Re:Request to - The Moderator_ Maniv Pathak

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Maniv_Pathak,

 

I think you are very comfortable when somebody was using expletives in

the group, perhaps they are more acceptable to you, than my polished

words, for I did not want to join a street fighter and would like to

maintain my dignified use of words.

 

Probably you are not aware of Mr. L_*... behavior in ,

believe me, if you had known it, you would have realized, the truth,

behind mine or Mr. Bhaskar every word.

 

Your once sided marks biasness, unless you did it unintentionally. Be

fair in your remarks/observations. As I said before & say again, I

have no hesitation to apologise, should some one prove me wrong

anytime..... I am always open.

 

With regards,

 

Sreeram_Srinivas

 

, " maniv_pathak " <maniv_pathak

wrote:

>

> It's a shame that even after the moderators warning, the conflict has

> continued.

>

> Although it would be unfair to levy the blame solely on Lalit (this

> is not excusing his mails), as several messages after this warning,

> for example from Sreeramji, have been provocative, both directly

> (references like `twisted mind') and indirectly (references to

> configurations in Lalitji's chart).

>

> I just can't relate to why learned and intelligent persons can't lay

> down their swords and maintain the peace, even after requests from

> many members.

>

> Rajji (moderator) please maintain consistency with your warning and

> moderate those that have carried on with the provocations and abuse.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Maniv

>

[Guest guest]

Sreeramji

 

I apologise if my mail came across as biased: this was far from the

intention. My objective was to highlight that this conflict can only

be ended by the mutual 'ignoration' of all involved parties, and this

applied to even those using diplomatic language.

 

My only experience of Lalitji previous to this was in the

Vedic_Astrology Group, where he clearly highlighted the fact that

Dakhshinamoortyji was using an additional ID ('Mohanram')to praise

himself. While Lalit had a strong case in that instance, his

aggressive approach and use of words were over the top.

 

On this occasion there is nothing or no one to expose, and there is

no excusing his use of language. That is why I have again and again

requested both parties to withdraw from this and focus on Jyotish.

 

Anyhow this is the jurisdiction of the moderator, and I shall leave

such issues to him from hereon.

 

Thank you,

 

Maniv

 

 

, " sreeram srinivas "

<sreeram64 wrote:

>

>

> Dear Mr. Maniv_Pathak,

>

> I think you are very comfortable when somebody was using expletives

in

> the group, perhaps they are more acceptable to you, than my polished

> words, for I did not want to join a street fighter and would like

to

> maintain my dignified use of words.

>

> Probably you are not aware of Mr. L_*... behavior in ,

> believe me, if you had known it, you would have realized, the truth,

> behind mine or Mr. Bhaskar every word.

>

> Your once sided marks biasness, unless you did it

unintentionally. Be

> fair in your remarks/observations. As I said before & say again,

I

> have no hesitation to apologise, should some one prove me wrong

> anytime..... I am always open.

>

> With regards,

>

> Sreeram_Srinivas

>

> , " maniv_pathak " <maniv_pathak@>

> wrote:

> >

> > It's a shame that even after the moderators warning, the conflict

has

> > continued.

> >

> > Although it would be unfair to levy the blame solely on Lalit

(this

> > is not excusing his mails), as several messages after this

warning,

> > for example from Sreeramji, have been provocative, both directly

> > (references like `twisted mind') and indirectly (references to

> > configurations in Lalitji's chart).

> >

> > I just can't relate to why learned and intelligent persons can't

lay

> > down their swords and maintain the peace, even after requests from

> > many members.

> >

> > Rajji (moderator) please maintain consistency with your warning

and

> > moderate those that have carried on with the provocations and

abuse.

> >

> > Thanks,

> >

> > Maniv

> >

>