Is every doctor, every lawer etc., are 100% successful ?Moreover Astrology as I understand is mostly a science of probability. Astrologer can tell what likely may happen but God only can tell what exactly will happen. Astrologer's foretelling / prediction may happen or may not happen. The success rate depends not simply upon amount of knowledge possed but mainly on his application skills and intuition. Application skills can not be acquired from books but only thru his own experience. Thus Astrology, like any other science is both science and art. The scientific aspect only is passed on from amn to man thru books and thru teaching by gurus. The artistic part of the subject can be acquired only thru his own personal experience which can not be passed on from one individual to another. It is purely individualistic and it dies with the individual. Besides above, Astrology since is a Devine science, the astrologer should possess some personal qualities - trikaran sudhi, some Devi / Devatha upasana. In some cases it is a God's gift I mean some astrologers are born astrologers and are not made. Intuitive skills do not have any defined formula/s. Amara shilpi Jakkana, the renowned shilpi, just by hammering the stone by his wand, declared unsuitability of the stone to make idol of God, since the stone has some frog inside it. Every one including the King was shocked and surprised when it was proved by breaking the stone and the frong inside. No amount of bookish knowledge alone will help this. It is the personal skill and intuition that helped in this case. Naidu KP Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591. --- On Sat, 2/8/08, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote: Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III " kpsystem groups " Cc: " Ramesh " <ram_t_1968 Saturday, 2 August, 2008, 9:57 AM Dear Ramesh Every astrologer claims that their prediction is 100% accutate but it is not true. The public may accept those words because they do not know the astrology. Since we are astrologers, we can judge easily. Again I repeat that if the formula is correct then only the result will be correct. If the formula is wrong then the result also will be wrong. If anyone uses the wrong formula and claims that his answer is correct then something wrong with the person. Whether you are getting the result or not is not the question. I do not want to test your ability. Some k.p.astrologers are giving predictions by blending vedic, nadi, jayamuni and cuspal interlink. So prediction differ from person to person. Mr.Raichur has compared the old edition of Reader III and the new edition of Reader III. Please go through that. Being an elderly person, having vast knowledge in k.p., etc. he commented as, " This casts a serious doubt whether even 1971 edition contained text not written by KSK " . I am telling that the whole Reader III was not written by Mr.KSK and it was written by somebody in the name of Mr.KSK. There are lot of vital changes were made in subsequent editions. Assuming that the Reader III was written by Mr.KSK, further correction in KSK's articles should not be done by others. If done, the originality of Mr.KSK will lost. The same thing was done in Reader III. The beginners thing that the entire content of the Reader III belongs to Mr.KSK. The reply for the mail of tw853 will continue from me. Now I have sent only a part reply. I have asked some clarifications from tw853. Let him give clarifications. Thank you R.Dhanabalan--- On Sat, 8/2/08, Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Ramesh <ram_t_1968 (AT) (DOT) co.in>Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III@gro ups.com Cc: r.dhanabalan@ Saturday, August 2, 2008, 3:18 AM Dear Dhanabalan SirSo which are the stuff, we are expected to follow. Sublord theory gives about 80% results for me. Is that fine? Amma Saranam!Regards Rameshhttp://www.amma. org Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > kpsystem groups <@gro ups.com>Friday, 1 August, 2008 9:46:28 PM confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Dear tw853 I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004. With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub's star theory. I like to supplement your findings 1) Tw853: In the " Theorectical Part " of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 pp 475-533 R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; R.Dhanabalan: o.k 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k 4) Tw853: After that, the " Sub Useful for Detailed Reading " is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 6) Tw853: The " Cusps and Subs- How to Judge " at the end of " Theoretical Part " , (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, " This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success. " simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word "significator" . Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. "According to k.p…..According to my method" It was not written by KSK. 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original. what about 269 to 312? Page 298 "Professor Krishnamoorthy says…" is addition. Page 303 "Moon sign is stronger". Page 304,306 western aspect. Page 309 cuspal interlink. 8) Tw853: But the " Theft and Chances of Recovery " in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the " Theft and Recovery " in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation. R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. Why it was not included in the original. Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:"sublord of meridian in the constellation of.." page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification Addition 349-386. Page 387 navamsa. Page393-398 addition. 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance " Overseas " . " The Profession- KP Principles " and etc. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub's star 11) Tw853: The " Time of Transfer " in pp 318-320 with the " sub " in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the " sub " with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator. 12) Tw853: The " Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 . R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 14) Tw853: The additional write up about " Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end. Page 434-444 cusp sub's star write up. 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. R.Dhanabalan: o.k. 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition) 43 153 sign was replaced with sub's star 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord 64 172 date changed 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord R.Dhanabalan Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2008 Report Share Posted August 3, 2008 Dear tw853 1) You did not consider my reply for the point number 6 in earlier mail. With reference to page 143,144 & 145 of Reader III, the subject matter belongs to the year 1939. Being so, why it was not included in the original volume of k.p. during 1966. What was the necessity to include in the Reader during 1971. I reproduce the sentences in page 150 of Reader III, "But according to Krishnamoorthy Padhdhati, saturn and ketu in 4 are in the constellation of mercury, lord of 11 and sub of mars owner of 4, education and 9, higher education. According to my method, if the dasanatha is connected with houses 4 and 9, they will give education." It clearly shows that the author of this article is not Mr.KSK. I reproduce the sentence in page 372 of the Reader III,"When this postion arises, our Gurujee has suggested to us to eliminate those which are not the ruling planets at the time of judgement." It clearly shows that the author of this article is not Mr.KSK. 2) You did not consider the point number 7 Page 303 of Reader. "Lagna is weak....Hence moon sign is stronger" It is told that research was conducted during 1965 and decided from 1967 only lagna and no moon sign. How this example based on moon sign find a place in the Reader III till now. 3) you did not consider the point number 8. Refer pages 219 to 225. Mr.KSK gave correct prediction with 108 sub. When he was able to give correct prediction with 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub. It is told that he invented the sub during 1951, why Mr,KSK asked him to tell a number within 108 during the year 1964.. Whether he was no confidence in 249 sub. 4) You did not conside the point number 14. When the research on moon sign was conducted? 1965 or 1967. 5) You did not consider the point number 2 , the last point. While copying the content from Volume II, the signlord was replaced with sublord for the same event. - Dhanabalan's reply for this present mail. 1. tw853: Of course, there are modification, deletion and addition etc making the KP Readers more useful than the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes. R.Dhanabalan: Readers were not written by Mr.KSK 2. tw853: Regarding the KP Reader III, only the Old Edition of 1971 version is published by Guruji KSK and the New Edition is a little bit revised by the next publisher, and so only the Old Edition is the proper version to compare. There are "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE AUTHOR", the pictures of Guru ji KSK receiving the Sothida Mannan and a gold medal on 29-6-70 for the outstanding service (giving lectures to the public) done in the Steller Astrology, not for the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes as a thesis or correct predictions. R.Dhanabalan: Do you know what lecture he has given. He might have given the lecture on vedic astrology also. In vedic astrology also there are stars. How can you presume that he gave lecture only on subs star theory. Nowadays or those days, getting gold medal or title for lecture is not so difficult especially in foreign countries. 3. tw853: Only the issues or rules are meaningful, helpful and applicable for KP practitioners with the back of research other than who wrote the KP Readers. It also needs to have the overall view than sticking to this or that sentence only. R.Dhanabalan: K.P. Reader III was not written by Mr.KSK. 4. tw 853: Regarding some questions, 1) it is to crow about his success only some time after the publication of the KP 2 volumes. The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87 Dhanabalan: The article was not written by Mr.KSK. 5) tw853: "As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory, the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him success. These have all now become history and only people ilke me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at that time, have complete knowledbge in this matter." -KP Kuppu Ganapathi (05-12-2005) R.Dhanabalan: The subject matter is the Reader III, original volumes and Mr.KSK. There is no need to introduce a third person's satement. It is not relevant. R.Dhanabalan --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 <tw853 wrote: tw853 <tw853 Re: confusion 3 K.P.Reader III Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008, 4:32 AM 1. Of course, there are modification, deletion and addition etc making the KP Readers more useful than the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes. 2. Regarding the KP Reader III, only the Old Edition of 1971 version is published by Guruji KSK and the New Edition is a little bit revised by the next publisher, and so only the Old Edition is the proper version to compare. There are "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE AUTHOR", the pictures of Guru ji KSK receiving the Sothida Mannan and a gold medal on 29-6-70 for the outstanding service (giving lectures to the public) done in the Steller Astrology, not for the Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2 Volumes as a thesis or correct predictions. 3. Only the issues or rules are meaningful, helpful and applicable for KP practitioners with the back of research other than who wrote the KP Readers. It also needs to have the overall view than sticking to this or that sentence only.. 4. Regarding some questions, 1) it is to crow about his success only some time after the publication of the KP 2 volumes. The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87 "As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory, the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him success. These have all now become history and only people ilke me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at that time, have complete knowledbge in this matter." -KP Kuppu Ganapathi (05-12-2005) 2) the evolution of horary no from 108 to 249 can be read in the Reader VI.. @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:>> Dear tw853> > > I appreciate your effort for the collection of data comparing all the k.p.Readers and Volume I & II of original Krishnamoorthy Padadhati. Due to hurry you missed to highlight some points while comparing the Readers. First, I like to take up the Reader III new edition 2004..> With reference to your mail, most of the contents in Reader III have been taken from the original two volumes. In between then and there some pages were added to confuse the astrologers and to drag to sub's star theory. I like to supplement your findings> 1) Tw853: In the "Theorectical Part" of the KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 1- 62 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol.. 1 pp 475-533 > R.Dhanabalan: o.k. > 2) Tw853: (up to p 82 of New Edition) from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 pp 1-17; > R.Dhanabalan: o.k> 3) Tw853: up to (p 114 of New Edition), it is the continued write up about Leo to Pisces lagnas as it was written up to Cancer lagna only in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k> 4) Tw853: After that, the "Sub Useful for Detailed Reading" is added in (pp 110- 114 of New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan: o.k.> 5) Tw853: The contents in (pp 108-130 of New Edition) are taken from pp 18-42 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2.. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k.> 6) Tw853: The "Cusps and Subs- How to Judge" at the end of "Theoretical Part", (pp 137-150 of New edition) is Guruji KSK's crowing part, "This discovery (of the sub-lord) has crowned me with success." simultaneously appearing in the KP Reader V pp 137-150 in new edition2004 and KP Reader VI pp 77-87, which was not included in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 1 or 2. > R.Dhanabalan: page 134 , line 24: one sentence is missing compare to original. What was the necessity to include the pages 137-150 now. Introduced the word "significator" . Why it was not included in original. The subject matter is before 1965. Refer page 150. "According to k.p…..According to my method" It was not written by KSK.> 7) Tw853: 3. In the Practical Part of KP Reader III, the contents in (pp 153-269 of New Edition) are taken from the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol .2 pp 43-169. > R.Dhanabalan: pages 153, 154,169, 170,171,172, 175,181,204, 205, 208,226, 227, 254, 261, 282, 296, 298, 303, 309 are differ from original.> what about 269 to 312? > Page 298 "Professor Krishnamoorthy says…" is addition. > Page 303 "Moon sign is stronger". > Page 304,306 western aspect. > Page 309 cuspal interlink.> 8) Tw853: But the "Theft and Chances of Recovery" in pp 116-122 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 is not found in the KP Reader III and the "Theft and Recovery" in pp 234-236 is a shortened presentation.> R.Dhanabalan: Theft and recovery in page 219-220. > Letter was written to KSK on 5-2-1965. > Why it was not included in the original. > Why KSK asked him to give a number within 108. > Why KSK did not ask a number within 249. > Whether KSK has doubt in 249 sublords. > When he was able to give correct prediction with vedic 108 sub, what was the necessity for him to go for 249 sub.> 9) Tw853: The contents in (pp 313-408 of New Edition) are taken from pp 276-318 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 and > R.Dhanabalan: Page 351:"sublord of meridian in the constellation of.." > page 358,359 :cuspal sublord signification > Addition 349-386. > Page 387 navamsa. > Page393-398 addition.> 10) Tw853: it is more comprehensive in the Reader III, for instance "Overseas". "The Profession- KP Principles" and etc.. are added in pp 182-198 (pp 350-366). > R.Dhanabalan: 350-366 dragging to cuspal sub's star> 11) Tw853: The "Time of Transfer" in pp 318-320 with the "sub" in the order of significators is replaced by the write up without the "sub" with two example charts in (pp 374-380 of the New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan: page 379 introduced RP to eliminate the significator.> 12) Tw853: The "Politics'' is presented in more details in (pp 390-398 of the New Edition) than a short presentation in pp 324-326 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2 .> R.Dhanabalan: page 393 addition of date > 13) Tw853: The contents in (pp 399-408 of New Edition) are taken from 327-336 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k.> 14) Tw853: The additional write up about "Spiritual Life, Choice of Gems etc is in (pp 408-445 of New Edition). > R.Dhanabalan: page 432: research finding for moon sign was 1965end.> Page 434-444 cusp sub's star write up.> 15) Tw853: The contents in (pp 445-526 of the New Edition) are more or less the same in 336-348 of the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2. > R.Dhanabalan: o.k..> > 2) The publishers have modified the original content of volume II and published as Reader III. For the same chart, the signlord in volume II is just replaced with sublord in the Reader III. For comparision, I am giving the page numbers of volume II and Reader III> pages in volume II Pages in Reader III (New edition)> 43 153 sign was replaced with sub's star> 61 169 signlord was replaced with sublord> 64 171 signlord was replaced with sublord> 64 172 date changed> 67 175 signlord was replaced with sublord> 74 181 addition: sub of significators 2,6,11> 98,99 204,205 cuspal sublord signification > 130 226 cuspal sublord new writeup> 155 254 navamsa lord is replaced with sublord> 162 261 aspect is replaced with sublord> R.Dhanabalan> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.