Guest guest Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 In the bes interest of having healthy debates in a common public forum like this, I would clarify here, that my comments about Leo ascendant are not aimed at any individual. It is not appropriate for us astrologers, to talk about one's horoscope and make fun of it; I noted it in the past and hence I am reiterating the same as I am seeing such trend to be building up again. If we indulge in such practices, then the basic purpose of our learning astrology is lost; no matter, whether we do it for several lifetimes, not useful. In the eyes of the GOD, no one is superior, no one else is inferior; all are at the same level. Regards, Satya Sai Kolachina , " Satya Sai Kolachina " <skolachi wrote: > > Dear Sri Dhananjay, > > 1. I did not say the person I was talking about was mad. The person > has a challenge in personal life; thats it. Every one having > challenges in personal life is not mad. Again based on something I > mentioned superficial, you seem to be making here an assumption. > 2. If other conditions indicate, any ascendant can be good with > respect to control, for that matter; not necessarily leo only. e.g., > Late Indian Prime Minister Smt Indira Gandhi had Cancer attendant, > and how much power, authority, and control she exercised, every one > knows. If you just take the ascendant characteristics, Cancer > ascendant should not be appropraite for her, since Cancer ascendants > are supposed to be more soft-natured due to watery sign, and also > more timid; at least with respect to her Public life, one cannot > easily agree of Smt Indira Gandhi's characteristics to be of > Cancer's. > 3. Every ascendant has specific characteristics, no doubt, due to > the lordship given to the specific planet, and due to the > characteristics of the sign itself, along with several other > factors. But, the total disposition of the horoscope is to be > examined, not giving too much importance to just the ascendant, or > for that matter, any single factor. > 4. I think with Leo ascendant, instead of using the word 'Can > Control', it would be more appropriate, if we say that 'they try to > show authority over people', and if other conditions do not > cooperrate, they miserably fail in that attempt to show authority, > and hence will be left with frustration. > > > Best regards, > Satya Sai Kolachina > > , " gupta089 " <gupta089@> wrote: > > > > DEAR > > " they can " means they can control if other condition > > indicates ofcourse.How mad person can control others, > > it is understood. leo person can also be mad. > > > > regards > > Dhananjay > > > > > > > > > > , " Satya Sai Kolachina " > > <skolachi@> wrote: > > > > > > If I may intervene, I cannot take this as a rule of thumb. It is > > just > > > one point to give weightage when we look into Leo Asc > horoscopes. > > > e.g., I know a specific horoscope of a Leo ascendant having 4 > > planets > > > in 12th house and 2 planets in the 6th house, having really > tough > > > time managing/controlling own-self; forget about controlling > > others. > > > To my knowledge, the person is trying to supercede others, but > in > > > vein. It all depends on the planetary combinations. > > > > > > Satya S Kolachina > > > > > > , " Raja Gursahani " > > > <rajagursahani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > my analysis was superificial yours wasn't. I had hurriedly > > replied > > > without > > > > giving greater thinking to it. so are you positive about leo > > > ascendant being > > > > able to control the other ascendants. I have never heard that > > one. > > > of course > > > > each chart is unique as well despite whatever ascendant > > > predominates. I mean > > > > is this a rule of thumb by which to go by or you saying that > is a > > > known fact > > > > in deep astrology circles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > namaskar, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ > > > > > > > > Raja G. Gursahani > > > > *: 314.761.3134 (Clovis, CA) > > > > *: rajagursahani(atgmail.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 Dear Shri Satyaji, Do not worry about me. I know you to be a humble and God fearing person who would have nothing to do with such low stooping behaviours. The problem in this world is that good people are being corrupted by bad people like Raja Gurshani. When we share our own experiences for benefit of others, it is people like him who take advantage of such disclosures and pour filth on person who shared his ascendant and experiences. These are the weeds of society who have to be plucked and burnt and not you good men who discuss in general for benefit of science and astrology. Rest assured, I respect you too much, and you may carry on with further discussions on Leo ascendants.I am sending a seperate mail for the benefit of the likes of this Raja. 10 rakshasas together may kill Abhimanyu , but they cannot kill Arjuna. I have Lord Krishna on my side. kind regards, Bhaskar. , " Satya Sai Kolachina " <skolachi wrote: > > In the bes interest of having healthy debates in a common public > forum like this, I would clarify here, that my comments about Leo > ascendant are not aimed at any individual. > > It is not appropriate for us astrologers, to talk about one's > horoscope and make fun of it; I noted it in the past and hence I am > reiterating the same as I am seeing such trend to be building up > again. If we indulge in such practices, then the basic purpose of > our learning astrology is lost; no matter, whether we do it for > several lifetimes, not useful. > > In the eyes of the GOD, no one is superior, no one else is inferior; > all are at the same level. > > Regards, > Satya Sai Kolachina > > , " Satya Sai Kolachina " > <skolachi@> wrote: > > > > Dear Sri Dhananjay, > > > > 1. I did not say the person I was talking about was mad. The > person > > has a challenge in personal life; thats it. Every one having > > challenges in personal life is not mad. Again based on something I > > mentioned superficial, you seem to be making here an assumption. > > 2. If other conditions indicate, any ascendant can be good with > > respect to control, for that matter; not necessarily leo only. > e.g., > > Late Indian Prime Minister Smt Indira Gandhi had Cancer attendant, > > and how much power, authority, and control she exercised, every > one > > knows. If you just take the ascendant characteristics, Cancer > > ascendant should not be appropraite for her, since Cancer > ascendants > > are supposed to be more soft-natured due to watery sign, and also > > more timid; at least with respect to her Public life, one cannot > > easily agree of Smt Indira Gandhi's characteristics to be of > > Cancer's. > > 3. Every ascendant has specific characteristics, no doubt, due to > > the lordship given to the specific planet, and due to the > > characteristics of the sign itself, along with several other > > factors. But, the total disposition of the horoscope is to be > > examined, not giving too much importance to just the ascendant, or > > for that matter, any single factor. > > 4. I think with Leo ascendant, instead of using the word 'Can > > Control', it would be more appropriate, if we say that 'they try > to > > show authority over people', and if other conditions do not > > cooperrate, they miserably fail in that attempt to show authority, > > and hence will be left with frustration. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Satya Sai Kolachina > > > > , " gupta089 " <gupta089@> wrote: > > > > > > DEAR > > > " they can " means they can control if other condition > > > indicates ofcourse.How mad person can control others, > > > it is understood. leo person can also be mad. > > > > > > regards > > > Dhananjay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Satya Sai Kolachina " > > > <skolachi@> wrote: > > > > > > > > If I may intervene, I cannot take this as a rule of thumb. It > is > > > just > > > > one point to give weightage when we look into Leo Asc > > horoscopes. > > > > e.g., I know a specific horoscope of a Leo ascendant having 4 > > > planets > > > > in 12th house and 2 planets in the 6th house, having really > > tough > > > > time managing/controlling own-self; forget about controlling > > > others. > > > > To my knowledge, the person is trying to supercede others, but > > in > > > > vein. It all depends on the planetary combinations. > > > > > > > > Satya S Kolachina > > > > > > > > , " Raja Gursahani " > > > > <rajagursahani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > my analysis was superificial yours wasn't. I had hurriedly > > > replied > > > > without > > > > > giving greater thinking to it. so are you positive about leo > > > > ascendant being > > > > > able to control the other ascendants. I have never heard > that > > > one. > > > > of course > > > > > each chart is unique as well despite whatever ascendant > > > > predominates. I mean > > > > > is this a rule of thumb by which to go by or you saying that > > is a > > > > known fact > > > > > in deep astrology circles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > namaskar, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ > > > > > > > > > > Raja G. Gursahani > > > > > *: 314.761.3134 (Clovis, CA) > > > > > *: rajagursahani(atgmail.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.