Guest guest Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Dear Group, It would be appreciated if members could please refrain from crossposting. I'm sure we can manage to convey our point on a particular topic without including posts from other groups. Thank You, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Dear Wendy I think this post/request is due to my mail to vic, it is just a coincidence it came as u c the 1st reply i had given did not have it once i sent it a few min later this mail came in JR so felt it conveys a point as none of the said members in that r part of JV felt it was `harmless' and nothing else was intended and other than saying how birth time can be wrongly given and taken us for a ride and then they give such data to rectify the data when they cud have given the same info and data and birth time not being certain in the first place.. the pointis is in a family or known astrologer handling some from a family will know either before hand on possible lagna, rasi, patterns, sex better than a new one as SUCH RISKS exist, EITHER PEOPLE IMPISHLY wanting to test us or playing around with data-net result people like Vics father'c comments will do more rounds we have to take it into consideration, ask for verifiable data and proceed, in personal consultations I do this. can't risk my work. my intention was to highlight a point than cross post. but will keep this in mind in future and avoid them Best wishes Prashant kumar On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya wrote: > Dear Group, > > It would be appreciated if members could please refrain from > crossposting. I'm sure we can manage to convey our point on a particular > topic without including posts from other groups. > > Thank You, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> > ___ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Dear Prashant, I understand your point. However people do tend to follow the lead set by others, and if I were to just sit back without commenting we could, before long, be inundated with posts from other groups...I'm sure you understand this :-) PS: I'm still not 100% after battling a nasty infection, but hope to be more active on the group sooner rather than later. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " astro desk " <astro.prashantkumar <jyotish-vidya > Friday, June 06, 2008 12:42 PM Re: Crossposting Dear Wendy I think this post/request is due to my mail to vic, it is just a coincidence it came as u c the 1st reply i had given did not have it once i sent it a few min later this mail came in JR so felt it conveys a point as none of the said members in that r part of JV felt it was `harmless' and nothing else was intended and other than saying how birth time can be wrongly given and taken us for a ride and then they give such data to rectify the data when they cud have given the same info and data and birth time not being certain in the first place.. the pointis is in a family or known astrologer handling some from a family will know either before hand on possible lagna, rasi, patterns, sex better than a new one as SUCH RISKS exist, EITHER PEOPLE IMPISHLY wanting to test us or playing around with data-net result people like Vics father'c comments will do more rounds we have to take it into consideration, ask for verifiable data and proceed, in personal consultations I do this. can't risk my work. my intention was to highlight a point than cross post. but will keep this in mind in future and avoid them Best wishes Prashant kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Dear Wendy get well, hope u recover faster, abt the cross posting as long as it is not based on a chart reading by someone else in another group any technical one can be allowed I guess, as no other way can we have said this point better, just a coincidence as I said will watch the future ones and probably check with u and post Best wishes prashant On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya wrote: > Dear Prashant, > > I understand your point. However people do tend to follow the lead set by > others, and if I were to just sit back without commenting we could, > before long, be inundated with posts from other groups...I'm sure you > understand this :-) > > PS: I'm still not 100% after battling a nasty infection, but hope to be > more active on the group sooner rather than later. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> > ___ > > - > " astro desk " <astro.prashantkumar<astro.prashantkumar%40gmail.com> > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Friday, June 06, 2008 12:42 PM > Re: Crossposting > > Dear Wendy > > I think this post/request is due to my mail to vic, it is just a > coincidence > it came as u c the 1st reply i had given did not have it once i sent it a > few min later this mail came in JR so felt it conveys a point as none of > the > said members in that r part of JV felt it was `harmless' and nothing > else > was intended and other than saying how birth time can be wrongly given > and > taken us for a ride and then they give such data to rectify the data when > they cud have given the same info and data and birth time not being > certain > in the first place.. > > the pointis is in a family or known astrologer handling some from a > family will know either before hand on possible lagna, rasi, patterns, > sex > better than a new one as SUCH RISKS exist, EITHER PEOPLE IMPISHLY wanting > to > test us or playing around with data-net result people like Vics father'c > comments will do more rounds > we have to take it into consideration, ask for verifiable data and > proceed, > in personal consultations I do this. can't risk my work. > > my intention was to highlight a point than cross post. > > but will keep this in mind in future and avoid them > > Best wishes > > Prashant kumar > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Prashantji, I think I finally understand your point. Let me restate it and you tell me if it's true: " To determine the gender is possible, but will require finely tuned considerations from divisional charts. These charts are strongly affected by relatively minor changes in the birth time. Therefore before even beginning an attempt to ascertain physical gender on the basis of a horoscope, first ensure that the birth time is highly accurate, and if necisarry, " rectify " it to make make events in life correspond with dasha predictions. " Did I get that right? - Vic On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:42 PM, astro desk wrote: > Dear Wendy > > I think this post/request is due to my mail to vic, it is just a > coincidence > it came as u c the 1st reply i had given did not have it once i sent > it a > few min later this mail came in JR so felt it conveys a point as > none of the > said members in that r part of JV felt it was `harmless' and > nothing else > was intended and other than saying how birth time can be wrongly > given and > taken us for a ride and then they give such data to rectify the data > when > they cud have given the same info and data and birth time not being > certain > in the first place.. > > the pointis is in a family or known astrologer handling some > from a > family will know either before hand on possible lagna, rasi, > patterns, sex > better than a new one as SUCH RISKS exist, EITHER PEOPLE IMPISHLY > wanting to > test us or playing around with data-net result people like Vics > father'c > comments will do more rounds > we have to take it into consideration, ask for verifiable data and > proceed, > in personal consultations I do this. can't risk my work. > > my intention was to highlight a point than cross post. > > but will keep this in mind in future and avoid them > > Best wishes > > Prashant kumar > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya > > > wrote: > >> Dear Group, >> >> It would be appreciated if members could please refrain from >> crossposting. I'm sure we can manage to convey our point on a >> particular >> topic without including posts from other groups. >> >> Thank You, >> Mrs. Wendy >> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> >> ___ >> >> >> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 Dear Vic gud that is the exact words I wud use to summerise what it is esp after so many posts on it I had said so at START and also add the major grahas positions too- the patterns, if u forget this u still will be in going in some circles u seem to be doing well though Best wishes Prashant On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Vic D <vicdicara wrote: > Prashantji, > > I think I finally understand your point. Let me restate it and you > tell me if it's true: > > " To determine the gender is possible, but will require finely tuned > considerations from divisional charts. These charts are strongly > affected by relatively minor changes in the birth time. Therefore > before even beginning an attempt to ascertain physical gender on the > basis of a horoscope, first ensure that the birth time is highly > accurate, and if necisarry, " rectify " it to make make events in life > correspond with dasha predictions. " > > Did I get that right? > > - Vic > > > On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:42 PM, astro desk wrote: > > > Dear Wendy > > > > I think this post/request is due to my mail to vic, it is just a > > coincidence > > it came as u c the 1st reply i had given did not have it once i sent > > it a > > few min later this mail came in JR so felt it conveys a point as > > none of the > > said members in that r part of JV felt it was `harmless' and > > nothing else > > was intended and other than saying how birth time can be wrongly > > given and > > taken us for a ride and then they give such data to rectify the data > > when > > they cud have given the same info and data and birth time not being > > certain > > in the first place.. > > > > the pointis is in a family or known astrologer handling some > > from a > > family will know either before hand on possible lagna, rasi, > > patterns, sex > > better than a new one as SUCH RISKS exist, EITHER PEOPLE IMPISHLY > > wanting to > > test us or playing around with data-net result people like Vics > > father'c > > comments will do more rounds > > we have to take it into consideration, ask for verifiable data and > > proceed, > > in personal consultations I do this. can't risk my work. > > > > my intention was to highlight a point than cross post. > > > > but will keep this in mind in future and avoid them > > > > Best wishes > > > > Prashant kumar > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya<jyotishvidya%40bigpond.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > >> Dear Group, > >> > >> It would be appreciated if members could please refrain from > >> crossposting. I'm sure we can manage to convey our point on a > >> particular > >> topic without including posts from other groups. > >> > >> Thank You, > >> Mrs. Wendy > >> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> < > http://jyotishvidya.com/> > >> ___ > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.