Prove or dont talk - 2

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeepji and cronies,

 

Prove -

 

1) There is nothing like Divisional Charts.

2) Only Rashi Chart exists.

3) there is no Navamsha Chart.

4) There is thus no aspects in Navamsha Chart.

5) Readings can only be given through Rashi

and its amsas but not Navamsha Chart.

6) Varga charts are not to be made

7) Vargas are to be seen from Rashi only.

8) Shri BV Raman in all his books he has

given Navamsha Chart- He is wrong

9) Shri KN Rao has given in all his books

Navamsha Chart - He is wrong.

10)Late Santhanam did not know Sanskrit.

11)Santhanamji has given in all his books

Navamsha Chart. He is wrong.

12)All softwares making Navamsha Charts are wrong.

13)LR Chawdhari showing use of Navamsha Charts is wrong.

14)All South Indians predicting through Navamsha charts

are wrong.

15)Chandulal Patel has written wrong books on use of

Navamsha Charts.

16) All diagrammatical representations in these books are

wrong.

17) Only you know Sanskrit is right.

18) One cannot predict from Divisional Charts.

19) All aspects being used by BV Raman,KN Rao,Santhanam,

LR Chawdhari etc. and susbtabtiating their explanations

of natives readings are wrong.

 

Prove above or dont talk.

We are not eager to close the Thread.

I only wish to avoid Jyotish Bloodbath,that

is why I was requesting you to

close the thread, and not because of any other reason,

but you dont seem to understand. You always

misunderstand.

So continue the thread. I am ready to argue,

debate and discuss.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.