Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Hi Everyone Have saturn in 10th house retrograde in cancer sign so my saturn is weak though iam libra asc...but amitabh ji the celebrity has faced tough times also and when he was 36 he has shine so saturn has shown him bad times also... --- astro_tellerkerala <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > om krishna guru > > dear vikas , > > Can u post the data and Please post your > reserch or cronologiacal > order of events ,as it may help others to study or > judge the result of a > chart. > > But did u find why saturn irrespective of vakra > has given good > results ,we r eager to know your findings . > > Let us start a healthy discussion and i hope all > gurus and seniors and > other student s will contribute to the thread . > > Also please ,if possible ,disclose how far we can > rely the data which > u hav . > > regds sunil nair. > > http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/ > <http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/> > > for naadi readings > < > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah. > > > vedic astrology , > " vikas_asthana009 " > <vikas_asthana009 wrote: > > > > ~JAI BALAJI MAHARAJ~ > > > > gaurav ji , > > i didnt jump to conclusion , what i wrote or > posted was just a small > > segment of the total thesis i have > > i was just answering the question of our fellow > astrologer who was > > not very sure of saturn and related influences on > amitabh > > bachchan ...................... > > > > as far as correct birth data is concerned , i can > assure u , its > > 200% correct , coz i havent taken this data , from > any source on > > internet , i have personal relations ...and thus > data is absolutely > > correct.... > > thank u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Gaurav > Ghosh " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gaurav.ghosh@ wrote: > > > > > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > > > Vikas, > > > Read Amitabh's chart thoroughly (I dont know > which data you are > > > using as in the world of internet, there are > many speculative Data > > > of Celebrities.) If you have the correct chart, > then see why > > Amitabh > > > had a good time in Saturn Mahadas, when the > planet is Retro, > > without > > > any beneficial aspect or in 6th house frm D-10 > Lagna. > > > See the Antardasa trends, their position in D-10 > chart, also see > > the > > > Nakshatra Lord of Saturn & its position. > Consider Saturn's > > position > > > in D-9 as well. DONT JUMP INTO CONCLUSIONS! > SOMEONE HAVING ALREADY > > > STRONG SATURN & WEARING 1000 NEELAM WILL NOT DO > ANYTHING GOOD!! > > > Thanq, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > " vikas_asthana009 " > > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote: > > > > > > > > my dear frend , whosoever has posted the > material written > > > > underneath " that amitabh was over shadowed by > rajesh khanna " > > > > > > > > i too agree that there was a time , when > amitabh was > > overshadowed > > > > by then superstar rajesh khanna , but at that > time , amitabh was > > > > through ,his guru mahadasha with rahu's antar > whch lasted in > > > > 1973 ......... > > > > > > > > as long as amitabh had GURU MD WITH RAHU ANTAR > , he was subsied > > by > > > > rajesh khanna but since 1973 ..... whn MD OF > SATURN STARTED IN > > > 1973 > > > > he became unstoppable ,,,, with release of > ZANJIR , IN 1973 , > > AND > > > > LATER THE ULTIMATE BLOCKBUSTER > " SHOLAY " .......... > > > > AND THEN CAME A SERIES OF IT , ....including > ,KAALIYA , > > > > MR.NATWARLAL , NAMAK-HARAM, DON ETC TO NAME A > FEW,,,,, > > > > > > > > HIS SATURN IS UNDOUBTEDLY STRONG ....HE IS > ALSO WEARING TWO BLUE > > > > SAPPHIRE TOGETHER IN HIS MIDDLE FINGER > .....GIVING HIM A > > > TREMENDOUS > > > > BOOST................. > > > > SO PLS THERE IS NO POINT OF DISCUSSING , THAT > AMITABH DIDNT HAD > > > GUD > > > > SATURN , OR FAVOURABLE GIFTS FROM SATURN , > > > > MOREOVER HIS ASCENDANT IS ALSO " KUMBHA " , SO .I > HOPE U UNDERSTAND > > > THE > > > > REST, > > > > AND AS FAR AS HIS CORRECT HOROSCOPE IS > CONCERNED , PLS DONT > > WORRY, > > > > i have exact data's of almost all celebrities, > ....... > > > > hope to have a warm discussion. > > > > vikas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > " Rohiniranjan " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But did Amitabh not gain the superstar state > rather quickly, > > > > despite > > > > > initially being somewhat overshadowed by the > superstar Rajesh > > > > Khanna > > > > > of those times? The smouldering intensity > that === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 respected gurus, thank u very much for participating in this discussion and making it such a lively one, ill post " my research on saturn and its influences on AMITABH BACHCHAN " .......ARRANGED CHRONOLOGICALLY LITTLE LATER , as now i am busy analysing horoscope of few important celbritiesor better would be , about whomsoever who made a mark in history ,,,,,so presetly....my research iis on " adolf hitler " as soon as i finish anlysing hitler's horoscope , ill post u ,materail i have about amitabh....... as as far as sunil nair ji asked regarding , correctness of data's i can only , say that both of us hail from same city , and thus know few persons , who are related to ...........hope u got it ..... eager to hear ur views vikas vedic astrology , " astro_tellerkerala " <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > > om krishna guru > > dear vikas , > > Can u post the data and Please post your reserch or cronologiacal > order of events ,as it may help others to study or judge the result of a > chart. > > But did u find why saturn irrespective of vakra has given good > results ,we r eager to know your findings . > > Let us start a healthy discussion and i hope all gurus and seniors and > other student s will contribute to the thread . > > Also please ,if possible ,disclose how far we can rely the data which > u hav . > > regds sunil nair. > > http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/ > <http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/> > > for naadi readings > < > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah. > > > vedic astrology , " vikas_asthana009 " > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote: > > > > ~JAI BALAJI MAHARAJ~ > > > > gaurav ji , > > i didnt jump to conclusion , what i wrote or posted was just a small > > segment of the total thesis i have > > i was just answering the question of our fellow astrologer who was > > not very sure of saturn and related influences on amitabh > > bachchan ...................... > > > > as far as correct birth data is concerned , i can assure u , its > > 200% correct , coz i havent taken this data , from any source on > > internet , i have personal relations ...and thus data is absolutely > > correct.... > > thank u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gaurav.ghosh@ wrote: > > > > > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > > > Vikas, > > > Read Amitabh's chart thoroughly (I dont know which data you are > > > using as in the world of internet, there are many speculative Data > > > of Celebrities.) If you have the correct chart, then see why > > Amitabh > > > had a good time in Saturn Mahadas, when the planet is Retro, > > without > > > any beneficial aspect or in 6th house frm D-10 Lagna. > > > See the Antardasa trends, their position in D-10 chart, also see > > the > > > Nakshatra Lord of Saturn & its position. Consider Saturn's > > position > > > in D-9 as well. DONT JUMP INTO CONCLUSIONS! SOMEONE HAVING ALREADY > > > STRONG SATURN & WEARING 1000 NEELAM WILL NOT DO ANYTHING GOOD!! > > > Thanq, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " vikas_asthana009 " > > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote: > > > > > > > > my dear frend , whosoever has posted the material written > > > > underneath " that amitabh was over shadowed by rajesh khanna " > > > > > > > > i too agree that there was a time , when amitabh was > > overshadowed > > > > by then superstar rajesh khanna , but at that time , amitabh was > > > > through ,his guru mahadasha with rahu's antar whch lasted in > > > > 1973 ......... > > > > > > > > as long as amitabh had GURU MD WITH RAHU ANTAR , he was subsied > > by > > > > rajesh khanna but since 1973 ..... whn MD OF SATURN STARTED IN > > > 1973 > > > > he became unstoppable ,,,, with release of ZANJIR , IN 1973 , > > AND > > > > LATER THE ULTIMATE BLOCKBUSTER " SHOLAY " .......... > > > > AND THEN CAME A SERIES OF IT , ....including ,KAALIYA , > > > > MR.NATWARLAL , NAMAK-HARAM, DON ETC TO NAME A FEW,,,,, > > > > > > > > HIS SATURN IS UNDOUBTEDLY STRONG ....HE IS ALSO WEARING TWO BLUE > > > > SAPPHIRE TOGETHER IN HIS MIDDLE FINGER .....GIVING HIM A > > > TREMENDOUS > > > > BOOST................. > > > > SO PLS THERE IS NO POINT OF DISCUSSING , THAT AMITABH DIDNT HAD > > > GUD > > > > SATURN , OR FAVOURABLE GIFTS FROM SATURN , > > > > MOREOVER HIS ASCENDANT IS ALSO " KUMBHA " , SO .I HOPE U UNDERSTAND > > > THE > > > > REST, > > > > AND AS FAR AS HIS CORRECT HOROSCOPE IS CONCERNED , PLS DONT > > WORRY, > > > > i have exact data's of almost all celebrities, ....... > > > > hope to have a warm discussion. > > > > vikas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Rohiniranjan " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But did Amitabh not gain the superstar state rather quickly, > > > > despite > > > > > initially being somewhat overshadowed by the superstar Rajesh > > > > Khanna > > > > > of those times? The smouldering intensity that became > > Amitabh's > > > > > trademark was beautifully portrayed by him in the schizoid, > > > > > introverted poet that he played in Saat Hindustani. But > > really, > > > it > > > > is > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.