Basic Principles for Leo as for all ascendants.

[Guest guest]

Every Ascendant has some peculiar characteristics

which is the base of that ascendant and which can be,

of course modified with presence of other planets,

change of Cuspal Lordships, and also aspects.

But the underlying principal would always

remain the same.This is commonsense, which every

astrologer should have and goes without saying

or repetition. Not repeating this commonsense basics

does not mean that it is avoided or not known.

 

In Leo ascendant always it will be " Control " if the

Sun is placed well, then it would be natural, if the Sun

is bad then it would be forced, leading in false pride.

For same Leo ascendant the Uncles younger to

Mother would have a harsh speech because the 3rd

house from the 4th house, which is the 6th house,

signifying younger brothers to mother, or Uncles, is

Capricorn owned by Saturn. Now it is commonsense

that unless the Capricorn sign or its Lord Saturn is

aspected by a planet like Jupiter , the speech would

remain harsh, and not change. If aspected by

Mercury, it would become diplomatic with a harsh

tone underlying ,or if with Mars, then further harsh and

attacking.But the basic principle would remain same.

Why do Leos more susceptible to heart attacks than

other signs ? First of all the Sun signifies the heart.

Moon which is a Functional malefic for this Lagna ,

signifies the chest region. And

Jupiter Lord of the 5th house for this Horoscope,

is also Lord of the 8th signifying Surgery.

 

Only commonsense and proper logic is required in

astrology, alongwith knowledge of basics, is enough to

become a good astrologer.No technical abracadabra

is needed to become a good one. The problem with

todays mould is, that people are trying to force

in all rubbish topics in these Astrological Forums,

which have no relevance to Predictions but all " Bakwaas "

like kisne 28 Nakshatras pahle likhe apne itihaas mein,

ya phir Sanskrit meaning kya hai actually kis word ka,

jabki yeh ustaad Greek words tak ka meaning dhoondh

lete hain, parantu Sanskrit ka dhoondh nahi paate,

only because they wish to let the Vedic astrology and

its culture and its Origins down and prove other Cultures

better. We do not need such type of discussions, rather

we should go back to the basics and start over once

again, which would help us a lot in our drive towards

becoming better at predictive astrology.

 

I can list all the basic underlying principles for each

ascendant and each house, but need time and proper

audience to appreciate these efforts. If people

are going to argue over matters which just need some

common sense then who is interested in putting

forth such efforts ?

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Bhaskar,

 

Nice description of Leo Ascendant. Yes, you are welcome to present

your synopsis on other ascendants too, that is the real crux (or

basics/foundation) of astrology. I am here to appreciate such an

effort.

 

I agree with you about so many deviated topics that distract

attention from core of astrology. Honestly, it does not serve

anything to the cause of astrology. May be there should be another

forum for such topics; not this forum. As humans (even before being

astrologers), we should understand our own limitations.

 

Simple question. Does anyone acknowledge that during British rule in

India (for over 250 years) so much of Indian history has been

corrupted (I mean modified in a way to degrade our culture, religion

and heritage)? Thus, any attempt before we even dream of questioning

our traditions/culture/systems should be preceded by self-

questioning 'Am I the right person to do this? Do I really have the

facts?'

 

People very conveniently forget that our system (or

religious/spiritual philosophy) is META-PHYSICAL and what is

prevalent in majority of Western countries is a bunch of PHYSICAL

systems. The worst damage to the Indian/Hindu philosophy is

happening now, during the globalization phenomena; first time it

happened during British rule (they half-spoiled it) and now we are

ourselves spoiling it in the name of globalization. The danger is in

the process of questioning everything and questioning anyone, as

promoted by most Western countries which are based on PHYSICAL

evidence. First of all, are we capable of questioning everything?

What is our basic level of knowledge in support of such questioning?

OK, even if we are capable of questioning, whom are we questioning?

A bunch of Internet based astrologer community, where we have no

idea of what kind of people we are interacting with. How do we know

the person we are interacting with is a capable and knowledged

person whose answer can be trusted?

 

Can one see physically how a planet is shaping a person? No. Only

the concerned person should feel it. That feeling only comes when

the concerned person has that bent of mind, and has the spiritual

inclination.

 

Vedic astrology is SPIRITUAL. Thats it. One who is not spiritual in

his approach, can only smell a half-cooked product and will come out

with all sorts of self-made logic to support his/her theories. Every

vedic astrologer has to build spiritual energy levels within

himself/herself. It should not be seen as a bread-winning subject

(though people may/can live reasonably well using it as a

livelihood). Without spiritual energy, whatever we predict goes

somewhere in air; neither it comes out to be true

predictions/guidance to the people, nor it becomes an eye-of-wisdom,

as the seers say. Vedic astrology is EYE OF WISDOM; the caveat is

that one has to build that spiritual energy to get there. It is NOT

EASY. One has to sacrifice a lot of time, energy, ego, and learn

from great people (if at all available within our reach).

 

People from every ethnic background is welcome to learn this super

spiritual science, and by following the spiritual practices as

suggested by the sages, anyone can become a learned astrologer. But

now we are going a step beyond; questioning the very sages'

scriptures, as if we know everything else except that question.

 

Forgetting all these will result in message threads that lead us

nowhere, but exchanging a few harsh words across.

 

I have been finding it really difficult to get a good Sanskrit

scholar who can teach me Sanskrit. I never knew that there are so

many Sanskrit scholars in the Internet community who can easily

interpret these Sanskrit slokas.

 

Regards,

Satya Sai Kolachina

 

 

 

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Every Ascendant has some peculiar characteristics

> which is the base of that ascendant and which can be,

> of course modified with presence of other planets,

> change of Cuspal Lordships, and also aspects.

> But the underlying principal would always

> remain the same.This is commonsense, which every

> astrologer should have and goes without saying

> or repetition. Not repeating this commonsense basics

> does not mean that it is avoided or not known.

>

> In Leo ascendant always it will be " Control " if the

> Sun is placed well, then it would be natural, if the Sun

> is bad then it would be forced, leading in false pride.

> For same Leo ascendant the Uncles younger to

> Mother would have a harsh speech because the 3rd

> house from the 4th house, which is the 6th house,

> signifying younger brothers to mother, or Uncles, is

> Capricorn owned by Saturn. Now it is commonsense

> that unless the Capricorn sign or its Lord Saturn is

> aspected by a planet like Jupiter , the speech would

> remain harsh, and not change. If aspected by

> Mercury, it would become diplomatic with a harsh

> tone underlying ,or if with Mars, then further harsh and

> attacking.But the basic principle would remain same.

> Why do Leos more susceptible to heart attacks than

> other signs ? First of all the Sun signifies the heart.

> Moon which is a Functional malefic for this Lagna ,

> signifies the chest region. And

> Jupiter Lord of the 5th house for this Horoscope,

> is also Lord of the 8th signifying Surgery.

>

> Only commonsense and proper logic is required in

> astrology, alongwith knowledge of basics, is enough to

> become a good astrologer.No technical abracadabra

> is needed to become a good one. The problem with

> todays mould is, that people are trying to force

> in all rubbish topics in these Astrological Forums,

> which have no relevance to Predictions but all " Bakwaas "

> like kisne 28 Nakshatras pahle likhe apne itihaas mein,

> ya phir Sanskrit meaning kya hai actually kis word ka,

> jabki yeh ustaad Greek words tak ka meaning dhoondh

> lete hain, parantu Sanskrit ka dhoondh nahi paate,

> only because they wish to let the Vedic astrology and

> its culture and its Origins down and prove other Cultures

> better. We do not need such type of discussions, rather

> we should go back to the basics and start over once

> again, which would help us a lot in our drive towards

> becoming better at predictive astrology.

>

> I can list all the basic underlying principles for each

> ascendant and each house, but need time and proper

> audience to appreciate these efforts. If people

> are going to argue over matters which just need some

> common sense then who is interested in putting

> forth such efforts ?

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Satyaji,

 

A good honest mail which I enjoyed reading

as usual from You.

 

My presentation of synopsis is not meant for good

astrologers like you of course, but for youngsters

and new entrants and for my ownself, I always like

to go back to those studies which I miss, because

we generally try to reach the advanced levels and

want to become predictors very soon, is the cause

for not studying the basics properly. My Guruji

in Bhartiya Vidya Bhuvan always used to tell us

to learn this boring (We found it boring

as students) chapter on Qualities,Quadruplicites

and Triplicities, and You have learnt half your

astrology. But we found it boring. But now as we

move further on,I find that without learning these,

no one can move up the ladder in predictive astrology.

 

About the Westerners, the less said the better.

They have done good in some areas though. But lack in

perception of Indian Vedic astrology as spiritual and

predictive through symbolism and subtle truths.

They had for half a century treated Pluto as a planet

with their modern telescopes and astronomical paraphernalia

at their disposal, but after half a century they are

back to what our sages said with naked eyes. Now

Pluto is no more a planet is what they decided it seems

after better technical machinery arrived to view the space..

 

Though our sages knew about all these planets with mention

in the classical texts , including the diameter of the earth,

Moon and the Sun, alongwith the distance, they had no such

modern machinery at their disposal. Our ancestors have

given the world the digit " 0 " . With so much knowledge

yet awaiting to be cracked from these classics, the modern

day astrologers, are now trying to question the Sages, and

have also jumped on the Epics, Ramayana and the Mahabharata.

I dont think anyone 4 decades ago would

have dared to address " Sage Valmiki " as " Valmiki " as they

do now in a wanton manner equating these

Sages to the categories of Tom,Dick and Harry. The

Spirituality is missing, and without it to become a

astrologer, would be like searching a needle in a haystack.

You are absolutely right, without spiritual energy

one can never predict successfully or truly.

 

I too wished to learn Sanskrit few years back, spoke to

a Master, but the timings were too early and his speech

was inaudible and not understandable, as he was a very

old man, so did not join. After that, I became busy in the

daily humdrum of Life, and am yet to satisfy my own family

members with the required physical luxuries or comforts

as per their scale, so left these personal luxuries at bay.

 

I wish to live a Life in solitude within 5 years, after

completion of financial security to family, and spend

the rest of days at Vrindavan or Haridwar or Mathura

wherever Lord Krishna takes me. because no one in this

world one can call his own except Him, so wish to

be at the places where His pastimes were spent, but

only He knows whether this wish of mines would be

fulfilled or not. But Sri Satyaji, I have now become

dispassionate of this world, its men, my own people,

and the ways of the world. I shall wait for His verdict

for my Future stay here in this Maya World..

 

kind regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

, " Satya Sai Kolachina "

<skolachi wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Bhaskar,

>

> Nice description of Leo Ascendant. Yes, you are welcome to present

> your synopsis on other ascendants too, that is the real crux (or

> basics/foundation) of astrology. I am here to appreciate such an

> effort.

>

> I agree with you about so many deviated topics that distract

> attention from core of astrology. Honestly, it does not serve

> anything to the cause of astrology. May be there should be another

> forum for such topics; not this forum. As humans (even before being

> astrologers), we should understand our own limitations.

>

> Simple question. Does anyone acknowledge that during British rule in

> India (for over 250 years) so much of Indian history has been

> corrupted (I mean modified in a way to degrade our culture, religion

> and heritage)? Thus, any attempt before we even dream of questioning

> our traditions/culture/systems should be preceded by self-

> questioning 'Am I the right person to do this? Do I really have the

> facts?'

>

> People very conveniently forget that our system (or

> religious/spiritual philosophy) is META-PHYSICAL and what is

> prevalent in majority of Western countries is a bunch of PHYSICAL

> systems. The worst damage to the Indian/Hindu philosophy is

> happening now, during the globalization phenomena; first time it

> happened during British rule (they half-spoiled it) and now we are

> ourselves spoiling it in the name of globalization. The danger is in

> the process of questioning everything and questioning anyone, as

> promoted by most Western countries which are based on PHYSICAL

> evidence. First of all, are we capable of questioning everything?

> What is our basic level of knowledge in support of such questioning?

> OK, even if we are capable of questioning, whom are we questioning?

> A bunch of Internet based astrologer community, where we have no

> idea of what kind of people we are interacting with. How do we know

> the person we are interacting with is a capable and knowledged

> person whose answer can be trusted?

>

> Can one see physically how a planet is shaping a person? No. Only

> the concerned person should feel it. That feeling only comes when

> the concerned person has that bent of mind, and has the spiritual

> inclination.

>

> Vedic astrology is SPIRITUAL. Thats it. One who is not spiritual in

> his approach, can only smell a half-cooked product and will come out

> with all sorts of self-made logic to support his/her theories. Every

> vedic astrologer has to build spiritual energy levels within

> himself/herself. It should not be seen as a bread-winning subject

> (though people may/can live reasonably well using it as a

> livelihood). Without spiritual energy, whatever we predict goes

> somewhere in air; neither it comes out to be true

> predictions/guidance to the people, nor it becomes an eye-of-wisdom,

> as the seers say. Vedic astrology is EYE OF WISDOM; the caveat is

> that one has to build that spiritual energy to get there. It is NOT

> EASY. One has to sacrifice a lot of time, energy, ego, and learn

> from great people (if at all available within our reach).

>

> People from every ethnic background is welcome to learn this super

> spiritual science, and by following the spiritual practices as

> suggested by the sages, anyone can become a learned astrologer. But

> now we are going a step beyond; questioning the very sages'

> scriptures, as if we know everything else except that question.

>

> Forgetting all these will result in message threads that lead us

> nowhere, but exchanging a few harsh words across.

>

> I have been finding it really difficult to get a good Sanskrit

> scholar who can teach me Sanskrit. I never knew that there are so

> many Sanskrit scholars in the Internet community who can easily

> interpret these Sanskrit slokas.

>

> Regards,

> Satya Sai Kolachina

>

>

>

>

> , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Every Ascendant has some peculiar characteristics

> > which is the base of that ascendant and which can be,

> > of course modified with presence of other planets,

> > change of Cuspal Lordships, and also aspects.

> > But the underlying principal would always

> > remain the same.This is commonsense, which every

> > astrologer should have and goes without saying

> > or repetition. Not repeating this commonsense basics

> > does not mean that it is avoided or not known.

> >

> > In Leo ascendant always it will be " Control " if the

> > Sun is placed well, then it would be natural, if the Sun

> > is bad then it would be forced, leading in false pride.

> > For same Leo ascendant the Uncles younger to

> > Mother would have a harsh speech because the 3rd

> > house from the 4th house, which is the 6th house,

> > signifying younger brothers to mother, or Uncles, is

> > Capricorn owned by Saturn. Now it is commonsense

> > that unless the Capricorn sign or its Lord Saturn is

> > aspected by a planet like Jupiter , the speech would

> > remain harsh, and not change. If aspected by

> > Mercury, it would become diplomatic with a harsh

> > tone underlying ,or if with Mars, then further harsh and

> > attacking.But the basic principle would remain same.

> > Why do Leos more susceptible to heart attacks than

> > other signs ? First of all the Sun signifies the heart.

> > Moon which is a Functional malefic for this Lagna ,

> > signifies the chest region. And

> > Jupiter Lord of the 5th house for this Horoscope,

> > is also Lord of the 8th signifying Surgery.

> >

> > Only commonsense and proper logic is required in

> > astrology, alongwith knowledge of basics, is enough to

> > become a good astrologer.No technical abracadabra

> > is needed to become a good one. The problem with

> > todays mould is, that people are trying to force

> > in all rubbish topics in these Astrological Forums,

> > which have no relevance to Predictions but all " Bakwaas "

> > like kisne 28 Nakshatras pahle likhe apne itihaas mein,

> > ya phir Sanskrit meaning kya hai actually kis word ka,

> > jabki yeh ustaad Greek words tak ka meaning dhoondh

> > lete hain, parantu Sanskrit ka dhoondh nahi paate,

> > only because they wish to let the Vedic astrology and

> > its culture and its Origins down and prove other Cultures

> > better. We do not need such type of discussions, rather

> > we should go back to the basics and start over once

> > again, which would help us a lot in our drive towards

> > becoming better at predictive astrology.

> >

> > I can list all the basic underlying principles for each

> > ascendant and each house, but need time and proper

> > audience to appreciate these efforts. If people

> > are going to argue over matters which just need some

> > common sense then who is interested in putting

> > forth such efforts ?

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Bhaskar,

 

We always should keep the foundation knowledge in mind for making

good astrology. You know, in music, even a practicing concert level

musician also practices the fundamental notes (Sa, Ri, Ga, Ma, Pa,

Da, Ni level) on a regular basis; most people don't know, or expect

this. That is why you see such stunning quality in their

presentations.

 

Hence we always should keep reading fundamentals, for a couple of

reasons (a) we may keep forgetting them as we progress in advanced

topics, and (b) we may find some new meaning every time we read the

same sentence, as Sri KN Rao beautifully explained this in one of his

books.

 

Hence, I enjoy the astrological content of all your mails and really

appreciate the same; only thing is that I may not be expressing my

appreciation everytime. You really have a very good depth of

knowledge in predictive astrology, which is only possible through

continuous reading of charts. A friendly advise is to just

concentrate yourself on the astrological content and keep away from

distracting messages; you have that capacity. This is an honest

message from me, though I never personally met you or talked to you.

 

By the way, I also like Lord SriKrishna very much since he is the

best Yogi we can every think of (though my ishta devatha is Jagadamba

for all guidance in my life); I named my son as Srikrishna.

 

Best regards,

Satya S Kolachina

 

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Satyaji,

>

> A good honest mail which I enjoyed reading

> as usual from You.

>

> My presentation of synopsis is not meant for good

> astrologers like you of course, but for youngsters

> and new entrants and for my ownself, I always like

> to go back to those studies which I miss, because

> we generally try to reach the advanced levels and

> want to become predictors very soon, is the cause

> for not studying the basics properly. My Guruji

> in Bhartiya Vidya Bhuvan always used to tell us

> to learn this boring (We found it boring

> as students) chapter on Qualities,Quadruplicites

> and Triplicities, and You have learnt half your

> astrology. But we found it boring. But now as we

> move further on,I find that without learning these,

> no one can move up the ladder in predictive astrology.

>

> About the Westerners, the less said the better.

> They have done good in some areas though. But lack in

> perception of Indian Vedic astrology as spiritual and

> predictive through symbolism and subtle truths.

> They had for half a century treated Pluto as a planet

> with their modern telescopes and astronomical paraphernalia

> at their disposal, but after half a century they are

> back to what our sages said with naked eyes. Now

> Pluto is no more a planet is what they decided it seems

> after better technical machinery arrived to view the space..

>

> Though our sages knew about all these planets with mention

> in the classical texts , including the diameter of the earth,

> Moon and the Sun, alongwith the distance, they had no such

> modern machinery at their disposal. Our ancestors have

> given the world the digit " 0 " . With so much knowledge

> yet awaiting to be cracked from these classics, the modern

> day astrologers, are now trying to question the Sages, and

> have also jumped on the Epics, Ramayana and the Mahabharata.

> I dont think anyone 4 decades ago would

> have dared to address " Sage Valmiki " as " Valmiki " as they

> do now in a wanton manner equating these

> Sages to the categories of Tom,Dick and Harry. The

> Spirituality is missing, and without it to become a

> astrologer, would be like searching a needle in a haystack.

> You are absolutely right, without spiritual energy

> one can never predict successfully or truly.

>

> I too wished to learn Sanskrit few years back, spoke to

> a Master, but the timings were too early and his speech

> was inaudible and not understandable, as he was a very

> old man, so did not join. After that, I became busy in the

> daily humdrum of Life, and am yet to satisfy my own family

> members with the required physical luxuries or comforts

> as per their scale, so left these personal luxuries at bay.

>

> I wish to live a Life in solitude within 5 years, after

> completion of financial security to family, and spend

> the rest of days at Vrindavan or Haridwar or Mathura

> wherever Lord Krishna takes me. because no one in this

> world one can call his own except Him, so wish to

> be at the places where His pastimes were spent, but

> only He knows whether this wish of mines would be

> fulfilled or not. But Sri Satyaji, I have now become

> dispassionate of this world, its men, my own people,

> and the ways of the world. I shall wait for His verdict

> for my Future stay here in this Maya World..

>

> kind regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

>

>

>

> , " Satya Sai Kolachina "

> <skolachi@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sri Bhaskar,

> >

> > Nice description of Leo Ascendant. Yes, you are welcome to

present

> > your synopsis on other ascendants too, that is the real crux (or

> > basics/foundation) of astrology. I am here to appreciate such an

> > effort.

> >

> > I agree with you about so many deviated topics that distract

> > attention from core of astrology. Honestly, it does not serve

> > anything to the cause of astrology. May be there should be

another

> > forum for such topics; not this forum. As humans (even before

being

> > astrologers), we should understand our own limitations.

> >

> > Simple question. Does anyone acknowledge that during British rule

in

> > India (for over 250 years) so much of Indian history has been

> > corrupted (I mean modified in a way to degrade our culture,

religion

> > and heritage)? Thus, any attempt before we even dream of

questioning

> > our traditions/culture/systems should be preceded by self-

> > questioning 'Am I the right person to do this? Do I really have

the

> > facts?'

> >

> > People very conveniently forget that our system (or

> > religious/spiritual philosophy) is META-PHYSICAL and what is

> > prevalent in majority of Western countries is a bunch of PHYSICAL

> > systems. The worst damage to the Indian/Hindu philosophy is

> > happening now, during the globalization phenomena; first time it

> > happened during British rule (they half-spoiled it) and now we

are

> > ourselves spoiling it in the name of globalization. The danger is

in

> > the process of questioning everything and questioning anyone, as

> > promoted by most Western countries which are based on PHYSICAL

> > evidence. First of all, are we capable of questioning everything?

> > What is our basic level of knowledge in support of such

questioning?

> > OK, even if we are capable of questioning, whom are we

questioning?

> > A bunch of Internet based astrologer community, where we have no

> > idea of what kind of people we are interacting with. How do we

know

> > the person we are interacting with is a capable and knowledged

> > person whose answer can be trusted?

> >

> > Can one see physically how a planet is shaping a person? No. Only

> > the concerned person should feel it. That feeling only comes when

> > the concerned person has that bent of mind, and has the spiritual

> > inclination.

> >

> > Vedic astrology is SPIRITUAL. Thats it. One who is not spiritual

in

> > his approach, can only smell a half-cooked product and will come

out

> > with all sorts of self-made logic to support his/her theories.

Every

> > vedic astrologer has to build spiritual energy levels within

> > himself/herself. It should not be seen as a bread-winning subject

> > (though people may/can live reasonably well using it as a

> > livelihood). Without spiritual energy, whatever we predict goes

> > somewhere in air; neither it comes out to be true

> > predictions/guidance to the people, nor it becomes an eye-of-

wisdom,

> > as the seers say. Vedic astrology is EYE OF WISDOM; the caveat is

> > that one has to build that spiritual energy to get there. It is

NOT

> > EASY. One has to sacrifice a lot of time, energy, ego, and learn

> > from great people (if at all available within our reach).

> >

> > People from every ethnic background is welcome to learn this

super

> > spiritual science, and by following the spiritual practices as

> > suggested by the sages, anyone can become a learned astrologer.

But

> > now we are going a step beyond; questioning the very sages'

> > scriptures, as if we know everything else except that question.

> >

> > Forgetting all these will result in message threads that lead us

> > nowhere, but exchanging a few harsh words across.

> >

> > I have been finding it really difficult to get a good Sanskrit

> > scholar who can teach me Sanskrit. I never knew that there are so

> > many Sanskrit scholars in the Internet community who can easily

> > interpret these Sanskrit slokas.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Satya Sai Kolachina

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Every Ascendant has some peculiar characteristics

> > > which is the base of that ascendant and which can be,

> > > of course modified with presence of other planets,

> > > change of Cuspal Lordships, and also aspects.

> > > But the underlying principal would always

> > > remain the same.This is commonsense, which every

> > > astrologer should have and goes without saying

> > > or repetition. Not repeating this commonsense basics

> > > does not mean that it is avoided or not known.

> > >

> > > In Leo ascendant always it will be " Control " if the

> > > Sun is placed well, then it would be natural, if the Sun

> > > is bad then it would be forced, leading in false pride.

> > > For same Leo ascendant the Uncles younger to

> > > Mother would have a harsh speech because the 3rd

> > > house from the 4th house, which is the 6th house,

> > > signifying younger brothers to mother, or Uncles, is

> > > Capricorn owned by Saturn. Now it is commonsense

> > > that unless the Capricorn sign or its Lord Saturn is

> > > aspected by a planet like Jupiter , the speech would

> > > remain harsh, and not change. If aspected by

> > > Mercury, it would become diplomatic with a harsh

> > > tone underlying ,or if with Mars, then further harsh and

> > > attacking.But the basic principle would remain same.

> > > Why do Leos more susceptible to heart attacks than

> > > other signs ? First of all the Sun signifies the heart.

> > > Moon which is a Functional malefic for this Lagna ,

> > > signifies the chest region. And

> > > Jupiter Lord of the 5th house for this Horoscope,

> > > is also Lord of the 8th signifying Surgery.

> > >

> > > Only commonsense and proper logic is required in

> > > astrology, alongwith knowledge of basics, is enough to

> > > become a good astrologer.No technical abracadabra

> > > is needed to become a good one. The problem with

> > > todays mould is, that people are trying to force

> > > in all rubbish topics in these Astrological Forums,

> > > which have no relevance to Predictions but all " Bakwaas "

> > > like kisne 28 Nakshatras pahle likhe apne itihaas mein,

> > > ya phir Sanskrit meaning kya hai actually kis word ka,

> > > jabki yeh ustaad Greek words tak ka meaning dhoondh

> > > lete hain, parantu Sanskrit ka dhoondh nahi paate,

> > > only because they wish to let the Vedic astrology and

> > > its culture and its Origins down and prove other Cultures

> > > better. We do not need such type of discussions, rather

> > > we should go back to the basics and start over once

> > > again, which would help us a lot in our drive towards

> > > becoming better at predictive astrology.

> > >

> > > I can list all the basic underlying principles for each

> > > ascendant and each house, but need time and proper

> > > audience to appreciate these efforts. If people

> > > are going to argue over matters which just need some

> > > common sense then who is interested in putting

> > > forth such efforts ?

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> >

>