functional planets :-patheya goya ji

[Guest guest]

thanks for your meaning ful illustration.

i would like to add some more things in that.

 

it is really all mathmatical calulation and are very complicated even

though most of the astrologer predicts according to the chart. they

even do not go for the amout of power or harmony stays in that chart.

i am not an perfect astrologer but knows the basics but try to answer

according to the calulations.

with reference to that i have found in many horoscops that

traditionly if a trine lord stays in a bad house it doesnot affect

the good possiblities of doing good if and only if it is affected by

bad planets.

keeping in all these calculation can only help us in answering any

chart.

also i would like to say as answered by you that most powerful

malefic planet is most malefic. but i would like to say if it is a

natural benific planet that, being a good planet it becomes helpless

not malefic. but if it is a natural malefic becomes more malefic.

 

also if a natural malefic become lord of trine for eg say ninth house

but giving benific results than it takes me to think as a teacher who

really wants that his students do better but being malefic treats bad

to his students by punishing them or so.

 

 

please let me know if i am meaning full or not. so that i could see

the light of the future.

 

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- In vedic astrology , Patheya Goyal

<patheyagoyal wrote:

>

> Dear Jaswinder,

>

> I don't claim by any means to have the last word on it, but the

answers are lurking in the very frames that you have posed; it is an

interpretative field, and though involving a lot of mathematics, the

answers are rarely mathematical and instead are very intuitive, based

on very good mathematical reasoning though. Confused? I guess that is

the nature of things here. But be sympathetic. I am happy if

someone/something can even point things out indicatively, towards the

future. I underline the future part because past I find Funny isn't

it that the things we know already [because they have happened on us]

when they are revealed to us, we feel wow, as if the things we are

discovering for the first time. Actually it is not the things but the

art [and the artist] of this field that we wow about. Now, back to

your frames: and I am not being funny here: a strong and malefic

planet is strongly malefic, I said I am not being funny here [you

could blame it on my Mercury], and a

> benefic planet in a dushsthan reminds me of Hritik Roshan in this

film called Lakshya singing that song 'mai aisa kyun hun' in that

immobilizing coverall, so fettered to perform its benefic aspects.

You'd often find natives with such config feeling confined, fettered,

people for no reason not responding, responding badly, may be Anand

of film Anand has a good complement to his theory of vibrations - you

like or dislike someone for no reason, because babu moshaye we all

emit strong vibrations - something along this line he says. Now,

perhaps, on a little more serious note, not that I do not consider

the above any the less serious, I have read people saying that Kendra

houses - 1st, 4th, 7th, and 10th [sorry, I shouldn't presume you

wouldn't know] - even if they host malefics, impact the native in

benefic manner [lagna is most important here, but my take is that the

placements of malefics here does leave their imprint - so a Mangal,

or Rahu or Ketu, or Shani should

> signatorily leave the native with their defining characterstics,

e.g. a scar, propensity towards a wound, spiritual inclination, or

lethargy, respectively]. In somewhat receding order, the trines have

the same orientation; and the good news is that the malefics [some

are naisargik and some in conjunction with the rashi] in dushsthanas

give good results, e.g. Shani in 6th gives good health, in 8th is

aayushkarak and so on. In my opinion, the drishtis refer to the

natural propensities of a graha. But these are just my humble

opinions. Best,

>

> patheya

>

>

>

> jaswinder <zzepro wrote: sir

>

> so things really confuses, like planet can be strong or weak and

also

> it can be benefic or melific. what if a planet is strong but

melific

> due to melific aspect being lord of kendra.

>

> also what if a planet is weak but benific in nature being a lord of

a

> bad house.

>

> when a planet aspect some planet or house, does it shows its

natural

> qualities or functional qulities according to the lagna.

>

> thanks

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-

 

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>