Guest guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Whenever valid concerns were raised, shri Narasimha Rao or others were not found for any support. For example when simple clear and conspicous discrepancy on the amsha'ka' explanation from Shri Sanjay Rath was pointed out quoting BPHS, there was no support. It is hard to beleive that shri Narasimha Rao did not notice this at first instance, especially taking into account his claim as a sanskrit scholar. When Parashara has clearly mentioned on how the strength of drishtis are to be measured and how drishtis emanate, we can still find people talking about aspects in different ''charts''. As a seperate paper will be presented on this topic, no further details are touched upon.Fundamentals were violated.Thus double standards are visible here. Selective criticism is turning blind eye on major flaws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.