Guest guest Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 While discussing the number 9 as being highly significant in numerology, our group member Mandar B. introduced " Pascal's Triangle " - I have only just now had the opportunity to examine this triangle. I encourage everyone interested to look it up in Wikipedia for background information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_triangle There will you will find that Halayudha is the oldest known source of this triangle, in his commentary on Chandas Shastra by Pingala. Halayudha describes the triangle as the staircase to Mount Meru - a Vedic Astronomical entity. Mandar inquired specifically about the number 9 in relation to this triangle. In examining the trinagle I find three numbers conspicuous by their absence: 3, 6, and 9. Amazing, no? They are completely absent from the triangle! What you do find is that the triangle sets up a binary pattern, the first tier sums to 1, the second to 2, the third to 4, the fourth to 8 and the 5th to 16, and so on.. 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, etc. If you further sum the digits of these binary numbers you will find the pattern, 1,2,4,5,7,5 repeating over and over as you step down the rows. All the divine numbers are absent from this pattern, I therefore propose that this triangle describes material nature, the kshetra, the field of action. Yours, Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor http://www.vedicastrologer.net On Aug 16, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Mandar B wrote: > Hi Vic & Sourabh, > First & Foremost....I was trying to fathom, the link of a > Mathematical Postulate (9times any Number, yields a Number whose Sum > of Digits yield a 9) to Astrology.... > > I meant to ask How This Mathematical Postulate Proves Astrology > Govens Numerology or Vice Versa. No offence was intended by me, If > Mr Sorabh felt so, my apologies. He is a Senior in the field , a > great Analyst and a fine human being..Really no offences intended, > my quest of knowledge made me question Sorabhs reasoning.... > > Some more Interesting stuff:(I want both of you to check this) > > (a+b)^0 = > 1 1 > (a+b)^1 = a+b , the coefficients deoted by 1 1 > (a+b)^2 = a^2+2ab+b^2 > 1 2 1 (Note 2 = basically sum of two 1's above) > 121*11 = > (a+b)^3 = a^3+3ab^2+3a^2b+b^3 1 3 > 3 1 (Note 3 = basically sum of 1+2 from the above row) > 1 > 4 6 4 1 > 1 > 5 10 10 5 1 > The coeffcients of the polynomial would follow 1 6 16 20 15 > 6 1 > > This is Pascals Triangle(You can google for the same) > Analysis: > 1. I do not see a sum totaling 9 in the above. > 2. The first 4 rows (1, 1*11, 11*11, 121*11, 1331*11) are multiples > of 11. therefater the corelation breaks the multiple of 11 logic, as > 14641*11 is not 1 5 10 10 5 1 > but equals 1 6 10 5 1 > 3. The sum of each row of the pacals Triangle is a series > 1,2,4,8,16,32,...... > 4. The difference in summation of digits is a# ending in zero (Row2- > Row1=10, Row3-Row2=110, Row4-Row3= 1210, Row5-Row4=13310, Row6-Row5 > = 15086410... > (no where I can see a 9...am not sure if(a+b)^9 would yield it... > > Questions to both of you learned men: > 1. Can you interpret something in the pascals Traingle? > 2. Assuming it is not returning a 9, what does it convey? > > Warm wishes to both of you seniors, in the field. I seek > knowledge...May be it is the Lords wish that I am in touch with you > two learned men. That Lord Shani maharaj is delibated is factual, > but may I seek your blessings in pleasing the Lord. > > Warm wishes > Mandar B > > > > --- On Sat, 8/16/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote: > > Vic D <vicdicara > Re: Re: Numerology > jyotish-vidya > Saturday, August 16, 2008, 6:48 PM Dear Sorabh, > >> thank you for clarifying my points - I think you should look at all >> meanings and interpret properly what is said before you jump to any >> conclusion - after all astrology is about analysis and looking at >> things from all possible angles. > > Don't be so sensitive, my friend! I think Mandar's scientific language > gave you a colder feeling than he intended. Don't jump to conclusions > yourself that someone means to insult you. =) > >> Vic, you mention a powerful saturn mars combination - is saturn >> deblitiated in the chart by any chance ? > > As a matter of fact, it IS. And... coincidentally, do you know who > else has debilitated Saturn??? Yours truly. As well as just about > anybody born in '69 '70 '71. So don't be *mean*. You should probably > apologize to Mandar for that rather scathing comment. And Mandar you > should probably apologize to Sorabh for coming across a bit harsh in > your initial reply to his post. > > After that we will have milk and cookies. I'll give straws for the > milk. Then there will be playtime, and then we will make construction > paper link malas. =) hahaha. > > By the way, both of you made AWESOME contributions to the discussion > of the significance of the number 9. Thank you and keep them coming! > > Yours, > Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor > http://www.vedicast rologer.net > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.