Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 dear jv A lagna chart reads out the best predictions if the accuracy of time of birth is justified. In case an accurate time is not available then a chan rasi chart can help in identifying as well guide the astrologers. In due cases it is given equal importance to that of a lagna chart. A navamsa chart is used to identifythe strength of a planet in a bhava/Rasi/cusp or sign. regards vedic astrology , Lovely Friend <jyotish_vigyan wrote: > > __ > Respected Astrologers, > > Namaskar, > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding the following: > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > Regards, > > JV > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear JV, If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. Thanq, (Any private consultation is chargeable) vedic astrology , Lovely Friend <jyotish_vigyan wrote: > > __ > Respected Astrologers, > > Namaskar, > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding the following: > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > Regards, > > JV > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Dear Mr JV, I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend Mr. Gaurav Ghosh. You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and Moon chart, along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific aspects of life are considered from other divisional charts. A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use of atleast 16 divisional charts. Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. G.K.GOEL <gaurav.ghosh wrote: ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear JV, If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. Thanq, (Any private consultation is chargeable) vedic astrology , Lovely Friend <jyotish_vigyan wrote: > > __ > Respected Astrologers, > > Namaskar, > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding the following: > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > Regards, > > JV > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 *hare rama krsna* Dear JV, Namaskar Yes, Gopal Goel is right. Minimum of three: Rasi-Dreshkon-Navamsa shows dingity of grahas through manifestation-activity-bhagya. This is the minimum which should not be overlooked by any astrologer (be it novice or professional). Many of good Jyotisha's count the other varga in mind, so it seems that they only use this d1-d3-d9 while in mind they draw any needed chart, depending on type of consultation. Regards, Rafal Gendarz SJC Guru www.rohinaa.com (+48) 503 44 18 18 Gopal Goel napisa?(a): > > Dear Mr JV, > I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend Mr. > . > You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and Moon chart, > along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific > aspects of > life are considered from other divisional charts. > A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use of atleast > 16 divisional charts. > Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. > G.K.GOEL > <gaurav.ghosh@ > <gaurav.ghosh%40>> wrote: > ||Jai Ramakrishna| | > Dear JV, > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > Thanq, > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, Lovely Friend > <jyotish_vigyan@ ...> wrote: > > > > __ > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding > the following: > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > Regards, > > > > JV > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Pls let me know that how a planet will behave if it is placed in a friendly sign in Lagna chart and debiliated in navamsa. <gaurav.ghosh wrote: ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear JV, If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. Thanq, (Any private consultation is chargeable) vedic astrology , Lovely Friend <jyotish_vigyan wrote: > > __ > Respected Astrologers, > > Namaskar, > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding the following: > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > Regards, > > JV > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 *hare rama krsna* Dear Lovely friend, Navamsa is most important in avastha. This is the view of Jataka Parijata and Deva Keralam. If the Navamsa is debiiltated then it shows Avisnu and this position shows bad luck, while D1 shows lack of oporutnities but still the bhagya is there and things can be better after initial setbacks. Debilitation in D9 should be remedied. Regards, Rafal Gendarz SJC Guru www.rohinaa.com (+48) 503 44 18 18 Lovely Friend napisa?(a): > > Pls let me know that how a planet will behave if it is placed in a > friendly sign in Lagna chart and debiliated in navamsa. > > <gaurav.ghosh@ > <gaurav.ghosh%40>> wrote: ||Jai Ramakrishna| | > Dear JV, > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > Thanq, > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, Lovely Friend > <jyotish_vigyan@ ...> wrote: > > > > __ > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding > the following: > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > Regards, > > > > JV > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2007 Report Share Posted April 14, 2007 [ Hare Rama Krsna ]Dear Lovely Friend/JV,They are equally important. But they show different things, Lagna shows the body, Moon shows the Mind and Navamsa Lagna will show inherent abilities. All of these should be looked at and some will be more prominent then others.Jyotish requires a multidimensional approach because life is, well... complex:)Respectfully,Michal[ Om Namo Narayanaya ]Lovely Friend <jyotish_vigyansohamsa Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 3:52:06 PM Lagna, Navamsa, Moon Chart Respected Astrologers,Namaskar,I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding the following:While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer.My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . Regards,JV Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2007 Report Share Posted April 14, 2007 ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear Goelji, Whether you agree or disagree with me, what I have said is frm my little experience. I have my own experience, where My own astrologer(fyi..he has agreed to teach me astrology)uses only Rashi chart & just a mere glimpse at Navamsha chart & then gives predictions, which are 90-95% correct. He is more experienced than you & I, he has an experience of more than 70 years(now he is 94). Today, we have so many readymade softwares, where getting d-16 to d- 150 chart is in few seconds, where 50 years before, manual casting of horoscope was done & casting 16 divisional charts were really painful & as we have readymade softwares & so many books in market, its easy to refer to them & cross check. In Vedic Astrology...we have so many systems...if u follow anyone, you will get the truth. If you experiment & cross-check your understanding, you are always welcome to use all other systems (which i do!) Thanq, vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: > > Dear Mr JV, > I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend Mr. . > You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and Moon chart, > along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific aspects of > life are considered from other divisional charts. > A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use of atleast > 16 divisional charts. > Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. > G.K.GOEL > <gaurav.ghosh wrote: > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > Dear JV, > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > Thanq, > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > vedic astrology , Lovely Friend > <jyotish_vigyan@> wrote: > > > > __ > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding > the following: > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > Regards, > > > > JV > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2007 Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 Dear Mr. Ghosh, My heart is full of appriciation for your Astrologer as he could give you 90 to 95 % correctly. The astrogical science which I teach and learnd is totally gepend on divisional charts. It is not possible to for me without Varga charts. I am not so accurate as your astrologer friend. Regards, G.K.GOEL <gaurav.ghosh wrote: ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear Goelji, Whether you agree or disagree with me, what I have said is frm my little experience. I have my own experience, where My own astrologer(fyi..he has agreed to teach me astrology)uses only Rashi chart & just a mere glimpse at Navamsha chart & then gives predictions, which are 90-95% correct. He is more experienced than you & I, he has an experience of more than 70 years(now he is 94). Today, we have so many readymade softwares, where getting d-16 to d- 150 chart is in few seconds, where 50 years before, manual casting of horoscope was done & casting 16 divisional charts were really painful & as we have readymade softwares & so many books in market, its easy to refer to them & cross check. In Vedic Astrology...we have so many systems...if u follow anyone, you will get the truth. If you experiment & cross-check your understanding, you are always welcome to use all other systems (which i do!) Thanq, vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: > > Dear Mr JV, > I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend Mr. . > You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and Moon chart, > along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific aspects of > life are considered from other divisional charts. > A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use of atleast > 16 divisional charts. > Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. > G.K.GOEL > <gaurav.ghosh wrote: > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > Dear JV, > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi chart...if > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > Thanq, > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > vedic astrology , Lovely Friend > <jyotish_vigyan@> wrote: > > > > __ > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in understanding > the following: > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > Regards, > > > > JV > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2007 Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear Goelji, Its nice to hear that you teach Astrology. Where do you teach?BVB or are you the same person in Shree K N Rao's team?? Thanq, vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: > > Dear Mr. Ghosh, > My heart is full of appriciation for your Astrologer as he could give you > 90 to 95 % correctly. > The astrogical science which I teach and learnd is totally gepend on divisional > charts. It is not possible to for me without Varga charts. I am not so accurate as your astrologer friend. > Regards, > G.K.GOEL > <gaurav.ghosh wrote: > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > Dear Goelji, > Whether you agree or disagree with me, what I have said is frm my > little experience. > I have my own experience, where My own astrologer(fyi..he has agreed > to teach me astrology)uses only Rashi chart & just a mere glimpse at > Navamsha chart & then gives predictions, which are 90-95% correct. > He is more experienced than you & I, he has an experience of more > than 70 years(now he is 94). > Today, we have so many readymade softwares, where getting d-16 to d- > 150 chart is in few seconds, where 50 years before, manual casting > of horoscope was done & casting 16 divisional charts were really > painful & as we have readymade softwares & so many books in market, > its easy to refer to them & cross check. > In Vedic Astrology...we have so many systems...if u follow anyone, > you will get the truth. If you experiment & cross-check your > understanding, you are always welcome to use all other systems > (which i do!) > Thanq, > > > vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Mr JV, > > I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend > Mr. . > > You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and > Moon chart, > > along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific > aspects of > > life are considered from other divisional charts. > > A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use > of atleast > > 16 divisional charts. > > Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. > > G.K.GOEL > > <gaurav.ghosh@> wrote: > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > > Dear JV, > > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi > chart...if > > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > > Thanq, > > > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > > > vedic astrology , Lovely Friend > > <jyotish_vigyan@> wrote: > > > > > > __ > > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > > > Namaskar, > > > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in > understanding > > the following: > > > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > JV > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2007 Report Share Posted April 16, 2007 Dear Mr. GHOSH, Myself is now learning astrology under the guidance of Pt. Sanjay Rath. Long back Mr. K.N.RAO and myself were working together , now I lost cntact with him. I TEACH ASTROLOGY SINCE 1990, at ASTRO SCIENCES RESARCH ORGANISATION ahnd honorary faculty member with Lal BAHADUR SANSKRIT VIDYAPEETH (DEEMED university) New Delhi. G.K.GOEL <gaurav.ghosh wrote: ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear Goelji, Its nice to hear that you teach Astrology. Where do you teach?BVB or are you the same person in Shree K N Rao's team?? Thanq, vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: > > Dear Mr. Ghosh, > My heart is full of appriciation for your Astrologer as he could give you > 90 to 95 % correctly. > The astrogical science which I teach and learnd is totally gepend on divisional > charts. It is not possible to for me without Varga charts. I am not so accurate as your astrologer friend. > Regards, > G.K.GOEL > <gaurav.ghosh wrote: > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > Dear Goelji, > Whether you agree or disagree with me, what I have said is frm my > little experience. > I have my own experience, where My own astrologer(fyi..he has agreed > to teach me astrology)uses only Rashi chart & just a mere glimpse at > Navamsha chart & then gives predictions, which are 90-95% correct. > He is more experienced than you & I, he has an experience of more > than 70 years(now he is 94). > Today, we have so many readymade softwares, where getting d-16 to d- > 150 chart is in few seconds, where 50 years before, manual casting > of horoscope was done & casting 16 divisional charts were really > painful & as we have readymade softwares & so many books in market, > its easy to refer to them & cross check. > In Vedic Astrology...we have so many systems...if u follow anyone, > you will get the truth. If you experiment & cross-check your > understanding, you are always welcome to use all other systems > (which i do!) > Thanq, > > > vedic astrology , Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Mr JV, > > I most humbly and respectfully totally dis-agree with our friend > Mr. . > > You are on right track. ONE must condider and study Rasi and > Moon chart, > > along with D-9 chart . This is basic minimum. THE other specific > aspects of > > life are considered from other divisional charts. > > A good , proficient and capable astrologer should know the use > of atleast > > 16 divisional charts. > > Kindly try to learn them it takes time and lots of labour. > > G.K.GOEL > > <gaurav.ghosh@> wrote: > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > > Dear JV, > > If you are a master in astrology, you may need only rasi > chart...if > > u r intermediate level, you may need rasi chart with navamsha > > chart....if u r a beginner like me, U must need all three+other > > divisional charts, to cross-check your understanding of the chart. > > Thanq, > > > > (Any private consultation is chargeable) > > > > vedic astrology , Lovely Friend > > <jyotish_vigyan@> wrote: > > > > > > __ > > > Respected Astrologers, > > > > > > Namaskar, > > > > > > I am a learner of jyotish. I would seek your help in > understanding > > the following: > > > > > > While analysing a chart, we have a Lagna Chart, a Moon Chart and > > then a NavamsaChart, which people generally refer. > > > > > > My question is that while analysing a chart how much importance > > should be given to Lagna chart, Moon Chart and D9 and what all > > should be deciphered from it. I shall be grateful, if astrologers > > can show the % of importance of each chart in overall reading . > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > JV > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 To, Shri Rafal Gendarz SJC Guru, It is stated that the debilited planet in the D-9 should be corrected. If the lord of the 12th house in D-1 chart gets debiliated in D-9 should remedial measures to be taken. alok Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your freeaccount today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 Dear Alok, 12th lord is debilited in D-9 is good and does not require remedy. If this planet is also the lord of any Kendra/ trikona house ,this will be bad. G.K.GOEL alok shri <c12alok wrote: To, Shri Rafal Gendarz SJC Guru, It is stated that the debilited planet in the D-9 should be corrected. If the lord of the 12th house in D-1 chart gets debiliated in D-9 should remedial measures to be taken. alok Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your freeaccount today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2007 Report Share Posted April 21, 2007 If it is other way out that a planet is Debialiated in D1(Rashi) and Exalted in Navamsa , How would it behave Good or Bad?? Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote: Dear Alok, 12th lord is debilited in D-9 is good and does not require remedy. If this planet is also the lord of any Kendra/ trikona house ,this will be bad. G.K.GOEL alok shri <c12alok wrote: To, Shri Rafal Gendarz SJC Guru, It is stated that the debilited planet in the D-9 should be corrected. If the lord of the 12th house in D-1 chart gets debiliated in D-9 should remedial measures to be taken. alok Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your freeaccount today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.