JYOTISH - REBOOT!

[Guest guest]

Speaking of Jyotish, Neelam ji, Message number 1 on this forum shows up as

having been posted by Sateesh Batas ji on Nov, 6, 2004 at 10:36 AM and published

on the forum at 10:43 AM (not sure which time zone).

 

Sometimes it helps to begin at the beginning! In computerese it is called

REBOOT, I believe! :-)

 

I will leave it to more able " DHIs " and 'minds' to take it up from there ;-)

 

Best regards,

 

Rohini

 

Note: It was refreshing to see Shri KN Rao's old response (message #27), sharp

as a shiny tack as always on the KALKI thread on page 1!

 

 

 

, neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote:

>

> Dear RR ji, Sunil ji, Vinay ji and all,

>

> Welcome to this fray RR ji! And thanks for bringing in some hope by

> volunteering to be the good umpire, for a good cause. Can I request you all

> to put an end to this series which has outlived its value, if it ever had

> any. Enough matches have been played in public view at various venues (read

> fora) without any conclusive results. Most of the players who joined

> initially have been smart enough to withdraw, not willing to fritter away

> their precious time and energy.

>

> Having witnessed this futile exchange (amusingly, painstakingly and

> agonizingly and devastatingly… in that order), for quite a few months now, I

> do not foresee a peaceful agreement here. With due regards to Vinay Jha ji's

> knowledge and status, we really do not have the time and inclination to go

> through the incoherent verbosity of the long-winded messages, with a

> diminutive hope of stumbling upon any nugget of worth.

>

> We cannot master everything in this short life. With one mainstay

> profession, a second line of predictive astrology is more than what I (and

> some others like me) can handle with some level of justification. Moreover,

> this is a Jyotish group, and technically we may perhaps discuss our core

> subject only and not stray into the undesired and unrequited realms of

> history and astronomy.

>

> Hope I am not making an unfair request! Let us get on with our core

> interest.

>

> Regards

> Neelam

>

>

>