Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Balaji, It is nice to be back in the list after a break. I guess I missed lot of good discussion. I hope I will be able to catch up soon. Meanwhile, I saw your statement: //Rahu takes away what he gives// I don't think this can be blindly applied to all charts. One may have to study and ascertain under what conditions in the chart the above statement could be made. I have not studied the chart under queston. However, I can give an example where this is not true. My wife married me during Rah-Rah period about 23 years back. We are still married. In her chart, Rahu sits in Cancer, in the constellation of Mercury. Both Mercury and Rahu's dispositor Moon are in the 2nd bhava (Taurus) of family. Moon is exalted and Mercury is in a friendly sign. Rahu is in the 4th house. Only Sani aspects Rahu in the chart. I am not sure why your statement is not true for this chart. If you study the chart for which you made the statement, we might get some clues as to in what situations this dictum(?) could be applied. Regards, Krishna --- Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji wrote: > Prashant ji, > > Though your mail is addressed to Wendy ji, I thought I > would have a look--after all, you are almost exactly > one year my junior! :-) > > On a more serious front, I do not believe much in > yogas--I think that an understanding of the > significances of grahas and their house lordship is > more important than looking at yogas. > > ///yes there has alway been a shortage of money in my > house alway , No matter what we will have expenses = > income or less./// > > The lord of the 2nd is in the 12th from the 2nd in > Rahu's star. The 2nd and the 11th are afflicted by the > aspect of Sani, the lord of the 12th. The lord of the > 9th house of luck is in the 12th, in the star of 6th > lord Chandra. > > ///But becuase of the break up and shortage of cash , > made me stronger and made me finish my degree, and by > gods help , one of my business client and my mom's > brother sponsered me to do my higher study in > Australia./// > > This is indicated by the presence of 9th lord [higher > education/long distance travel] Sukra in the 12th > [stay abroad]. Sukra's presence in star of 6th lord > would have implied that you would have had to > struggle. But the 6th also rules maternal uncle, and > the lord of the 6th is in own star in the 8th > [overseas journeys]. > > ///At the age of 24 i fell in love with a female , we > had an affair for 4 -5 years/// > > You broke up when you were around 29, right? This > would have been around 2003, when Rahu's MD ended, > right? Rahu takes away what he gives. In your chart, > he is in the star of Ketu, aspected by 12th lord Sani. > > I am sure that some of the problems you have > faced--especially those relating to loneliness and > isolation--can be traced back to Kemadruma Yoga. But, > in the main, as can be seen, a lot of other factors > too have had a hand. > > ~~~~~~~~~ > Balaji Narasimhan > Author & Editor > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > ~~~~~~~~~ > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative > vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center. > http://autos./green_center/ > ______________________________\ ____Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on TV. http://tv./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Krishna, Balaji and All, These dictums which spring from certain situations, are noted, and become ingrained in jyotish lore. No doubt the dictum; " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his period " is an established dictum according to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be applied with common-sense. For example, Rahu dasa is followed by Jupiter who does not, by nature, signify loss or grief in any way. However, Rahu's antar in dasa of Jupiter, capable of bestowing great things when favourably placed, is followed by Saturn, significator of loss. Perhaps it's from here that this well-established dictum has arisen. But, once again, as with everything, we need to consider Saturn's intention in individual charts. Another scenario could be (favourable) Rahu dasa followed by afflicted F/M Jupiter? Parashara states: **72-75. Effects, like attachment to Yog, gain of wealth and grains during the first five months, sovereignty over a village, or country, meeting with a foreign king, well-being in the family, journeys to distant lands, bathing in holy places, will be derived in the Antar Dasha of Rahu in the Dasha of Guru, if Rahu is in his exaltation, in his own Rashi, in his Multrikon, or, if Rahu is in a Kendr, or Trikon, or, if Rahu receives a Drishti from the Lord of a Kendr, or, if Rahu is associated with, or receives a Drishti from a benefic.** When much is gained, much is lost... Little gained, little lost. Is this not so? PS: Braha says in his much acclaimed book; " Hindu scriptures also maintain that even when Rahu is well disposed, the benefits gained during the period will all be lost during the close of the dasa. " Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com jyotish-vidya ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 <jyotish-vidya > Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:20 PM Rahu takes away what he gives? Dear Balaji, It is nice to be back in the list after a break. I guess I missed lot of good discussion. I hope I will be able to catch up soon. Meanwhile, I saw your statement: //Rahu takes away what he gives// I don't think this can be blindly applied to all charts. One may have to study and ascertain under what conditions in the chart the above statement could be made. I have not studied the chart under queston. However, I can give an example where this is not true. My wife married me during Rah-Rah period about 23 years back. We are still married. In her chart, Rahu sits in Cancer, in the constellation of Mercury. Both Mercury and Rahu's dispositor Moon are in the 2nd bhava (Taurus) of family. Moon is exalted and Mercury is in a friendly sign. Rahu is in the 4th house. Only Sani aspects Rahu in the chart. I am not sure why your statement is not true for this chart. If you study the chart for which you made the statement, we might get some clues as to in what situations this dictum(?) could be applied. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Mrs. Wendy, Keeping malefic and benefic terms aside, I feel that no period is entirely good or entirely bad. What I may loose in one period, may be for my own good, which I may realise in another period. Again what I may loose, may look as loss for me, which actually may be profit for some ene else in my family, and may give me happiness and content inside, due to loosing the same. It sll in the approach, how we take. Every one has to loose someone from his family, in any of the long period Dashas like Rahu,Saturn,Jupiter or Mercury. Both good and bad may have to be witnessed by the native in all these long dashas. So ultimately loss and gain have to be experienced simultaneously, sooner or later, in all the MahaDasha Periods. It will be difficult to define what exactly is gained and whether whatever is gained will nececessarily be lost in that same Dasha. I keep my fingers crossed Mrs.Wendy, nowadays, neither look forward much happily to any approaching good period, neither unnecessary fear for , any expected dangers, because ultimately as you quoted, what is gained is lost, even any loss would be gained at some other time,i feel this works for most of the matters in our life, so we should never expect much, nor keep attachment,so as to overrule the fructification of these dictums, which otherwise would hurt us much, when manifested. sorry for the long response, regards, Bhaskar. jyotish-vidya , " Wendy Vasicek " <jyotish wrote: > > Dear Krishna, Balaji and All, > > These dictums which spring from certain situations, are noted, and become > ingrained in jyotish lore. No doubt the dictum; " What is gained during Rahu > period is lost at the end of his period " is an established dictum according > to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > applied with common-sense. > > For example, Rahu dasa is followed by Jupiter who does not, by nature, > signify loss or grief in any way. However, Rahu's antar in dasa of Jupiter, > capable of bestowing great things when favourably placed, is followed by > Saturn, significator of loss. Perhaps it's from here that this > well-established dictum has arisen. But, once again, as with everything, we > need to consider Saturn's intention in individual charts. > > Another scenario could be (favourable) Rahu dasa followed by afflicted F/M > Jupiter? > > Parashara states: > **72-75. Effects, like attachment to Yog, gain of wealth and grains during > the first five months, sovereignty over a village, or country, meeting with > a foreign king, well-being in the family, journeys to distant lands, bathing > in holy places, will be derived in the Antar Dasha of Rahu in the Dasha of > Guru, if Rahu is in his exaltation, in his own Rashi, in his Multrikon, or, > if Rahu is in a Kendr, or Trikon, or, if Rahu receives a Drishti from the > Lord of a Kendr, or, if Rahu is associated with, or receives a Drishti from > a benefic.** > > When much is gained, much is lost... Little gained, little lost. Is this not > so? > > PS: Braha says in his much acclaimed book; " Hindu scriptures also maintain > that even when Rahu is well disposed, the benefits gained during the period > will all be lost during the close of the dasa. " > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:20 PM > Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Balaji, > > It is nice to be back in the list after a break. I guess I > missed lot of good discussion. I hope I will be able to catch up > soon. > > Meanwhile, I saw your statement: > > //Rahu takes away what he gives// > > I don't think this can be blindly applied to all charts. One may > have to study and ascertain under what conditions in the chart > the above statement could be made. I have not studied the chart > under queston. However, I can give an example where this is not > true. My wife married me during Rah-Rah period about 23 years > back. We are still married. > > In her chart, Rahu sits in Cancer, in the constellation of > Mercury. Both Mercury and Rahu's dispositor Moon are in the 2nd > bhava (Taurus) of family. Moon is exalted and Mercury is in a > friendly sign. Rahu is in the 4th house. Only Sani aspects Rahu > in the chart. I am not sure why your statement is not true for > this chart. > > If you study the chart for which you made the statement, we > might get some clues as to in what situations this dictum(?) > could be applied. > > Regards, > Krishna > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Wendy, // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his period " is an established dictum according to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be applied with common-sense.// I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - when to apply this dictum? Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable to that chart? It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this dictum? Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: > Dear Krishna, Balaji and All, > > These dictums which spring from certain situations, are noted, > and become > ingrained in jyotish lore. No doubt the dictum; " What is > gained during Rahu > period is lost at the end of his period " is an established > dictum according > to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums > must be > applied with common-sense. > > For example, Rahu dasa is followed by Jupiter who does not, by > nature, > signify loss or grief in any way. However, Rahu's antar in > dasa of Jupiter, > capable of bestowing great things when favourably placed, is > followed by > Saturn, significator of loss. Perhaps it's from here that this > > well-established dictum has arisen. But, once again, as with > everything, we > need to consider Saturn's intention in individual charts. > > Another scenario could be (favourable) Rahu dasa followed by > afflicted F/M > Jupiter? > > Parashara states: > **72-75. Effects, like attachment to Yog, gain of wealth and > grains during > the first five months, sovereignty over a village, or country, > meeting with > a foreign king, well-being in the family, journeys to distant > lands, bathing > in holy places, will be derived in the Antar Dasha of Rahu in > the Dasha of > Guru, if Rahu is in his exaltation, in his own Rashi, in his > Multrikon, or, > if Rahu is in a Kendr, or Trikon, or, if Rahu receives a > Drishti from the > Lord of a Kendr, or, if Rahu is associated with, or receives a > Drishti from > a benefic.** > > When much is gained, much is lost... Little gained, little > lost. Is this not > so? > > PS: Braha says in his much acclaimed book; " Hindu scriptures > also maintain > that even when Rahu is well disposed, the benefits gained > during the period > will all be lost during the close of the dasa. " > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:20 PM > Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Balaji, > > It is nice to be back in the list after a break. I guess I > missed lot of good discussion. I hope I will be able to catch > up > soon. > > Meanwhile, I saw your statement: > > //Rahu takes away what he gives// > > I don't think this can be blindly applied to all charts. One > may > have to study and ascertain under what conditions in the chart > the above statement could be made. I have not studied the > chart > under queston. However, I can give an example where this is > not > true. My wife married me during Rah-Rah period about 23 years > back. We are still married. > > In her chart, Rahu sits in Cancer, in the constellation of > Mercury. Both Mercury and Rahu's dispositor Moon are in the > 2nd > bhava (Taurus) of family. Moon is exalted and Mercury is in a > friendly sign. Rahu is in the 4th house. Only Sani aspects > Rahu > in the chart. I am not sure why your statement is not true for > this chart. > > If you study the chart for which you made the statement, we > might get some clues as to in what situations this dictum(?) > could be applied. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness./webhosting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Krishna, Just a very quick response before I switch off (the computer) and enjoy the rest of this weekend :-) Certainly we can discuss this further on Monday... However, as per my own chart, this dictum proved absolutely correct. JU/RA dasa led me to a foreign land where my whole life prospered as never before or could ever have been imagined. At the close of this period all that had been gained was lost (including status, home, family, health, wealth, friends etc..everything!). Of course Saturn (following dasa) occupies 12th from Rahu's position. None-the-less the sheer weight of the loss was incomprehensible due, no doubt, to the enormous gains bestowed by Rahu. As I said earlier, the greater the gain the greater the loss. ///Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this dictum?/// As with everything, each horoscope is unique, and, unfortunately, there is no " One Size Fits All " ...how easy that would be! However, keeping this dictum in mind, one should become more aware of the potential of Rahu to give and the following dasa's potential to take what's been given. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com jyotish-vidya ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 <jyotish-vidya > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? Dear Wendy, // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his period " is an established dictum according to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be applied with common-sense.// I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - when to apply this dictum? Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable to that chart? It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this dictum? Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Krishna, ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th house of gains in friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's nakshatra lord...what does this indicate? As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use our common sense when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every horoscope is unique! //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha.// Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on file so can't really comment at this stage. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com jyotish-vidya ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 <jyotish-vidya > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? Dear Wendy, // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his period " is an established dictum according to traditional astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be applied with common-sense.// I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - when to apply this dictum? Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable to that chart? It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this dictum? Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Wendy, Thanks for your note on Rahu in my wife's chart in addition to what I have already indicated. It is very clear that Rahu is working under the influence of Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and Saturn, eventually giving a benefic result. In my daughter's chart (July 15, 1985, 22:05, Bangalore), Rahu is in the constellation of Yogakaraka Venus who also gives Malavya Yoga in the 4th house of happiness. This malavya yoga repeats in Navamsa also, Venus being a vargottama. There is no planet in Rahu's constellation. As Lagna is Kumbha, given the planetary positions, I would assume Sani is the lord of lagna (as well as 12th lord). Sani aspects Rahu from 9th house. In this chart, Rahu is in the benefic influence of Venus and Saturn. It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the chart that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes the lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating problems with the marriage/spouse. As you have said, each chart is unique - No doubt. Then, why blame poor Rahu who appears to be a mere puppet in the hands of other planets :-) Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of > Rahu > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// > > Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th house > of gains in > friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's nakshatra > lord...what does > this indicate? > As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use our > common sense > when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every > horoscope is unique! > > //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha > and she is in > her early Guru dasha.// > > Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on file > so can't really > comment at this stage. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Wendy, > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > applied > with common-sense.// > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > when > to apply this dictum? > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable > to > that chart? > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of > Rahu > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this > dictum? > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Games. http://get.games./proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Wendy, //However, keeping this dictum in mind, one should become more aware of the potential of Rahu to give and the following dasa's potential to take what's been given.// Let me understand the dictum correctly. Initially, I was under the impression that the dictum applies only to Rahu MD. What you say here seem to suggest that it extends to next MD as well and in the period of Rahu AD. Is this correct? So, it means that there is a possibility that my wife could get separated from me during her Guru-Rahu period a few years from now. Have I understood the dictum correctly? Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > Just a very quick response before I switch off (the computer) > and enjoy the > rest of this weekend :-) > > Certainly we can discuss this further on Monday... However, as > per my own > chart, this dictum proved absolutely correct. JU/RA dasa led > me to a foreign > land where my whole life prospered as never before or could > ever have been > imagined. At the close of this period all that had been gained > was lost > (including status, home, family, health, wealth, friends > etc..everything!). > Of course Saturn (following dasa) occupies 12th from Rahu's > position. > None-the-less the sheer weight of the loss was > incomprehensible due, no > doubt, to the enormous gains bestowed by Rahu. As I said > earlier, the > greater the gain the greater the loss. > > ///Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this > dictum?/// > > As with everything, each horoscope is unique, and, > unfortunately, there is > no " One Size Fits All " ...how easy that would be! > However, keeping this dictum in mind, one should become more > aware of the > potential of Rahu to give and the following dasa's potential > to take what's > been given. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Wendy, > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > applied > with common-sense.// > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > when > to apply this dictum? > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable > to > that chart? > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of > Rahu > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this > dictum? > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv./collections/222 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2007 Report Share Posted June 16, 2007 Dear Krishna Ji, Pranam , can u pls explain below little more . According to my knownledge , Rahu in Guru nak gives heaps and as it is in 11th house forms a dhan yoga, as guru is the lord of the 11th and the 2nd + guru mahadasa " It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the chart that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes the lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating problems with the marriage/spouse. " thanking you Kind Regards Prashant On 6/16/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: > > Dear Wendy, > > Thanks for your note on Rahu in my wife's chart in addition to > what I have already indicated. It is very clear that Rahu is > working under the influence of Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and > Saturn, eventually giving a benefic result. > > In my daughter's chart (July 15, 1985, 22:05, Bangalore), Rahu > is in the constellation of Yogakaraka Venus who also gives > Malavya Yoga in the 4th house of happiness. This malavya yoga > repeats in Navamsa also, Venus being a vargottama. There is no > planet in Rahu's constellation. As Lagna is Kumbha, given the > planetary positions, I would assume Sani is the lord of lagna > (as well as 12th lord). Sani aspects Rahu from 9th house. In > this chart, Rahu is in the benefic influence of Venus and > Saturn. > > It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the chart > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes the > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > problems with the marriage/spouse. > > As you have said, each chart is unique - No doubt. Then, why > blame poor Rahu who appears to be a mere puppet in the hands of > other planets :-) > > Regards, > Krishna > > --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au>> > wrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > > > ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of > > Rahu > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// > > > > Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th house > > of gains in > > friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's nakshatra > > lord...what does > > this indicate? > > As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use our > > common sense > > when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every > > horoscope is unique! > > > > //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu dasha > > and she is in > > her early Guru dasha.// > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on file > > so can't really > > comment at this stage. > > > > Best Wishes, > > Mrs. Wendy > > http://JyotishVidya.com > > jyotish-vidya > > ___ > > > > > > - > > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40> > > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > > Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of his > > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > > applied > > with common-sense.// > > > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > > when > > to apply this dictum? > > > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the chart he > > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is applicable > > to > > that chart? > > > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end of > > Rahu > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and when > > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply this > > dictum? > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > ________ > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated > for today's economy) at Games. > http://get.games./proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Dear Wedy, Thanks for the clarifications. No, I am not afraid that my wife would leave me. As of now, I don't see any hint in that direction :-) Not only she married me in Rahu MD, she also got two daughters during the same MD. I was only throwing up an astrological question. //The possible implications of (any) Rahu period would need to be assessed for each (individual) horoscope before any conclusion could be drawn.// Perfectly correct. That is why when I raised my question initially to Balaji, I was trying to understand what indications are there in Prashu's chart to reach the conclusion that " Rahu takes away what he gives " . I gave the examples of my wife and daugther just to indicate that the dictum can not be applied blindly to all charts. Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: > PS: Rahu antar may simply indicate some health problems (or > any other > difficulty) which do not sustain beyond his period. > The possible implications of (any) Rahu period would need to > be assessed for > each (individual) horoscope before any conclusion could be > drawn. > > It really is pointless to allow fear to arise unnecessarily. > Investigate the > matter thoroughly and your fears will melt away, I'm sure. > ____________ > > > Dear Krishna, > > ///So, it means that there is a possibility that my wife could > get > separated from me during her Guru-Rahu period a few years from > now./// > > Why would you assume that? > > We really do have to be sensible in applying these dictums, > and we really do > need to put away all unfounded fears.. There can be no > comparison whatsoever > between your wife's horoscope and my own example. > > As with everything, the effects of the Nodes are spoken of in > very general > terms. For instances, it's said that what Saturn gives is long > lasting > whereas what Rahu gives is not sustainable beyond his > period...and herein > lies a valuable clue...what Rahu gives may not always be worth > sustaining! > > My own experience, of course, was of a tremendous loss due, no > doubt, to the > beneficence of Rahu antar (in Jupiter dasa) which lifted me to > great > heights...both materially and spiritually. > > Naturally, when this was over, it was experienced as a > tremendous > loss. For others, leaving Rahu behind, may be a longed-for > relief. It could > be a release from addiction or any other of the significations > of Rahu. I'm > talking in very general terms here as, again (and again and > again!!), every > horoscope has a unique story to tell...there is no 'One Size > Fits All'. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 8:03 PM > Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Wendy, > > //However, keeping this dictum in mind, one should become more > aware of the potential of Rahu to give and the following > dasa's > potential to take what's been given.// > > Let me understand the dictum correctly. Initially, I was under > the impression that the dictum applies only to Rahu MD. What > you > say here seem to suggest that it extends to next MD as well > and > in the period of Rahu AD. Is this correct? > > So, it means that there is a possibility that my wife could > get > separated from me during her Guru-Rahu period a few years from > now. Have I understood the dictum correctly? > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out. http://answers./dir/?link=list & sid=396545469 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2007 Report Share Posted June 17, 2007 Dear Prashat, Please drop the 'ji', I am another one like you :-) In your chart, note that Rahu and Guru have a parivartana. Parivartana is probably the strogest of all the sambandhas. In such a case, my understand is that whichever planet is stronger will force its results through the other planet as well. It appears that Rahu is more influenced by its 'Role Model' Sani and giving its results rahter than getting influenced by Guru and giving the results that would have been given by Guru. That is why probably your financial condition is not satisfactory. And in general, there will problems with relationship with the spouse when Venus is placed in the 12th. In many cases even getting into a relationship is also very tough. Note that Venus is disposited by Sani. Hence, Rahu is giving the results of Venus in the 12th through the influence of Saturn on it. Hope I have made it clearer now. Regards, Krishna --- Prashant Doshi <prashuastro wrote: > Dear Krishna Ji, > > Pranam , > > can u pls explain below little more . According to my > knownledge , Rahu in > Guru nak gives heaps and as it is in 11th house forms a dhan > yoga, as guru > is the lord of the 11th and the 2nd + guru mahadasa > > " It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > chart > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > the > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > problems with the marriage/spouse. " > > thanking you > > Kind Regards > > Prashant > > On 6/16/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 > wrote: > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > Thanks for your note on Rahu in my wife's chart in addition > to > > what I have already indicated. It is very clear that Rahu is > > working under the influence of Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and > > Saturn, eventually giving a benefic result. > > > > In my daughter's chart (July 15, 1985, 22:05, Bangalore), > Rahu > > is in the constellation of Yogakaraka Venus who also gives > > Malavya Yoga in the 4th house of happiness. This malavya > yoga > > repeats in Navamsa also, Venus being a vargottama. There is > no > > planet in Rahu's constellation. As Lagna is Kumbha, given > the > > planetary positions, I would assume Sani is the lord of > lagna > > (as well as 12th lord). Sani aspects Rahu from 9th house. In > > this chart, Rahu is in the benefic influence of Venus and > > Saturn. > > > > It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > chart > > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and > Satrun > > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in > this > > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > the > > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of > being > > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. > Also, > > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > > problems with the marriage/spouse. > > > > As you have said, each chart is unique - No doubt. Then, why > > blame poor Rahu who appears to be a mere puppet in the hands > of > > other planets :-) > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > > > --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish > <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au>> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Krishna, > > > > > > ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is > not > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > of > > > Rahu > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// > > > > > > Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th > house > > > of gains in > > > friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's > nakshatra > > > lord...what does > > > this indicate? > > > As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use > our > > > common sense > > > when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every > > > horoscope is unique! > > > > > > //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu > dasha > > > and she is in > > > her early Guru dasha.// > > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on > file > > > so can't really > > > comment at this stage. > > > > > > Best Wishes, > > > Mrs. Wendy > > > http://JyotishVidya.com > > > jyotish-vidya > > > ___ > > > > > > > > > - > > > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " > <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40> > > > > > > <jyotish-vidya > <jyotish-vidya%40>> > > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > > > Re: Rahu takes away what he > gives? > > > > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of > his > > > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > > > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > > > applied > > > with common-sense.// > > > > > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > > > when > > > to apply this dictum? > > > > > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the > chart he > > > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is > applicable > > > to > > > that chart? > > > > > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > of > > > Rahu > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > > > > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and > when > > > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > > > > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply > this > > > dictum? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now > (it's updated > > for today's economy) at Games. > > http://get.games./proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Dear Krishna, Remembering the dictum SaniVadRahu, it's relevant to note their (SA/RA) dual dispositorship of Jupiter, significator of children...note that both Jupiter and Saturn aspect 7th house of marriage. Saturn also aspects the bhava occupied by Rahu... Rahu, influencing the bhava he occupies, is in turn influenced by that bhava; who, in this instance, is influenced by aspect of Saturn. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com jyotish-vidya ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 <jyotish-vidya > Monday, June 18, 2007 10:51 AM Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? Dear Wedy, Thanks for the clarifications. No, I am not afraid that my wife would leave me. As of now, I don't see any hint in that direction :-) Not only she married me in Rahu MD, she also got two daughters during the same MD. I was only throwing up an astrological question. //The possible implications of (any) Rahu period would need to be assessed for each (individual) horoscope before any conclusion could be drawn.// Perfectly correct. That is why when I raised my question initially to Balaji, I was trying to understand what indications are there in Prashu's chart to reach the conclusion that " Rahu takes away what he gives " . I gave the examples of my wife and daugther just to indicate that the dictum can not be applied blindly to all charts. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Dear Wedny, No, I was not looking for the justification for my wife to have got children during Rahu MD. Thanks in any case. I was olny mentioning in a lighter vein that my wife has lot more at stake as she has got two children in addition to getting a husband in Rahu dasha :-) Regards, Krishna --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: > Dear Krishna, > > Remembering the dictum SaniVadRahu, it's relevant to note > their (SA/RA) dual > dispositorship of Jupiter, significator of children...note > that both Jupiter > and Saturn aspect 7th house of marriage. Saturn also aspects > the bhava > occupied by Rahu... > > Rahu, influencing the bhava he occupies, is in turn influenced > by that > bhava; who, in this instance, is influenced by aspect of > Saturn. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > jyotish-vidya > ___ > > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 > <jyotish-vidya > > Monday, June 18, 2007 10:51 AM > Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? > > > Dear Wedy, > > Thanks for the clarifications. No, I am not afraid that my > wife > would leave me. As of now, I don't see any hint in that > direction :-) Not only she married me in Rahu MD, she also got > two daughters during the same MD. I was only throwing up an > astrological question. > > //The possible implications of (any) Rahu period would need to > be assessed for each (individual) horoscope before any > conclusion could be drawn.// > > Perfectly correct. That is why when I raised my question > initially to Balaji, I was trying to understand what > indications > are there in Prashu's chart to reach the conclusion that " Rahu > takes away what he gives " . > > I gave the examples of my wife and daugther just to indicate > that the dictum can not be applied blindly to all charts. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > ______________________________\ ___ You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck in the all-new Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents./mailbeta/newmail_html.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Dear Krishna, Actually, the (often times lengthy) justification of certain principles, and their possible negation, is offered in the hope that all members might mull over what's being discussed and perhaps (even) offer their own insights... I'm mindful always of the many silent members following the conversations and perhaps investigating the validity of what we say in their own charts :-)) Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com jyotish-vidya ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <krishna_1998 <jyotish-vidya > Monday, June 18, 2007 3:09 PM Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? Dear Wedny, No, I was not looking for the justification for my wife to have got children during Rahu MD. Thanks in any case. I was olny mentioning in a lighter vein that my wife has lot more at stake as she has got two children in addition to getting a husband in Rahu dasha :-) Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 My own experiences in Rahu Mahadasa so far has been a roller coaster ride that started with a bang and has been going downhill ever since. >Naturally, when this was over, it was experienced as a tremendous >loss. For others, leaving Rahu behind, may be a longed-for relief. It could >be a release from addiction or any other of the significations of Rahu. I'm >talking in very general terms here as, again (and again and again!!), every >horoscope has a unique story to tell...there is no 'One Size Fits All'. It also has not helped to have SadeSati on top of that. Having suffered severe monetary losses and piling up huge debt, I am hoping the MBA that I have just completed is the silver lining to help overcome. I still have another 7 years left, and definitely will feel relieved when the dasa is over. regards, enigma ______________________ Check Out the new free AIM® Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 Hello Krishna, No worries , no " Ji " Ok mate , so what should i concluded , that my financial sitution will not improve at all ?? , According to me , Saturn is my lagna lord , wont that make a diffrence , Secongly it is in parivartan too , which indicates , that Rahu is virtually influenced by Mer partially . I would like to known more about it , so if u would like to discuss astrologically , i am intrested in it thanks Prashu On 6/18/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote: > > Dear Prashat, > > Please drop the 'ji', I am another one like you :-) > > In your chart, note that Rahu and Guru have a parivartana. > Parivartana is probably the strogest of all the sambandhas. In > such a case, my understand is that whichever planet is stronger > will force its results through the other planet as well. It > appears that Rahu is more influenced by its 'Role Model' Sani > and giving its results rahter than getting influenced by Guru > and giving the results that would have been given by Guru. That > is why probably your financial condition is not satisfactory. > > And in general, there will problems with relationship with the > spouse when Venus is placed in the 12th. In many cases even > getting into a relationship is also very tough. Note that Venus > is disposited by Sani. Hence, Rahu is giving the results of > Venus in the 12th through the influence of Saturn on it. > > Hope I have made it clearer now. > > Regards, > Krishna > > --- Prashant Doshi <prashuastro <prashuastro%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Dear Krishna Ji, > > > > Pranam , > > > > can u pls explain below little more . According to my > > knownledge , Rahu in > > Guru nak gives heaps and as it is in 11th house forms a dhan > > yoga, as guru > > is the lord of the 11th and the 2nd + guru mahadasa > > > > " It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > > chart > > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun > > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this > > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > > the > > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being > > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, > > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > > problems with the marriage/spouse. " > > > > thanking you > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Prashant > > > > On 6/16/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > > > Thanks for your note on Rahu in my wife's chart in addition > > to > > > what I have already indicated. It is very clear that Rahu is > > > working under the influence of Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and > > > Saturn, eventually giving a benefic result. > > > > > > In my daughter's chart (July 15, 1985, 22:05, Bangalore), > > Rahu > > > is in the constellation of Yogakaraka Venus who also gives > > > Malavya Yoga in the 4th house of happiness. This malavya > > yoga > > > repeats in Navamsa also, Venus being a vargottama. There is > > no > > > planet in Rahu's constellation. As Lagna is Kumbha, given > > the > > > planetary positions, I would assume Sani is the lord of > > lagna > > > (as well as 12th lord). Sani aspects Rahu from 9th house. In > > > this chart, Rahu is in the benefic influence of Venus and > > > Saturn. > > > > > > It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > > chart > > > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and > > Satrun > > > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in > > this > > > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > > the > > > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > > > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of > > being > > > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. > > Also, > > > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > > > problems with the marriage/spouse. > > > > > > As you have said, each chart is unique - No doubt. Then, why > > > blame poor Rahu who appears to be a mere puppet in the hands > > of > > > other planets :-) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Krishna > > > > > > --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au> > > <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Krishna, > > > > > > > > ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is > > not > > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > > of > > > > Rahu > > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// > > > > > > > > Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th > > house > > > > of gains in > > > > friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's > > nakshatra > > > > lord...what does > > > > this indicate? > > > > As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use > > our > > > > common sense > > > > when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every > > > > horoscope is unique! > > > > > > > > //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu > > dasha > > > > and she is in > > > > her early Guru dasha.// > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on > > file > > > > so can't really > > > > comment at this stage. > > > > > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > Mrs. Wendy > > > > http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> > > > > jyotish-vidya > > > > ___ > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " > > <krishna_1998 <krishna_1998%40><krishna_1998% > 40> > > > > > > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> > > <jyotish-vidya%40>> > > > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > > > > Re: Rahu takes away what he > > gives? > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > > > > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of > > his > > > > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > > > > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > > > > applied > > > > with common-sense.// > > > > > > > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > > > > when > > > > to apply this dictum? > > > > > > > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the > > chart he > > > > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is > > applicable > > > > to > > > > that chart? > > > > > > > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > > of > > > > Rahu > > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > > > > > > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and > > when > > > > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > > > > > > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply > > this > > > > dictum? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now > > (it's updated > > > for today's economy) at Games. > > > http://get.games./proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2007 Report Share Posted June 18, 2007 I am not aware of this whole thread but about rahu I will say this the words of acharya krishnayee and a writer of druv nadi this ancient teachers called rahu sudha payee the only planet who was given nectar by lord Krishna with his own hands how can he be melific how can he be melific this teachers have called ketu the worst melific if this writers are correct or not only our experience will decide regs jiger shah - Prashant Doshi<prashuastro jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya > Monday, June 18, 2007 8:45 PM Re: Rahu takes away what he gives? Hello Krishna, No worries , no " Ji " Ok mate , so what should i concluded , that my financial sitution will not improve at all ?? , According to me , Saturn is my lagna lord , wont that make a diffrence , Secongly it is in parivartan too , which indicates , that Rahu is virtually influenced by Mer partially . I would like to known more about it , so if u would like to discuss astrologically , i am intrested in it thanks Prashu On 6/18/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40>> wrote: > > Dear Prashat, > > Please drop the 'ji', I am another one like you :-) > > In your chart, note that Rahu and Guru have a parivartana. > Parivartana is probably the strogest of all the sambandhas. In > such a case, my understand is that whichever planet is stronger > will force its results through the other planet as well. It > appears that Rahu is more influenced by its 'Role Model' Sani > and giving its results rahter than getting influenced by Guru > and giving the results that would have been given by Guru. That > is why probably your financial condition is not satisfactory. > > And in general, there will problems with relationship with the > spouse when Venus is placed in the 12th. In many cases even > getting into a relationship is also very tough. Note that Venus > is disposited by Sani. Hence, Rahu is giving the results of > Venus in the 12th through the influence of Saturn on it. > > Hope I have made it clearer now. > > Regards, > Krishna > > --- Prashant Doshi <prashuastro<prashuastro%40gmail.com> <prashuastro%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Dear Krishna Ji, > > > > Pranam , > > > > can u pls explain below little more . According to my > > knownledge , Rahu in > > Guru nak gives heaps and as it is in 11th house forms a dhan > > yoga, as guru > > is the lord of the 11th and the 2nd + guru mahadasa > > > > " It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > > chart > > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and Satrun > > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in this > > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > > the > > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of being > > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. Also, > > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > > problems with the marriage/spouse. " > > > > thanking you > > > > Kind Regards > > > > Prashant > > > > On 6/16/07, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40><krishna_1998%40.co\ m> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > > > Thanks for your note on Rahu in my wife's chart in addition > > to > > > what I have already indicated. It is very clear that Rahu is > > > working under the influence of Moon, Mercury, Jupiter and > > > Saturn, eventually giving a benefic result. > > > > > > In my daughter's chart (July 15, 1985, 22:05, Bangalore), > > Rahu > > > is in the constellation of Yogakaraka Venus who also gives > > > Malavya Yoga in the 4th house of happiness. This malavya > > yoga > > > repeats in Navamsa also, Venus being a vargottama. There is > > no > > > planet in Rahu's constellation. As Lagna is Kumbha, given > > the > > > planetary positions, I would assume Sani is the lord of > > lagna > > > (as well as 12th lord). Sani aspects Rahu from 9th house. In > > > this chart, Rahu is in the benefic influence of Venus and > > > Saturn. > > > > > > It is interesting to note that in the chart of Prashu (the > > chart > > > that Balaji was refering to) also has Kumbha lagna and > > Satrun > > > aspects Rahu (but from the 5th house). The difference in > > this > > > chart is that based on the planetary postions, Rahu becomes > > the > > > lagna lord and Sani is just the 12th lord only. Hence, Rahu > > > gives the resluts of a dusthana lord. This is inspite of > > being > > > disposited by 2nd and 11th lord Guru who sits in lagna. > > Also, > > > please note that Venus occupies the 12th house indicating > > > problems with the marriage/spouse. > > > > > > As you have said, each chart is unique - No doubt. Then, why > > > blame poor Rahu who appears to be a mere puppet in the hands > > of > > > other planets :-) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Krishna > > > > > > --- Wendy Vasicek <jyotish<jyotish%40optusnet.com.au> <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au> > > <jyotish%40optusnet.com.au>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Krishna, > > > > > > > > ///It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is > > not > > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > > of > > > > Rahu > > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha./// > > > > > > > > Consider, for your wife, 9th lord Jupiter occupying 11th > > house > > > > of gains in > > > > friendly sign. Also note Rahu's role as Jupiter's > > nakshatra > > > > lord...what does > > > > this indicate? > > > > As we've said many times before, Krishna, we have to use > > our > > > > common sense > > > > when applying any of these dictums (yogas etc)...every > > > > horoscope is unique! > > > > > > > > //My daughter also got married towards the end of Rahu > > dasha > > > > and she is in > > > > her early Guru dasha.// > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have your daughters horoscope on > > file > > > > so can't really > > > > comment at this stage. > > > > > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > Mrs. Wendy > > > > http://JyotishVidya.com<http://jyotishvidya.com/> <http://jyotishvidya.com/<http://jyotishvidya.com/>> > > > > jyotish-vidya<jyotis\ h-vidya> > > > > ___ > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " > > <krishna_1998<krishna_1998%40> <krishna_1998%40><krishna_1998% > 40> > > > > > > > > To: <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> <jyotish-vidya%40> > > <jyotish-vidya%40>> > > > > Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:39 PM > > > > Re: Rahu takes away what he > > gives? > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Wendy, > > > > > > > > // " What is gained during Rahu period is lost at the end of > > his > > > > period " is an established dictum according to traditional > > > > astrologers. However, as we know, these dictums must be > > > > applied > > > > with common-sense.// > > > > > > > > I agree with you. And, that is what I wanted to look for - > > > > when > > > > to apply this dictum? > > > > > > > > Balaji might be correct in applying the dictum in the > > chart he > > > > was looking at. But, do we know why the dictum is > > applicable > > > > to > > > > that chart? > > > > > > > > It is clear that in my wife's case that the dictum is not > > > > applicable. My daughter also got married towards the end > > of > > > > Rahu > > > > dasha and she is in her early Guru dasha. > > > > > > > > If only we understand when we should apply the dictum and > > when > > > > not, it gives lot more clarity to chart reading. > > > > > > > > Do you have any general guidelines as to when to apply > > this > > > > dictum? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now > > (it's updated > > > for today's economy) at Games. > > > http://get.games./proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow<http://get.games.yah\ oo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.