Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

jaideep ji, gaurav ji.....amitabh's saturn

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

jaideep ji , gaurav ji and other esteemed memebers

 

sorry ....that was just a typing mistake ,, ..........i too know

that if " kumbha " is the lagna then how can 4th house be

cancer .......................it is taurus ......

but i actually wanted to convey that amitabh's saturn is in 4th

house and is retro..........

 

very soon i shall upload or perhaps send u , the horoscope of amitabh

 

i told u that i am currently working on " adolf hitler's " horoscope,

and ..........so might be just a mix up , while typing.......

 

hope u people will unedrstand ....

 

pls do respond

vikas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " "

 

 

 

<gaurav.ghosh wrote:

>

> ||Jai Ramakrishna||

> Vikas,

> Hold a sec!!If Kumbha is the Lagna, how do u get Cancer as the 4th

> house???

> Thanq,

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology , " vikas_asthana009 "

> <vikas_asthana009@> wrote:

> >

> > jaideep ji.........

> > thank u for ur response , actually u know megstar amitabh ji has

> > saturn in cancer in his 4th house retro.......and his lagna

> > is " kumbha "

> >

> > and regarding ups and downs at th age of 36 , i think u are

> talking

> > aboout that " coolie " incident .........i can also explain , that

> > that was just because of an unfavourable antardasha

> >

> > details arranged according to " my research on saturn and

amitabh "

> > i will post later on ......

> > vikas

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ......... In vedic astrology , jaideep mukherji

> > <anmol400@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hi Everyone

> > >

> > > Have saturn in 10th house retrograde in cancer sign so

> > > my saturn is weak though iam libra asc...but amitabh

> > > ji the celebrity has faced tough times also and when

> > > he was 36 he has shine so saturn has shown him bad

> > > times also...

> > > --- astro_tellerkerala

> > > <astro_tellerkerala@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > om krishna guru

> > > >

> > > > dear vikas ,

> > > >

> > > > Can u post the data and Please post your

> > > > reserch or cronologiacal

> > > > order of events ,as it may help others to study or

> > > > judge the result of a

> > > > chart.

> > > >

> > > > But did u find why saturn irrespective of vakra

> > > > has given good

> > > > results ,we r eager to know your findings .

> > > >

> > > > Let us start a healthy discussion and i hope all

> > > > gurus and seniors and

> > > > other student s will contribute to the thread .

> > > >

> > > > Also please ,if possible ,disclose how far we can

> > > > rely the data which

> > > > u hav .

> > > >

> > > > regds sunil nair.

> > > >

> > > > http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/

> > > > <http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/>

> > > >

> > > > for naadi readings @

> > > > <@>

> > > >

> > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > " vikas_asthana009 "

> > > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ~JAI BALAJI MAHARAJ~

> > > > >

> > > > > gaurav ji ,

> > > > > i didnt jump to conclusion , what i wrote or

> > > > posted was just a small

> > > > > segment of the total thesis i have

> > > > > i was just answering the question of our fellow

> > > > astrologer who was

> > > > > not very sure of saturn and related influences on

> > > > amitabh

> > > > > bachchan ......................

> > > > >

> > > > > as far as correct birth data is concerned , i can

> > > > assure u , its

> > > > > 200% correct , coz i havent taken this data , from

> > > > any source on

> > > > > internet , i have personal relations ...and thus

> > > > data is absolutely

> > > > > correct....

> > > > > thank u

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology , " Gaurav

> > > > Ghosh "

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > gaurav.ghosh@ wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ||Jai Ramakrishna||

> > > > > > Vikas,

> > > > > > Read Amitabh's chart thoroughly (I dont know

> > > > which data you are

> > > > > > using as in the world of internet, there are

> > > > many speculative Data

> > > > > > of Celebrities.) If you have the correct chart,

> > > > then see why

> > > > > Amitabh

> > > > > > had a good time in Saturn Mahadas, when the

> > > > planet is Retro,

> > > > > without

> > > > > > any beneficial aspect or in 6th house frm D-10

> > > > Lagna.

> > > > > > See the Antardasa trends, their position in D-10

> > > > chart, also see

> > > > > the

> > > > > > Nakshatra Lord of Saturn & its position.

> > > > Consider Saturn's

> > > > > position

> > > > > > in D-9 as well. DONT JUMP INTO CONCLUSIONS!

> > > > SOMEONE HAVING ALREADY

> > > > > > STRONG SATURN & WEARING 1000 NEELAM WILL NOT DO

> > > > ANYTHING GOOD!!

> > > > > > Thanq,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > " vikas_asthana009 "

> > > > > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > my dear frend , whosoever has posted the

> > > > material written

> > > > > > > underneath " that amitabh was over shadowed by

> > > > rajesh khanna "

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > i too agree that there was a time , when

> > > > amitabh was

> > > > > overshadowed

> > > > > > > by then superstar rajesh khanna , but at that

> > > > time , amitabh was

> > > > > > > through ,his guru mahadasha with rahu's antar

> > > > whch lasted in

> > > > > > > 1973 .........

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > as long as amitabh had GURU MD WITH RAHU ANTAR

> > > > , he was subsied

> > > > > by

> > > > > > > rajesh khanna but since 1973 ..... whn MD OF

> > > > SATURN STARTED IN

> > > > > > 1973

> > > > > > > he became unstoppable ,,,, with release of

> > > > ZANJIR , IN 1973 ,

> > > > > AND

> > > > > > > LATER THE ULTIMATE BLOCKBUSTER

> > > > " SHOLAY " ..........

> > > > > > > AND THEN CAME A SERIES OF IT , ....including

> > > > ,KAALIYA ,

> > > > > > > MR.NATWARLAL , NAMAK-HARAM, DON ETC TO NAME A

> > > > FEW,,,,,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > HIS SATURN IS UNDOUBTEDLY STRONG ....HE IS

> > > > ALSO WEARING TWO BLUE

> > > > > > > SAPPHIRE TOGETHER IN HIS MIDDLE FINGER

> > > > .....GIVING HIM A

> > > > > > TREMENDOUS

> > > > > > > BOOST.................

> > > > > > > SO PLS THERE IS NO POINT OF DISCUSSING , THAT

> > > > AMITABH DIDNT HAD

> > > > > > GUD

> > > > > > > SATURN , OR FAVOURABLE GIFTS FROM SATURN ,

> > > > > > > MOREOVER HIS ASCENDANT IS ALSO " KUMBHA " , SO .I

> > > > HOPE U UNDERSTAND

> > > > > > THE

> > > > > > > REST,

> > > > > > > AND AS FAR AS HIS CORRECT HOROSCOPE IS

> > > > CONCERNED , PLS DONT

> > > > > WORRY,

> > > > > > > i have exact data's of almost all celebrities,

> > > > .......

> > > > > > > hope to have a warm discussion.

> > > > > > > vikas

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > " Rohiniranjan "

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But did Amitabh not gain the superstar state

> > > > rather quickly,

> > > > > > > despite

> > > > > > > > initially being somewhat overshadowed by the

> > > > superstar Rajesh

> > > > > > > Khanna

> > > > > > > > of those times? The smouldering intensity

> > > > that

> > > === message truncated ===

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection

around

> > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...