Discontinue both threads- no just on doubtful data 7/8/7

[Guest guest]

tarun

 

NO I POINT TO IT AS A DANGER in talking abt celebreties whover sunil datt,

Britney, mikel jackson, any pouplar person in the enws

 

btw have u seen Sonia gandhis borth details 2 diff years and 2 diff dates

too places are different also so if ppl discuss her it is a comedyagain

 

Man Mohan singh too one record says sept 4 another feb 26 or so

 

it is al slippery path to venture on such doubtful data

 

prashant

 

 

On 8/6/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> Dear Prashant ji,

>

> Why you are still running for Britney's topic....

>

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

> <%40>,

> " astro desk "

> <astro.prashantkumar wrote:

> >

> > Pradeep, Baskar

> >

> > I had mentioned 2 months back I said to Tarun 's post on a girl

> singer [in a

> > reply to some one today u said not girl but women] who is a women

> too and

> > later Britney spears that no celrebrity discussion will help us as

> all is

> > cooked up, fake info and most of them have relationships, children

> > /abortions before marriage except a few good artists most of them

> have had

> > terrible personal lives, show biz is full of filth and some good

> people a

> > minority surely we can count good ones on finger tips

> >

> > I will rather discuss personal cases of people in need of an answer

> than

> > this gossip subjects and try to fix astrological basis for it

> >

> > about what I read in that magazine was about a son to them whatever

> it be he

> > was not a star then nor I remember the date there but a ref to them

> having a

> > son before they got married. and in show biz lets not look at any

> normal

> > pattern, children then marriage in most cases will be reverse and

> some good

> > people will be ok, this is a society opposite of us a short shelf

> life and

> > make the best when sun shines.

> >

> >

> > on Vargas I have said what I can say and also quoted possible

> references in

> > old Magazines where stalwarts discussed them we r too small in

> comparison I

> > merely know they had less distractions, ego and need to make living

> society

> > took care of them better than now. so they poured sincere , wise

> works

> >

> > we have to balance our life expenses and also work endlessly free

> in groups.

> > and on and off get rebuked.

> >

> >

> >

> > best wishes

> >

> >

> > On 8/6/07, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > >

> > > Nobody is degrading anyone.I have found from a website, Sanjay

> Dutt

> > > is being interviewed,where his birth year is mentioned as

> 1956.Thus

> > > as astrologers we can verify the possibility.

> > >

> > > On the other hand,1959 was given by some in this list from

> authentic

> > > sources.There were totally ilogical and contradictory stories

> posted

> > > as support.

> > >

> > > I can understand the eagerness of some to stop these threads.This

> is

> > > also against those who tries to misguide others and give false

> info.

> > >

> > > Read Raojis website -He has told the truth regarding non-

> > > verification fo 1959.Nobody is saying 1956 is true or whatever

> being

> > > said is right.Possibilities are there.

> > >

> > > Now what is bad or degrading about Dutt/nargis?Did he desert his

> > > child.Late Dutt saved the lady by risking his life and married

> her.

> > >

> > > Regarding Varga charts -Your views are welcome.You can ignore,or

> say

> > > it was inconclusive or waste of time etc etc.It is ok.

> > >

> > > By the way,you can post your opinion.What has to be posted,when to

> > > keep silence etc is not in the hands of a few individuals.

> > >

> > > Regds

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > >

<%40><%

> 40>,

> > > " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Freinds,

> > > >

> > > > I request all to please discontinue these 2 threads.

> > > >

> > > > 1) ON Sanjay Dutt.

> > > > That family is already shattered. Sunil Dutt and

> > > > Nargis have been our favourites. And so has been

> > > > Sanjay Dutt- as actors.This boy made a mistake which of course

> > > > cannot be pardoned because he was keeping friendship with

> > > > the enemies of the nation, but it was still a mistake.

> > > > He is in jail, His parents are no more. What right do we have

> > > > to talk dirty about them ? Does it behove

> > > > of us ? No certainly not.

> > > >

> > > > 2) ON VARGA ASPECTS AND CHARTS.

> > > > Nothing conclusive could be produced from that thread,

> > > > instead factions were created bewteen members, animosity

> > > > and differences of opinions, which persists uptil today.

> > > > What is the meaning then of creating more inimical feelings

> > > > and ill will ?

> > > >

> > > > Yet if certain people wish to continue this for temporary

> > > > false prestige, then so be it. But things could take a ugly

> > > > turn is what I sense.

> > > >

> > > > Hope all good members agree with me.

> > > >

> > > > best wishes,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> > Thank you,

> >

> > Prashantkumar

> > --------

> > For Consultation charges please write to me

> > --------

> > G B Prashant Kumar

> > `Gyandeep' 4, Fifth street

> > Nandanam Extn,

> > Chennai 600035, INDIA

> > MOBILE 9840051861

> > TEL 42110983/24340186

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant ji,

 

OKay sir, As u say.

I thought to trust for astrodatabank software for datas . But yes you

are right we cannot say what time is correct. Because when on just

one indian celebrity we are confused or facing opposition on the data

available in market. Then American datas are under question mark.

 

Warm Regards,

 

Tarun

, " astro desk "

<astro.prashantkumar wrote:

>

> tarun

>

> NO I POINT TO IT AS A DANGER in talking abt celebreties whover

sunil datt,

> Britney, mikel jackson, any pouplar person in the enws

>

> btw have u seen Sonia gandhis borth details 2 diff years and 2 diff

dates

> too places are different also so if ppl discuss her it is a

comedyagain

>

> Man Mohan singh too one record says sept 4 another feb 26 or so

>

> it is al slippery path to venture on such doubtful data

>

> prashant

>

>

> On 8/6/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote:

> >

> > Dear Prashant ji,

> >

> > Why you are still running for Britney's topic....

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Tarun

> >

> > <%

40>,

> > " astro desk "

> > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Pradeep, Baskar

> > >

> > > I had mentioned 2 months back I said to Tarun 's post on a girl

> > singer [in a

> > > reply to some one today u said not girl but women] who is a

women

> > too and

> > > later Britney spears that no celrebrity discussion will help us

as

> > all is

> > > cooked up, fake info and most of them have relationships,

children

> > > /abortions before marriage except a few good artists most of

them

> > have had

> > > terrible personal lives, show biz is full of filth and some good

> > people a

> > > minority surely we can count good ones on finger tips

> > >

> > > I will rather discuss personal cases of people in need of an

answer

> > than

> > > this gossip subjects and try to fix astrological basis for it

> > >

> > > about what I read in that magazine was about a son to them

whatever

> > it be he

> > > was not a star then nor I remember the date there but a ref to

them

> > having a

> > > son before they got married. and in show biz lets not look at

any

> > normal

> > > pattern, children then marriage in most cases will be reverse

and

> > some good

> > > people will be ok, this is a society opposite of us a short

shelf

> > life and

> > > make the best when sun shines.

> > >

> > >

> > > on Vargas I have said what I can say and also quoted possible

> > references in

> > > old Magazines where stalwarts discussed them we r too small in

> > comparison I

> > > merely know they had less distractions, ego and need to make

living

> > society

> > > took care of them better than now. so they poured sincere , wise

> > works

> > >

> > > we have to balance our life expenses and also work endlessly

free

> > in groups.

> > > and on and off get rebuked.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > best wishes

> > >

> > >

> > > On 8/6/07, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > > >

> > > > Nobody is degrading anyone.I have found from a website, Sanjay

> > Dutt

> > > > is being interviewed,where his birth year is mentioned as

> > 1956.Thus

> > > > as astrologers we can verify the possibility.

> > > >

> > > > On the other hand,1959 was given by some in this list from

> > authentic

> > > > sources.There were totally ilogical and contradictory stories

> > posted

> > > > as support.

> > > >

> > > > I can understand the eagerness of some to stop these

threads.This

> > is

> > > > also against those who tries to misguide others and give false

> > info.

> > > >

> > > > Read Raojis website -He has told the truth regarding non-

> > > > verification fo 1959.Nobody is saying 1956 is true or whatever

> > being

> > > > said is right.Possibilities are there.

> > > >

> > > > Now what is bad or degrading about Dutt/nargis?Did he desert

his

> > > > child.Late Dutt saved the lady by risking his life and married

> > her.

> > > >

> > > > Regarding Varga charts -Your views are welcome.You can

ignore,or

> > say

> > > > it was inconclusive or waste of time etc etc.It is ok.

> > > >

> > > > By the way,you can post your opinion.What has to be

posted,when to

> > > > keep silence etc is not in the hands of a few individuals.

> > > >

> > > > Regds

> > > > Pradeep

> > > >

> > > > <%

40><%

> > 40>,

> > > > " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Freinds,

> > > > >

> > > > > I request all to please discontinue these 2 threads.

> > > > >

> > > > > 1) ON Sanjay Dutt.

> > > > > That family is already shattered. Sunil Dutt and

> > > > > Nargis have been our favourites. And so has been

> > > > > Sanjay Dutt- as actors.This boy made a mistake which of

course

> > > > > cannot be pardoned because he was keeping friendship with

> > > > > the enemies of the nation, but it was still a mistake.

> > > > > He is in jail, His parents are no more. What right do we

have

> > > > > to talk dirty about them ? Does it behove

> > > > > of us ? No certainly not.

> > > > >

> > > > > 2) ON VARGA ASPECTS AND CHARTS.

> > > > > Nothing conclusive could be produced from that thread,

> > > > > instead factions were created bewteen members, animosity

> > > > > and differences of opinions, which persists uptil today.

> > > > > What is the meaning then of creating more inimical feelings

> > > > > and ill will ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Yet if certain people wish to continue this for temporary

> > > > > false prestige, then so be it. But things could take a ugly

> > > > > turn is what I sense.

> > > > >

> > > > > Hope all good members agree with me.

> > > > >

> > > > > best wishes,

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > > Thank you,

> > >

> > > Prashantkumar

> > > --------

> > > For Consultation charges please write to me

> > > --------

> > > G B Prashant Kumar

> > > `Gyandeep' 4, Fifth street

> > > Nandanam Extn,

> > > Chennai 600035, INDIA

> > > MOBILE 9840051861

> > > TEL 42110983/24340186

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

tarun

 

most of these celebrities have many fathers and mothers too as they keep

changing them like clothes, which can be a source of trouble for research,

but for record, or fun it is fine

 

I hope u have heard the quote in such industires

 

ur children and my children are playing with our children

 

that is each one has already a few children and beget some of their own

 

I hope u saw the Movie Khata , Meeta nearly 20 yrs ago a similar story

 

if we discussed Enstien, newton, APJ KALAM. dr radha krishna, amatya sen,

zakir husain-tabla, u srinivas -mandolin, Amma hazara etc even if wrong

data is ok has some use as they r great people

 

prashant

 

 

 

On 8/7/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> Dear Prashant ji,

>

> OKay sir, As u say.

> I thought to trust for astrodatabank software for datas . But yes you

> are right we cannot say what time is correct. Because when on just

> one indian celebrity we are confused or facing opposition on the data

> available in market. Then American datas are under question mark.

>

> Warm Regards,

>

> Tarun

> <%40>,

> " astro desk "

> <astro.prashantkumar wrote:

> >

> > tarun

> >

> > NO I POINT TO IT AS A DANGER in talking abt celebreties whover

> sunil datt,

> > Britney, mikel jackson, any pouplar person in the enws

> >

> > btw have u seen Sonia gandhis borth details 2 diff years and 2 diff

> dates

> > too places are different also so if ppl discuss her it is a

> comedyagain

> >

> > Man Mohan singh too one record says sept 4 another feb 26 or so

> >

> > it is al slippery path to venture on such doubtful data

> >

> > prashant

> >

> >

> > On 8/6/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Prashant ji,

> > >

> > > Why you are still running for Britney's topic....

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > Tarun

> > >

> > >

<%40><%

> 40>,

>

> > > " astro desk "

> > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Pradeep, Baskar

> > > >

> > > > I had mentioned 2 months back I said to Tarun 's post on a girl

> > > singer [in a

> > > > reply to some one today u said not girl but women] who is a

> women

> > > too and

> > > > later Britney spears that no celrebrity discussion will help us

> as

> > > all is

> > > > cooked up, fake info and most of them have relationships,

> children

> > > > /abortions before marriage except a few good artists most of

> them

> > > have had

> > > > terrible personal lives, show biz is full of filth and some good

> > > people a

> > > > minority surely we can count good ones on finger tips

> > > >

> > > > I will rather discuss personal cases of people in need of an

> answer

> > > than

> > > > this gossip subjects and try to fix astrological basis for it

> > > >

> > > > about what I read in that magazine was about a son to them

> whatever

> > > it be he

> > > > was not a star then nor I remember the date there but a ref to

> them

> > > having a

> > > > son before they got married. and in show biz lets not look at

> any

> > > normal

> > > > pattern, children then marriage in most cases will be reverse

> and

> > > some good

> > > > people will be ok, this is a society opposite of us a short

> shelf

> > > life and

> > > > make the best when sun shines.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > on Vargas I have said what I can say and also quoted possible

> > > references in

> > > > old Magazines where stalwarts discussed them we r too small in

> > > comparison I

> > > > merely know they had less distractions, ego and need to make

> living

> > > society

> > > > took care of them better than now. so they poured sincere , wise

> > > works

> > > >

> > > > we have to balance our life expenses and also work endlessly

> free

> > > in groups.

> > > > and on and off get rebuked.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > best wishes

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 8/6/07, vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > > > >

> > > > > Nobody is degrading anyone.I have found from a website, Sanjay

> > > Dutt

> > > > > is being interviewed,where his birth year is mentioned as

> > > 1956.Thus

> > > > > as astrologers we can verify the possibility.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the other hand,1959 was given by some in this list from

> > > authentic

> > > > > sources.There were totally ilogical and contradictory stories

> > > posted

> > > > > as support.

> > > > >

> > > > > I can understand the eagerness of some to stop these

> threads.This

> > > is

> > > > > also against those who tries to misguide others and give false

> > > info.

> > > > >

> > > > > Read Raojis website -He has told the truth regarding non-

> > > > > verification fo 1959.Nobody is saying 1956 is true or whatever

> > > being

> > > > > said is right.Possibilities are there.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now what is bad or degrading about Dutt/nargis?Did he desert

> his

> > > > > child.Late Dutt saved the lady by risking his life and married

> > > her.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regarding Varga charts -Your views are welcome.You can

> ignore,or

> > > say

> > > > > it was inconclusive or waste of time etc etc.It is ok.

> > > > >

> > > > > By the way,you can post your opinion.What has to be

> posted,when to

> > > > > keep silence etc is not in the hands of a few individuals.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regds

> > > > > Pradeep

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

<%40><%

> 40><%

> > > 40>,

> > > > > " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Freinds,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I request all to please discontinue these 2 threads.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1) ON Sanjay Dutt.

> > > > > > That family is already shattered. Sunil Dutt and

> > > > > > Nargis have been our favourites. And so has been

> > > > > > Sanjay Dutt- as actors.This boy made a mistake which of

> course

> > > > > > cannot be pardoned because he was keeping friendship with

> > > > > > the enemies of the nation, but it was still a mistake.

> > > > > > He is in jail, His parents are no more. What right do we

> have

> > > > > > to talk dirty about them ? Does it behove

> > > > > > of us ? No certainly not.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2) ON VARGA ASPECTS AND CHARTS.

> > > > > > Nothing conclusive could be produced from that thread,

> > > > > > instead factions were created bewteen members, animosity

> > > > > > and differences of opinions, which persists uptil today.

> > > > > > What is the meaning then of creating more inimical feelings

> > > > > > and ill will ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yet if certain people wish to continue this for temporary

> > > > > > false prestige, then so be it. But things could take a ugly

> > > > > > turn is what I sense.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hope all good members agree with me.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > best wishes,

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > Thank you,

> > > >

> > > > Prashantkumar

> > > > --------

> > > > For Consultation charges please write to me

> > > > --------

> > > > G B Prashant Kumar

> > > > `Gyandeep' 4, Fifth street

> > > > Nandanam Extn,

> > > > Chennai 600035, INDIA

> > > > MOBILE 9840051861

> > > > TEL 42110983/24340186

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >