Yukteshwar and precession rate

[Guest guest]

Avish,

 

Many, many thanks for your kind answer!!!

 

--

Best regards,

François!

 

On Thursday, December 06, 2007 12:13 AM, aavesh t <aavesh_s

wrote:

 

> Hello Francois,

>

> Interesting question.I personally do not use this Ayanamsha

>

> Dr David Frawley uses this Ayanmasha.You can get in touch with him

> for more details (His website is vedanet.com)

>

> Regards,

>

> aavesh

>

>

> Francois Carriere <fc21063 wrote:

> Hello,

>

> I have kind of an historical question. From what I understand of

> jyotish (rather not much, obviously!), previous to Lahiri ayanamsha,

> Swami Yukteshwar had an important impact and was grounded on the

> Surya Siddhanta for his astrological works, or at least for what is

> known as the Yuga. Revati star was the fiducial also. Apparently he

> evaluated the ayanamsha to 20:54:36 on spring equinox 1894 (when he

> wrote Holy Science?), with Surya Siddhanta precession rate of 54 " .

>

> So, I would like to know if anyone uses this ayanamsha and precession

> rate, and what are the results? And what about Swami Yukteshwar

> result?

>

> The reason of my question is quite simple. If jyotisha is grounded on

> indian astronomy, as gathered in Surya Siddhanta, I suppose that we

> should use the same " notions " , regardless of the " scientific "

> knowledge...

>

> What do you think?

>

> Remember, I don't wish to start any argument at all, but only wish to

> understand how, historically, jyotishi worked. Thank you!

[Guest guest]

Dear Francois,

 

You are most welcome.

 

It is really nice to know that the French too are learning Jyotish.

 

This is what Shri Yukteshwar had envisoned when he met Mahavtar Babaji at the

Kumbh Mela

 

Regards,

 

aavesh

 

P.S:By the way my name is Aavesh which means enthusiasm (I do have plenty of

it as far as Jyotish is concerned)

 

 

 

 

CARRIERE Francois <fc21063 wrote:

Avish,

 

Many, many thanks for your kind answer!!!

 

--

Best regards,

François!

 

On Thursday, December 06, 2007 12:13 AM, aavesh t <aavesh_s

wrote:

 

> Hello Francois,

>

> Interesting question.I personally do not use this Ayanamsha

>

> Dr David Frawley uses this Ayanmasha.You can get in touch with him

> for more details (His website is vedanet.com)

>

> Regards,

>

> aavesh

>

>

> Francois Carriere <fc21063 wrote:

> Hello,

>

> I have kind of an historical question. From what I understand of

> jyotish (rather not much, obviously!), previous to Lahiri ayanamsha,

> Swami Yukteshwar had an important impact and was grounded on the

> Surya Siddhanta for his astrological works, or at least for what is

> known as the Yuga. Revati star was the fiducial also. Apparently he

> evaluated the ayanamsha to 20:54:36 on spring equinox 1894 (when he

> wrote Holy Science?), with Surya Siddhanta precession rate of 54 " .

>

> So, I would like to know if anyone uses this ayanamsha and precession

> rate, and what are the results? And what about Swami Yukteshwar

> result?

>

> The reason of my question is quite simple. If jyotisha is grounded on

> indian astronomy, as gathered in Surya Siddhanta, I suppose that we

> should use the same " notions " , regardless of the " scientific "

> knowledge...

>

> What do you think?

>

> Remember, I don't wish to start any argument at all, but only wish to

> understand how, historically, jyotishi worked. Thank you!

 

 

 

 

 

 

With Best Wishes,

 

aavesh

 

 

 

Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online.