Guest guest Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: This can happen with anybody that right. But when you point at someone that he is using qrong data, then before pointing a finger at him , all those rest of the 4 fingers pointing at yourself,should contain proof to substantiate the one finger you point at others. You are misguiding others by framing stories and trying to push people to believe its authenticity. a) Having vision in temple. b) Believing rumour of child birth before marriage. The above may be true too, but prove it. Till proved guilty, you dont punish anyone. So prove others as wromg as yourself as right. regards, Bhaskar. , " vijayadas_pradeep " <vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Krishna ji > > When we engage in doing case studies,inadvertently we may use false > charts assuming them as true.This can happen with me as well as > you.There is no need for criticism. > > It is needed when ,we misguide others by framing stories regarding > authenticity. > > Regds > Pradeep > > , Krishnamurthy Seetharama > <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > I assumed that your remarks were targeted at me as I presented > > my write-up on Bandhana Yoga and also explained it with > > reference to Sanjay Dutt's chart. > > > > If you say that your comment was not directed to me, I will > > accept it on the face value. Hence, please ignore my previous > > mail to you. > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Krishnaji > > > > > > I was not all mentioning about,your case studies.It was > > > against some > > > people who creates stories about authenticity of data. > > > > > > Regds > > > Pradeep > > > > > > , Krishnamurthy Seetharama > > > <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > > > > > You said: > > > > > > > > <<<Atleast people will stop explaining bandhana yogas using > > > > false horoscopes.>>> > > > > > > > > I only pity you for your line of thinking. You can't produce > > > any > > > > authentic birth data (even according to you), except > > > following > > > > some article based on rumor. And, you call others using > > > false > > > > horoscopes. Wonderful! > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant ji > > > > > > > > > > Your view on Vargas are respected and one will present the > > > > > > > > paper.Those who are finding merit can accept while others > > > can > > > > > reject.Thus there is no debate here. > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand ,britney etc,there are serious > > > manipulations > > > > > and > > > > > fabrications,done by some to promote their vested > > > interests.I > > > > > am not > > > > > against anyone making benefits out of astrological > > > > > consultations ,if > > > > > they wish so.It is upto them.But trying to make astrology > > > a > > > > > commodity and selling it in market will not succeed. > > > > > > > > > > Your mememory of Nargis/Dutt having a son before marriage > > > is a > > > > > > > > > > strong point.We are not sure of anything,but possibilities > > > > > cannot be > > > > > ruled out.Atleast people will stop explaining bandhana > > > yogas > > > > > using > > > > > false horoscopes. > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hGroup , " astro desk " > > > <astro.prashantkumar@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep, Baskar > > > > > > > > > > > > I had mentioned 2 months back I said to Tarun 's post on > > > a > > > > > girl > > > > > singer [in a > > > > > > reply to some one today u said not girl but women] who > > > is a > > > > > women > > > > > too and > > > > > > later Britney spears that no celrebrity discussion will > > > help > > > > > us as > > > > > all is > > > > > > cooked up, fake info and most of them have > > > relationships, > > > > > children > > > > > > /abortions before marriage except a few good artists > > > most of > > > > > them > > > > > have had > > > > > > terrible personal lives, show biz is full of filth and > > > some > > > > > good > > > > > people a > > > > > > minority surely we can count good ones on finger tips > > > > > > > > > > > > I will rather discuss personal cases of people in need > > > of an > > > > > > > > > > answer than > > > > > > this gossip subjects and try to fix astrological basis > > > for > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > about what I read in that magazine was about a son to > > > them > > > > > whatever it be he > > > > > > was not a star then nor I remember the date there but a > > > ref > > > > > to > > > > > them having a > > > > > > son before they got married. and in show biz lets not > > > look > > > > > at any > > > > > normal > > > > > > pattern, children then marriage in most cases will be > > > > > reverse and > > > > > some good > > > > > > people will be ok, this is a society opposite of us a > > > short > > > > > shelf > > > > > life and > > > > > > make the best when sun shines. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on Vargas I have said what I can say and also quoted > > > > > possible > > > > > references in > > > > > > old Magazines where stalwarts discussed them we r too > > > small > > > > > in > > > > > comparison I > > > > > > merely know they had less distractions, ego and need to > > > make > > > > > > > > > > living society > > > > > > took care of them better than now. so they poured > > > sincere , > > > > > wise > > > > > works > > > > > > > > > > > > we have to balance our life expenses and also work > > > endlessly > > > > > free > > > > > in groups. > > > > > > and on and off get rebuked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/6/07, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody is degrading anyone.I have found from a > > > website, > > > > > Sanjay > > > > > Dutt > > > > > > > is being interviewed,where his birth year is mentioned > > > as > > > > > 1956.Thus > > > > > > > as astrologers we can verify the possibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand,1959 was given by some in this list > > > from > > > > > > > > > > authentic > > > > > > > sources.There were totally ilogical and contradictory > > > > > stories > > > > > posted > > > > > > > as support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can understand the eagerness of some to stop these > > > > > threads.This is > > > > > > > also against those who tries to misguide others and > > > give > > > > > false > > > > > info. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read Raojis website -He has told the truth regarding > > > non- > > > > > > > verification fo 1959.Nobody is saying 1956 is true or > > > > > whatever > > > > > being > > > > > > > said is right.Possibilities are there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what is bad or degrading about Dutt/nargis?Did he > > > > > desert his > > > > > > > child.Late Dutt saved the lady by risking his life and > > > > > married > > > > > her. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding Varga charts -Your views are welcome.You can > > > > > ignore,or > > > > > say > > > > > > > it was inconclusive or waste of time etc etc.It is ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way,you can post your opinion.What has to be > > > > > === message truncated === > > > > > > > > > ________ > > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative > vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center. > > http://autos./green_center/ > > > Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on TV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 Whenever You tried meeting your mother,in childhood. and entered her room , thats what you saw, Right ? So you seem to have a Hangover of Bhaskar in every breath of yours. But i advise you to talk with your mother if she is alive. I am sure I was not the only one. , Assy Baby <ass_trologers wrote: > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: This can happen with anybody that right. But when you > point at someone that he is using qrong > data, then before pointing a finger > at him , all those rest of the 4 fingers pointing at > yourself,should contain proof to substantiate the one > finger you point at others. > > You are misguiding others by framing stories and > trying to push people to believe its authenticity. > > a) Having vision in temple. > b) Believing rumour of child birth before marriage. > > The above may be true too, but prove it. > Till proved guilty, you dont punish anyone. > > So prove others as wromg as yourself > as right. > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > , " vijayadas_pradeep " > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > Dear Krishna ji > > > > When we engage in doing case studies,inadvertently we may use false > > charts assuming them as true.This can happen with me as well as > > you.There is no need for criticism. > > > > It is needed when ,we misguide others by framing stories regarding > > authenticity. > > > > Regds > > Pradeep > > > > , Krishnamurthy Seetharama > > <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > > > I assumed that your remarks were targeted at me as I presented > > > my write-up on Bandhana Yoga and also explained it with > > > reference to Sanjay Dutt's chart. > > > > > > If you say that your comment was not directed to me, I will > > > accept it on the face value. Hence, please ignore my previous > > > mail to you. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Krishna > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Krishnaji > > > > > > > > I was not all mentioning about,your case studies.It was > > > > against some > > > > people who creates stories about authenticity of data. > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > , Krishnamurthy Seetharama > > > > <krishna_1998@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > > > > > > > You said: > > > > > > > > > > <<<Atleast people will stop explaining bandhana yogas using > > > > > false horoscopes.>>> > > > > > > > > > > I only pity you for your line of thinking. You can't produce > > > > any > > > > > authentic birth data (even according to you), except > > > > following > > > > > some article based on rumor. And, you call others using > > > > false > > > > > horoscopes. Wonderful! > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Krishna > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant ji > > > > > > > > > > > > Your view on Vargas are respected and one will present the > > > > > > > > > > paper.Those who are finding merit can accept while others > > > > can > > > > > > reject.Thus there is no debate here. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand ,britney etc,there are serious > > > > manipulations > > > > > > and > > > > > > fabrications,done by some to promote their vested > > > > interests.I > > > > > > am not > > > > > > against anyone making benefits out of astrological > > > > > > consultations ,if > > > > > > they wish so.It is upto them.But trying to make astrology > > > > a > > > > > > commodity and selling it in market will not succeed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your mememory of Nargis/Dutt having a son before marriage > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > > > > strong point.We are not sure of anything,but possibilities > > > > > > cannot be > > > > > > ruled out.Atleast people will stop explaining bandhana > > > > yogas > > > > > > using > > > > > > false horoscopes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hGroup , " astro desk " > > > > <astro.prashantkumar@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep, Baskar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had mentioned 2 months back I said to Tarun 's post on > > > > a > > > > > > girl > > > > > > singer [in a > > > > > > > reply to some one today u said not girl but women] who > > > > is a > > > > > > women > > > > > > too and > > > > > > > later Britney spears that no celrebrity discussion will > > > > help > > > > > > us as > > > > > > all is > > > > > > > cooked up, fake info and most of them have > > > > relationships, > > > > > > children > > > > > > > /abortions before marriage except a few good artists > > > > most of > > > > > > them > > > > > > have had > > > > > > > terrible personal lives, show biz is full of filth and > > > > some > > > > > > good > > > > > > people a > > > > > > > minority surely we can count good ones on finger tips > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will rather discuss personal cases of people in need > > > > of an > > > > > > > > > > > > answer than > > > > > > > this gossip subjects and try to fix astrological basis > > > > for > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about what I read in that magazine was about a son to > > > > them > > > > > > whatever it be he > > > > > > > was not a star then nor I remember the date there but a > > > > ref > > > > > > to > > > > > > them having a > > > > > > > son before they got married. and in show biz lets not > > > > look > > > > > > at any > > > > > > normal > > > > > > > pattern, children then marriage in most cases will be > > > > > > reverse and > > > > > > some good > > > > > > > people will be ok, this is a society opposite of us a > > > > short > > > > > > shelf > > > > > > life and > > > > > > > make the best when sun shines. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on Vargas I have said what I can say and also quoted > > > > > > possible > > > > > > references in > > > > > > > old Magazines where stalwarts discussed them we r too > > > > small > > > > > > in > > > > > > comparison I > > > > > > > merely know they had less distractions, ego and need to > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > > living society > > > > > > > took care of them better than now. so they poured > > > > sincere , > > > > > > wise > > > > > > works > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we have to balance our life expenses and also work > > > > endlessly > > > > > > free > > > > > > in groups. > > > > > > > and on and off get rebuked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/6/07, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody is degrading anyone.I have found from a > > > > website, > > > > > > Sanjay > > > > > > Dutt > > > > > > > > is being interviewed,where his birth year is mentioned > > > > as > > > > > > 1956.Thus > > > > > > > > as astrologers we can verify the possibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand,1959 was given by some in this list > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > authentic > > > > > > > > sources.There were totally ilogical and contradictory > > > > > > stories > > > > > > posted > > > > > > > > as support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can understand the eagerness of some to stop these > > > > > > threads.This is > > > > > > > > also against those who tries to misguide others and > > > > give > > > > > > false > > > > > > info. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read Raojis website -He has told the truth regarding > > > > non- > > > > > > > > verification fo 1959.Nobody is saying 1956 is true or > > > > > > whatever > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > said is right.Possibilities are there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what is bad or degrading about Dutt/nargis?Did he > > > > > > desert his > > > > > > > > child.Late Dutt saved the lady by risking his life and > > > > > > married > > > > > > her. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding Varga charts -Your views are welcome.You can > > > > > > ignore,or > > > > > > say > > > > > > > > it was inconclusive or waste of time etc etc.It is ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way,you can post your opinion.What has to be > > > > > > > === message truncated === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative > > vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center. > > > http://autos./green_center/ > > > > > > Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on TV. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.