Guest guest Posted February 3, 2008 Report Share Posted February 3, 2008 Respected members, Sirs, The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. planet, in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a retro.planet will not give results only as long as the star planet is retrograde but will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? regards, sujatkaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2008 Report Share Posted February 4, 2008 Dear Sujatkaram, 1. Why don't you read KP Reader VI page 145-147, if you want to properly understand Guruji KSK's teaching in this regard. 2. The 4 Step view in this regard can be found in the 4 Step note in the file section of this group. Regards, tw , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram wrote: > > Respected members, > Sirs, > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. planet, > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a retro.planet > will not give results only as long as the star planet is retrograde but > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? > regards, > sujatkaram > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Respected Tinwinji, sir, There are views, views and views and in most cases they contradict one another. Someone has jocularly said that we agree on only one point viz. Disagreement.When there is only one truth why different views should keep on floating ? I think this might be the situation which our revered Guruji referred to as muddy water.And therefore he gave us a wholesome complete system which has only one rule for prediction of each aspect of life.Are we going to contaminate the waters again? It is not correct, in my opinion, to expect each and every student to study all the views and arrive at correct conclusion. The veterans, researchers and scholors have to do this and put forth a single view that comes closest to the truth, and that view will stand good until it is proved wrong.This happens in science. regards, sujat.-- In , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > 1. Why don't you read KP Reader VI page 145-147, if you want to > properly understand Guruji KSK's teaching in this regard. > > 2. The 4 Step view in this regard can be found in the 4 Step note in > the file section of this group. > > Regards, > > tw > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > > Respected members, > > Sirs, > > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. > planet, > > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a retro.planet > > will not give results only as long as the star planet is retrograde > but > > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? > > regards, > > sujatkaram > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2008 Report Share Posted February 5, 2008 Dear Sujatkaram ji, That is why references are given to read Gurui KSK's view and 4 step view, if you want to know. Which one is true is open to imperical research. Regards, tw > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram wrote: > > Respected Tinwinji, > sir, > There are views, views and views and in most cases they contradict > one another. Someone has jocularly said that we agree on only one > point viz. Disagreement.When there is only one truth why different > views should keep on floating ? I think this might be the situation > which our revered Guruji referred to as muddy water.And therefore he > gave us a wholesome complete system which has only one rule for > prediction of each aspect of life.Are we going to contaminate the > waters again? > It is not correct, in my opinion, to expect each and every student to > study all the views and arrive at correct conclusion. The veterans, > researchers and scholors have to do this and put forth a single view > that comes closest to the truth, and that view will stand good until > it is proved wrong.This happens in science. > regards, > sujat.-- In , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > > 1. Why don't you read KP Reader VI page 145-147, if you want to > > properly understand Guruji KSK's teaching in this regard. > > > > 2. The 4 Step view in this regard can be found in the 4 Step note > in > > the file section of this group. > > > > Regards, > > > > tw > > > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected members, > > > Sirs, > > > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. > > planet, > > > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a > retro.planet > > > will not give results only as long as the star planet is > retrograde > > but > > > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? > > > regards, > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Dear Friends In my opinion Mr. Sujatkaramji is right. Just giving references confuse new students like me. And expecting everybody to choose the correct one is asking a bit too much. I appriciate Mr. Tin Win ji for his vast knowledge and hard work he does for promotion of Astrology. He is a living encyclopeadia, I accept. My proposal to all members is, " Why not form a research team under able guidance of Mr.Tin Winji ? " He can choose the topic for research, members to help him etc. Commitee of stalwarts like Lajmi ji, Raichur ji, Tin Winji, Gondhalekar ji and others may be formed to finalise the methodology of research. Each member can contribute to the database alongwith (research) working as suggested by the commitee which may be consolidated and summerized by Mr.Tin Winji. The research carried out alongwith results shall then be posted on the forum. Members of forum can express their views/opinions and finally a commitee/jury of learned members mentioned above can express their approval or otherwise. Thus we can eliminate many options and endorse the right one thus clearing the muddy water. I am ready to assist in this noble cause and hereby offer my services to Mr.Tin Winji....of course, if this proposal is acceptabble to him and all other members. Regards Subhash Ektare , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Sujatkaram ji, > > That is why references are given to read Gurui KSK's view and 4 step > view, if you want to know. Which one is true is open to imperical > research. > > Regards, > > tw > > > > > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> > wrote: > > > > Respected Tinwinji, > > sir, > > There are views, views and views and in most cases they contradict > > one another. Someone has jocularly said that we agree on only one > > point viz. Disagreement.When there is only one truth why different > > views should keep on floating ? I think this might be the > situation > > which our revered Guruji referred to as muddy water.And therefore > he > > gave us a wholesome complete system which has only one rule for > > prediction of each aspect of life.Are we going to contaminate > the > > waters again? > > It is not correct, in my opinion, to expect each and every student > to > > study all the views and arrive at correct conclusion. The > veterans, > > researchers and scholors have to do this and put forth a single > view > > that comes closest to the truth, and that view will stand good > until > > it is proved wrong.This happens in science. > > regards, > > sujat.-- In , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > > > > 1. Why don't you read KP Reader VI page 145-147, if you want to > > > properly understand Guruji KSK's teaching in this regard. > > > > > > 2. The 4 Step view in this regard can be found in the 4 Step > note > > in > > > the file section of this group. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected members, > > > > Sirs, > > > > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. > > > planet, > > > > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a > > retro.planet > > > > will not give results only as long as the star planet is > > retrograde > > > but > > > > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? > > > > regards, > > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Respected members, sir, This is an excellent and constructive proposal .i second it wholeheartedly. Let us all agree on this point. sujatkaram , " Subhash " <subhash_ektare wrote: > > Dear Friends > > In my opinion Mr. Sujatkaramji is right. Just giving references > confuse new students like me. And expecting everybody to choose the > correct one is asking a bit too much. > > I appriciate Mr. Tin Win ji for his vast knowledge and hard work he > does for promotion of Astrology. He is a living encyclopeadia, I > accept. My proposal to all members is, " Why not form a research team > under able guidance of Mr.Tin Winji ? " He can choose the topic for > research, members to help him etc. Commitee of stalwarts like Lajmi > ji, Raichur ji, Tin Winji, Gondhalekar ji and others may be formed to > finalise the methodology of research. Each member can contribute to > the database alongwith (research) working as suggested by the > commitee which may be consolidated and summerized by Mr.Tin Winji. > > The research carried out alongwith results shall then be posted on > the forum. Members of forum can express their views/opinions and > finally a commitee/jury of learned members mentioned above can > express their approval or otherwise. Thus we can eliminate many > options and endorse the right one thus clearing the muddy water. > > I am ready to assist in this noble cause and hereby offer my services > to Mr.Tin Winji....of course, if this proposal is acceptabble to him > and all other members. > > Regards > > Subhash Ektare > > > , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sujatkaram ji, > > > > That is why references are given to read Gurui KSK's view and 4 > step > > view, if you want to know. Which one is true is open to imperical > > research. > > > > Regards, > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Respected Tinwinji, > > > sir, > > > There are views, views and views and in most cases they > contradict > > > one another. Someone has jocularly said that we agree on only one > > > point viz. Disagreement.When there is only one truth why > different > > > views should keep on floating ? I think this might be the > > situation > > > which our revered Guruji referred to as muddy water.And therefore > > he > > > gave us a wholesome complete system which has only one rule for > > > prediction of each aspect of life.Are we going to contaminate > > the > > > waters again? > > > It is not correct, in my opinion, to expect each and every > student > > to > > > study all the views and arrive at correct conclusion. The > > veterans, > > > researchers and scholors have to do this and put forth a single > > view > > > that comes closest to the truth, and that view will stand good > > until > > > it is proved wrong.This happens in science. > > > regards, > > > sujat.-- In , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > > > > > > 1. Why don't you read KP Reader VI page 145-147, if you want to > > > > properly understand Guruji KSK's teaching in this regard. > > > > > > > > 2. The 4 Step view in this regard can be found in the 4 Step > > note > > > in > > > > the file section of this group. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected members, > > > > > Sirs, > > > > > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a > retro. > > > > planet, > > > > > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a > > > retro.planet > > > > > will not give results only as long as the star planet is > > > retrograde > > > > but > > > > > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it > correct? > > > > > regards, > > > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 My father's observation is exactly same, Sujata , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram wrote: > > Respected members, > Sirs, > The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. planet, > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a retro.planet > will not give results only as long as the star planet is retrograde but > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct? > regards, > sujatkaram > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 dear sujatkaram, i am not getting such results thats why i am not using this rule in 4step theory -sunil gondhalekar On 2/8/08, parag_m_g <parag_m_g wrote: My father's observation is exactly same, Sujata , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram wrote: >> Respected members,> Sirs,> The latest about retro. planets I came across is that a retro. planet, > in horaty, does give results; a planet in the star of a retro.planet > will not give results only as long as the star planet is retrograde but > will give results after it begins to move direct.Is it correct?> regards,> sujatkaram> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.