Guest guest Posted July 21, 2008 Report Share Posted July 21, 2008 Dear members, It is stated that the 4 step theory is totally based on the articles published in k.p. and astrology written by k.m.subramanium. 1) I have gone through the articles under the heading "sublord speaks". Mr.KMS has followed the straightline newcomb ayanamsa which is nearer to Lahari. The difference between the KPNA 2003 and the KMS followed ayanamsa is about 5'. Whether the author of 4 step theory recommends KMS straightline newcomb ayanamsa. 2) Further, Mr.KMS did not consider the conjoined and aspected planets among themselves or with the cusp. 3) Mr.KMS referred only the k.p.Readers I to VI and not the two volumes of Krishnamoorthy paddhati published in the sagar publications during 1966. Mr.KSK never ever asked the sub's star in those volumes. 4) The k.p.reader III is not reliable. In some places, the author states that" for marraige, the 7th cusp sublord should signify 2,7,11." In some places, the author sates that " for marriage, the 7th cusp sub's star should signify 2,7,11." 5) According to me, an orb of 5 degree for the cusp for the planet Jupiter is correct. Regards, R.Dhanabalan Tamilnadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Dear DhanbalanWhen mr Gondhalekar says he has been inpired by the articles SUB_SUB Speaks, to do research, One cannot assume that he has followed his articles in toto. So the question of Ayanasa used by k.m. subramainiam is not very crtitical. In fact I have read these articles when printed. Even At that point many readers raised questions about this.Mr Subramaniam s reply was : KP has given 2 figures :year 291 a.d. and the mean rate of change, 50....... seconds per year. Since they are given by Guruji, he has used them as derived a simple straight line connecton,. Even when it was pointed out, that this st-line formula does not give correctly, the Ayansa given by Guruji, in the same Originally published, KP READER 1. he simply stuck to his view.That is formula was no correct was recently proved not accurate, and the modified formula,(refered as NEW KP AYAN) is published and used.Dear My Dhanbalan,Do a simple experiment. CAST 25 pairs of Charts, using 1 (the new Ayanam, and then corresponding one using the st.line ayanamsacompare the two sub-lords. Find how many change the sub-lords between the two.4 step uses the latest accepted value of ayanams. You can find the values in the file section of the groupgood luckraichur anant mumbai--- On Mon, 7/21/08, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote:Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan 4 step theory"kpsysk.m.subramaniam tem groups" Monday, July 21, 2008, 12:03 PM Dear members, It is stated that the 4 step theory is totally based on the articles published in k.p. and astrology written by k.m.subramanium. 1) I have gone through the articles under the heading "sublord speaks". Mr.KMS has followed the straightline newcomb ayanamsa which is nearer to Lahari. The difference between the KPNA 2003 and the KMS followed ayanamsa is about 5'. Whether the author of 4 step theory recommends KMS straightline newcomb ayanamsa. 2) Further, Mr.KMS did not consider the conjoined and aspected planets among themselves or with the cusp. 3) Mr.KMS referred only the k.p.Readers I to VI and not the two volumes of Krishnamoorthy paddhati published in the sagar publications during 1966. Mr.KSK never ever asked the sub's star in those volumes. 4) The k.p.reader III is not reliable. In some places, the author states that" for marraige, the 7th cusp sublord should signify 2,7,11." In some places, the author sates that " for marriage, the 7th cusp sub's star should signify 2,7,11." 5) According to me, an orb of 5 degree for the cusp for the planet Jupiter is correct. Regards, R.Dhanabalan Tamilnadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Dear Raichur For cuspal interlinks by Mr.Devaraj of Madras, Madurai Mr.Baskaran, Madurai Mr.Ponnaiah and many k.p.astrologers in salem/Tamilnadu and in other staes are using the straightline formula and claiming that they could give correct prediction. Late Mr.Mohan who was associated with Mr.KSK recommended the straightline ayanamsam. Mr.KMS, who was closely associated with Mr.KSK was using the straightline ayanamsa. Since Mr.KSK's sons published many books based on old ayanamsa, they want to stick to the old ayanamsa. Knowingly or unknowingly Mr.KSK used the old ayanamsa. Which ayanamsa to be used for k.p.is still under controversy. Thank you R.Dhanabalan --- On Thu, 7/24/08, Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Raichur-a-r <raichurarRe: 4 step theory Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008, 7:29 AM Dear DhanbalanWhen mr Gondhalekar says he has been inpired by the articles SUB_SUB Speaks, to do research, One cannot assume that he has followed his articles in toto. So the question of Ayanasa used by k.m. subramainiam is not very crtitical. In fact I have read these articles when printed. Even At that point many readers raised questions about this.Mr Subramaniam s reply was : KP has given 2 figures :year 291 a.d. and the mean rate of change, 50....... seconds per year. Since they are given by Guruji, he has used them as derived a simple straight line connecton,. Even when it was pointed out, that this st-line formula does not give correctly, the Ayansa given by Guruji, in the same Originally published, KP READER 1. he simply stuck to his view.That is formula was no correct was recently proved not accurate, and the modified formula,(refered as NEW KP AYAN) is published and used.Dear My Dhanbalan,Do a simple experiment. CAST 25 pairs of Charts, using 1 (the new Ayanam, and then corresponding one using the st.line ayanamsacompare the two sub-lords. Find how many change the sub-lords between the two.4 step uses the latest accepted value of ayanams. You can find the values in the file section of the groupgood luck raichur anant mumbai--- On Mon, 7/21/08, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > wrote: Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > 4 step theory"kpsysk.m.subramani am tem groups" <@gro ups.com>Monday, July 21, 2008, 12:03 PM Dear members, It is stated that the 4 step theory is totally based on the articles published in k.p. and astrology written by k.m.subramanium. 1) I have gone through the articles under the heading "sublord speaks". Mr.KMS has followed the straightline newcomb ayanamsa which is nearer to Lahari. The difference between the KPNA 2003 and the KMS followed ayanamsa is about 5'. Whether the author of 4 step theory recommends KMS straightline newcomb ayanamsa. 2) Further, Mr.KMS did not consider the conjoined and aspected planets among themselves or with the cusp. 3) Mr.KMS referred only the k.p.Readers I to VI and not the two volumes of Krishnamoorthy paddhati published in the sagar publications during 1966. Mr.KSK never ever asked the sub's star in those volumes. 4) The k.p.reader III is not reliable. In some places, the author states that" for marraige, the 7th cusp sublord should signify 2,7,11." In some places, the author sates that " for marriage, the 7th cusp sub's star should signify 2,7,11." 5) According to me, an orb of 5 degree for the cusp for the planet Jupiter is correct. Regards, R.Dhanabalan Tamilnadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.