Open Heartedness towards All Approaches.

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

 

BV Raman has proved to be the Modern day saint of

Indian astrology and first Guru to me at least,for

whatever knowledge I possess. But it has been proved

conclusively that his ayanamsha is baseless and wrong

which does not give proper timing of results .

 

Regarding KP, I would say that it cannot be called

a cross breed system because it uses Nakshatra based

predictions,which was the ancient way of prediction.

Even those who profess to be shishyas or disciples of

BV Raman and commercialise astrology using his name

and ayanamsha,do not know that BV Raman used to give

his best predictions based on Nakshatra only. One has

to study his books properly to know this. KP is only

a specialised way of Predictions using the nakshatra

system, which can be learnt only after passing the

study of the traditional system, and not before.

Those who spend their time of the day giving 50

predictions to 50 enquiries on various Internet

Forums may never be able to grasp the learnings of

this system because it needs a focused mind willing

to learn the intracasies of the 27 Nakshatras, and

not just 9 Planets placed in 12 signs.

 

Therfore my advise to those who cannot learn this

system due to lack of understanding power,logic and

intelligence,not to comment on other systems and

call them as cross breeds, unless they study the

same, and prove themselves as masters of what they

already are into.

 

A good spiritual person would be he, who is into his

own religion but does not criticise others religions

or their Masters and their disciples.

 

Same for astrology. None should criticise other

systems, instead should try to learn all approaches,

so that when he encounters a Query he can study them

through all and several approaches, so that the

conclusion which is arrived at, would be more

substantial and containing weight.

 

Let us become masters in our own approach if we

cannot attempt to learn other approaches, and least

of all talk derogatory of others. Incompetency in ones

ownself to understand other systems, should not be cause

for one to feel jealous of others following systems which cannot

be his cup of tea, and judge other systems as - Cross Breeds.

One has to reach a certain stage in the field he has chosen

for him to comment so.

 

 

BV Raman remains my Foremost Guru in Astrology, and

the comment on his ayanamsha was only made, because

those who portray as being his disciples and use his name

to garner Prospective Gullible Customers from the Forum

should no that no system and no Guru is infallible.

thatswhy it is better to not comment otherwise

on others , otherwise one would be inviting same

from others in this process.

Dear all,

 

BV Raman has proved to be the Modern day saint of

Indian astrology and first Guru to me at least,for

whatever knowledge I possess. But it has been proved

conclusively that his ayanamsha is baseless and wrong

which does not give proper timing of results .

 

Regarding KP, I would say that it cannot be called

a cross breed system because it uses Nakshatra based

predictions,which was the ancient way of prediction.

Even those who profess to be shishyas or disciples of

BV Raman and commercialise astrology using his name

and ayanamsha,do not know that BV Raman used to give

his best predictions based on Nakshatra only. One has

to study his books properly to know this. KP is only

a specialised way of Predictions using the nakshatra

system, which can be learnt only after passing the

study of the traditional system, and not before.

Those who spend their time of the day giving 50

predictions to 50 enquiries on various Internet

Forums may never be able to grasp the learnings of

this system because it needs a focused mind willing

to learn the intracasies of the 27 Nakshatras, and

not just effects of 9 Planets placed in 12 signs.

 

Therfore my advise to those who cannot learn this

system due to lack of understanding power,logic and

intelligence, not to comment on other systems and

call them as cross breeds, or shortcuts, unless they study

the same, and prove themselves as masters of what they

already are into.

(These same so called astrologers cannot solve their

own queries as to why they have not been

married for lkast 50 years of existence , with the astrological

knowledge they possess, and they come behind doors to

these same shortcut system followers whom they criticise,

to know when they would be getting married, in private).

 

A good spiritual person would be he, who is into his

own religion but does not criticise others religions

or their Masters and their disciples.

 

Same for astrology. None should criticise other

systems, instead should try to learn all approaches,

so that when he encounters a Query he can study them

through all and several approaches, so that the

conclusion which is arrived at, would be more

substantial and containing weight.

 

Let us become masters in our own approach if we

cannot attempt to learn other approaches, and least

of all not talk derogatory of others.

Incompetence in ones ownself to understand other systems,

should not be cause for one to feel jealous of others following

systems , and judge other systems as - Cross Breeds.

One has to reach a certain stage in the field he has chosen

for him to comment so. Judgement in such manner can only be

made by Kings of the realms they are into. If one is not

a King then please refrain from commenting derogatory.

 

Let this Forum be clean without untoward comments on others

and their systems of approach.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.