Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Chandrashekhar ji This mail is not at all showing any positive signal to me.Kindly pardon for the lengthy debate.I can imagine the effort and patience you have given at your age,when i myslef find it tiring. As you may have noted i have tried my level best to stick to Tarka and Pramana.As a human being i have all limitations and would had erred.I had forgotten your age in enthusiasm and should not had dragged you to lenghty debates.I could had dirctly gone for the paper a left it for acceptance or rejection based on merit.In either case we will never get full support. Kindly take care of your health.Kindly pardon me as your son for making you write lengthy mails.It is from my heart.I cannot forget all the guidance you have given to me as well as members in this list. I cannot forget the guidance given personally. I will not say ,only my views are correct.Even if it is correct by Lords grace,i would prefer to have your guidance as compared to winning a debate. During the occassion of Guru Poornima,i seek your blessings. I request to you that,i would like to write a paper and will present my views.It can be corrected by any learned scholar through Tarka and Pramana. Respect Pradeep I can see Vulture eyed gentlemen playing hide and seek in masked names,longing for blood ,from a fight between us. Dear friend you are not going to succeed.Even if you come in English name or Pakistani name. , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Pradeep, > > Not being acquainted with Mr. Bose's stature as an astrologer analyzing > Parashara, while not meaning any disrespect for him, I do not see why I > should blindly accept his views. I have not seen any commentary by Mr. > Bose on BPHS as you seem to have done. If you can give me the name of > the publisher, I shall obtain it, go through it and then revert with my > opinion. > > Why not answer my points in this mail? That makes an old man like me > keep track of what is happening with this wandering thread. > > Chandrashekhar. > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > I have answered the points in another mail. > > > > Now why Mr.Bose is relevant.He has mentioned why aspects are possible > > with Tarka and Paramana.While in other cases,people say it worls for > > him well.This has no relevance. > > > > Mr.Bose isanalyzing Parashara. > > > > Hope you agree. > > > > Respect > > Pradeep > > > > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > > > I have already indicated my reluctance to respond to threads that > > jump > > > from one topic to another with out any logic. However could you > > indicate > > > where have I said that longitudinal difference is not the basis of > > > planetary aspects in Graha drishti, or even for rasi drishti? > > > > > > I have not understood what you mean by " do we have special rules > > > elsewhere for aspects of Jupiter, Mars and Saturn " neither the > > logic > > > behind your question. For your information there are also special > > rules > > > for evaluating the drishti of Gulika. > > > > > > It might be good idea if we either follow the original thread or > > close > > > the topic. In other mail you asked why I do not agree with Mr. > > Bose. The > > > discussion is about whether sages talked about aspects in D- charts > > or > > > not, so I do not find any reason to express my opinion on what Mr. > > Bose > > > said, according to you. His opinions are not under discussions here. > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > > > > > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of > > > > longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti > > > > > > > > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30 > > > > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something > > > > > > > > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from > > > > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have > > special > > > > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th > > and > > > > 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. > > > > > > > > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with > > > > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga > > > > Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha > > drishti > > > > in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as wrong. > > > > > > > > Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based > > > > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. > > > > > > > > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your > > opinion > > > > is there in the archives. > > > > > > > > Respect > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: > > 7/24/2007 1:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 Dear Pradeep, I do not understand what you need as positive sign. If it is about my ignorance to the astrological stature of Mr. Bose, I really do not know of him nor have I read his books. You should know that there is more than one way a shastra is interpreted and every one has his own perception of what is right and what is not right. You also know that I do not get perturbed by criticism, unless the language is very crude. I will try to guide those who think that I am worth receiving guidance from and want to be guided, and shall continue to do so as long as someone seeks it. And it is not a one way traffic. I also learn from the queries so there is no way a person should feel obliged to me. I know you for essentially a good person, so do not worry I have not taken the debate in bad light. let us not talk about Tarka and Pramana as even those terms mean different things to different people. Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > This mail is not at all showing any positive signal to me.Kindly > pardon for the lengthy debate.I can imagine the effort and patience > you have given at your age,when i myslef find it tiring. > As you may have noted i have tried my level best to stick to Tarka > and Pramana.As a human being i have all limitations and would had > erred.I had forgotten your age in enthusiasm and should not had > dragged you to lenghty debates.I could had dirctly gone for the paper > a left it for acceptance or rejection based on merit.In either case > we will never get full support. > > Kindly take care of your health.Kindly pardon me as your son for > making you write lengthy mails.It is from my heart.I cannot forget > all the guidance you have given to me as well as members in this > list. > > I cannot forget the guidance given personally. > > I will not say ,only my views are correct.Even if it is correct by > Lords grace,i would prefer to have your guidance as compared to > winning a debate. > > During the occassion of Guru Poornima,i seek your blessings. > > I request to you that,i would like to write a paper and will present > my views.It can be corrected by any learned scholar through Tarka and > Pramana. > > Respect > Pradeep > > I can see Vulture eyed gentlemen playing hide and seek in masked > names,longing for blood ,from a fight between us. > > Dear friend you are not going to succeed.Even if you come in English > name or Pakistani name. > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > Not being acquainted with Mr. Bose's stature as an astrologer > analyzing > > Parashara, while not meaning any disrespect for him, I do not see > why I > > should blindly accept his views. I have not seen any commentary by > Mr. > > Bose on BPHS as you seem to have done. If you can give me the name > of > > the publisher, I shall obtain it, go through it and then revert > with my > > opinion. > > > > Why not answer my points in this mail? That makes an old man like > me > > keep track of what is happening with this wandering thread. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > > > I have answered the points in another mail. > > > > > > Now why Mr.Bose is relevant.He has mentioned why aspects are > possible > > > with Tarka and Paramana.While in other cases,people say it worls > for > > > him well.This has no relevance. > > > > > > Mr.Bose isanalyzing Parashara. > > > > > > Hope you agree. > > > > > > Respect > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > <%40> > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > > > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > > > > > I have already indicated my reluctance to respond to threads > that > > > jump > > > > from one topic to another with out any logic. However could you > > > indicate > > > > where have I said that longitudinal difference is not the basis > of > > > > planetary aspects in Graha drishti, or even for rasi drishti? > > > > > > > > I have not understood what you mean by " do we have special rules > > > > elsewhere for aspects of Jupiter, Mars and Saturn " neither the > > > logic > > > > behind your question. For your information there are also > special > > > rules > > > > for evaluating the drishti of Gulika. > > > > > > > > It might be good idea if we either follow the original thread or > > > close > > > > the topic. In other mail you asked why I do not agree with Mr. > > > Bose. The > > > > discussion is about whether sages talked about aspects in D- > charts > > > or > > > > not, so I do not find any reason to express my opinion on what > Mr. > > > Bose > > > > said, according to you. His opinions are not under discussions > here. > > > > > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > > > > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > > > > > > > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of > > > > > longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti > > > > > > > > > > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does > this 30 > > > > > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something > > > > > > > > > > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from > > > > > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have > > > special > > > > > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and > 9th,4th > > > and > > > > > 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. > > > > > > > > > > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree > with > > > > > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga > > > > > Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha > > > drishti > > > > > in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based > > > > > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. > > > > > > > > > > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your > > > opinion > > > > > is there in the archives. > > > > > > > > > > Respect > > > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release > Date: > > > 7/24/2007 1:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.