Guest guest Posted November 20, 2008 Report Share Posted November 20, 2008 Namaste SS If i am allowed to intervene - > it's degree would be calculated as 30-7 = 23-Tula (i.e. 203 deg in the zodiac) Rahu's degree is not and cannot be calculated as 23 degree Tula. It says Rahu has traversed ''23 degrees'' from the end of Tula. This is same as 7 degree Tula(from beginning of Tula). Thus nakshathra will always correspond to 7 degrees Tula. Your argument will be correct if Rahu is at 23 degrees from beginning of Tula, which is not the case. Other grahas as you are aware will start from 0 degree Tula and proceed to 1, 2,3 . Rahu on the other hand starts from 30 degrees Tula and recedes to 29, 28 etc to reach 7 degrees. In this process it has traversed 23 degrees within Tula(reverse direction). Sarvashree Sanjay,Partha and Shanmukha has explained the same. Thus trying to mark rahu with someother nakshathra for whatsoever logic ,is improper. Hope it is clear Pradeep om namo bhagavate narasimhaya Dear Soul Sadhak, Namaskar Yes, we do that. For example to find Shiva name for pranayama we use AK nakshatra. We reverse it if its for Rahu. Regards, Rafal Gendarz ----------------------------- Hi Partha, I get your point, so far as calculation of Charakaraka is concerned, now the question is: e.g. Rahu is at 7-Tula (i.e. 187 deg in the zodiac) and is hence indicated in Svati Pada 1, it's degree would be calculated as 30-7 = 23-Tula (i.e. 203 deg in the zodiac) then do we consider it's nakshatra as Vishakha pada 1 or Svati pada 1? Many Thanx and Best Regards, SS sohamsa , " Partha Sarathy " <partvinu wrote: > > Hi SS > > The longitude of a planet is the exact point at which it is located in the > zodiac. And, Nakshatras are calculated based on this point. > The degrees are calculated from the beginning or the end of a Sign, and is > indicative of how far the planet has " experienced " or " matured " and hence is > diferent. > Hence, the degrees matter a lot for finding out who are the various soul > level significators. > > Also remember, Sign is a physical entity that can be measured. So the > placement of a planet in a particular point cannot be compromised. This > principle is especially useful when you are discussing Bhava chalit chakra. > > > > regards > partha > > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak wrote: > > > Dear Sanjay, > > > > This would mean that nakshatra/nakshatra-pada has nothing to do with > > degrees in the zodiac. > > > > Best Regards, > > SS > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa% 40>, " Sanjay > > Prabhakaran " > > sanjaychettiar@ wrote: > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > Dear SS, > > > No, I think you are also reversing the nakshatra placements. The > > > nakshatra's dont get reversed. Let me explain it by my > > understanding. > > > Suppose you are going reverse in Car after you missed a place, The > > road does > > > not get reversed. If we do reverse the road then the car is no more > > giong > > > reverse! > > > Warm Regards > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/11/20 Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Since the degrees of nodes are counted as subtracted from 30deg, > > should > > > > the nakshatra placement be considered thence or otherwise? > > > > > > > > e.g. Rahu is at 7-Tula and is hence indicated in Svati nakshatra > > Pada 1, > > > > it's degree would be calculated as 30-7 = 23-Tula > > > > then do we also consider it's nakshatra as Vishakha pada 1? > > > > > > > > Many thanx and Best Regards, > > > > SS > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.