4 step theory: Rahu/Ketu

[Guest guest]

Dear members,

When the aspecting and conjoining planets are prime significators. Rahu has not gone as star for other planets. i.e. Rahu also a prime significator. under these condition,

when Rahu as a planet or as sublord, it will signify the planet conjoined first,

if no conjoin planet it will signify the aspecting planet,

in the absence of conjoin and apecting planet, it will signify the sign occupied and signlord.

 

My question is:

a) when there is a cojoin planet, is it necessary to go to the next level, the aspecting planet signification?

b) When there is a conjoin/aspecting planet, is it necessary to go to the next level, the house occupied and signlord signification?

 

2) In the starlevel, what is the ascending order of signification for Rahu/Ketu among the conjoin, aspect, own starlord, house occupied and signlord.

As above, if there is a conjoin/aspecting planet, is it necessary to go to the next level, the own starlord and signlord signification.

 

3) If we consider without eliminating, then Rahu/Ketu will signify all the 12 houses most of the time. How to eliminate to arrive only three significators.

 

4) I do agree that the order of significator for Rahu/Ketu is not followed in K.P.Readers. But one should follow the order of significators in the 4 step theory example charts sent to the members to confirm the rules under Uttarakalamrita is correct.

 

Regards,

R.Dhanabalan

Tamilnadu