Guest guest Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 DEAR VIC JI, as wrote gayatri mantra in your mail , that is simlest form called jyoti gayatri, it is also have 4 forms for 4 varnas, those have taken diksha do japa of brahm gayatri (saptvyahti yukta) i understand u must be aware with all 4 forms (kinds) of gayatri mantra. love niket PS: shree bhaskar ji is very good friend of mine, we never feel bad each other's saying, and never did any fighting. he is good soul, but sometime he jumps in with some good words. i love him . and he also love me. jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara wrote: > > delicious. dhanyavad. > =) > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:40 AM, astroiniket wrote: > > > shree vic ji, i accept your limca, and i offer you a cup of coffee. > > > > rgds > > niket > > > > > > jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > >> > >> Yes, let's drink a limca, now Niketji. > >> > >> On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:22 AM, astroiniket wrote: > >> > >>> dear vic ji, > >>> > >>> now i understand there is some confusion, ok let me clear it. > >>> > >>> **god is saakara and nirakara both** for detail if you can read > >>> ramcharit manas, where shree sati ji wife of lord shiva asked same > >>> question to lord shiva.*** > >>> > >>> i will use word almighty here. > >>> > >>> 1. brahma, visnu, mahesh, and others and theri forms are not supreem > >>> almighty. > >>> > >>> 2. they are from of supreem almighty. > >>> > >>> 3. as one wish to see almighty in desired form , almighty will give > >>> darshan in that form. > >>> > >>> 4. for almighty no form is required, almighty have all forms like > >>> narsimhavtar, or all dashavtara. > >>> > >>> 5. almighty him self or herself in every bit of this universe and > >>> this > >>> whole universe is in his left foot's thumb's nail. > >>> > >>> 6. human have very limited vision, thoughts, knowledge, imagine etc. > >>> > >>> 7. almighty is unlimited in all means, and is creator of this > >>> universe > >>> it includes all cast which u can think and which we do not know. > >>> > >>> 8. these 9 planets governs only this galaxy and it's planets or > >>> stars > >>> whatever is in this galaxy, but remem in universe broad spectrum is > >>> cosmos may be billions of galaxy's are there, for detail pls read > >>> veads specialy sam and yagurveda. > >>> > >>> 10. one who is limited cant say any thing about unlimted, that > >>> unlimted when he / she wants to play , play with us through his or > >>> her > >>> maya. > >>> > >>> i think now both we will get shanti. > >>> > >>> rgds > >>> niket > >>> > >>> jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Dear Rajeev, > >>>> > >>>> This topic *is* shanti. =) > >>>> > >>>> Form / noform is fine. As I said, Brahmajyoti is wonderful. One > >>>> should > >>>> be a brahmavadi who wants to appreciate the non-form of Godhead, > >>>> not a > >>>> mayavadi who declares that the forms of Godhead are maya or > >>>> prakriti. > >>>> There are many paths. Many of them are good, not all of them are. > >>>> Mayavad is not a good path. > >>>> > >>>> Yours > >>>> Vic DiCara > >>>> http://www.vedicastrologer.net > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 well noted vic ji i will follow your advice. love niket jyotish-vidya , " astroiniket " <astroiniket wrote: > > DEAR VIC JI, > > as wrote gayatri mantra in your mail , that is simlest form called > jyoti gayatri, it is also have 4 forms for 4 varnas, those have taken > diksha do japa of brahm gayatri (saptvyahti yukta) i understand u must > be aware with all 4 forms (kinds) of gayatri mantra. > > love > niket > > PS: shree bhaskar ji is very good friend of mine, we never feel bad > each other's saying, and never did any fighting. he is good soul, but > sometime he jumps in with some good words. i love him . and he also > love me. > > jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > > > delicious. dhanyavad. > > =) > > > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:40 AM, astroiniket wrote: > > > > > shree vic ji, i accept your limca, and i offer you a cup of coffee. > > > > > > rgds > > > niket > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes, let's drink a limca, now Niketji. > > >> > > >> On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:22 AM, astroiniket wrote: > > >> > > >>> dear vic ji, > > >>> > > >>> now i understand there is some confusion, ok let me clear it. > > >>> > > >>> **god is saakara and nirakara both** for detail if you can read > > >>> ramcharit manas, where shree sati ji wife of lord shiva asked same > > >>> question to lord shiva.*** > > >>> > > >>> i will use word almighty here. > > >>> > > >>> 1. brahma, visnu, mahesh, and others and theri forms are not supreem > > >>> almighty. > > >>> > > >>> 2. they are from of supreem almighty. > > >>> > > >>> 3. as one wish to see almighty in desired form , almighty will give > > >>> darshan in that form. > > >>> > > >>> 4. for almighty no form is required, almighty have all forms like > > >>> narsimhavtar, or all dashavtara. > > >>> > > >>> 5. almighty him self or herself in every bit of this universe and > > >>> this > > >>> whole universe is in his left foot's thumb's nail. > > >>> > > >>> 6. human have very limited vision, thoughts, knowledge, imagine etc. > > >>> > > >>> 7. almighty is unlimited in all means, and is creator of this > > >>> universe > > >>> it includes all cast which u can think and which we do not know. > > >>> > > >>> 8. these 9 planets governs only this galaxy and it's planets or > > >>> stars > > >>> whatever is in this galaxy, but remem in universe broad spectrum is > > >>> cosmos may be billions of galaxy's are there, for detail pls read > > >>> veads specialy sam and yagurveda. > > >>> > > >>> 10. one who is limited cant say any thing about unlimted, that > > >>> unlimted when he / she wants to play , play with us through his or > > >>> her > > >>> maya. > > >>> > > >>> i think now both we will get shanti. > > >>> > > >>> rgds > > >>> niket > > >>> > > >>> jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Dear Rajeev, > > >>>> > > >>>> This topic *is* shanti. =) > > >>>> > > >>>> Form / noform is fine. As I said, Brahmajyoti is wonderful. One > > >>>> should > > >>>> be a brahmavadi who wants to appreciate the non-form of Godhead, > > >>>> not a > > >>>> mayavadi who declares that the forms of Godhead are maya or > > >>>> prakriti. > > >>>> There are many paths. Many of them are good, not all of them are. > > >>>> Mayavad is not a good path. > > >>>> > > >>>> Yours > > >>>> Vic DiCara > > >>>> http://www.vedicastrologer.net > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --- > > >>> > > >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2008 Report Share Posted June 25, 2008 Dear Niketji, You may invite me anytime whenever we have to defend Lord Shiva. You will find me ahead of the gang, defending Bholenath Baba. If I am misunderstood then as I said I am extremely sorry. Any such feeling was unintentional if it has been portrayed by mistake or my language. Your image has always been in my mind of a good man, so please forgive me, if at times I jump in to defend Krishna or just speak out when I feel like. I am sure you would like a forthright fearless starighforwward friend, rather than a quiet domicile one. Love, bhaskar. jyotish-vidya , " astroiniket " <astroiniket wrote: > > DEAR VIC JI, > > as wrote gayatri mantra in your mail , that is simlest form called > jyoti gayatri, it is also have 4 forms for 4 varnas, those have taken > diksha do japa of brahm gayatri (saptvyahti yukta) i understand u must > be aware with all 4 forms (kinds) of gayatri mantra. > > love > niket > > PS: shree bhaskar ji is very good friend of mine, we never feel bad > each other's saying, and never did any fighting. he is good soul, but > sometime he jumps in with some good words. i love him . and he also > love me. > > jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > > > delicious. dhanyavad. > > =) > > > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:40 AM, astroiniket wrote: > > > > > shree vic ji, i accept your limca, and i offer you a cup of coffee. > > > > > > rgds > > > niket > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes, let's drink a limca, now Niketji. > > >> > > >> On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:22 AM, astroiniket wrote: > > >> > > >>> dear vic ji, > > >>> > > >>> now i understand there is some confusion, ok let me clear it. > > >>> > > >>> **god is saakara and nirakara both** for detail if you can read > > >>> ramcharit manas, where shree sati ji wife of lord shiva asked same > > >>> question to lord shiva.*** > > >>> > > >>> i will use word almighty here. > > >>> > > >>> 1. brahma, visnu, mahesh, and others and theri forms are not supreem > > >>> almighty. > > >>> > > >>> 2. they are from of supreem almighty. > > >>> > > >>> 3. as one wish to see almighty in desired form , almighty will give > > >>> darshan in that form. > > >>> > > >>> 4. for almighty no form is required, almighty have all forms like > > >>> narsimhavtar, or all dashavtara. > > >>> > > >>> 5. almighty him self or herself in every bit of this universe and > > >>> this > > >>> whole universe is in his left foot's thumb's nail. > > >>> > > >>> 6. human have very limited vision, thoughts, knowledge, imagine etc. > > >>> > > >>> 7. almighty is unlimited in all means, and is creator of this > > >>> universe > > >>> it includes all cast which u can think and which we do not know. > > >>> > > >>> 8. these 9 planets governs only this galaxy and it's planets or > > >>> stars > > >>> whatever is in this galaxy, but remem in universe broad spectrum is > > >>> cosmos may be billions of galaxy's are there, for detail pls read > > >>> veads specialy sam and yagurveda. > > >>> > > >>> 10. one who is limited cant say any thing about unlimted, that > > >>> unlimted when he / she wants to play , play with us through his or > > >>> her > > >>> maya. > > >>> > > >>> i think now both we will get shanti. > > >>> > > >>> rgds > > >>> niket > > >>> > > >>> jyotish-vidya , Vic D <vicdicara@> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Dear Rajeev, > > >>>> > > >>>> This topic *is* shanti. =) > > >>>> > > >>>> Form / noform is fine. As I said, Brahmajyoti is wonderful. One > > >>>> should > > >>>> be a brahmavadi who wants to appreciate the non-form of Godhead, > > >>>> not a > > >>>> mayavadi who declares that the forms of Godhead are maya or > > >>>> prakriti. > > >>>> There are many paths. Many of them are good, not all of them are. > > >>>> Mayavad is not a good path. > > >>>> > > >>>> Yours > > >>>> Vic DiCara > > >>>> http://www.vedicastrologer.net > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --- > > >>> > > >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.