Guest guest Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Dear Bhaskar ji Many thanks for your love. As we have mentioned before,regarding Varga Chakras there is no point in writing lengthy mails.Offer answer for the technical points which are objectively verifable,once the paper is presented.I have mentioned 100 times that you may agree or disagree.It is only for the members who are curious. Regds Pradeep , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear members, > > It is only out of compassion and love , > for these good members who were participating > in this thread, that I wished to close the thread. > I have been requesting continously since the start , > and constantly to please close the thread, since > it is getting us nowhere, it would only aim to > lower the respect of Shri Pradeepji and the likes, > which i did not wish, as we certainly respect him for > his Sanskrit knowledge and his generous past,I did > not wish him to be at the other end of the Gun, if I > can say bluntly,was the reason why I wished to close > this thread,so that none would loose face, but > my continous requests have fallen on deaf ears. > We are all good men, and do not wish other good men > like Shri Pradeepji to act unreasonably and then become > targetted,was the main reason of my persistent efforts > and requests to close the thread. > But it seems apparently, still these facts seem to be miles > away from these respected members, and they would > only like to live in fruitless debates and discussions. > So be it. > > But I still feel pity and compassion, and for > the final time I request that stop this thread. > I would never like basically good men like Pradeepji, > Chandrasekharji, and so many others like them, to > ever come in an uncomfortable position. > If all our family members remain happy, then so do we. > If one of them is uncomfortable then we too > loose our peace. Is it not ? > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Pradeepji and cronies, > > > > Prove - > > > > 1) There is nothing like Divisional Charts. > > 2) Only Rashi Chart exists. > > 3) there is no Navamsha Chart. > > 4) There is thus no aspects in Navamsha Chart. > > 5) Readings can only be given through Rashi > > and its amsas but not Navamsha Chart. > > 6) Varga charts are not to be made > > 7) Vargas are to be seen from Rashi only. > > 8) Shri BV Raman in all his books he has > > given Navamsha Chart- He is wrong > > 9) Shri KN Rao has given in all his books > > Navamsha Chart - He is wrong. > > 10)Late Santhanam did not know Sanskrit. > > 11)Santhanamji has given in all his books > > Navamsha Chart. He is wrong. > > 12)All softwares making Navamsha Charts are wrong. > > 13)LR Chawdhari showing use of Navamsha Charts is wrong. > > 14)All South Indians predicting through Navamsha charts > > are wrong. > > 15)Chandulal Patel has written wrong books on use of > > Navamsha Charts. > > 16) All diagrammatical representations in these books are > > wrong. > > 17) Only you know Sanskrit is right. > > 18) One cannot predict from Divisional Charts. > > 19) All aspects being used by BV Raman,KN Rao,Santhanam, > > LR Chawdhari etc. and susbtabtiating their explanations > > of natives readings are wrong. > > > > Prove above or dont talk. > > We are not eager to close the Thread. > > I only wish to avoid Jyotish Bloodbath,that > > is why I was requesting you to > > close the thread, and not because of any other reason, > > but you dont seem to understand. You always > > misunderstand. > > So continue the thread. I am ready to argue, > > debate and discuss. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Dear Pradeepji, Thank you for understanding me now. My personal view- I do not accept anything as right or anything wrong. because it is difficult to assess with my limited brains the great meanings hidden in the shlokas and encompassed within, which probably only the shishyas of those times could fathom, or spiritually very highly elevated modern men of today could understand. Since I do not fall in either category, for me I keep no bias for anyone and his search-research or conclusion. For me,You could be as right as the others, for want of Great Rishi like Personages like Parashar, in our presence today, to explain us the actual truth. If You notice in all my exchanges, I have never mentioned that I am right and You are wrong in our respective approach to the vargas and assessment thereof. because honestly speaking no one knows the real truth actually. There are many principles contrary to common knowledge of acceptance, which also work, but if I try to display those, I would become a laughing stock for want of authenticity. Therefore I keep those to myself, as long as they work for me, its fine. I do not doubt your researches, and also believe that ultimately you may prove yourself right in maybe few decades from now, or few years too,but till that time, you have to keep your facts known to you, behind the curtain , for the reasons mentioned earlier. I wish you good progress in your search for the truth,and believe me I harbor no ill will, have never harbnored so, but always wish well for all people like you, and hope that you meet success soon. Best wishes, Bhaskar. , " vijayadas_pradeep " <vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar ji > > Many thanks for your love. > As we have mentioned before,regarding Varga Chakras there is no > point in writing lengthy mails.Offer answer for the technical points > which are objectively verifable,once the paper is presented.I have > mentioned 100 times that you may agree or disagree.It is only for > the members who are curious. > > Regds > Pradeep > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Dear members, > > > > It is only out of compassion and love , > > for these good members who were participating > > in this thread, that I wished to close the thread. > > I have been requesting continously since the start , > > and constantly to please close the thread, since > > it is getting us nowhere, it would only aim to > > lower the respect of Shri Pradeepji and the likes, > > which i did not wish, as we certainly respect him for > > his Sanskrit knowledge and his generous past,I did > > not wish him to be at the other end of the Gun, if I > > can say bluntly,was the reason why I wished to close > > this thread,so that none would loose face, but > > my continous requests have fallen on deaf ears. > > We are all good men, and do not wish other good men > > like Shri Pradeepji to act unreasonably and then become > > targetted,was the main reason of my persistent efforts > > and requests to close the thread. > > But it seems apparently, still these facts seem to be miles > > away from these respected members, and they would > > only like to live in fruitless debates and discussions. > > So be it. > > > > But I still feel pity and compassion, and for > > the final time I request that stop this thread. > > I would never like basically good men like Pradeepji, > > Chandrasekharji, and so many others like them, to > > ever come in an uncomfortable position. > > If all our family members remain happy, then so do we. > > If one of them is uncomfortable then we too > > loose our peace. Is it not ? > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Pradeepji and cronies, > > > > > > Prove - > > > > > > 1) There is nothing like Divisional Charts. > > > 2) Only Rashi Chart exists. > > > 3) there is no Navamsha Chart. > > > 4) There is thus no aspects in Navamsha Chart. > > > 5) Readings can only be given through Rashi > > > and its amsas but not Navamsha Chart. > > > 6) Varga charts are not to be made > > > 7) Vargas are to be seen from Rashi only. > > > 8) Shri BV Raman in all his books he has > > > given Navamsha Chart- He is wrong > > > 9) Shri KN Rao has given in all his books > > > Navamsha Chart - He is wrong. > > > 10)Late Santhanam did not know Sanskrit. > > > 11)Santhanamji has given in all his books > > > Navamsha Chart. He is wrong. > > > 12)All softwares making Navamsha Charts are wrong. > > > 13)LR Chawdhari showing use of Navamsha Charts is wrong. > > > 14)All South Indians predicting through Navamsha charts > > > are wrong. > > > 15)Chandulal Patel has written wrong books on use of > > > Navamsha Charts. > > > 16) All diagrammatical representations in these books are > > > wrong. > > > 17) Only you know Sanskrit is right. > > > 18) One cannot predict from Divisional Charts. > > > 19) All aspects being used by BV Raman,KN Rao,Santhanam, > > > LR Chawdhari etc. and susbtabtiating their explanations > > > of natives readings are wrong. > > > > > > Prove above or dont talk. > > > We are not eager to close the Thread. > > > I only wish to avoid Jyotish Bloodbath,that > > > is why I was requesting you to > > > close the thread, and not because of any other reason, > > > but you dont seem to understand. You always > > > misunderstand. > > > So continue the thread. I am ready to argue, > > > debate and discuss. > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.