Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Dear Satya, Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most important it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the earlier age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations have lived in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the weak, meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in their glare. neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and resources it an offer its inhabitants. it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as the earlier ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come we need some adjustments or fine tuning to them. I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man who did many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations or sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings make will last for all times to come. Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get knowledge from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama smarana itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so without worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a sports event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something or other will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual pursuits and without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light for long the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our time, We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on aspects or bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in Vargas so be it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing astrology today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected light. as he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our syste,s greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead others to also do same. Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what he said is close to what one must know develop systems around it. Best wishes On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija wrote: > > Dear Prashant, > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > question is that whether we should analyse the > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > according to others we should follow classic > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > rope. Both are right because our past experience > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > benefit of the human being. > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar<astro.prashantkumar%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Dear SCK, > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > as in astronomy else HOW > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > like wise excess solar > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > like wise the super Nova's > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > region only Rohini > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > or Super star materials > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > does not matter in our > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > planets though well > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > speed, location and also > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > not going to help u > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > get some inputs from > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > essence see if there is an > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > have multiple meanings > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > totally over write what was > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > corrections as u said and is done > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > vice versa, as long as > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > helps else like the Vakya > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > corrects them as they have > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > defensive methods like a > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > care to study the source. > > > > best wishes > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija <sckursija%40>> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > of > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > with > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > has > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > astrological rules according to the available > > data. We > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > have > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > in > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > every > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > over > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > been > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > teaching > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > So > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > scholars > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > Singh, > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > Rao, > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > advise to > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > Rahu > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > things > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > not > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > and > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > thing > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > <vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > the > > > > divisional charts > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > aspects in > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > to > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > Without > > > > commenting > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > at > > > > that, accepting > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > are > > > > there in those > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > (in > > > > the birth > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > lords > > > > of Thula and > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > lordship between > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > DO > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > time > > > > of birth. > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > that these planets > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > be > > > > in rasi, if > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > of > > > > drikbala function > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > that > > > > the drikbala is > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > identity,and > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > attributed between > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > aspect > > > > and aspectual > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > '' > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Prashant ji, Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. ------------------------------ > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man who did > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations or > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings make will > last for all times to come. ------------------------------ There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand its basic. Warm Regards, Tarun , " astro desk " <astro.prashantkumar wrote: > > Dear Satya, > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most important > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the earlier > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations have lived > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the weak, > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in their glare. > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and resources it an > offer its inhabitants. > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as the earlier > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come we need > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man who did > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations or > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings make will > last for all times to come. > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get knowledge > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama smarana > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so without > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a sports > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something or other > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual pursuits and > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light for long > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our time, > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on aspects or > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in Vargas so be > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing astrology > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected light. as > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our syste,s > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead others to > also do same. > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what he said > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > Best wishes > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija wrote: > > > > Dear Prashant, > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > according to others we should follow classic > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > benefit of the human being. > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar<astro.prashantkumar% 40gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > like wise excess solar > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > region only Rohini > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > or Super star materials > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > does not matter in our > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > planets though well > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > speed, location and also > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > not going to help u > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > get some inputs from > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > essence see if there is an > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > have multiple meanings > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > totally over write what was > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > vice versa, as long as > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > corrects them as they have > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > defensive methods like a > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija <sckursija%40>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > of > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > with > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > has > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > data. We > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > have > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > in > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > every > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > over > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > been > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > teaching > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > So > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > scholars > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > Singh, > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > Rao, > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > advise to > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > Rahu > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > things > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > not > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > and > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > thing > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > the > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > aspects in > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > to > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > Without > > > > > commenting > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > at > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > are > > > > > there in those > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > (in > > > > > the birth > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > lords > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > lordship between > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > DO > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > time > > > > > of birth. > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > that these planets > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > be > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > of > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > that > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > identity,and > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > attributed between > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > aspect > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Tarun ji Well - KP is good or bad; it works or not - can only be seen, if we interact closely with good KP astrologers. I have a great friend from 90's Shri Vijay Bhai - who is an excellent predictor with KP system(In my observation - none of the modern internet predictors can match his skills and maturity in predictive approach). Most members from early 90's jyotish list may be familiar with him. Few also criticized him that he stolen the stellar theory from Meena - but I fail to understand then - why people do not blame Sage Jaimini to take few theories from Sage Parashar. In jyotish all these theory import / export need not be seen in bad light. On the contrary, we must be happy that - some one explored the stellar realities and expanded on that to produce a consistent interpretation model. The best part of the model is that - he proved in classroom on any random events and taught. It will be interesting astro journey for you / anyone to hear those experiences from Late Shri Krishna Moorthy's classroom students. So in my opinion - if you may closely interact with KP astrologers and (also in dedicated KP forums) - then you may form your own opinion. Dear Sandy Crowther has dedicated KP forum on MSN. I strongly recommend you to explore KP on that discussion group. You will be pleased with its consistent framework of rules. In my humble opinion - All system works in the hand of experts. regards / Prafulla , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Prashant ji, > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > ------------------------------ > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > or > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will > > last for all times to come. > ------------------------------ > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > its basic. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > > > > , " astro desk " > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > important > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > earlier > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > have lived > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > weak, > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > their glare. > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > resources it an > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > the earlier > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > we need > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > or > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will > > last for all times to come. > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > knowledge > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > smarana > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > without > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > sports > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > or other > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > pursuits and > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > for long > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > time, > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > aspects or > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > Vargas so be > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > astrology > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > light. as > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > syste,s > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > others to > > also do same. > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > he said > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > benefit of the human being. > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > 40gmail.com>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > region only Rohini > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > or Super star materials > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > does not matter in our > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > planets though well > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > speed, location and also > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > not going to help u > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > get some inputs from > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > totally over write what was > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija%40>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > of > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > with > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > has > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > data. We > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > have > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > in > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > every > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > over > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > been > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > teaching > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > So > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > scholars > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > Singh, > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > Rao, > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > advise to > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > Rahu > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > things > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > not > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > and > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > thing > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > the > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > to > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > Without > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > at > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > are > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > (in > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > lords > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > DO > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > time > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > be > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > of > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > that > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > aspect > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Tarunji, This is a democratic country and a democratic Platform. Anyone is allowed to say anything.But all systems are good in hands of able astrologer. That is another matter,that one gives time to one system, and is able to gain some proficiency in same and labelled as Traditional-Parashar or Jamini or KP. But the base is same. Jamini uses the same planets and so does KP. We cannot talk about any system not being able to give good results unless we study that system, and then comment. I am a follower of Kp, for instant examination of any period or problem when native comes for readibngs, but I use all approaches, and at times, I give readings as per traditional. I also believe in vargas, though I may not believe that Saturn is going to give evil results in 9 places (Houses) in transit from the Moon. There are hundreds of rules, and we may not be well versant in all, neither in amalgamation of these, to form a proper judgement, so for me all these systems are good, with no bias to any one. Let us also not forget that one can lean KP, only after passing the Traditional systems of prognostications, which is the base for any specialised system. Traditional system is like a B'Com Graduate degree,and then one may choose to master any system like Astakvarga, Amsas- Jamini, KP-Nakshatra. Nadi or whatever, but all systems work in the respective followers of each system who are specialised in the same. best wishes, Bhaskar. , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Prashant ji, > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > ------------------------------ > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > or > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will > > last for all times to come. > ------------------------------ > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > its basic. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > > > > , " astro desk " > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > important > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > earlier > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > have lived > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > weak, > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > their glare. > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > resources it an > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > the earlier > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > we need > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > or > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will > > last for all times to come. > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > knowledge > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > smarana > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > without > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > sports > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > or other > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > pursuits and > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > for long > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > time, > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > aspects or > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > Vargas so be > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > astrology > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > light. as > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > syste,s > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > others to > > also do same. > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > he said > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > benefit of the human being. > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > 40gmail.com>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > region only Rohini > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > or Super star materials > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > does not matter in our > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > planets though well > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > speed, location and also > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > not going to help u > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > get some inputs from > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > totally over write what was > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija%40>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > of > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > with > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > has > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > data. We > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > have > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > in > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > every > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > over > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > been > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > teaching > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > So > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > scholars > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > Singh, > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > Rao, > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > advise to > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > Rahu > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > things > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > not > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > and > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > thing > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > the > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > to > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > Without > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > at > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > are > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > (in > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > lords > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > DO > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > time > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > be > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > of > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > that > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > aspect > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Bhaskar ji, Yes you are absolutely right. KP and Parashari or Jemini. All are finally based on Rashi's no one can change the effects of Aries or meena, or any sign. All sciences have proved themselves. And finally in this scientific context life......all believe on Proof. as you are into stock market astrology too ( CNBC channel ) how to convince people there, they are commercial people and trust on proofs only, not once but 100's of times we have to give them proof so that they accept the way. and KP has finally proved it in minutes accuracy for rise and falls. Warm Regards, Tarun , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Tarunji, > > This is a democratic country and a democratic Platform. > Anyone is allowed to say anything.But all systems are good > in hands of able astrologer. That is another matter,that one > gives time to one system, and is able to gain some proficiency > in same and labelled as Traditional-Parashar or Jamini or KP. > But the base is same. Jamini uses the same planets and so does > KP. We cannot talk about any system not being able to give good > results unless we study that system, and then comment. > > I am a follower of Kp, for instant examination of any period > or problem when native comes for readibngs, but I use all > approaches, and at times, I give readings as per traditional. > I also believe in vargas, though I may not believe that Saturn > is going to give evil results in 9 places (Houses) in transit > from the Moon. There are hundreds of rules, and we may not be > well versant in all, neither in amalgamation of these, > to form a proper judgement, so for me all these systems are > good, with no bias to any one. > > Let us also not forget that one can lean KP, only after passing > the Traditional systems of prognostications, which is the > base for any specialised system. Traditional system is like > a B'Com Graduate degree,and then one may choose to master any > system like Astakvarga, Amsas- Jamini, KP-Nakshatra. Nadi or > whatever, but all systems work in the respective followers of > each system who are specialised in the same. > > best wishes, > Bhaskar. > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > Dear Prashant ji, > > > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > > ------------------------------ > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > > or > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will > > > last for all times to come. > > ------------------------------ > > > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > > its basic. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > , " astro desk " > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > > important > > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > > earlier > > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > > have lived > > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > > weak, > > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > > their glare. > > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > > resources it an > > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > > the earlier > > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > > we need > > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > > or > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will > > > last for all times to come. > > > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > > knowledge > > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > > smarana > > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > > without > > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > > sports > > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > > or other > > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > > pursuits and > > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > > for long > > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > > time, > > > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > > aspects or > > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > > Vargas so be > > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > > astrology > > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > > light. as > > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > > syste,s > > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > > others to > > > also do same. > > > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > > he said > > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > > benefit of the human being. > > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > > 40gmail.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > > region only Rohini > > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > > or Super star materials > > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > > does not matter in our > > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > > planets though well > > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > > speed, location and also > > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > > not going to help u > > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > > get some inputs from > > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > > totally over write what was > > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija% 40>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > > of > > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > > with > > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > > has > > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > > data. We > > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > > have > > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > > in > > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > > every > > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > > over > > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > > been > > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > > teaching > > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > > So > > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > > scholars > > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > > Singh, > > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > > Rao, > > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > > advise to > > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > > things > > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > > not > > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > > and > > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > > thing > > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > > the > > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > > to > > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > > Without > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > > at > > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > > are > > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > > (in > > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > > lords > > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > > DO > > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > > time > > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > > be > > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > > of > > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > > that > > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > > aspect > > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Prafulla ji, Sir none of the science is bad, even i wont say western astrology as bad. just proof and predictions are needed....we all are material persons. and we none can run behind anything blidnly...even we are spiritual we can get intutive power in ourself which help us to predict. but on mathematical side, one needs to have proof. and the one sayings for current world. " " chamatkar ko namaskar hei " " Yes i am already member of Sandy's forum on Msn. But Prafulla ji -do you know Gayatri Devi Vasudev learnt KP from KP himself.. as KP is said to be predictive science.do you know Gayatri Devi Vasudev learnt KP from KP himself.. sir about Jemini and Parashari, even i asked chandrashekar ji that ...did Parashari Astrology principles had some BUG in it..so Jemini gave his views , why he didnt followed Parashari Blindly as we do. this gives us a hint that every Rishi's method is incomplete. and one planet if properly said, cant be explained in few lines. 100s of pages are less to explain a planet. Warm Regards, Tarun , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish wrote: > > Dear Tarun ji > > Well - KP is good or bad; it works or not - can only be seen, if we > interact closely with good KP astrologers. I have a great friend from > 90's Shri Vijay Bhai - who is an excellent predictor with KP system (In > my observation - none of the modern internet predictors can match his > skills and maturity in predictive approach). Most members from early > 90's jyotish list may be familiar with him. > > Few also criticized him that he stolen the stellar theory from Meena - > but I fail to understand then - why people do not blame Sage Jaimini > to take few theories from Sage Parashar. In jyotish all these theory > import / export need not be seen in bad light. On the contrary, we > must be happy that - some one explored the stellar realities and > expanded on that to produce a consistent interpretation model. The > best part of the model is that - he proved in classroom on any random > events and taught. It will be interesting astro journey for you / > anyone to hear those experiences from Late Shri Krishna Moorthy's > classroom students. > > So in my opinion - if you may closely interact with KP astrologers and > (also in dedicated KP forums) - then you may form your own opinion. > Dear Sandy Crowther has dedicated KP forum on MSN. I strongly > recommend you to explore KP on that discussion group. You will be > pleased with its consistent framework of rules. > > In my humble opinion - All system works in the hand of experts. > > regards / Prafulla > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > Dear Prashant ji, > > > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > > ------------------------------ > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > > or > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will > > > last for all times to come. > > ------------------------------ > > > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > > its basic. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > , " astro desk " > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > > important > > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > > earlier > > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > > have lived > > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > > weak, > > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > > their glare. > > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > > resources it an > > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > > the earlier > > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > > we need > > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > > or > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will > > > last for all times to come. > > > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > > knowledge > > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > > smarana > > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > > without > > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > > sports > > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > > or other > > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > > pursuits and > > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > > for long > > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > > time, > > > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > > aspects or > > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > > Vargas so be > > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > > astrology > > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > > light. as > > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > > syste,s > > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > > others to > > > also do same. > > > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > > he said > > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > > benefit of the human being. > > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > > 40gmail.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > > region only Rohini > > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > > or Super star materials > > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > > does not matter in our > > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > > planets though well > > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > > speed, location and also > > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > > not going to help u > > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > > get some inputs from > > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > > totally over write what was > > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija% 40>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > > of > > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > > with > > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > > has > > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > > data. We > > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > > have > > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > > in > > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > > every > > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > > over > > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > > been > > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > > teaching > > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > > So > > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > > scholars > > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > > Singh, > > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > > Rao, > > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > > advise to > > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > > things > > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > > not > > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > > and > > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > > thing > > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > > the > > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > > to > > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > > Without > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > > at > > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > > are > > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > > (in > > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > > lords > > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > > DO > > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > > time > > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > > be > > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > > of > > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > > that > > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > > aspect > > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Tarunji, I have already presented my Interpretation Model, in KP Method, for individual stock picking, in the KP Forums, where the Masters of the forums have accepted the same, and there is no reason not to, for I have hundreds of charts of real people, real purchases made and real profits earnt, along with real phone numbers of these various stock market clients, who are primarily into Stock market, and do crores of turnover daily, and would not accept just any guess work for stock suggestions. I have stopped writing,off late in KP Forum, and one may search within 2 months messages, and would find the interpretation model, if one wishes to use for himself. I would not have revealed it, but I do not believe in selfishness, Knowledge shared is knowledge gained, is what I believe in, and I have received numerous calls from KP astrologers who now respect me more for my nature of free exchange of information sharing. A person who shares predictive knowledge would be able to receive back more predictive knoweldge from the nature or law of Prakriti. Thus KP does work, but it depends on which astrologer one meets, and the astrologer is good in what type of prediction (Subject), and also on the current time of the Querist, and how much the Querist can pay back in cash or kind, in return for the services given,and whether both are blessed by Almighty to transact- give and take- advise and receive advise. At times KP has been so wonderful that the day of the event can be foretold in advance in certain cases, but to repeat this everytime depends on the astrologers mood, spiritual power, Hora running, a good receipient coming back for advise, and also on the purity on both sides at time of judgment. Purity is of many kinds including physical., and also depends on the period after sunrise, before sunset, and at midnight, and individual purity. Now if a astrologer cannot repeat his spectacular predictions 7 out of 10 times, does not mean that KP is a bad system, it may be well said, that the astrologer is not in a proper frame of mind to predict due to other overbearing factors on his mind, or the querist is not worthy of receiving proper advise due to number of factors again. I would appreciate that critics,instead of blaming other systems, should try to perfect their own approach of whatever system they follow. One should not throw stones at other houses when one is himself living in glass house. I appreciate your perception levels, wiseness of looking at matters, the broad outlook and practical astrological knowledge you are after, and into. best wishes, Bhaskar. , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar ji, > > Yes you are absolutely right. > > KP and Parashari or Jemini. All are finally based on Rashi's no one > can change the effects of Aries or meena, or any sign. > > All sciences have proved themselves. And finally in this scientific > context life......all believe on Proof. > > as you are into stock market astrology too ( CNBC channel ) how to > convince people there, they are commercial people and trust on proofs > only, not once but 100's of times we have to give them proof so that > they accept the way. and KP has finally proved it in minutes accuracy > for rise and falls. > > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Tarunji, > > > > This is a democratic country and a democratic Platform. > > Anyone is allowed to say anything.But all systems are good > > in hands of able astrologer. That is another matter,that one > > gives time to one system, and is able to gain some proficiency > > in same and labelled as Traditional-Parashar or Jamini or KP. > > But the base is same. Jamini uses the same planets and so does > > KP. We cannot talk about any system not being able to give good > > results unless we study that system, and then comment. > > > > I am a follower of Kp, for instant examination of any period > > or problem when native comes for readibngs, but I use all > > approaches, and at times, I give readings as per traditional. > > I also believe in vargas, though I may not believe that Saturn > > is going to give evil results in 9 places (Houses) in transit > > from the Moon. There are hundreds of rules, and we may not be > > well versant in all, neither in amalgamation of these, > > to form a proper judgement, so for me all these systems are > > good, with no bias to any one. > > > > Let us also not forget that one can lean KP, only after passing > > the Traditional systems of prognostications, which is the > > base for any specialised system. Traditional system is like > > a B'Com Graduate degree,and then one may choose to master any > > system like Astakvarga, Amsas- Jamini, KP-Nakshatra. Nadi or > > whatever, but all systems work in the respective followers of > > each system who are specialised in the same. > > > > best wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Prashant ji, > > > > > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted > man > > > who did > > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame > creations > > > or > > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater > beings > > > make will > > > > last for all times to come. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to > understand > > > its basic. > > > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " astro desk " > > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, > most > > > important > > > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike > the > > > earlier > > > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > > > have lived > > > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for > the > > > weak, > > > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > > > their glare. > > > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > > > resources it an > > > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual > as > > > the earlier > > > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to > come > > > we need > > > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted > man > > > who did > > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame > creations > > > or > > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater > beings > > > make will > > > > last for all times to come. > > > > > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > > > knowledge > > > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > > > smarana > > > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do > so > > > without > > > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or > a > > > sports > > > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport > something > > > or other > > > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > > > pursuits and > > > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true > light > > > for long > > > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on > our > > > time, > > > > > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > > > aspects or > > > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > > > Vargas so be > > > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are > discussing > > > astrology > > > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his > reflected > > > light. as > > > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on > our > > > syste,s > > > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > > > others to > > > > also do same. > > > > > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so > what > > > he said > > > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > > > benefit of the human being. > > > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > > > 40gmail.com>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > > > region only Rohini > > > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > > > or Super star materials > > > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > > > does not matter in our > > > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > > > planets though well > > > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > > > speed, location and also > > > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > > > not going to help u > > > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > > > get some inputs from > > > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > > > totally over write what was > > > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija% > 40>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > > > of > > > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > > > with > > > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > > > has > > > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > > > data. We > > > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > > > have > > > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > > > in > > > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > > > every > > > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > > > over > > > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > > > been > > > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > > > teaching > > > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > > > So > > > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > > > scholars > > > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > > > Singh, > > > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > > > Rao, > > > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > > > advise to > > > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > > > things > > > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > > > not > > > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > > > and > > > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > > > Without > > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > > > (in > > > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > > > lords > > > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > > > DO > > > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > > > aspect > > > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Tarun ji It may also be construed as jyotish being evolving subject. And perhaps based on different yuga or environment, each sages / authors modified the interpretation to suit the human perspective. So as mentioned by another honorable member of this forum that - we can not keep all those old parameters fixed (constant) makes lots of sense. If you read various classics - there are huge deviation in methods and interpretations. Perhaps all were right at their age / yuga. So we must also remain open to its modern application and should not be dogged in by old quotes. Compared to internet astrologers, I found traditionalist more progressive in their jyotish and I found they have modified various karkatva to suit their experience. Yes - even western astrologer will also be able to predict well, if he is good. Why not? Glad to know that you are member of Sandy's forum. She is a wonderful person and a very good astrologer. I enjoyed her association on earlier jyotish list. Yes, GDV is an expert KP astrologer and I am sure she must have found merit in that some system - before opting to learn that. In my opinion - we must read all systems with open mind and our interpretation model must be a good synthesis - of what we could see them working on consistent basis. Now when talk of stellar theories - We must appreciate that constellations are links of rashi chart to navamsa / other divisions. They work as micro lord (compared to macro lordship of rasi). And this helps us in tracing inner relationship of planets and bhavas at various layers. regards / Prafulla , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Prafulla ji, > > Sir none of the science is bad, even i wont say western astrology as > bad. > > just proof and predictions are needed....we all are material persons. > and we none can run behind anything blidnly...even we are spiritual > we can get intutive power in ourself which help us to predict. > > but on mathematical side, one needs to have proof. and the one > sayings for current world. > " " chamatkar ko namaskar hei " " > > Yes i am already member of Sandy's forum on Msn. > > But Prafulla ji -do you know Gayatri Devi Vasudev learnt KP from KP > himself.. > > as KP is said to be predictive science.do you know Gayatri Devi > Vasudev learnt KP from KP himself.. > > sir about Jemini and Parashari, even i asked chandrashekar ji > that ...did Parashari Astrology principles had some BUG in it..so > Jemini gave his views , why he didnt followed Parashari Blindly as we > do. > > this gives us a hint that every Rishi's method is incomplete. > and one planet if properly said, cant be explained in few lines. 100s > of pages are less to explain a planet. > > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Tarun ji > > > > Well - KP is good or bad; it works or not - can only be seen, if we > > interact closely with good KP astrologers. I have a great friend > from > > 90's Shri Vijay Bhai - who is an excellent predictor with KP system > (In > > my observation - none of the modern internet predictors can match > his > > skills and maturity in predictive approach). Most members from early > > 90's jyotish list may be familiar with him. > > > > Few also criticized him that he stolen the stellar theory from > Meena - > > but I fail to understand then - why people do not blame Sage > Jaimini > > to take few theories from Sage Parashar. In jyotish all these theory > > import / export need not be seen in bad light. On the contrary, we > > must be happy that - some one explored the stellar realities and > > expanded on that to produce a consistent interpretation model. The > > best part of the model is that - he proved in classroom on any > random > > events and taught. It will be interesting astro journey for you / > > anyone to hear those experiences from Late Shri Krishna Moorthy's > > classroom students. > > > > So in my opinion - if you may closely interact with KP astrologers > and > > (also in dedicated KP forums) - then you may form your own opinion. > > Dear Sandy Crowther has dedicated KP forum on MSN. I strongly > > recommend you to explore KP on that discussion group. You will be > > pleased with its consistent framework of rules. > > > > In my humble opinion - All system works in the hand of experts. > > > > regards / Prafulla > > > > , " Tarun " <tarun.virgo@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Prashant ji, > > > > > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted > man > > > who did > > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame > creations > > > or > > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater > beings > > > make will > > > > last for all times to come. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to > understand > > > its basic. > > > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > > > Tarun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " astro desk " > > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, > most > > > important > > > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike > the > > > earlier > > > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > > > have lived > > > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for > the > > > weak, > > > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > > > their glare. > > > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > > > resources it an > > > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual > as > > > the earlier > > > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to > come > > > we need > > > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted > man > > > who did > > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame > creations > > > or > > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater > beings > > > make will > > > > last for all times to come. > > > > > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > > > knowledge > > > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > > > smarana > > > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do > so > > > without > > > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or > a > > > sports > > > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport > something > > > or other > > > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > > > pursuits and > > > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true > light > > > for long > > > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on > our > > > time, > > > > > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > > > aspects or > > > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > > > Vargas so be > > > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are > discussing > > > astrology > > > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his > reflected > > > light. as > > > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on > our > > > syste,s > > > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > > > others to > > > > also do same. > > > > > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so > what > > > he said > > > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > > > benefit of the human being. > > > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > > > 40gmail.com>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > > > region only Rohini > > > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > > > or Super star materials > > > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > > > does not matter in our > > > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > > > planets though well > > > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > > > speed, location and also > > > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > > > not going to help u > > > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > > > get some inputs from > > > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > > > totally over write what was > > > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija% > 40>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > > > of > > > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > > > with > > > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > > > has > > > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > > > data. We > > > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > > > have > > > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > > > in > > > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > > > every > > > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > > > over > > > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > > > been > > > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > > > teaching > > > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > > > So > > > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > > > scholars > > > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > > > Singh, > > > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > > > Rao, > > > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > > > advise to > > > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > > > things > > > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > > > not > > > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > > > and > > > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > > > Without > > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > > > (in > > > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > > > lords > > > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > > > DO > > > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > > > aspect > > > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Sri Prashant, I think you intended to address this to Sri Kursija. I guess you mistyped my name. Satya S Kolachina , " astro desk " <astro.prashantkumar wrote: > > Dear Satya, > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most important > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the earlier > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations have lived > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the weak, > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in their glare. > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and resources it an > offer its inhabitants. > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as the earlier > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come we need > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man who did > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations or > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings make will > last for all times to come. > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get knowledge > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama smarana > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so without > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a sports > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something or other > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual pursuits and > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light for long > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our time, > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on aspects or > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in Vargas so be > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing astrology > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected light. as > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our syste,s > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead others to > also do same. > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what he said > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > Best wishes > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija wrote: > > > > Dear Prashant, > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > according to others we should follow classic > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > benefit of the human being. > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar<astro.prashantkumar% 40gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > like wise excess solar > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > region only Rohini > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > or Super star materials > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > does not matter in our > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > planets though well > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > speed, location and also > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > not going to help u > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > get some inputs from > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > essence see if there is an > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > have multiple meanings > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > totally over write what was > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > vice versa, as long as > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > corrects them as they have > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > defensive methods like a > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija <sckursija%40>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > of > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > with > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > has > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > data. We > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > have > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > in > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > every > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > over > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > been > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > teaching > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > So > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > scholars > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > Singh, > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > Rao, > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > advise to > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > Rahu > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > things > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > not > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > and > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > thing > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > the > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > aspects in > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > to > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > Without > > > > > commenting > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > at > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > are > > > > > there in those > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > (in > > > > > the birth > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > lords > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > lordship between > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > DO > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > time > > > > > of birth. > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > that these planets > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > be > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > of > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > that > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > identity,and > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > attributed between > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > aspect > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Bhaskar ji, " " I would not have revealed it, but I do not believe in selfishness, Knowledge shared is knowledge gained, is what I believe in, " " [Tarun]- Very well said sir. sir there are many people, who quote Guru but guru never say to criticise other methods, and those who do ....are just fake. " " Thus KP does work, but it depends on which astrologer one meets, and the astrologer is good in what type of prediction (Subject), and also on the current time of the Querist, and how much the Querist can pay back in cash or kind, in return for the services given,and whether both are blessed by Almighty to transact- give and take- advise and receive advise " " " [Tarun]-Exactly sir, true knowledge is necessary to make predictions rather than writing long mails which makes one bored to read him.----- --- " " At times KP has been so wonderful that the day of the event can be foretold in advance in certain cases, but to repeat this everytime depends on the astrologers mood, spiritual power, Hora running, a good receipient coming back for advise, and also on the purity on both sides at time of judgment " " [Tarun]- Sir spritual knowledge is god given ,and very few persons are god's messenger who can help people to get right advice. and so they are given with RIGHT knowledge too. Warm Regards, Tarun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 tarun I had explained this once to you on his gifted predictions and there is one typos in my line thanks for showing it to me it is man made not man dame, sorry for the TYPOS members similarly in his H is missing. pl cee the corrections again in red to show where errors were there. prashant On 7/30/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote: > > Dear Prashant ji, > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > ------------------------- > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not His system as all man MADE creations > or > > systems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will last for all times to come. > ------------------------- > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > its basic. > > Warm Regards, > > Tarun > > <%40>, > " astro desk " > > <astro.prashantkumar wrote: > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > important > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > earlier > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > have lived > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > weak, > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > their glare. > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > resources it an > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > the earlier > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > we need > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > who did > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > or > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > make will > > last for all times to come. > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > knowledge > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > smarana > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > without > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > sports > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > or other > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > pursuits and > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > for long > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > time, > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > aspects or > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > Vargas so be > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > astrology > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > light. as > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > syste,s > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > others to > > also do same. > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > he said > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija wrote: > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > benefit of the human being. > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar<astro.prashantkumar% > 40gmail.com>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > region only Rohini > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > or Super star materials > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > does not matter in our > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > planets though well > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > speed, location and also > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > not going to help u > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > get some inputs from > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > totally over write what was > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija <sckursija%40>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > of > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > with > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > has > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > data. We > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > have > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > in > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > every > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > over > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > been > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > teaching > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > So > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > scholars > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > Singh, > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > Rao, > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > advise to > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > Rahu > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > things > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > not > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > and > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > thing > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > the > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > to > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > Without > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > at > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > are > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > (in > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > lords > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > DO > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > time > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > be > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > of > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > that > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > aspect > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 Dear Prashant ji, No problem sir..its fine with all of us. Just actually these lines confused me, but clear now :-) Warm Regard, Tarun , " astro desk " <astro.prashantkumar wrote: > > tarun > > I had explained this once to you on his gifted predictions > > and there is one typos in my line thanks for showing it to me > > it is man made not man dame, sorry for the TYPOS members > > similarly in his H is missing. > pl cee the corrections again in red to show where errors were there. > > prashant > > On 7/30/07, Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote: > > > > Dear Prashant ji, > > > > Can you please tell me , wht the following lines means. > > ------------------------- > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not His system as all man MADE creations > > or > > > systems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will last for all times to come. > > ------------------------- > > > > There are just few books for KP as KP Reader books...to understand > > its basic. > > > > Warm Regards, > > > > Tarun > > > > <% 40>, > > " astro desk " > > > > <astro.prashantkumar@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Satya, > > > > > > Yes we have to accept we r not prefect for various reasons, most > > important > > > it the material plane we r in now, no escape from this unlike the > > earlier > > > age I can't even say generations as we see last few generations > > have lived > > > in the material world, society rarely cares now or provides for the > > weak, > > > meak etc neither the Govt some NGO's max if we r lucky to be in > > their glare. > > > neither living in forests possible with them dwindling and > > resources it an > > > offer its inhabitants. > > > > > > it will be a great challange to find some one truly spiritual as > > the earlier > > > ages so what they saw is too deep, and good for all times to come > > we need > > > some adjustments or fine tuning to them. > > > > > > I can't say much on KP system other than saying he as gifted man > > who did > > > many great predictions, but not is system as all man dame creations > > or > > > sytems will have a short shelf life. what nature or greater beings > > make will > > > last for all times to come. > > > > > > Good old ages people cud meditate for years or decades and get > > knowledge > > > from the direct source-God, but now in Kali Yuga Bhagavad Nama > > smarana > > > itself can give one some bliss it is said if we can care to do so > > without > > > worrying about our next meal, a film program or a tv serial or a > > sports > > > event or other side no water, power, servant, transport something > > or other > > > will distract our time and we have less time for the spiritual > > pursuits and > > > without them such divine subjects will not deliver its true light > > for long > > > the batter needs to be recharged. even with such challenges on our > > time, > > > > > > We have to best stick to our rishies concepts , guidlines on > > aspects or > > > bigger picture in Jyotish if no one except KNR used aspects in > > Vargas so be > > > it. BVR never did and yet delivered more and if we are discussing > > astrology > > > today it is BV ramans works alone rest shine under his reflected > > light. as > > > he took it to the west and from the west we get more light on our > > syste,s > > > greatness and all of us benifit from his Englsh works that lead > > others to > > > also do same. > > > > > > Like I already said B V Raman demystified Parashara for us so what > > he said > > > is close to what one must know develop systems around it. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/29/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Prashant, > > > > I have clearly said that astrology is bases on Siddant > > > > as you have also accepted it. It can not over rule > > > > Siddant. It can draw its on rules and laws which does > > > > not go agaist the basic principles of the Siddant. > > > > > > > > More over we have to confined ourselves to aspect. The > > > > question is that whether we should analyse the > > > > divisional chart on the basis of aspect of planets as > > > > in Rashi chart. According to Respected K.N.Rao the > > > > answer is yes. According to Santhanam we should not as > > > > divisional chart is made to analyse a particular > > > > aspect of life for the jatak. When we look towards > > > > others eminent writers of astrology we find they have > > > > not used aspect in divisional charts. So what we > > > > should do? My answer will be that wait and see who is > > > > correct. When we are not on one opinion for the > > > > construction of varga, how we can be on aspect? > > > > According to some eminent astrologers, the divisional > > > > charts should be constructed in cyclic manner and > > > > according to others we should follow classic > > > > particulrly for Hora, Dreshkon and trimshamsha. > > > > Similarly we have not one opinion for the use of seven > > > > or eight planet as karaks in Jaimini, for the sign of > > > > exaltation of Rahu or Ketu, Karkamsha in rashi chart > > > > or in navamsha chart and etc. The followers of > > > > K.P.system are not ready to accepts even the > > > > vargas.Does all are not giving correct predictions? > > > > All are right.I bow before them as they are in search > > > > of the truth.Only truth is right. We are not perfect. > > > > We are blind examining an elephant.One who has got the > > > > leg of the elephant, he says that elephant is a > > > > pillar. One who has hold the tail, he says that she is > > > > rope. Both are right because our past experience > > > > blends the truth. We does not know the whole, but the > > > > part of it.The truth is one a dot, the absolute > > > > Brahma. He expands himself with the help of his > > > > energy, the Prakriti and goes on taking different > > > > forms. All form are true. When he feels, he absorbs > > > > his prakriti and again become a dot. He is only > > > > perfect. We are to search for the truth for the > > > > benefit of the human being. > > > > No one is wrong or right till he is searching for the > > > > truth.He is a bacon of light.He is showing the path > > > > what he finds is true.I bow before them on the > > > > occasion of Guru Poornima. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- astro desk <astro.prashantkumar@<astro.prashantkumar% > > 40gmail.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear SCK, > > > > > > > > > > yes the broad rules of motion, declination orb etc > > > > > as in astronomy else HOW > > > > > will they be able to predict Eclipses so accurately, > > > > > like wise excess solar > > > > > activity or solar flares as we call in astronomy, > > > > > like wise the super Nova's > > > > > in the 27 star scheme [that is within the Equatorial > > > > > region only Rohini > > > > > falls under it [has reference to such names] Quasars > > > > > or Super star materials > > > > > too have been given a mention in our works but what > > > > > does not matter in our > > > > > life time are not considered esp the trans saturnine > > > > > planets though well > > > > > described and locatable form Mahabharata times > > > > > through Veda Vyasa [compiler > > > > > of Mahabharata] he not only describes their color, > > > > > speed, location and also > > > > > said it doesn't concern human life as it takes > > > > > nearly 240 odd years for a > > > > > cycle of the zodiac. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but applying just astronomical rules to Jyotishya is > > > > > not going to help u > > > > > need to blend them and more with the other aspects > > > > > like Gunas, tatwa,s > > > > > rasas, devatas , adidevathas and a lot more we must > > > > > get some inputs from > > > > > Sanskrit source for any rethink on it gets its > > > > > essence see if there is an > > > > > answer or to our thinking as u said Sanskrit words > > > > > have multiple meanings > > > > > and test them over a period of time. but we cant > > > > > totally over write what was > > > > > said in past all we can is make necessary > > > > > corrections as u said and is done > > > > > by good Siddhantis from time to time astronomy is > > > > > siddhana and jyotishya is > > > > > a part of it not whole of it/ > > > > > a good siddhanthi need not be a good jyotishi and > > > > > vice versa, as long as > > > > > one understands the essence of them and work it > > > > > helps else like the Vakya > > > > > panchanga of TN will be stuck with errors no one > > > > > corrects them as they have > > > > > probably lost the clues to correct them and use > > > > > defensive methods like a > > > > > brand can't be wrong correction is in built if we > > > > > care to study the source. > > > > > > > > > > best wishes > > > > > > > > > > On 7/28/07, S.C. Kursija <sckursija@ <sckursija% 40>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vijayadas Praqdeep, > > > > > > I have clearly said that Astrology is based on > > > > > > Astronomy and laws of mathematics. The movements > > > > > of > > > > > > planets is governed by Kepler's law and modified > > > > > with > > > > > > the observations of Nasa.Even the laws of Motions > > > > > has > > > > > > been modified. But we have not modifies our > > > > > > astrological rules according to the available > > > > > data. We > > > > > > are not in a position to explain that why superior > > > > > > planets have been granted three full aspects. We > > > > > have > > > > > > accepted with due respects what has been written > > > > > in > > > > > > our classics hundreds years ago, when our classic > > > > > > clearly say that data should be modified after > > > > > every > > > > > > 60 years or so due to precession of equinox. Every > > > > > > thing in this universe is moving and is relative. > > > > > > Nothing is absolute and determine, fixed. More > > > > > over > > > > > > our astrological books are in sanskrit and has > > > > > been > > > > > > translated by scholars who know sanskrit bur not > > > > > > astrology. In sanskrit a single word has many > > > > > > meanings. I have faced this difficulty while > > > > > teaching > > > > > > reduction in longevity due to Kuja in Ashtakvarga. > > > > > So > > > > > > we have to refer the experience of our early > > > > > scholars > > > > > > in astrrology Sh.Harihar Majumdar, Devikinand > > > > > Singh, > > > > > > Dr.B.V.Raman, Sh. Surya Narain,Smt Gayatri Devi, > > > > > > Sh.K.N.Rao, Iyenger, Sanjay Rath, PVR Narsimha > > > > > Rao, > > > > > > Santhanam and host of others.Sh. K.N.Rao accepts > > > > > > aspect in varga, Late sh. Santhanam does not > > > > > advise to > > > > > > accept. Similar is the position for the signs of > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > and Ketu. Similarly we are confused for so many > > > > > things > > > > > > in other fields of Astrrology. Accept that we are > > > > > not > > > > > > clear about the aspects of planets in varga. Time > > > > > and > > > > > > experience will clear it. But one thing is crystal > > > > > > clear that Astrology is based on Astronomy.Any > > > > > thing > > > > > > against Astronomy's law is to be rejected. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- vijayadas_pradeep > > > > > > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep@ <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > <vijayadas_pradeep%40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Respected memebers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some individuals with scientific bent of mind > > > > > > > like Kursija ji > > > > > > > have raised concerns i am making one more mail > > > > > > > ,before the paper to > > > > > > > make them understand the astronomical > > > > > subtilities - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)Late Santhanam - " Aspects are referred to in > > > > > the > > > > > > > divisional charts > > > > > > > here. I am unable to fully conceive the logic in > > > > > > > aspects in > > > > > > > divisional charts for the SAGE HIMSELF REFERRED > > > > > to > > > > > > > the LONGITUDINAL > > > > > > > aspectual evaluations in an earlier chapter. > > > > > Without > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > further on this controversial aspect I leave it > > > > > at > > > > > > > that, accepting > > > > > > > my limitations to explain this fully. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)Mr.Bose - > > > > > > > ''One has to remember that when a planet is in > > > > > > > Thula(Libra) and > > > > > > > another one is in Mesha in Navamsha chart, they > > > > > are > > > > > > > there in those > > > > > > > respective rasis because those planets occupied > > > > > (in > > > > > > > the birth > > > > > > > chart) segments ruled by Venus and Mars, the > > > > > lords > > > > > > > of Thula and > > > > > > > Mesha respectively.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''Such a relationship originates in the amsa > > > > > > > lordship between > > > > > > > segments of a given rasi, it has got NOTHING TO > > > > > DO > > > > > > > WITH any ANGULAR > > > > > > > relationship between planets existing at the > > > > > time > > > > > > > of birth. > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no justification to consider > > > > > > > that these planets > > > > > > > are in opposition in the same sense as they will > > > > > be > > > > > > > in rasi, if > > > > > > > they are similarly placed.'' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ''The starting point of the math for evaluation > > > > > of > > > > > > > drikbala function > > > > > > > is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear > > > > > that > > > > > > > the drikbala is > > > > > > > aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal > > > > > > > identity,and > > > > > > > consequently no angular relationship can be > > > > > > > attributed between > > > > > > > planets in an amsa chart, does it not make > > > > > aspect > > > > > > > and aspectual > > > > > > > strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? > > > > > '' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regds > > > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.