360 days Vs 360 degrees - Interesting Link

[Guest guest]

Dear Satish ji

 

Thanks for your valauable views and the example from mahabharatha.

 

I am giving a link ,which covers some interesting points.I do not know

how far the views on phaladeepika etc are true ,but one can say that

the author has covered the topic well.

 

http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

 

Regds

Pradeep , SPK <aquaris_rising

wrote:

>

> Vijaydasji,

>

> Yes that makes sense. A civil day is from 1 sunrise to

> next sunrise. 360 such civil days make a civil( savana

> year).

>

> Also jyotish is such a nice and symmetric model. 120

> year dasha, 9 planets, 12 houses, 30 degrees per

> rashi. all these are nice multiples. So 360 fits

> nicely in scheme of things. 360 can be divisible by

> all the numbers mentioned above. 365.25 is such an odd

> entity.

>

> There is a dialogue between bhisma and duryodhana

> about whether pandavas exile had ended or not ?

> According to duryodhana it had not ended. According to

> bheshma and Pandavas it had ended. Probably duryodhana

> was using 365 day solar year but bheeshma knower of

> shstras was probably using 360 day year. A point to

> ponder.

>

> Satish

> --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep

> wrote:

>

> > Dear Satya ji,Satish ji Bhaskar ji,Chandrashekhar ji

> > and all

> >

> > As i am engaged with Varga Chakra assignment, i may

> > not be able to

> > devote much time for studying this topic.But it

> > would be interesting

> > to read if other members can share their

> > views.Chandrashekhar ji is

> > extensively using 360 days.

> >

> > As mentioned before, i am just experimenting.But i

> > can present my

> > logic or Tarka which gave me a go-ahead to

> > experiment with 360 days.

> > As long as I do not have enough Pramanas, this

> > remains my personal view.

> >

> > 1) Many learned scholars debate that Sun takes so

> > many days to

> > traverse 360 degrees and hence the length of year is

> > 365.25.

> >

> > Nobody has a disagreement here - This is a fact as

> > far as solar path

> > is concerned.

> >

> > 2) What is Mahadasha ?

> > It is the period of influence a particular planet

> > is having on a

> > Jataka. It can be so many years, so many months and

> > so many days.

> >

> > What can be the duration of this day?

> >

> > a) 1 degree movement of Sun

> > b) 1 sunrise to another sunrise

> >

> >

> > Horashastra is based on Ahoratra, which is the

> > period between two sun

> > rises. If some one says, 360 days is not based on

> > Sun's influence-

> > then we can deny it.

> >

> > Udaya or rise has significance. Horizon is the

> > ''visible'' realm that

> > denotes our arrival. Lagna do have a degree, but it

> > has no

> > significance without horizon. It is the Udaya or

> > rise of our Lagna.

> > Earth is the frame of reference, and it marks the

> > Thala or Plane from

> > which a Jataka is analyzed. Thus as compared to 1

> > degree movement of

> > Sun, I feel 1 AHO + 1 RATRA or the time period

> > between two sunrises is

> > a day.This is because Sun re-enters the said Thala

> > at every Udaya or Rise.

> >

> > Sun's influence is the very Karaka for our separate

> > existence. He is

> > the Karaka for Lagna as per Jyotish. Thus his Udaya

> > marks the

> > beginning of influence. The period of influence of a

> > Graha, thus has

> > to be measured on the basis of the above said

> > argument is my personal

> > view at this moment. I will stand corrected if

> > learned scholars may

> > provide, sufficient Tarka and Pramana.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

______________________________\

____

> Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's

> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.

> http://tv./collections/222

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeepji,

 

That was a good link provided by You.

 

Both Phaldeepika and Shri Ramanji are right.

The 365 1/4 has to be proportionately translated

to the Planetary periods of the Vimsottari

Dasha from the 360 number of the days.

 

Thus 60 Ghatis Multiplied by

The Duration of the Planet in Days,

Divided by 360 Days

= No.of Years alloted.

 

Thus we have for Sun

60 Ghatis x 36 days

= 2160 Days divided by 360 days

= 6 Years.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Satish ji

>

> Thanks for your valauable views and the example from mahabharatha.

>

> I am giving a link ,which covers some interesting points.I do not know

> how far the views on phaladeepika etc are true ,but one can say that

> the author has covered the topic well.

>

> http://www.sulekha.com/content/epress/samples/EB_RAMAN_015_S.pdf

>

> Regds

> Pradeep , SPK <aquaris_rising@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Vijaydasji,

> >

> > Yes that makes sense. A civil day is from 1 sunrise to

> > next sunrise. 360 such civil days make a civil( savana

> > year).

> >

> > Also jyotish is such a nice and symmetric model. 120

> > year dasha, 9 planets, 12 houses, 30 degrees per

> > rashi. all these are nice multiples. So 360 fits

> > nicely in scheme of things. 360 can be divisible by

> > all the numbers mentioned above. 365.25 is such an odd

> > entity.

> >

> > There is a dialogue between bhisma and duryodhana

> > about whether pandavas exile had ended or not ?

> > According to duryodhana it had not ended. According to

> > bheshma and Pandavas it had ended. Probably duryodhana

> > was using 365 day solar year but bheeshma knower of

> > shstras was probably using 360 day year. A point to

> > ponder.

> >

> > Satish

> > --- vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@>

> > wrote:

> >

> > > Dear Satya ji,Satish ji Bhaskar ji,Chandrashekhar ji

> > > and all

> > >

> > > As i am engaged with Varga Chakra assignment, i may

> > > not be able to

> > > devote much time for studying this topic.But it

> > > would be interesting

> > > to read if other members can share their

> > > views.Chandrashekhar ji is

> > > extensively using 360 days.

> > >

> > > As mentioned before, i am just experimenting.But i

> > > can present my

> > > logic or Tarka which gave me a go-ahead to

> > > experiment with 360 days.

> > > As long as I do not have enough Pramanas, this

> > > remains my personal view.

> > >

> > > 1) Many learned scholars debate that Sun takes so

> > > many days to

> > > traverse 360 degrees and hence the length of year is

> > > 365.25.

> > >

> > > Nobody has a disagreement here - This is a fact as

> > > far as solar path

> > > is concerned.

> > >

> > > 2) What is Mahadasha ?

> > > It is the period of influence a particular planet

> > > is having on a

> > > Jataka. It can be so many years, so many months and

> > > so many days.

> > >

> > > What can be the duration of this day?

> > >

> > > a) 1 degree movement of Sun

> > > b) 1 sunrise to another sunrise

> > >

> > >

> > > Horashastra is based on Ahoratra, which is the

> > > period between two sun

> > > rises. If some one says, 360 days is not based on

> > > Sun's influence-

> > > then we can deny it.

> > >

> > > Udaya or rise has significance. Horizon is the

> > > ''visible'' realm that

> > > denotes our arrival. Lagna do have a degree, but it

> > > has no

> > > significance without horizon. It is the Udaya or

> > > rise of our Lagna.

> > > Earth is the frame of reference, and it marks the

> > > Thala or Plane from

> > > which a Jataka is analyzed. Thus as compared to 1

> > > degree movement of

> > > Sun, I feel 1 AHO + 1 RATRA or the time period

> > > between two sunrises is

> > > a day.This is because Sun re-enters the said Thala

> > > at every Udaya or Rise.

> > >

> > > Sun's influence is the very Karaka for our separate

> > > existence. He is

> > > the Karaka for Lagna as per Jyotish. Thus his Udaya

> > > marks the

> > > beginning of influence. The period of influence of a

> > > Graha, thus has

> > > to be measured on the basis of the above said

> > > argument is my personal

> > > view at this moment. I will stand corrected if

> > > learned scholars may

> > > provide, sufficient Tarka and Pramana.

> > >

> > > Regds

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

______________________________\

____

> > Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's

> > Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.

> > http://tv./collections/222

> >

>