Guest guest Posted February 10, 2005 Report Share Posted February 10, 2005 Respected Umesh Bhai, This is so far “the most positive step” taken in the forum. I was eagerly waiting for these sorts of activities for a long time. I am not at all against analyzing the charts in bulk; but the lack of some constructive debate on the subject was hurting me deeply. In the absence of a positive discussion, the form was losing its very essence. But, I was ecstatic to know that a discussion on 1941 edition of Lal Kitab known as Gutka is going to begin in the group. I was expecting an introductory note about the book (the original 1941 edition) by you before discussing its text; I mean a brief details regarding the number of pages, why it is called Gutka, from where it was originally published, or any other unique feature etc. etc. These points are necessary for the academic interests of the students of this subject, and no one is better equipped than you to explain the above-mentioned matter in the forum. These sorts of interesting and useful information do help greatly in removing the misgivings about the book. I read about the first two lines along with its explanation by your good self and the subsequent clarifications by Parvez Bhai. Both of you tried your “the best” to explicate these lines for the Lal Kitab devotees. But I don’t know why “DIL HAI KI MAANTA NAHIN….” Something obviously is seems to be missing from the clarification portion, and is certainly not hitting as hard as it supposed to be. Nevertheless, I salute your endeavor and the “Something is better than nothing” scenario from deep inside. Regards Yograj Prabhakar Mail - You care about security. So do we. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.