Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

MOMENTARY PLEASURE.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Bhaskar,

 

Far better to use this as an opportunity to teach rather than to condemn. By

doing so doubts as to the intentions of the Rishis may be dispelled for

many...

 

The best teachers endeavour to lead softly without denying sincere students

the opportunity to learn from mistakes/misconceptions...wouldn't you say? A

constructive debate on the points raised by Balaji would, I'm sure, be very

helpful to many who may have similar questions in the back of their mind.

 

The times we live in (particularly in the West) are very different today and

many basic values have sadly fallen by the wayside. So it's not uncommon for

the younger generation to question age-old principles. A wise jyotisha would

welcome this opportunity to guide rather than condemn...condemnation is

easy! It's not so easy to lead gently through the maze of uncertainty

towards clarity.

 

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

jyotish-vidya

___

 

 

-

" Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

<jyotish-vidya >

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:00 PM

MOMENTARY PLEASURE.

 

 

Nowadays its become a habit to create uproars or gain momentary

recognitions , and one torches big men or people of repute or

the famous ones to prove himself smarter and very wise.

 

Those who find any injsutice in any Shastras, should not try to then

open these shastras, neither refer to them, neither gain fame from

them, neither use them for a living, and just shut up.

 

Trying to find fault or injustices without giving thought

for retrospection about the times and circumstances when these

shastras were written, one should not make comments unnecessarily and

show that the writers were wrong or unjustified. Its like eating food

from a plate and then making hole in that same plate. Instead of

keeping a biased and negative approach and unnecessary uncalled

favourutism towards the fairer sex, if one looks and studies with a

positive approach, one would know that the rishis form the inner

Circle of Gods advisors , and certainly they knew what they were

writing.

It is our mind of today which is narrowed, trying to give credence to

the soft species, because of shortcomings in our own self, and not

because of any unlawful dispense of justice by the Rishis, that we

see the differences shown towards both the sexes in the jyotish

Shastras.

 

Its high time that we start feeling sorry for ourselves rather than

for the luminaries like Sitaji and the likes,

for if its the men who have caused sufferings towards them,

then we belong to the same species.

We have to remove first lust from within us, then we should talk

about cleansing our ancestors and their sermons (Jyotish or

whatever). Lets bother about ourselves rather than create

controversies about nothing just because we have spare time on hand.

We are going to become ancestors soon, just a matter of time, just

get ready to be remembered as good ones.

 

Bhaskar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Madam,

 

As You say so

 

But the points raised in this issue and initiated

were not raised by students, and would on the contrary

raise doubts in students minds., those who must

have never thought on those lines, would now start thinking,

" Yes why this discriminations ? " Actually no discrimination

is there. On the contrary Women were more revered in the olden

days and society, and there was no place for discriminations

unless the women was unchaste. Such type of issues if raised

by students I can understand, but if unnecessary provoked

into thinking by Men bigger by age and who are supposed to

be responsible,, it will lead to more confusions rather

than any solutions for the beginenrs and newcomers in astrology.

This is like creating something out of nothing.

 

And Yes I agree what Your goodself said. Condemnation is

easy.That was already done by Shri Balaji. I was just doing

the repair work. Okay and Yes it should be done in a constructive

manner and not in a vociferoius way, as I did. That part

shall try to complete well.

 

Thanks and regards for being kind and patient.

 

Sincerely,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

jyotish-vidya , " Wendy Vasicek " <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar,

>

> Far better to use this as an opportunity to teach rather than to

condemn. By

> doing so doubts as to the intentions of the Rishis may be dispelled

for

> many...

>

> The best teachers endeavour to lead softly without denying sincere

students

> the opportunity to learn from mistakes/misconceptions...wouldn't

you say? A

> constructive debate on the points raised by Balaji would, I'm sure,

be very

> helpful to many who may have similar questions in the back of their

mind.

>

> The times we live in (particularly in the West) are very different

today and

> many basic values have sadly fallen by the wayside. So it's not

uncommon for

> the younger generation to question age-old principles. A wise

jyotisha would

> welcome this opportunity to guide rather than

condemn...condemnation is

> easy! It's not so easy to lead gently through the maze of

uncertainty

> towards clarity.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com

> jyotish-vidya

> ___

>

>

> -

> " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

> <jyotish-vidya >

> Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:00 PM

> MOMENTARY PLEASURE.

>

>

> Nowadays its become a habit to create uproars or gain momentary

> recognitions , and one torches big men or people of repute or

> the famous ones to prove himself smarter and very wise.

>

> Those who find any injsutice in any Shastras, should not try to then

> open these shastras, neither refer to them, neither gain fame from

> them, neither use them for a living, and just shut up.

>

> Trying to find fault or injustices without giving thought

> for retrospection about the times and circumstances when these

> shastras were written, one should not make comments unnecessarily

and

> show that the writers were wrong or unjustified. Its like eating

food

> from a plate and then making hole in that same plate. Instead of

> keeping a biased and negative approach and unnecessary uncalled

> favourutism towards the fairer sex, if one looks and studies with a

> positive approach, one would know that the rishis form the inner

> Circle of Gods advisors , and certainly they knew what they were

> writing.

> It is our mind of today which is narrowed, trying to give credence

to

> the soft species, because of shortcomings in our own self, and not

> because of any unlawful dispense of justice by the Rishis, that we

> see the differences shown towards both the sexes in the jyotish

> Shastras.

>

> Its high time that we start feeling sorry for ourselves rather than

> for the luminaries like Sitaji and the likes,

> for if its the men who have caused sufferings towards them,

> then we belong to the same species.

> We have to remove first lust from within us, then we should talk

> about cleansing our ancestors and their sermons (Jyotish or

> whatever). Lets bother about ourselves rather than create

> controversies about nothing just because we have spare time on hand.

> We are going to become ancestors soon, just a matter of time, just

> get ready to be remembered as good ones.

>

> Bhaskar.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...