Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 *Om mahaganapataye namah* Dear Tarun, Nameste, You wrote, " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own principles instead of following parashara blindly. " I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of discussion.. May i say,something? Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise called BPHS. The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now it is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many people. Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise for masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is so. Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. With best wishes. Om tat sat Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo tarun_vst Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) Dear Chandrashekhar ji, Thanks for your mail and your views. no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much different views. (as wht i have heard / read) that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So he presented his own views .. or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. Warm Regards, Tarun , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Tarun, > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or not. It is > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his pupils in his > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. Again it is > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are available and > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, may not > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to date. > > Chandrashekhar. > > Tarun wrote: > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tarun > > ---------------------- R.C.Srivastava E-mail : swami_rcs http://www.kaalvastu.com http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 Mob 9412268768 -- Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the right direction Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com ---------------------- R.C.Srivastava Consultation-Service E-mail : swami_rcs http://www.kaalvastu.com http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 Mob 9412268768 -- Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the right direction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Swami ji, Thanks for your mail. .....so that means Jemini Used Parashara's principles and converted them to shloka / sutra ? but i think Parashara provided his teachings in sutra form. so we write it like.. o'brahmin .......and so on. little confusing .. Warm Regards, Tarun , " swamircs " <swami_rcs wrote: > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > Dear Tarun, > Nameste, You wrote, > " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > principles instead of following parashara blindly. " > > I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of discussion.. > May i say,something? > Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise called BPHS. > The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now it is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many people. > Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise for masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. > This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. > His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is so. > Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. > With best wishes. > Om tat sat > Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo tarun_vst > Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > Thanks for your mail and your views. > > no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much different > views. (as wht i have heard / read) > that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So he > presented his own views .. > or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > , Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or not. It > is > > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his pupils in > his > > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. Again > it is > > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are available > and > > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, may > not > > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to date. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Tarun wrote: > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.kaalvastu.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > Mob 9412268768 > > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > > > Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > Consultation-Service > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.kaalvastu.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > Mob 9412268768 > > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Swamiji, //At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is so.// Yes Sir. I agree. No Guru and Shishya can be different. Their source and End has to be the same, though the style of walking or the ways may be different or appear different. best wishes, Bhaskar. , " swamircs " <swami_rcs wrote: > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > Dear Tarun, > Nameste, You wrote, > " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > principles instead of following parashara blindly. " > > I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of discussion.. > May i say,something? > Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise called BPHS. > The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now it is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many people. > Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise for masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. > This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. > His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is so. > Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. > With best wishes. > Om tat sat > Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo tarun_vst > Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > Thanks for your mail and your views. > > no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much different > views. (as wht i have heard / read) > that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So he > presented his own views .. > or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > , Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or not. It > is > > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his pupils in > his > > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. Again > it is > > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are available > and > > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, may > not > > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to date. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > Tarun wrote: > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.kaalvastu.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > Mob 9412268768 > > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > > > Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > Consultation-Service > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.kaalvastu.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > Mob 9412268768 > > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2007 Report Share Posted July 31, 2007 - *Om mahaganapataye namah* Dear Tarun, You are nearly right.If we desire to put little more accurately Rsi parashar followed well known pattern of Purans.What Jaimini knew was already known to all in there parampara Parashar was no exception, He was before Jaimini But there composition were aimed at blessing the masses and students respectively,in two different modes at different times. Sutra literature has different format.Parashar did not use it.Padma puran gives definition what is sutra literature. " people , learned in sutra literature,say that the sutra should be concise and unambiguous,give the essence of the argument on a topic but at the same time deal with all aspects of the question,be free from repetition and faultless. Jaimini updesh is superb to this definition. with regards. OM TAT SAT -- In , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Swami ji, > > Thanks for your mail. > > ....so that means Jemini Used Parashara's principles and converted > them to shloka / sutra ? > > but i think Parashara provided his teachings in sutra form. > > so we write it like.. > > o'brahmin .......and so on. > > little confusing .. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > , " swamircs " <swami_rcs@> wrote: > > > > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > Nameste, You wrote, > > " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that what > was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. " > > > > I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of discussion.. > > May i say,something? > > Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise > called BPHS. > > The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now it > is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many > people. > > Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise for > masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified > Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to > memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be > understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a > parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. > > This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of > subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. > > His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and > applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as > are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas > different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is > so. > > Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. > > With best wishes. > > Om tat sat > > Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. > > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo@ tarun_vst > > Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > Thanks for your mail and your views. > > > > no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much different > > views. (as wht i have heard / read) > > that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So he > > presented his own views .. > > or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > , Chandrashekhar > > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > > > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or not. > It > > is > > > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his pupils > in > > his > > > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. Again > > it is > > > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are > available > > and > > > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, > may > > not > > > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to > date. > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > Tarun wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------- > > R.C.Srivastava > > E-mail : swami_rcs@ > > http://www.kaalvastu.com > > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > > Mob 9412268768 > > > > -- > > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power > that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the > right direction > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit > http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com > > ---------------------- > > R.C.Srivastava > > Consultation-Service > > E-mail : swami_rcs@ > > http://www.kaalvastu.com > > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > > Mob 9412268768 > > > > -- > > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > > our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2007 Report Share Posted July 31, 2007 Dear Srivastava ji, Definately, all have covered different areas of life in terms of astrology. As medical astrology is a very different subject other than normal chart readings. Medical astrology can decide the life and can save life of the person. Thanks again for your mail and provinding me your views about Jemini and Parashara. Warm Regards, Tarun , " R.C.Srivastava " <swami_rcs wrote: > > - > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > Dear Tarun, > You are nearly right.If we desire to put little more accurately Rsi > parashar followed well known pattern of Purans.What Jaimini knew > was already known to all in there parampara Parashar was no > exception, He was before Jaimini But there composition were aimed at > blessing the masses and students respectively,in two different modes > at different times. > Sutra literature has different format.Parashar did not use it.Padma > puran gives definition what is sutra literature. > " people , learned in sutra literature,say that the sutra should be > concise and unambiguous,give the essence of the argument on a topic > but at the same time deal with all aspects of the question,be free > from repetition and faultless. > Jaimini updesh is superb to this definition. > with regards. > OM TAT SAT > > -- In , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > Dear Swami ji, > > > > Thanks for your mail. > > > > ....so that means Jemini Used Parashara's principles and converted > > them to shloka / sutra ? > > > > but i think Parashara provided his teachings in sutra form. > > > > so we write it like.. > > > > o'brahmin .......and so on. > > > > little confusing .. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > , " swamircs " <swami_rcs@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > Nameste, You wrote, > > > " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that > what > > was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. " > > > > > > I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of > discussion.. > > > May i say,something? > > > Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise > > called BPHS. > > > The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now > it > > is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many > > people. > > > Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise > for > > masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified > > Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to > > memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be > > understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a > > parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. > > > This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of > > subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. > > > His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and > > applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts > as > > are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar > apperas > > different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it > is > > so. > > > Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. > > > With best wishes. > > > Om tat sat > > > Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. > > > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo@ tarun_vst > > > Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > Thanks for your mail and your views. > > > > > > no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much > different > > > views. (as wht i have heard / read) > > > that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So > he > > > presented his own views .. > > > or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. > > > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > , Chandrashekhar > > > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > > > > > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or > not. > > It > > > is > > > > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his > pupils > > in > > > his > > > > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. > Again > > > it is > > > > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are > > available > > > and > > > > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, > > may > > > not > > > > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to > > date. > > > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > Tarun wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > > > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------- > > > R.C.Srivastava > > > E-mail : swami_rcs@ > > > http://www.kaalvastu.com > > > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > > > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > > > Mob 9412268768 > > > > > > -- > > > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power > > that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in > the > > right direction > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit > > http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed > http://www.cosmograce.com > > > ---------------------- > > > R.C.Srivastava > > > Consultation-Service > > > E-mail : swami_rcs@ > > > http://www.kaalvastu.com > > > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > > > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > > > Mob 9412268768 > > > > > > -- > > > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > > > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > > > our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 Dear Swami ji Could you kindly give the interpretation and notes from Shri P.S.Shastri on Bhrigwonkaraka varge which you had not given earlier. Thanks in advance. Regds Pradeep -- In , " swamircs " <swami_rcs wrote: > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > Dear Tarun, > You are nearly right.If we desire to put little more accurately Rsi parashar followed > well known pattern of Purans.What Jaimini knew was already known to all in there parampara Parashar was no exception,But there composition were aimed at blessing the masses and students respectively, > in two different modes at different times. > Sutra literature has different format.Parashar did not use it.Padma puran gives definition what is sutra literature. > " people , learned in sutra literature,say that the sutra should be concise and unambiguous,give the essence of the argument on a topic but at the same time deal with all aspects of the question,be free from repetition and faultless. > Jaimini updesh is superb to this definition. > with regards. > OM TAT SAT > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy our sins, and guide us in the right direction. > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo tarun_vst > Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:06 am (PST) > Dear Swami ji, > > Thanks for your mail. > > ....so that means Jemini Used Parashara's principles and converted > them to shloka / sutra ? > > but i think Parashara provided his teachings in sutra form. > > so we write it like.. > > o'brahmin .......and so on. > > little confusing .. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > , " swamircs " <swami_rcs@> wrote: > > > > > > *Om mahaganapataye namah* > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > Nameste, You wrote, > > " just a small question i had in my mind from many days. that what > was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. " > > > > I am not a scholar but was attracted to some part of discussion.. > > May i say,something? > > Parashar was a rsi who for coming generations gave a treatise > called BPHS. > > The knowledge of constellation was too common in his time, now it > is lost,and we are left with compilation handed over through many > people. > > Jamini was also a rsi of great yore.He did not wrote a treatise for > masses interested in learning Jyotish.He on the contrary codified > Jyotish concepts in sutra form,with a puropse to be committed to > memory,rich in meaning.As it is true No sutra literature can be > understood correctly without the grace of living guru in a > parampra.Keys are communicated by gurumukh and are not written. > > This guards knowledge from misuse.My little understanding of > subject tells me jaimini Sutras are universal in application. > > His principlas are sure shot if correctly understood and > applied.BTW At deeper level parashar treatise uses same concepts as > are taught by Jaimini later.Simply put jaimini and parashar apperas > different but they are one and same.It may appear strange, but it is > so. > > Hope ,My mail is not unwelcome but search provoking. > > With best wishes. > > Om tat sat > > Jemini / Parashara. - Chandrashekar ji. > > Posted by: " Tarun " tarun.virgo@ tarun_vst > > Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:14 pm (PST) > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > Thanks for your mail and your views. > > > > no but i was in a doubt that , since Jemini has very much different > > views. (as wht i have heard / read) > > that means he feels that parashara principles had bug in it. So he > > presented his own views .. > > or he was one of those only who translate Parashara. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > , Chandrashekhar > > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tarun, > > > > > > Jaimini does not say whether he was following Parashara or not. > It > > is > > > assumed that he did. I think he was only instructing his pupils > in > > his > > > understanding of the Jyotish principles given by the sages. Again > > it is > > > thought that he wrote 8 adhyaayas of which only four are > available > > and > > > of which some opine that the order of shlokas in the last two, > may > > not > > > be correct. So there could be more to Jaimini than is known to > date. > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > Tarun wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > > > > just a small question i had in my mind from many days. > > > > tht what was need in Jemini's mind, so that he made his own > > > > principles instead of following parashara blindly. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------- > > R.C.Srivastava > > E-mail : swami_rcs@ > > http://www.kaalvastu.com > > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > > Mob 9412268768 > > > > > > Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com > ---------------------- > R.C.Srivastava > Consultation-Service > E-mail : swami_rcs > http://www.kaalvastu.com > http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com > Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223 > Mob 9412268768 > > -- > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > our sins, and guide us in the right direction > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.