Guest guest Posted July 29, 2008 Report Share Posted July 29, 2008 Confusion I: In KP Take always Lagna alone. 1. In the Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, 1966, Sagar Publications, out of many examples, in some examples like in pp 82, 118, 255, 261- 2, 264, 313, 316, it was ascertained whether Lagna is strong or the Moon sign, and the Moon sign was taken as the first house in the two examples of pp 118 and 264. 2. But the further research reveals the correct approach is to take always Lagna alone, and the correction was made by Guruji KSK in the KP Reader III as quoted below. KP Reader III, Old Edition (first published in 1970 in Guruji KSK's life time), Practical Part, p 85, New Edition pp 243-4 Disposal of a House A building is indicated by the 4th house counted from Lagna. Always count from the Lagna. Never consider whether Moon sign is strong or Lagna is strong. In the research after 1967 it was found that we have to take always Lagna alone. We should never Judge which is stronger whether Moon sign or Lagna. The main reason is that in a twin birth, only the cusps of the house including the ascendant change whereas Moon is in the same position. What we had been following in KP printed in 1966, is to be give up. KP Reader III, Old Edition, Practical Part, p 259, New Edition pp 432-3 Why Lagna alone is considered? Dear Sir, I find in your Magazine, that since a couple of years, you are not suggesting that the Moon sign should be taken in case the lagna is afflicted and Moon sign is not. Why? Answer: Sir, I had been following the above method of taking the unafflicted ascendant or Moon sign, in case the lagna is afflicted and Moon sign is not. But in my research only in 1965 end, I understood that when twins are born, Moon does not move a single minute, whereas the lagna alone moves and when the research on the sub-lord, came out successful to read out the diametrically opposite results among the twins, I have given up the idea of taking Moon sign, in case lagna is afflicted. It needed reconsideration. So, we must, whether lagna is afflicted or not, take only the exact position of lagna. If the lagna is afflicted, then the horoscope has certain defect, and simply because there is that defect, we should not jump to Moon sign which is auspicious. After having found out this, I have stopped writing in the above manner, mentioned by you. Therefore, I request all the readers to take only the lagna and never the Moon sign, whether the lagna is afflicted or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.