Bhaskar and RP singh are fighing for NOTHING (They cannot predict my future ACCURATELY)

[Guest guest]

Hey Moderator,

 

I find that bhaskar and RP Singh always fight and they do NOT care or bother

to predict my future Accurately.

 

Throw these fucking fighter cock Asshole Mother Fuckers out of this website.

 

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Dear RP Singh ji,

 

If You think I am bad, then so be it.

Please feel happy with that knowledge.

You may continue your tirade towards me.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

, " rpsingh2710 " <rpsingh2710

wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> You know why people do not take you seriously. And it is exactly for

> this reason you flare up to be noticed. This is counter-productive.

>

> Regards,

>

> RP Singh

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear RP Singh ji,

> >

> > Buy why me only ?

> >

> > Why would you not comment when Sreenadh or Raja Gursahani

> > or venkat yasmin uses uncivilised language ?

> > Why this bias?

> >

> > What wrong have i done you ?

> > What harm have I caused You ?

> >

> > If you dont care about me, then why did you comment in

> > the first place. And again you are talking on behalf of

> > others, that no one takes me seriously. Why ? Are you

> > their leader ?

> >

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> > , " rpsingh2710 " <rpsingh2710@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > I will comment if you will use uncivilised language for any one.

> I

> > > don't care about your comments. No one takes you seriously any

> way.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > RP Singh

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Bhaskar "

> <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear RP Singh ji,

> > > >

> > > > I do not wish to comment on Pradeepji. He is as much

> > > > dear to me as others are.And about you, too I do not

> > > > wish to comment unnecessarily. For me its a simple

> > > > rule, if one comments on me, then I comment on him,

> > > > otherwise I do not.

> > > >

> > > > Another thing, one cannot turn humble by slapping

> > > > some one and then suddenly saying that I am humble.

> > > >

> > > > So lets not tow that line.

> > > >

> > > > I hope you would not comment on me again, and give me the

> > > > opportunity to retaliate.

> > > >

> > > > best wishes,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " rpsingh2710 "

> <rpsingh2710@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Mr. Bhaskar,

> > > > >

> > > > > You can go on with your comments. I have learnt to be humble

> > > from

> > > > > Pradeep ji, who is a scholar with unmatched knowledge.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > RP Singh

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > , " Bhaskar "

> > > <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > RP Singh,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Yes You were one of the friends that time who

> > > > > > supported Sreenadh. And I know why you can co-relate

> > > > > > with the word I used " Stupid friends " and " rats " .

> > > > > > You feel guilty.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Instead of trying to push Bhaskar away, why dont

> > > > > > you talk sensible on astrology and prove that You

> > > > > > are smart.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At least I am honest. and talk from the heart.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At least I am trying to stop the

> > > > > > unnecessary arguments from continuing.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If you have some sense then note that I am not

> > > > > > taking any sides, but talking the truth

> > > > > > and want all to mantain their self respect.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I wish no fights should continue here.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > What has been your contribution ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This is your 4th or 5th mail

> > > > > > where you have shown your jealousy and inadequacy by

> > > > > > trying to take the Moderators sympathy,but for what

> > > > > > cause ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mr RP Singh, dont confirm that all Singhs are stupid,

> > > > > > by this mail. Dont enter any thread if you have nothing

> > > > > > to contribute.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dont try to take sides of injustice.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dont try to look good when you have nothing to

> > > > > > show that you are good.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Did you ask the Moderator to remove Sreenadh from

> > > > > > the Forum

> > > > > > 'when he used the word " Mother fuc..r " for me ?

> > > > > > Where was your Punjabi Manliness gone that time

> > > > > > or Your Bhraminness ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Were you sleeping with a overdose of Depressants

> > > > > > that you kept quiet that time?

> > > > > > Why suddenly awakened now ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why talk on behalf of the silent majority ?

> > > > > > Are you their leader ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Who made you their leader ? What proof ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Just be away and keep quiet.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > , " rpsingh2710 "

> > > <rpsingh2710@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected moderator,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sir, the message of Mr Bhaskar is very offensive to say

> the

> > > > > least.

> > > > > > > He has no right to use such words as " stupid friends "

> or "

> > > > > > > rats " , " idiotic and senseless tark "

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I believe that the silent majority in the group feels

> the

> > > same

> > > > > way.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sir, I think you should put the group on moderation to

> stop

> > > such

> > > > > > > occurings over and over again.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respectfully,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > RP Singh

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > , " Bhaskar "

> > > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Pradeepji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Only a person who does not mind sweeping, is fit

> > > > > > > > to sit on the Kings throne.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Only a person who knows to request for pardon,

> > > > > > > > and accept his mistakes can control others.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Let us face the truth. You have done only tarka

> > > > > > > > and no pramana has come forth from your side.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Yet without even proper clothing to face the

> > > > > > > > freezing cold, and with a small blunt knife

> > > > > > > > not even good enought to cut vegetables ,You

> > > > > > > > are trying to be a great warrior on the Kargil

> > > > > > > > front, is amusing.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Your stupid friends have left. Sreenadh,Satish or

> > > > > > > > Sateesh whatever and few others. It is a clear

> > > > > > > > display of rats skipmpering and leaving the ship

> > > > > > > > first when it is about to sink.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > The first rat- Sreenadh- who also misquotes the

> > > > > > > > Shastras and misinterprets them to his advantage,

> > > > > > > > to create artificial hype in public , about his

> > > > > > > > greatness,has left. Whatever little knowledge

> > > > > > > > you had was contributed from him, as he projects

> > > > > > > > in all Forums, as soon as he left, you had nothing

> > > > > > > > to contribute, but just defending yourself like a

> > > > > > > > women with transparent clothing.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Pradeepji, I respect you much, to see you in

> > > > > > > > such a position. Have you not seen how Chandrasekharji

> > > > > > > > has rubbed you everyday with his mails since a

> fortnight ?

> > > > > > > > And he was right, and you were wrong. Therefore he had

> > > > > > > > full right to rub you. But why were you in such a

> > > vulnerable

> > > > > > > > position ? because You kept yourself open,with your

> idiotic

> > > > > > > > and senseless tarka without any pramana and sang (

> > > > > > > > Companionship) of fools whom you thought

> > > > > > > > would support you and defend your interpretations or

> > > > > > > > misinterpretations. But where are these rats now ?

> > > > > > > > Why are you left alone ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Who knows for real that who is right ?

> > > > > > > > Either You or Chandrasekharji ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Only time would show. Till then why dont you

> > > > > > > > keep quiet, instead of allowing yourself

> > > > > > > > to be rubbed by one and all. What is the harm in

> > > > > > > > accepting your defeat ? Why such a Big EGO ?

> > > > > > > > For the time being accept that You may be wrong and

> > > > > > > > they may be right.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > In the meanwhile consolidate your studies, do some

> > > > > > > > research, prove your principles through theseis and

> > > > > > > > publish them. Then all those who have been rubbing

> > > > > > > > you, would start touching Your feet .

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But at the moment you have no ammunitions

> > > > > > > > to defend yourself, so just dont

> > > > > > > > make a fool of yourself.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Accept silence and pardon.

> > > > > > > > Period,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > best wishes,

> > > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > --- In

> , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Prafulla ji

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I repeat,we have to take a relook at basics whenever

> in

> > > > > > > doubt.This

> > > > > > > > > does not mean K.N.Raoji does not know basics -it is

> your

> > > > > > > > > interpretation.I am no man to judge whether Raoji

> has

> > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > basics or not.It is beyond my capacities.He may be

> > > having

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > own

> > > > > > > > > reasons.It is upto him to say whe he use aspects.Not

> me.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > For me i have presented my case with Tarka and

> > > Pramana.Now i

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > present my views in a structured fashion.Those who

> wish

> > > can

> > > > > > > respond.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regarding,Kalyan Varma etc ...explanations were

> > > > > > > given.Chandrashekhar

> > > > > > > > > ji had explained to shri Rohini ranjan in the past

> > > > > > > too.Supporting

> > > > > > > > > Pramana will be given in the paper.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Late Santhanams view -no more comment.When Lste

> > > Santhanam

> > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > written in plain English in BPHS...there is no point

> in

> > > > > > > discussing

> > > > > > > > > your views about opposition,though one can respect

> it as

> > > > > > > personal

> > > > > > > > > view.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > You may keep on trying to create rift between

> people,if

> > > you

> > > > > love

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > do so.Let us see whether you succeed or not.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Vijayaads Pradeep is different from

> > > > > > > > > Srutakeerthi,Jeevasharma,Garga,Thalakkulathu

> Bhattathiri

> > > > > > > etc.Thus it

> > > > > > > > > is not my Sanskrit interpretation.But you may try

> this

> > > > > tactic

> > > > > > > again

> > > > > > > > > if you have nothing technical to offer.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I would like to remind you politely,efforts to

> create

> > > rift

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > remain unsuccesful.But whether to continue this or

> not

> > > is

> > > > > upto

> > > > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > For me if i have to concentrate on my duties and

> > > > > > > > > promises.Oppoistions and obstacles are normal.I have

> > > been an

> > > > > > > > > optimist and will always remain.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regds

> > > > > > > > > Pradeep

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > , Prafulla Gang

> > > > > <jyotish@>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Pradeep ji,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I would like to mention a few words regarding

> the

> > > > > attempts

> > > > > > > made

> > > > > > > > > by a

> > > > > > > > > > > some.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > 1)When one is asked to have a relook at the

> basics -

> > > It

> > > > > > > is ''high

> > > > > > > > > > > lighted'' by some as ''K.N.Rao does not know

> > > basics''.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] Well, Pradeep ji - your statements on

> forum

> > > can

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > have two meanings - one for Shri KN Rao and another

> one

> > > for

> > > > > > > members

> > > > > > > > > arguing with you. We did not comment on anyone's

> basics,

> > > but

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > was

> > > > > > > > > you who were questioning " basics " of the members

> with

> > > > > respect to

> > > > > > > D

> > > > > > > > > chakra and its interpretation. You were mentioning

> that

> > > > > sages

> > > > > > > said

> > > > > > > > > this, whereas they were your opinion on what " sages "

> > > > > mentioned.

> > > > > > > So

> > > > > > > > > when people not agreeing to your opinion can be

> > > subjected to

> > > > > > > those

> > > > > > > > > forceful questioning on " basics " , then why not all

> those

> > > > > people,

> > > > > > > > > whose views are in contrast to your view. You should

> > > have

> > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > careful in your comments in questioning " basics " of

> the

> > > > > people

> > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > are not agreeing to your view.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > 2)When Points are presented with the help of

> Tarka

> > > and

> > > > > > > > > Pramana,one

> > > > > > > > > > > may counter them through Tarka and

> > > Pramana.Unfortunately

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > used

> > > > > > > > > > > as a vehicle to create rift between K.N.Raoji

> and

> > > his

> > > > > > > students as

> > > > > > > > > > > well as between K.N.Raoji and individuals having

> > > good

> > > > > > > rapport

> > > > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > > > > him.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] Pradeep ji, I am indeed surprised to

> see

> > > your

> > > > > > > > > objections, if your opinion is conveyed to Shri KN

> rao

> > > > > > > > > in " verbatim " . Trust me, If I meet him - I will not

> > > twist

> > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > words, but will produce your own mails. So now you

> mean

> > > to

> > > > > say

> > > > > > > that -

> > > > > > > > > those mails must not be applicable to him? Let this

> > > tarka

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > pramana theory from your own perspective, be also

> known

> > > to

> > > > > him.

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > With my rapport with him since 1993, let me advise

> you -

> > > so

> > > > > he

> > > > > > > > > likes jyotish exploration. So where is the question

> of

> > > any

> > > > > rift?

> > > > > > > If

> > > > > > > > > it is your own words are troubling you, then it was

> your

> > > > > call

> > > > > > > dear.

> > > > > > > > > None of the other members, questioned the " basics "

> > > including

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > yours.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Shri Satya did object to your contents of your

> mail

> > > > > > > on " basics " ,

> > > > > > > > > but you persisted with forceful conversion.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Moreover some are not interested in knowing the

> > > > > Truth,but to

> > > > > > > > > > > aggravate things and create rift and fight.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] is it? We all presented classics

> (Kalyan

> > > > > Varma),

> > > > > > > case

> > > > > > > > > studies (late Santhanam) and opinion of so many

> learned

> > > > > people.

> > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > you kept on overruling them for your whims and now

> > > asking

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > truth

> > > > > > > > > and praman. It was never twisted or misquoted - but

> by

> > > you

> > > > > all

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > time to win the argument. Can truth only be those

> > > things,

> > > > > which

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > propogated?. and Can pramana can only be your

> sankstri

> > > > > > > translations?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > 3)When such comments are ignored - some say,one

> is

> > > > > selective.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] is it? You ignored the predicitve

> > > challenges on

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > chart. You ignored case studies of Late Santhanam.

> You

> > > > > ignored

> > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > many areas, where members presented - but you always

> > > opted

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > consider those points (even in articles), which

> suited

> > > your

> > > > > > > > > argument. So sir, had we been closed minded - we

> would

> > > not

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > discussed at all. But if you reread all the mails

> and

> > > select

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > points skipped - then it may taken another long list

> of

> > > > > mails to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > answered.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > It is so sad to see how people are unable to

> take

> > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > debates in

> > > > > > > > > > > an objective sense.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > If somebody is not in agreement with a

> particular

> > > > > > > understanding

> > > > > > > > > of a

> > > > > > > > > > > scholar - it can no way mean,one is degrading

> that

> > > > > scholar

> > > > > > > as a

> > > > > > > > > > > whole.But unfortunately some are trying to

> create

> > > rift

> > > > > > > between

> > > > > > > > > > > individuals and twist Jyotish debates as

> disrespect

> > > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > learned

> > > > > > > > > > > men.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] Who degraded any scholar? who

> questioned

> > > the

> > > > > basics

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > the people? Sir - if you are so sure of your opinion

> > > then,

> > > > > what

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > the problem? None of us except you, have implied a

> > > single

> > > > > > > negative

> > > > > > > > > comment on any learned person. When Shri

> Chandrasekhar

> > > ji

> > > > > > > explained

> > > > > > > > > the views available in classics - you even rediculed

> > > those

> > > > > > > sages. At

> > > > > > > > > one stage, you said that BV Raman did not read

> > > Dashadhayayi.

> > > > > So

> > > > > > > sir

> > > > > > > > > please restrain defending your lies.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > In that case there is no need for discussion

> groups

> > > or

> > > > > > > > > debates.Every

> > > > > > > > > > > one can say i am in the group of Raoji,Sanjayji

> etc

> > > as

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > politics

> > > > > > > > > > > and support individual manifestos.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Prafulla] well - if any argument is restricted to

> > > closed

> > > > > > > minded

> > > > > > > > > approach with trust being implied, ponly when

> suiting

> > > your

> > > > > > > argument -

> > > > > > > > > then certainly such debates have no place. But if

> > > > > astrologer is

> > > > > > > > > capable to predict with his interpretation model,

> then

> > > only

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > called PRAMANA. Until then - it is only called

> bright

> > > ideas -

> > > > >

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > necessarily genuine one.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > No one is supporting any manifestos. It is you -

> who

> > > are

> > > > > > > choosing

> > > > > > > > > political terms. We simply respect, what each

> scholar

> > > says -

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > want to see it it works or not? Can you prove with

> the

> > > > > > > predictive

> > > > > > > > > challenges? if yes - we can have debates on any

> > > astrological

> > > > > > > > > principle.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regds

> > > > > > > > > > > Pradeep

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards / Prafulla Gang

> > > > > > > > > > http://www.prafulla.net

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " There are two kinds of people in the world, those

> who

> > > > > believe

> > > > > > > > > there are two kinds of people in the world and those

> who

> > > > > don't. "

> > > > > > > > > > ************************************************

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > ________

> > > > > > > > > > Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get

> Free

> > > Radio

> > > > > &

> > > > > > > MP3

> > > > > > > > > Player & Recorder

> > > > > > > > > > Learn more at http://www.inbox.com/radio

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and

lay it on us.