Prove or dont talk - 2

[Guest guest]

Dear members,

 

It is only out of compassion and love ,

for these good members who were participating

in this thread, that I wished to close the thread.

I have been requesting continously since the start ,

and constantly to please close the thread, since

it is getting us nowhere, it would only aim to

lower the respect of Shri Pradeepji and the likes,

which i did not wish, as we certainly respect him for

his Sanskrit knowledge and his generous past,I did

not wish him to be at the other end of the Gun, if I

can say bluntly,was the reason why I wished to close

this thread,so that none would loose face, but

my continous requests have fallen on deaf ears.

We are all good men, and do not wish other good men

like Shri Pradeepji to act unreasonably and then become

targetted,was the main reason of my persistent efforts

and requests to close the thread.

But it seems apparently, still these facts seem to be miles

away from these respected members, and they would

only like to live in fruitless debates and discussions.

So be it.

 

But I still feel pity and compassion, and for

the final time I request that stop this thread.

I would never like basically good men like Pradeepji,

Chandrasekharji, and so many others like them, to

ever come in an uncomfortable position.

If all our family members remain happy, then so do we.

If one of them is uncomfortable then we too

loose our peace. Is it not ?

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeepji and cronies,

>

> Prove -

>

> 1) There is nothing like Divisional Charts.

> 2) Only Rashi Chart exists.

> 3) there is no Navamsha Chart.

> 4) There is thus no aspects in Navamsha Chart.

> 5) Readings can only be given through Rashi

> and its amsas but not Navamsha Chart.

> 6) Varga charts are not to be made

> 7) Vargas are to be seen from Rashi only.

> 8) Shri BV Raman in all his books he has

> given Navamsha Chart- He is wrong

> 9) Shri KN Rao has given in all his books

> Navamsha Chart - He is wrong.

> 10)Late Santhanam did not know Sanskrit.

> 11)Santhanamji has given in all his books

> Navamsha Chart. He is wrong.

> 12)All softwares making Navamsha Charts are wrong.

> 13)LR Chawdhari showing use of Navamsha Charts is wrong.

> 14)All South Indians predicting through Navamsha charts

> are wrong.

> 15)Chandulal Patel has written wrong books on use of

> Navamsha Charts.

> 16) All diagrammatical representations in these books are

> wrong.

> 17) Only you know Sanskrit is right.

> 18) One cannot predict from Divisional Charts.

> 19) All aspects being used by BV Raman,KN Rao,Santhanam,

> LR Chawdhari etc. and susbtabtiating their explanations

> of natives readings are wrong.

>

> Prove above or dont talk.

> We are not eager to close the Thread.

> I only wish to avoid Jyotish Bloodbath,that

> is why I was requesting you to

> close the thread, and not because of any other reason,

> but you dont seem to understand. You always

> misunderstand.

> So continue the thread. I am ready to argue,

> debate and discuss.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>