Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear All:

 

Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

is extremely benefic?

 

Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

for each and what that would indicate to you?

 

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vicji,

 

I think or according Prof. Chaudhriji, Planets are only functional malafic when

Mooltrikona sign fall under malefic house.

 

As per example for pisces Asc. Saturn,Sun and Venus are functional malefic. I

donot know too much about intrinsic malefics. So

 

 

RP

 

--- On Sun, 7/6/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

Sunday, July 6, 2008, 1:13 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear All:

 

Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

is extremely benefic?

 

Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

for each and what that would indicate to you?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Rickji,

 

By " functional malefic " I mean that the planet is functioning as a

malefic due to house lordship considerations.

 

- Vic

 

 

On Jul 6, 2008, at 2:24 PM, R.P wrote:

 

> Dear Vicji,

>

> I think or according Prof. Chaudhriji, Planets are only functional

> malafic when Mooltrikona sign fall under malefic house.

>

> As per example for pisces Asc. Saturn,Sun and Venus are functional

> malefic. I donot know too much about intrinsic malefics. So

>

>

> RP

>

> --- On Sun, 7/6/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

> Sunday, July 6, 2008, 1:13 PM

Dear All:

>

> Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

> Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

> benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

> one angle of vision and benefic from another?

>

> Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

> Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

> two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

> is extremely benefic?

>

> Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

> for each and what that would indicate to you?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic

 

If we have to make a good sandwich, the bread has to spend time in oven also.

Thus Sun, Ma, Su is a malefic in terms, that it is responsible for such areas in

life which are closer to a Roasting.

 

But again great accomplishment cannot come without the strength which comes from

being hard roasted.

Like Henry Ford, roasted till 52 and then created an empire. (if the dates are

not too off)

 

What I think, is more important in a Kundli may be see roasting agents and then

to see if the roasting will totally burn out the individual or add shining

lusture to the individual.after he comes out of it.

 

A person without much Roasting in his life may start to stink real bad as he

grows old.

Too much punya being consumed in one life.

 

Just my 2 cents, regarding the " benefic " effects of " maelfics " .

After a time it is becomes difficult to seperate malefics from benefics and

the only thing than can be said is that such and sun opportunity or experience

can minifest which the person has to face sometime.

Good or bad and what to take out from that the person has to decide with this

free will.

I think an satrologer should normally not say, that something is good or

something is bad.

 

Many great novel writers were severe drug addicts at sometime, over

came it and then went on to write master pieces on those themes.

Had they never been to jail or suffered what they did, such novels would not be

there.

 

Kindly be assured that i am not being critical to what you have written.

Just random thoughts.

 

Regards

-m-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Jyotish Vidya <jyotish-vidya >

Sunday, 6 July, 2008 11:43:08 PM

Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

 

 

Dear All:

 

Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

is extremely benefic?

 

Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

for each and what that would indicate to you?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

 

 

 

Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite group

at http://in.promos./groups/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Monica,

 

Thank you for my reply. I already agree and understand thoroughly.

This has been my own personal outlook from the very start. However my

question is different than what you addressed, unless I am not reading

you correctly.

 

My question is..

 

SUN: Intrinsically malefic, but for Sagittarius ascendants it is a

benefic lord of the 9th. How do you personally counterbalance it being

malefic from one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

SATURN: Intrinsically very malefic, but for Taurus ascendants it is

Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the two angles:

intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but by lordship it is extremely

benefic?

 

Is the question clearer?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:42 AM, monica Astro wrote:

 

> Dear Vic

>

> If we have to make a good sandwich, the bread has to spend time in

> oven also.

> Thus Sun, Ma, Su is a malefic in terms, that it is responsible for

> such areas in life which are closer to a Roasting.

>

> But again great accomplishment cannot come without the strength

> which comes from being hard roasted.

> Like Henry Ford, roasted till 52 and then created an empire. (if the

> dates are not too off)

>

> What I think, is more important in a Kundli may be see roasting

> agents and then to see if the roasting will totally burn out the

> individual or add shining lusture to the individual.after he comes

> out of it.

>

> A person without much Roasting in his life may start to stink real

> bad as he grows old.

> Too much punya being consumed in one life.

>

> Just my 2 cents, regarding the " benefic " effects of " maelfics " .

> After a time it is becomes difficult to seperate malefics from

> benefics and

> the only thing than can be said is that such and sun opportunity or

> experience can minifest which the person has to face sometime.

> Good or bad and what to take out from that the person has to decide

> with this free will.

> I think an satrologer should normally not say, that something is

> good or something is bad.

>

> Many great novel writers were severe drug addicts at sometime, over

> came it and then went on to write master pieces on those themes.

> Had they never been to jail or suffered what they did, such novels

> would not be there.

>

> Kindly be assured that i am not being critical to what you have

> written.

> Just random thoughts.

>

> Regards

> -m-

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Jyotish Vidya <jyotish-vidya >

> Sunday, 6 July, 2008 11:43:08 PM

> Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

>

>

> Dear All:

>

> Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

> Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

> benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

> one angle of vision and benefic from another?

>

> Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

> Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

> two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

> is extremely benefic?

>

> Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

> for each and what that would indicate to you?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

>

>

>

> Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite

> group at http://in.promos./groups/

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic

 

I think it goes like this.

 

Lets say " karate " or " kick boxng " is " malefic stuff " . Violence, hard training

etc.

Now Assuming Sun signifies Karate and thus gets the adjective " malefic " .

 

If Sun is strong and lord good houses, karate skills should come,

and probably 9th house would get a boost due to karate or he can have good luck

due to karate.

Thus an seemingly intrinsic malefic attribute gives benefic results.

 

If Sun is weak and sits in duststhan, some dust would come and try his karate on

the native.

Malefic giving karate weakness and inviting troubles from karate-strong enemies.

or he gets a broken rib and leg while doing karate.

 

Astro Chart of Bruclee etc fighters should be interesting case of malefics

giving speed & strength in activities related to them.

 

In that sevent planet in one axis email, Saturn and mars together gives

technical or logical outlook.

Strength of logic or deductive powers and how far and deep it goes could depends

on benefic lordships and benefic aspect of planets or being able to influence

some planet or bhavas which is related to mind, thinking, and is strong etc.

Else a Saturn-Mars native would turn out to a car mechanic and someone else to

be a car engine designer.

 

Regards

-m-

 

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara

jyotish-vidya

Monday, 7 July, 2008 11:26:14 PM

Re: Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

 

 

Dear Monica,

 

Thank you for my reply. I already agree and understand thoroughly.

This has been my own personal outlook from the very start. However my

question is different than what you addressed, unless I am not reading

you correctly.

 

My question is..

 

SUN: Intrinsically malefic, but for Sagittarius ascendants it is a

benefic lord of the 9th. How do you personally counterbalance it being

malefic from one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

SATURN: Intrinsically very malefic, but for Taurus ascendants it is

Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the two angles:

intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but by lordship it is extremely

benefic?

 

Is the question clearer?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:42 AM, monica Astro wrote:

 

> Dear Vic

>

> If we have to make a good sandwich, the bread has to spend time in

> oven also.

> Thus Sun, Ma, Su is a malefic in terms, that it is responsible for

> such areas in life which are closer to a Roasting.

>

> But again great accomplishment cannot come without the strength

> which comes from being hard roasted.

> Like Henry Ford, roasted till 52 and then created an empire. (if the

> dates are not too off)

>

> What I think, is more important in a Kundli may be see roasting

> agents and then to see if the roasting will totally burn out the

> individual or add shining lusture to the individual.after he comes

> out of it.

>

> A person without much Roasting in his life may start to stink real

> bad as he grows old.

> Too much punya being consumed in one life.

>

> Just my 2 cents, regarding the " benefic " effects of " maelfics " .

> After a time it is becomes difficult to seperate malefics from

> benefics and

> the only thing than can be said is that such and sun opportunity or

> experience can minifest which the person has to face sometime.

> Good or bad and what to take out from that the person has to decide

> with this free will.

> I think an satrologer should normally not say, that something is

> good or something is bad.

>

> Many great novel writers were severe drug addicts at sometime, over

> came it and then went on to write master pieces on those themes.

> Had they never been to jail or suffered what they did, such novels

> would not be there.

>

> Kindly be assured that i am not being critical to what you have

> written.

> Just random thoughts.

>

> Regards

> -m-

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Jyotish Vidya <jyotish-vidya>

> Sunday, 6 July, 2008 11:43:08 PM

> Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

>

>

> Dear All:

>

> Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

> Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

> benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

> one angle of vision and benefic from another?

>

> Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

> Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

> two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

> is extremely benefic?

>

> Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

> for each and what that would indicate to you?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

>

>

>

> Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite

> group at http://in.promos. / groups/

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic

 

I think it goes like this.

 

Lets say " karate " or " kick boxng " is " malefic stuff " . Violence, hard training

etc.

Now Assuming Sun signifies Karate and thus gets the adjective " malefic " .

 

If Sun is strong and lord good houses, karate skills should come,

and probably 9th house would get a boost due to karate or he can have good luck

due to karate.

Thus an seemingly intrinsic malefic attribute gives benefic results.

 

If Sun is weak and sits in duststhan, some dust would come and try his karate on

the native.

Malefic giving karate weakness and inviting troubles from karate-strong enemies.

or he gets a broken rib and leg while doing karate.

 

Astro Chart of Bruclee etc fighters should be interesting case of malefics

giving speed & strength in activities related to them.

 

In that sevent planet in one axis email, Saturn and mars together gives

technical or logical outlook.

Strength of logic or deductive powers and how far and deep it goes could depends

on benefic lordships and benefic aspect of planets or being able to influence

some planet or bhavas which is related to mind, thinking, and is strong etc.

Else a Saturn-Mars native would turn out to a car mechanic and someone else to

be a car engine designer.

 

Regards

-m-

 

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara

jyotish-vidya

Monday, 7 July, 2008 11:26:14 PM

Re: Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

 

 

Dear Monica,

 

Thank you for my reply. I already agree and understand thoroughly.

This has been my own personal outlook from the very start. However my

question is different than what you addressed, unless I am not reading

you correctly.

 

My question is..

 

SUN: Intrinsically malefic, but for Sagittarius ascendants it is a

benefic lord of the 9th. How do you personally counterbalance it being

malefic from one angle of vision and benefic from another?

 

SATURN: Intrinsically very malefic, but for Taurus ascendants it is

Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the two angles:

intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but by lordship it is extremely

benefic?

 

Is the question clearer?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Jul 7, 2008, at 1:42 AM, monica Astro wrote:

 

> Dear Vic

>

> If we have to make a good sandwich, the bread has to spend time in

> oven also.

> Thus Sun, Ma, Su is a malefic in terms, that it is responsible for

> such areas in life which are closer to a Roasting.

>

> But again great accomplishment cannot come without the strength

> which comes from being hard roasted.

> Like Henry Ford, roasted till 52 and then created an empire. (if the

> dates are not too off)

>

> What I think, is more important in a Kundli may be see roasting

> agents and then to see if the roasting will totally burn out the

> individual or add shining lusture to the individual.after he comes

> out of it.

>

> A person without much Roasting in his life may start to stink real

> bad as he grows old.

> Too much punya being consumed in one life.

>

> Just my 2 cents, regarding the " benefic " effects of " maelfics " .

> After a time it is becomes difficult to seperate malefics from

> benefics and

> the only thing than can be said is that such and sun opportunity or

> experience can minifest which the person has to face sometime.

> Good or bad and what to take out from that the person has to decide

> with this free will.

> I think an satrologer should normally not say, that something is

> good or something is bad.

>

> Many great novel writers were severe drug addicts at sometime, over

> came it and then went on to write master pieces on those themes.

> Had they never been to jail or suffered what they did, such novels

> would not be there.

>

> Kindly be assured that i am not being critical to what you have

> written.

> Just random thoughts.

>

> Regards

> -m-

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Jyotish Vidya <jyotish-vidya>

> Sunday, 6 July, 2008 11:43:08 PM

> Functional vs. Intrinsic Malefics

>

>

> Dear All:

>

> Take the sun for example. It is Intrinsically a mild malefic. For

> Sagitarians, it rules the 9th House and thus becomes functionally

> benefic. How do you personally counterbalance it being malefic from

> one angle of vision and benefic from another?

>

> Take a second example, Saturn is intrinsically very malefic. For

> Taurus ascendants it is Yogakar Benefic. So how would you balance the

> two angles: intrinsically it is extremely malefic, but functionally it

> is extremely benefic?

>

> Can you give two or three practical examples or a house/sign placement

> for each and what that would indicate to you?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

>

>

>

> Bring your gang together. Do your thing. Find your favourite

> group at http://in.promos. / groups/

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...