Pradeep ji-- Reveal name of my Friend....whom u are pointing again and again.

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep ji,

 

Thanks for your kind words.

but....

 

Why are you just hovering around that " Kha " still...

 

I strictly say you to Reveal the name of that Friend you are pointing

to.

 

or stop playing this dirty tricks...this dont suit you.

 

 

" " > Pls ask him if this earlier chapter is from BPHS or western.

>

> Dear friend ,you are young.Kindly verify things before you talk.It

is

> not an advise -But always do the homework before we present

something. " " "

 

This is really pity of you Pradeep ji. This is making me feel

that...instead of gathering astrological knowledge from you, we are

learning dirty politics.

 

If i am asking question, i expect as you are astrologer to answer

them only.

A friendlly advice for you too,...you are too elder...

 

Pradeep ji , responding correctly and point to point only makes

others impress , and changing direction of topics makes others to

point fingures.

 

I please not to make this forum like AAJ Tak news channel, which keep

on repeating same news from morning to evening...in sake of

increasing TRP / channel viewers.

 

I just can hope....rest is upto u.

 

Warm Regards,

 

Tarun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep ji,

>

> Thanks for your kind words.

> but....

>

> Why are you just hovering around that " Kha " still...

>

> I strictly say you to Reveal the name of that Friend you are

pointing

> to.

>

> or stop playing this dirty tricks...this dont suit you.

>

>

> " " > Pls ask him if this earlier chapter is from BPHS or western.

> >

> > Dear friend ,you are young.Kindly verify things before you

talk.It

> is

> > not an advise -But always do the homework before we present

> something. " " "

>

> This is really pity of you Pradeep ji. This is making me feel

> that...instead of gathering astrological knowledge from you, we are

> learning dirty politics.

>

> If i am asking question, i expect as you are astrologer to answer

> them only.

> A friendlly advice for you too,...you are too elder...

>

> Pradeep ji , responding correctly and point to point only makes

> others impress , and changing direction of topics makes others to

> point fingures.

>

> I hope

>

> Warm Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

>

>

>

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri Tarun

> >

> > I do not want to tell anything.I can only make a sleeping person

> > awake not a pretender.

> >

> > Neither i do what is longitudinal nor i know how to draw varga

> charts

> > as proposed by your group.Neither does Late Santhanam.

> >

> > For your kind information it is not western.Ask your friend who

> gave

> > you kha what is Sphuta.

> >

> > Then show him the following -

> >

> > " Aspects are referred to in the divisional charts here. I am

unable

> > to fully conceive the logic in aspects in divisional charts for

the

> > sage himself referred to the LONGITUDINAL aspectual evaluations

in

> an

> > EARLIER chapter. Without commenting further on this controversial

> > aspect I leave it at that, accepting my limitations to explain

this

> > fully. "

> >

> > Pls ask him if this earlier chapter is from BPHS or western.

> >

> > Dear friend ,you are young.Kindly verify things before you

talk.It

> is

> > not an advise -But always do the homework before we present

> something.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Pradeep ji

> > >

> > > u said -

> > >

> > > > Late Sri R. Santhanam states in his book Deva Keralam that "

the

> > > > aspect as a rule should be seen in rashi chart only, not in

> > navamsha

> > > > and other charts, for aspects emanate only by longitudinal

> > > > distances " .

> > >

> > > Can u tell me what are longitudinal aspects ???

> > >

> > > i hoep they are the same as in western astrology ( 30,45, 60 ,

> 90 ,

> > > 120 , 135, 150 , 180) and minor aspects like 36 , 72 etc.)

> > >

> > > Do u know how varga charts are made...how D-9 is made. if yes

> then

> > > you yourself disagree with your views.

> > >

> > > late santhanam did not mention of Pluto in BPHS..but he has

used

> in

> > > artcile as quoted by Prafulla ji. so what does it imply? can we

> say

> > > that - Late Santhnam was against using Pluto - as his BPHS

> > > translation talks only for 9 grahas

> > >

> > > I hope you will reply to each of my line asked. without

skipping

> > > anything.

> > >

> > > Warm Regards,

> > >

> > > Tarun

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Shri Pradeep ji

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Now you mean to say that - opposition of planets in D chakra

> will

> > > > affect without aspects? how? guru in lagan in D9 and venus in

> 7th

> > in

> > > > D9 - how will they affect together, without considering this

> > > > association through aspects.

> > > >

> > > > You again twisted.

> > > >

> > > > I asked you one basic thing. If you do not approve late

> > Santhanam's

> > > D

> > > > chakra interpretation model - then why are you referring his

one

> > > > statement on aspects in BPHS (overlooking his own case

studies

> in

> > > > TOA). Do you mean to say that since you accept his one

> statement

> > on

> > > > aspects, do you accept this theory on D chakra (if they

exist,

> > > whether

> > > > combination works in D chakra etc). If his D chakra theory is

> not

> > > > accepted by you, then is it not selective and misquote.

> > > >

> > > > The contention is not only on Aspects, but on the existence

of D

> > > > chakra itself.

> > > >

> > > > Or I understand now that - you have agreed that - D chakra

> exists,

> > > > Combinations can be considered in D charts.

> > > >

> > > > If you are rejecting his D chakra opinion - then please do

not

> > quote

> > > > him for aspects, without reading his articles and case

studies -

>

> > > which

> > > > are available in public domain. It will be injustice with

> learned

> > > > soul. Forget about us, but do respect a learned soul.

> > > >

> > > > regards / Prafulla

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Prafulla ji

> > > > >

> > > > > Every ''Navamsha chart'' will have atleast one

opposition.If

> > they

> > > > > are in opposition they should ''aspect'' as per you.Also as

> per

> > > you

> > > > > Late Santhanam too felt ,if in opposition they

> will ''aspect''.

> > > > >

> > > > > So you mean to say -

> > > > >

> > > > > While Translating BPHS

> > > > >

> > > > > 1)Late Santhanam was unaware about this

simple ''opposition''

> > > > >

> > > > > 2)Late Santhanam for chumma some fun mentioned so during

the

> > > > > translation

> > > > >

> > > > > Either of the above should be ''true'' - else why should

the

> > BPHS

> > > > > translator say as mentioned below.

> > > > >

> > > > > Late Sri R. Santhanam states in his book Deva Keralam

that "

> > the

> > > > > aspect as a rule should be seen in rashi chart only, not in

> > > navamsha

> > > > > and other charts, for aspects emanate only by longitudinal

> > > > > distances " .

> > > > >

> > > > > This will be my last reply for your misquote on Late

> > Santhanam's

> > > > > view on aspects in varga chakras.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regds

> > > > > Pradeep

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>