RE: Decoding The Lal Kitab 1941 Edition - Prabhakarji mail

[Guest guest]

Dear Yograj bhai,

 

Thanks for your

encouraging words.

 

You say ‘ Dil hai

ki manta nahin’ …. True. Dil cheez

hi aisi hai. My

understanding and expectation is that persons like your self have to step in to

add/correct/modify our works. Your desire for better and better should inspire you

to take the initiative to be the guiding spirit of this endeavour.

 

Please amend

the translation and present it to the forum. I want you to help us Yograj bhai.

 

 

bye

Sheikh Pervez Hameed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yograj Prabhakar

[yr_prabhakar]

10 February 2005 13:15

lalkitab

[lalkitab]

Decoding The Lal Kitab 1941 Edition

 

 

 

Respected Umesh Bhai,

This is so far the most positive

step taken in the forum. I was eagerly waiting for these sorts of

activities for a long time. I am not at all against analyzing the charts in

bulk; but the lack of some constructive debate on the subject was hurting me

deeply. In the absence of a positive discussion, the form was losing its very

essence. But, I was ecstatic to know that a discussion on 1941 edition of Lal

Kitab known as Gutka is going to begin in the group.

I was expecting an introductory note about the book (the original

1941 edition) by you before discussing its text; I mean a brief details

regarding the number of pages, why it is called Gutka, from where it was

originally published, or any other unique feature etc. etc. These points are necessary for the

academic interests of the students of this subject, and no one is better

equipped than you to explain the above-mentioned matter in the forum. These

sorts of interesting and useful information do help greatly in removing the

misgivings about the book.

I read about the first two lines along with its explanation by your

good self and the subsequent clarifications by Parvez Bhai. Both of you tried

your the best to explicate these lines for the Lal Kitab devotees.

But I dont know why DIL HAI KI MAANTA NAHIN. Something obviously is seems to be missing

from the clarification portion, and is certainly not hitting as hard as it

supposed to be. Nevertheless, I salute your endeavor and the Something is

better than nothing scenario from deep inside.

Regards

Yograj Prabhakar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mail - You care about security. So do we.