Graha in rashi and navamsha

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.AshwiniKumara

 

The navamshas and other amshas are based on lordship of grahas.For

example a graha is not exalted in navamsha but it is having navamsha

in its exaltation rashi.

 

Exaltation has grade and there are points of deep exaltation.Thus it

is a longitudinal position within a rashi.On the other hand navamsha

is a relationship a graha is having with a rashi,while placed elsewhere.

 

There is no dispute here and everyone including Raoji uses it.

 

Regds

Pradeep

 

, " ashwinikumaras "

<ashwinikumaras wrote:

>

> I m one question about when somebody analyzing graha.

> I look graha in rashi chart and in navamsha and I take in navamha

> drishti on that graha.

> So I don't no did Mr.K.N.Rao take lordships of graha when he looks in

> navamsha or just drishti.

> Thank you very much.

>

> regards ashwini

>

[Guest guest]

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Mr.AshwiniKumara

>

> The navamshas and other amshas are based on lordship of grahas.For

> example a graha is not exalted in navamsha but it is having navamsha

> in its exaltation rashi.

>

> Exaltation has grade and there are points of deep exaltation.Thus it

> is a longitudinal position within a rashi.On the other hand navamsha

> is a relationship a graha is having with a rashi,while placed elsewhere.

>

> There is no dispute here and everyone including Raoji uses it.

>

> Regds

> Pradeep

>

> , " ashwinikumaras "

> <ashwinikumaras@> wrote:

> >

> > I m one question about when somebody analyzing graha.

> > I look graha in rashi chart and in navamsha and I take in navamha

> > drishti on that graha.

> > So I don't no did Mr.K.N.Rao take lordships of graha when he looks in

> > navamsha or just drishti.

> > Thank you very much.

> >

> > regards ashwini

>

>

Thank you for your answer.

I m just on beginner level so I catch basic.

 

regards,

ashwini