Guest guest Posted July 24, 2007 Report Share Posted July 24, 2007 Res. Members, Recently i have come accross a book which claims to be an authentic translation of Revrad Pandit ji's 1939 work titled as " amudrik ke lalkitab ke farman " which was forwaded by the knownpersonalties of lakitab such as Rajender bhatia, Rajivee kumar khattar,Maheshwar Singh Kondal, and Respected yograj parbhakar. Friends i was shocked that the page no seven of the book says that Mars (mangal) is significator of Sasural (in-laws) whereas there is no mention of Rahu in this regard. Freinds, the page no. 203 shocked me a lot which that Rahu, which is inimical to Sun Debilitats it, I could not understand how come my learned freinds who have forwarded the book by saying that this book would keep you away from " DALDA " books. Freinds, I am sorry to say, but duty bound to convey to the group members that What so ever you do but for god sake do not defame the Gods word said throgh lalkitab. Please take care while forwarding any book on lal kitab because you are esteemed scholars of lal kitab. If I am wrong please reply my quires. I have a lot of quires on this book from my reveren learned firends on this book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Sir, It is the hight of shamelessness when Mr Rajinder Bhatia said that the correction sheet for the 1939 lal kitab was not added into the book because the originality of the book would be bad. The names you have mention in your messege have nothing to do with lal kitab. they are not known as lal kitab astrologers. I have not seen even a single horoscope studied by them in any of the lal kitab group. But all of them have given their message in the 1939 book as if they are great astrologers. Very shamefull. Sir the truth is that these people themselve did not knew that there is a correction sheet for the 1939 lalkitab. They came to knew about the correction sheet only after the 1939 book was printed in hindi. Sir the lal kitab on the net is not known because of these people. People know lal kitab because of persons like you who has been serving people for so many years. thankfull, HS Gill lalkitab , " Umesh Sharma " <mudit982001 wrote: > > Res. Members, > Recently i have come accross a book which claims to be an authentic > translation of Revrad Pandit ji's 1939 work titled as " amudrik ke > lalkitab ke farman " which was forwaded by the knownpersonalties of > lakitab such as Rajender bhatia, Rajivee kumar khattar,Maheshwar Singh > Kondal, and Respected yograj parbhakar. Friends i was shocked that the > page no seven of the book says that Mars (mangal) is significator of > Sasural (in-laws) whereas there is no mention of Rahu in this regard. > Freinds, the page no. 203 shocked me a lot which that Rahu, which is > inimical to Sun Debilitats it, I could not understand how come my > learned freinds who have forwarded the book by saying that this book > would keep you away from " DALDA " books. > Freinds, I am sorry to say, but duty bound to convey to the group > members that What so ever you do but for god sake do not defame the > Gods word said throgh lalkitab. Please take care while forwarding any > book on lal kitab because you are esteemed scholars of lal kitab. > If I am wrong please reply my quires. I have a lot of quires on this > book from my reveren learned firends on this book. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.