Navamsha OR NAVAMSHA CHART - What to see here ?

July 29, 2007

Dear members and all,

I would like to have your views on what should

one astrologer see from the navamsha ?

1) Should he see the strength of all the

Planets from the Navamsha ?

b) How to judge spouse from the Navamsha.

Having once done this, should the navamsha

(Chart) be kept aside, after this excersise ?

Is there any use for the same once the spouse

has been checked ?

regards,

Bhaskar.

July 29, 2007

Dear SRi Bhaskar,

To be very honest, the navamsa chart also drives every other aspect

of life; career, children etc. It is as important as Rasi chart. If

you can go back to one of my postings where I mentioned Sri KN Rao's

assignment of strenghts to different charts, Navamsa chart is given

equal importance to Rasi, in terms of weightage. The Top three charts

of importance are Rasi, Navamsa and Shashtyamsa; Shastyamsa having

the highest weight; this is Sri KN Rao's assignment of weights; not

mine.

I can very well say, that my career patterns are very easily seen for

the past 20 years, more from Rasi and Navamsa, compared to Dasamasa.

Of course, I have never attempted on Shashtyamsa.

Regards,

Satya S Kolachina

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear members and all,

>

> I would like to have your views on what should

> one astrologer see from the navamsha ?

>

> 1) Should he see the strength of all the

> Planets from the Navamsha ?

>

> b) How to judge spouse from the Navamsha.

> Having once done this, should the navamsha

> (Chart) be kept aside, after this excersise ?

> Is there any use for the same once the spouse

> has been checked ?

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

July 29, 2007

Dear Shri Satya Saiji,

I also second your opinions on these charts, as you have

said. I certainly do give importance to the navamsha Chart.

Sashtiamasa, even I have not used, because of lower divisions

at the point when I used to study the same, and was not able

to actually tell whether my birth time was accurate to the

minute or not. Of course, now its a different story, and only

lack of quality time , eludes me to study the same, honestly

to tell you, I have lost interest in my chart long back,

and have left all in the hands of the Sarvasva Parmatma,

Bhagwaan Shri krishna, to decide what is to

be my future course. and I mean this.

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

, " Satya Sai Kolachina "

<skolachi wrote:

>

> Dear SRi Bhaskar,

>

> To be very honest, the navamsa chart also drives every other aspect

> of life; career, children etc. It is as important as Rasi chart. If

> you can go back to one of my postings where I mentioned Sri KN Rao's

> assignment of strenghts to different charts, Navamsa chart is given

> equal importance to Rasi, in terms of weightage. The Top three charts

> of importance are Rasi, Navamsa and Shashtyamsa; Shastyamsa having

> the highest weight; this is Sri KN Rao's assignment of weights; not

> mine.

>

> I can very well say, that my career patterns are very easily seen for

> the past 20 years, more from Rasi and Navamsa, compared to Dasamasa.

> Of course, I have never attempted on Shashtyamsa.

>

> Regards,

> Satya S Kolachina

>

> , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear members and all,

> >

> > I would like to have your views on what should

> > one astrologer see from the navamsha ?

> >

> > 1) Should he see the strength of all the

> > Planets from the Navamsha ?

> >

> > b) How to judge spouse from the Navamsha.

> > Having once done this, should the navamsha

> > (Chart) be kept aside, after this excersise ?

> > Is there any use for the same once the spouse

> > has been checked ?

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

>

July 29, 2007

Dear Bhaskar ji,

If we see in terminology,

In my view Navamsa to see strengh of planet, and Navamsa chart to see

paticular things.

For example as i think - if a planet is in exalted in rashi chart,

will be said as debilated in navamsa or as per its rashi in navamsa

(not chart), and if we are taking navamsa say, for marriage

prospects, then the word CHART is used.

So the Chart is for its usability to predict for marriage / job / or

anykind of other specific indepth information.

I hope i am correct in my views.

Warm Regards,

Tarun

, " Satya Sai Kolachina "

<skolachi wrote:

>

> Dear SRi Bhaskar,

>

> To be very honest, the navamsa chart also drives every other aspect

> of life; career, children etc. It is as important as Rasi chart. If

> you can go back to one of my postings where I mentioned Sri KN

Rao's

> assignment of strenghts to different charts, Navamsa chart is given

> equal importance to Rasi, in terms of weightage. The Top three

charts

> of importance are Rasi, Navamsa and Shashtyamsa; Shastyamsa having

> the highest weight; this is Sri KN Rao's assignment of weights; not

> mine.

>

> I can very well say, that my career patterns are very easily seen

for

> the past 20 years, more from Rasi and Navamsa, compared to

Dasamasa.

> Of course, I have never attempted on Shashtyamsa.

>

> Regards,

> Satya S Kolachina

>

> , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear members and all,

> >

> > I would like to have your views on what should

> > one astrologer see from the navamsha ?

> >

> > 1) Should he see the strength of all the

> > Planets from the Navamsha ?

> >

> > b) How to judge spouse from the Navamsha.

> > Having once done this, should the navamsha

> > (Chart) be kept aside, after this excersise ?

> > Is there any use for the same once the spouse

> > has been checked ?

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

>

July 29, 2007

Dear Tarunji,

Thank you for your views.

I was looking for views from the emminent Experts on

amsas, in our Forums, who have access to shlokas and

the actual truth, which we may not be having.

regards,

Bhaskar.

, " Tarun " <tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> If we see in terminology,

> In my view Navamsa to see strengh of planet, and Navamsa chart to see

> paticular things.

>

> For example as i think - if a planet is in exalted in rashi chart,

> will be said as debilated in navamsa or as per its rashi in navamsa

> (not chart), and if we are taking navamsa say, for marriage

> prospects, then the word CHART is used.

>

> So the Chart is for its usability to predict for marriage / job / or

> anykind of other specific indepth information.

>

> I hope i am correct in my views.

>

> Warm Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

> , " Satya Sai Kolachina "

> <skolachi@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear SRi Bhaskar,

> >

> > To be very honest, the navamsa chart also drives every other aspect

> > of life; career, children etc. It is as important as Rasi chart. If

> > you can go back to one of my postings where I mentioned Sri KN

> Rao's

> > assignment of strenghts to different charts, Navamsa chart is given

> > equal importance to Rasi, in terms of weightage. The Top three

> charts

> > of importance are Rasi, Navamsa and Shashtyamsa; Shastyamsa having

> > the highest weight; this is Sri KN Rao's assignment of weights; not

> > mine.

> >

> > I can very well say, that my career patterns are very easily seen

> for

> > the past 20 years, more from Rasi and Navamsa, compared to

> Dasamasa.

> > Of course, I have never attempted on Shashtyamsa.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Satya S Kolachina

> >

> > , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear members and all,

> > >

> > > I would like to have your views on what should

> > > one astrologer see from the navamsha ?

> > >

> > > 1) Should he see the strength of all the

> > > Planets from the Navamsha ?

> > >

> > > b) How to judge spouse from the Navamsha.

> > > Having once done this, should the navamsha

> > > (Chart) be kept aside, after this excersise ?

> > > Is there any use for the same once the spouse

> > > has been checked ?

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> >

>

July 29, 2007

Dear Bhaskar,

The science of Astrology is explained in such a way that Master in Sanaskrit

can only give meanings of the Shalokas, but to gain the hidden wisdom one

need to practice and have a Divine blessings. Thus it is an individual

search to truth and when one gains he gains too the tune of original writers

that why the things shall remain secret and to which extent these needs to

be exposed.

These will never be exposed in the groups like this and only will have to be

attained with individual learning the competent will have always excess to

that .Only beginning terminology can be learned through translators but the

for mastery language country had no barriers.

Expecting that Rishis might had written 2 divided by 2 is one and hoping

that those very famous and Sanaskrit Scholars had given the things correctly

is a wrong assumption. Whereas the chances of mistakes by such persons are

more , because the main reward to their Karmas is fame/money and name which

they had gained , and what is gained is always with the desire and Karma

activity in continuity.

Further Astrology is a Science which should match with ground realities.And

a rule applicable in one chart should be applicable in others chart too. The

yogas which does not give results at Ground level shall be rejected and the

rules which give results , said by any should be adopted.

Though your proposal to look at the chart and to look at the results from

different angle is good . But who will decide that what is correct or what

is wrong.

Every individual had its own limitation , some will not move beyond Rashi,

some will try to fit every thing in Jamini and some in KP.

Without one having the Knowledge of all the things determinant to the final

reading can not decide that what is wrong and what is right.

Any how your proposal to demonstrate the Charts with different D-Charts is

good.

With Best Wishes,