Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Chandrashekhar ji 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30 have any connection - span of a Rashi or something 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha drishti in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as wrong. Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion is there in the archives. Respect Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Pradeep, I have already indicated my reluctance to respond to threads that jump from one topic to another with out any logic. However could you indicate where have I said that longitudinal difference is not the basis of planetary aspects in Graha drishti, or even for rasi drishti? I have not understood what you mean by " do we have special rules elsewhere for aspects of Jupiter, Mars and Saturn " neither the logic behind your question. For your information there are also special rules for evaluating the drishti of Gulika. It might be good idea if we either follow the original thread or close the topic. In other mail you asked why I do not agree with Mr. Bose. The discussion is about whether sages talked about aspects in D-charts or not, so I do not find any reason to express my opinion on what Mr. Bose said, according to you. His opinions are not under discussions here. Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of > longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti > > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30 > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something > > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and > 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. > > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga > Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha drishti > in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as wrong. > > Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. > > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion > is there in the archives. > > Respect > Pradeep > > > ------ > > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007 1:50 PM > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Chandrashekhar ji I have answered the points in another mail. Now why Mr.Bose is relevant.He has mentioned why aspects are possible with Tarka and Paramana.While in other cases,people say it worls for him well.This has no relevance. Mr.Bose isanalyzing Parashara. Hope you agree. Respect Pradeep , Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > Dear Pradeep, > > I have already indicated my reluctance to respond to threads that jump > from one topic to another with out any logic. However could you indicate > where have I said that longitudinal difference is not the basis of > planetary aspects in Graha drishti, or even for rasi drishti? > > I have not understood what you mean by " do we have special rules > elsewhere for aspects of Jupiter, Mars and Saturn " neither the logic > behind your question. For your information there are also special rules > for evaluating the drishti of Gulika. > > It might be good idea if we either follow the original thread or close > the topic. In other mail you asked why I do not agree with Mr. Bose. The > discussion is about whether sages talked about aspects in D-charts or > not, so I do not find any reason to express my opinion on what Mr. Bose > said, according to you. His opinions are not under discussions here. > > Chandrashekhar. > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of > > longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti > > > > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30 > > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something > > > > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from > > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special > > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and > > 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. > > > > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with > > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga > > Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha drishti > > in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as wrong. > > > > Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based > > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. > > > > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion > > is there in the archives. > > > > Respect > > Pradeep > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: 7/24/2007 1:50 PM > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Pradeep, Not being acquainted with Mr. Bose's stature as an astrologer analyzing Parashara, while not meaning any disrespect for him, I do not see why I should blindly accept his views. I have not seen any commentary by Mr. Bose on BPHS as you seem to have done. If you can give me the name of the publisher, I shall obtain it, go through it and then revert with my opinion. Why not answer my points in this mail? That makes an old man like me keep track of what is happening with this wandering thread. Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > I have answered the points in another mail. > > Now why Mr.Bose is relevant.He has mentioned why aspects are possible > with Tarka and Paramana.While in other cases,people say it worls for > him well.This has no relevance. > > Mr.Bose isanalyzing Parashara. > > Hope you agree. > > Respect > Pradeep > > > <%40>, Chandrashekhar > <chandrashekhar46 wrote: > > > > Dear Pradeep, > > > > I have already indicated my reluctance to respond to threads that > jump > > from one topic to another with out any logic. However could you > indicate > > where have I said that longitudinal difference is not the basis of > > planetary aspects in Graha drishti, or even for rasi drishti? > > > > I have not understood what you mean by " do we have special rules > > elsewhere for aspects of Jupiter, Mars and Saturn " neither the > logic > > behind your question. For your information there are also special > rules > > for evaluating the drishti of Gulika. > > > > It might be good idea if we either follow the original thread or > close > > the topic. In other mail you asked why I do not agree with Mr. > Bose. The > > discussion is about whether sages talked about aspects in D-charts > or > > not, so I do not find any reason to express my opinion on what Mr. > Bose > > said, according to you. His opinions are not under discussions here. > > > > Chandrashekhar. > > > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > > > > > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of > > > longitudes - what is the basis of Graha drishti > > > > > > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30 > > > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something > > > > > > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from > > > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have > special > > > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th > and > > > 8th,3rd and 10th etc.What does it imply. > > > > > > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with > > > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga > > > Chakras.Moreover you have mentioned in thsi list that Graha > drishti > > > in Navamsha and other D-Charts is personalyl considerd as wrong. > > > > > > Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based > > > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate. > > > > > > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your > opinion > > > is there in the archives. > > > > > > Respect > > > Pradeep > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date: > 7/24/2007 1:50 PM > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.