Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > These people are here just to flaunt their > ignorance and create confusions. I'm waiting to see what the 'moderator' will do now... PJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Sir, Thats the difference between experience and mere talks. Always respect experience. Never practise writing 08.30.02 as 8.30.02 because some day when you write 02.30.10 as 2.30.10 the next time you observe what you have written, you may read it as 20.30.10. regards, Bhaskar. , " pranesh_joshi2003 " <pranesh_joshi2003 wrote: > No, best to use 8-30-02. > > PJ > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Sir, > > > > Whenever we read the Longitude of a Planet > > it is expressed as under. > > > > For instance Moon in 08.30.02 > > > No, best to use 8-30-02. > > PJ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Sir, 1) The issue which you have raised 13.33, can You tell us where have you read this ? 2) Can You also provide us the length of the Nakshatras as you know it ? 3) And the reference ? 4) What was the point in starting that thread? 5) How do we express 13 Degrees 40 minutes in the way You suggested ? Should it be 13.66.00 ? Is the Moderator at our beck and call ,that whenever we wish him to come he comes ? And why should anyone act now, What harm has been done? Does the below mentioned statement call for the Moderators intervention ? Is he here to comment on every second comment made ? Is it not our duty to respect him and not take his name for small issues ? There has been no untruth in the statement said. Certainly ignorance is exposed with no resemblance of trying to learn, and a ultimate waste of time. Bhaskar. , " pranesh_joshi2003 " <pranesh_joshi2003 wrote: > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > These people are here just to flaunt their > > ignorance and create confusions. > > > I'm waiting to see what the 'moderator' will do now... > > PJ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Hello all, there are several methods to calculate degrees. 1)- Decimal Degrees, for Ex- 0.000000 2)- Degree Minute Second , for ex- 0d00'00 " 3)- Gradians 0.000g 4)- Radians 0.000r But in general practise we use Degree minute seconds, it depends on self practise what the person uses and prefers. 20minutes = 1/3 degree now if we calculate on simple calculator with 8 digit precision we will get 0.3333333, which is infinite. 40 minutes = 2/3 degrees , this is 0.6666667 60 minutes = 3/3 degree which leads to round off to 1 Regards, Tarun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > >Certainly > ignorance is exposed with no resemblance of > trying to learn, and a ultimate waste of time. I posted wanting to know something, and you've sabotaged it with typical moronic digression. I don't care what the moderator thinks but you're a bastard vermin that anyone with even a smidgen of intellect should treat with nothing but the disdain that a yokel with toddler egotism deserves. If this post is 'removed' by the 'moderator', so be it - but to hell with you! PJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 I see your good progress in astrology. Bhaskar. , " pranesh_joshi2003 " <pranesh_joshi2003 wrote: > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > >Certainly > > ignorance is exposed with no resemblance of > > trying to learn, and a ultimate waste of time. > > > I posted wanting to know something, and you've sabotaged it with > typical moronic digression. > > I don't care what the moderator thinks but you're a bastard vermin > that anyone with even a smidgen of intellect should treat with nothing > but the disdain that a yokel with toddler egotism deserves. > > If this post is 'removed' by the 'moderator', so be it - but to hell > with you! > > PJ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Dear Tarunji, Yes. When someone is calculating Degrees on a simple calculator and arrives at .33333 or any other such figure,after the decimal, then he must multiply the same by 60, to arrive at the actual degree part, which has to be expressed in writing or verbally in the same mode. regards, Bhaskar. , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Hello all, > > there are several methods to calculate degrees. > > 1)- Decimal Degrees, for Ex- 0.000000 > 2)- Degree Minute Second , for ex- 0d00'00 " > 3)- Gradians 0.000g > 4)- Radians 0.000r > > > But in general practise we use Degree minute seconds, it depends on > self practise what the person uses and prefers. > > 20minutes = 1/3 degree now if we calculate on simple calculator with > 8 digit precision we will get 0.3333333, which is infinite. > > 40 minutes = 2/3 degrees , this is 0.6666667 > > 60 minutes = 3/3 degree which leads to round off to 1 > > Regards, > > Tarun > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Ok i was under the impression that u had gone deep in the subject Wishing u well in ur practice best SJ > Om Namah Shivaya. > > Well in my little practice with nakshatras I must say that 13.20 > degrees is favorable to me in analysis chart for now. > And plus for me is K.N.Rao approvement of that method in analyzing of > nakshatras. > > When my dasha is be favorable for Jyotish and exploring of similar > thing I gone to study little about of 13.19 degree methods of calculating. > > regards, > ashwini > , " ashwinikumaras " <ashwinikumaras wrote: > > , " suniljohn_2002 " > suniljohn_2002@ wrote: > > > > OM Datta Guru > > Dear Ashwini, > > This is an interesting topic and for long i have pursued it without > > getting a clear cut guidance. Shri P.S.Sastri in his book 'Scientific > > Text Book of Astrology' gives us different sizes for each nakshatra, (If > > i remember well) if we follow that then the nak lordship is being > > changed dramatically at times > > > > Have u or anyone gone deeper in this and found some source > > > > The size of 13.19 can you kindly quote the reference for further studies > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards > > Sunil John > > Mumbai > > > > > > , " ashwinikumaras " > > <ashwinikumaras@> wrote: > > > > > > , " pranesh_joshi2003 " > > > pranesh_joshi2003@ wrote: > > > > > > > > I am looking for a reference from a classic where it is clearly > > stated > > > > that each nakshatra is of an equal size (13.33 degrees). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > PJ > > > > > > > I know for two size in rashi for each nakshatras: > > > 1-13.20 degrees, with this size K.N.Rao is agreed. > > > 2-13.19 from another texts > > > > > > regards, > > > ashwini > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Hare rama krishna. dear sunil , thanks for wishes . regds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah. http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/ <http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/> pt.sunilnair <pt.sunilnair , " jjnet2000_in " <jjnet2000_in wrote: > > Ok i was under the impression that u had gone deep in the subject > Wishing u well in ur practice > best > SJ > > > > > Om Namah Shivaya. > > > > Well in my little practice with nakshatras I must say that 13.20 > > degrees is favorable to me in analysis chart for now. > > And plus for me is K.N.Rao approvement of that method in analyzing of > > nakshatras. > > > > When my dasha is be favorable for Jyotish and exploring of similar > > thing I gone to study little about of 13.19 degree methods of > calculating. > > > > regards, > > ashwini > > > , " ashwinikumaras " > ashwinikumaras@ wrote: > > > > , " suniljohn_2002 " > > suniljohn_2002@ wrote: > > > > > > OM Datta Guru > > > Dear Ashwini, > > > This is an interesting topic and for long i have pursued it without > > > getting a clear cut guidance. Shri P.S.Sastri in his book > 'Scientific > > > Text Book of Astrology' gives us different sizes for each nakshatra, > (If > > > i remember well) if we follow that then the nak lordship is being > > > changed dramatically at times > > > > > > Have u or anyone gone deeper in this and found some source > > > > > > The size of 13.19 can you kindly quote the reference for further > studies > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Regards > > > Sunil John > > > Mumbai > > > > > > > > > , " ashwinikumaras " > > > <ashwinikumaras@> wrote: > > > > > > > > , " pranesh_joshi2003 " > > > > pranesh_joshi2003@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for a reference from a classic where it is clearly > > > stated > > > > > that each nakshatra is of an equal size (13.33 degrees). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > PJ > > > > > > > > > I know for two size in rashi for each nakshatras: > > > > 1-13.20 degrees, with this size K.N.Rao is agreed. > > > > 2-13.19 from another texts > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > ashwini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Dear Bhaskar ji, yes we finally hvae to equate in whatever method we adopt. as i am civil engineer, i have to use all methods when needed. Every drawing is based on accuracy of degrees minutes and seconds. Warm Regards, Tarun , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Tarunji, > > Yes. When someone is calculating Degrees on a > simple calculator and arrives at .33333 or any other > such figure,after the decimal, then he must multiply > the same by 60, to arrive at the actual degree part, > which has to be expressed in writing or verbally > in the same mode. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > there are several methods to calculate degrees. > > > > 1)- Decimal Degrees, for Ex- 0.000000 > > 2)- Degree Minute Second , for ex- 0d00'00 " > > 3)- Gradians 0.000g > > 4)- Radians 0.000r > > > > > > But in general practise we use Degree minute seconds, it depends on > > self practise what the person uses and prefers. > > > > 20minutes = 1/3 degree now if we calculate on simple calculator with > > 8 digit precision we will get 0.3333333, which is infinite. > > > > 40 minutes = 2/3 degrees , this is 0.6666667 > > > > 60 minutes = 3/3 degree which leads to round off to 1 > > > > Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Dear Tarunji, I remember last year, when I had made a error of just 1 (One) Second in the error,in RAMC, while calculating a Chart manually, it resulted in an error of 15 seconds on the 10th Cusp, which means,if suppose the 10th Cusp is on a sandhi, the Nakshatra Lord, that is ownership may change, and those who are accustomed to using this point for predictive astrology in Profession,would give readings which may not be actually related to the native, or may be wrong. That is the power of 1 second. regards, Bhaskar. , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > yes we finally hvae to equate in whatever method we adopt. > as i am civil engineer, i have to use all methods when needed. Every > drawing is based on accuracy of degrees minutes and seconds. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Tarunji, > > > > Yes. When someone is calculating Degrees on a > > simple calculator and arrives at .33333 or any other > > such figure,after the decimal, then he must multiply > > the same by 60, to arrive at the actual degree part, > > which has to be expressed in writing or verbally > > in the same mode. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > there are several methods to calculate degrees. > > > > > > 1)- Decimal Degrees, for Ex- 0.000000 > > > 2)- Degree Minute Second , for ex- 0d00'00 " > > > 3)- Gradians 0.000g > > > 4)- Radians 0.000r > > > > > > > > > But in general practise we use Degree minute seconds, it depends > on > > > self practise what the person uses and prefers. > > > > > > 20minutes = 1/3 degree now if we calculate on simple calculator > with > > > 8 digit precision we will get 0.3333333, which is infinite. > > > > > > 40 minutes = 2/3 degrees , this is 0.6666667 > > > > > > 60 minutes = 3/3 degree which leads to round off to 1 > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 Dear Bhaskar ji, This is interesting to read that just One second of error made such a big difference in calculations. yes this is definite that for Predictive astrology accuracy is the main need. Warm Regards, Tarun , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Tarunji, > > I remember last year, when I had made a error > of just 1 (One) Second in the error,in RAMC, > while calculating a > Chart manually, it resulted in an error of 15 > seconds on the 10th Cusp, which means,if suppose > the 10th Cusp is on a sandhi, the Nakshatra Lord, > that is ownership may change, and those who are > accustomed to using this point for predictive > astrology in Profession,would give readings which > may not be actually related to the native, or > may be wrong. That is the power of 1 second. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > > > yes we finally hvae to equate in whatever method we adopt. > > as i am civil engineer, i have to use all methods when needed. Every > > drawing is based on accuracy of degrees minutes and seconds. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tarunji, > > > > > > Yes. When someone is calculating Degrees on a > > > simple calculator and arrives at .33333 or any other > > > such figure,after the decimal, then he must multiply > > > the same by 60, to arrive at the actual degree part, > > > which has to be expressed in writing or verbally > > > in the same mode. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > there are several methods to calculate degrees. > > > > > > > > 1)- Decimal Degrees, for Ex- 0.000000 > > > > 2)- Degree Minute Second , for ex- 0d00'00 " > > > > 3)- Gradians 0.000g > > > > 4)- Radians 0.000r > > > > > > > > > > > > But in general practise we use Degree minute seconds, it depends > > on > > > > self practise what the person uses and prefers. > > > > > > > > 20minutes = 1/3 degree now if we calculate on simple calculator > > with > > > > 8 digit precision we will get 0.3333333, which is infinite. > > > > > > > > 40 minutes = 2/3 degrees , this is 0.6666667 > > > > > > > > 60 minutes = 3/3 degree which leads to round off to 1 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.