Do you use Navamsa or other Varga Charts - Thanks Satish ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Tarun

 

Satish ji has explained it better than what i could have.

 

Regds

Pradeep

 

, SPK <aquaris_rising wrote:

>

> Hello,

>

> Although the quesry is raised to pradeep ji I will

> give you my take on it

>

> 1. I use navamsha ( Again amsha not a chart or houses

> or yogas). Also let me be clear that I use it to see

> the strength a graha may achiev, exaltaion,

> swakshetra, friendly kshetra. Aslo I use it as a

> tertiary factor not the main factor or secondary

> factor.

>

> 2. Divisions are made like they all make them, first

> navamsha in chara rashi is of rashi itself, etc. No

> difference there.

>

> 3. Lagnamsha in a particular division is like a lagna

> of that domain. Meaning lagna navanmsha and the lord

> of it has a say in matters related to the domain of

> navansha, i.e. marriage for example. Lagna dashamshga

> will have a say on matters related to career. I do not

> use 10th house in dashamsha to look for career related

> matters as I do not think there is a 10th house in

> dashamsha. There are no houses in amshas.

>

> As for twins or similar horoscopes, yes the amshas

> will change but thats it they are amsha not houses,

> not yogas, not aspects.

>

> There was question on other systems. The answer was

> asked in YES or NO. Unfortunately how can one answer

> in YES and NO such a complex issue.

>

>

> Lets also ask how many good predictions all the

> celebrated astrologers have made in past two years

> that came true. Please do not say someone predicted

> Federer will win wimbledon ? I mean if this is the

> best jyotish can do there is nothing more to say. When

> predictions go wrong people just keep quiet and when

> even commonsense predictions ( federer will win) come

> true they are posted all over the internet.

>

> Satish

> --- Tarun <tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> > Dear Pradeep ji,

> >

> > Donot misunderstand this mail,

> >

> > I would like to ask you that -

> >

> > 1. Do you use Navamsa, or other Divisions.

> >

> > 2. How do you make Divisions ?

> >

> > 3. What is the use of Lagna or first house in

> > divisions.

> >

> >

> > Please donot put this mail in folder for whitepaper.

> >

> > Eagerly waiting for your reply.

> >

> > Warm Regards,

> >

> > Tarun

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

___________________

_______________

> Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your

story. Play Sims Stories at Games.

> http://sims./

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep ji,

 

I was in a mood to ignore Satish ji's mail actually but as you do

agree with him i am asking you few more questions.

 

> > 1. I use navamsha ( Again amsha not a chart or houses

> > or yogas). Also let me be clear that I use it to see

> > the strength a graha may achiev, exaltaion,

> > swakshetra, friendly kshetra. Aslo I use it as a

> > tertiary factor not the main factor or secondary

> > factor.

 

[Tarun] What do u get by seeing its strength in it ???

Do u agree that if it is exalted , or vargottam or debilated it

matters for you ?????

 

> > 2. Divisions are made like they all make them, first

> > navamsha in chara rashi is of rashi itself, etc. No

> > difference there.

 

[Tarun] Do you use D-27, D-81, and more higher divisions.

 

> > 3. Lagnamsha in a particular division is like a lagna

> > of that domain. Meaning lagna navanmsha and the lord

> > of it has a say in matters related to the domain of

> > navansha, i.e. marriage for example. Lagna dashamshga

> > will have a say on matters related to career. I do not

> > use 10th house in dashamsha to look for career related

> > matters as I do not think there is a 10th house in

> > dashamsha. There are no houses in amshas.

 

Can you predict the date of joining / Profession of native /

Education profile / Marriage date / Sex of Child to be born.

 

-------------------

 

Other may or may not have given good predictions , but i ask you do

you have provided any reading in the forum ?? or on any internet

forum which is proved.

 

 

Regards,

 

Tarun

 

PS.- Think before replying.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Shri Tarun

>

> Satish ji has explained it better than what i could have.

>

> Regds

> Pradeep

>

> , SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> >

> > Hello,

> >

> > Although the quesry is raised to pradeep ji I will

> > give you my take on it

> >

> > 1. I use navamsha ( Again amsha not a chart or houses

> > or yogas). Also let me be clear that I use it to see

> > the strength a graha may achiev, exaltaion,

> > swakshetra, friendly kshetra. Aslo I use it as a

> > tertiary factor not the main factor or secondary

> > factor.

> >

> > 2. Divisions are made like they all make them, first

> > navamsha in chara rashi is of rashi itself, etc. No

> > difference there.

> >

> > 3. Lagnamsha in a particular division is like a lagna

> > of that domain. Meaning lagna navanmsha and the lord

> > of it has a say in matters related to the domain of

> > navansha, i.e. marriage for example. Lagna dashamshga

> > will have a say on matters related to career. I do not

> > use 10th house in dashamsha to look for career related

> > matters as I do not think there is a 10th house in

> > dashamsha. There are no houses in amshas.

> >

> > As for twins or similar horoscopes, yes the amshas

> > will change but thats it they are amsha not houses,

> > not yogas, not aspects.

> >

> > There was question on other systems. The answer was

> > asked in YES or NO. Unfortunately how can one answer

> > in YES and NO such a complex issue.

> >

> >

> > Lets also ask how many good predictions all the

> > celebrated astrologers have made in past two years

> > that came true. Please do not say someone predicted

> > Federer will win wimbledon ? I mean if this is the

> > best jyotish can do there is nothing more to say. When

> > predictions go wrong people just keep quiet and when

> > even commonsense predictions ( federer will win) come

> > true they are posted all over the internet.

> >

> > Satish

> > --- Tarun <tarun.virgo@> wrote:

> >

> > > Dear Pradeep ji,

> > >

> > > Donot misunderstand this mail,

> > >

> > > I would like to ask you that -

> > >

> > > 1. Do you use Navamsa, or other Divisions.

> > >

> > > 2. How do you make Divisions ?

> > >

> > > 3. What is the use of Lagna or first house in

> > > divisions.

> > >

> > >

> > > Please donot put this mail in folder for whitepaper.

> > >

> > > Eagerly waiting for your reply.

> > >

> > > Warm Regards,

> > >

> > > Tarun

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

___________________

> _______________

> > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your

> story. Play Sims Stories at Games.

> > http://sims./

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dêar Shri Tarun , " Tarun "

<tarun.virgo wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep ji,

>

> I was in a mood to ignore Satish ji's mail actually but as you do

> agree with him i am asking you few more questions.

>

> > > 1. I use navamsha ( Again amsha not a chart or houses

> > > or yogas). Also let me be clear that I use it to see

> > > the strength a graha may achiev, exaltaion,

> > > swakshetra, friendly kshetra. Aslo I use it as a

> > > tertiary factor not the main factor or secondary

> > > factor.

>

> [Tarun] What do u get by seeing its strength in it ???

> Do u agree that if it is exalted , or vargottam or debilated it

> matters for you ?????

 

It matters.I have explained in the past that it means that graha is

having amsha in the rashi of its exaltation,debilitation.In case of

Vargottama -It means the Graha is having amsha in ther same rashi

wehere it is situated.Varga -Uttama -means Varga as in the first

place or same.

>

> > > 2. Divisions are made like they all make them, first

> > > navamsha in chara rashi is of rashi itself, etc. No

> > > difference there.

>

> [Tarun] Do you use D-27, D-81, and more higher divisions.

 

I don't use any divsion as a chart.But i do check the strength of

planets in many amshas.No chart.

>

> > > 3. Lagnamsha in a particular division is like a lagna

> > > of that domain. Meaning lagna navanmsha and the lord

> > > of it has a say in matters related to the domain of

> > > navansha, i.e. marriage for example. Lagna dashamshga

> > > will have a say on matters related to career. I do not

> > > use 10th house in dashamsha to look for career related

> > > matters as I do not think there is a 10th house in

> > > dashamsha. There are no houses in amshas.

>

> Can you predict the date of joining / Profession of native /

> Education profile / Marriage date / Sex of Child to be born.

>

> -------------------

>

> Other may or may not have given good predictions , but i ask you

do

> you have provided any reading in the forum ?? or on any internet

> forum which is proved.

>

>

Nobody can boast that he can predict everything.If Lords will is

there our predictions will come true.Fortunately i have given

reading and also have participated in open quizzes and have got some

answers correct.In this forum as well as vedic astrology forum.

 

Now as i am going to be busy with other things - we may discuss

after my paper.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

 

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

> PS.- Think before replying.

>

>

>

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shri Tarun

> >

> > Satish ji has explained it better than what i could have.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep

> >

> > , SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hello,

> > >

> > > Although the quesry is raised to pradeep ji I will

> > > give you my take on it

> > >

> > > 1. I use navamsha ( Again amsha not a chart or houses

> > > or yogas). Also let me be clear that I use it to see

> > > the strength a graha may achiev, exaltaion,

> > > swakshetra, friendly kshetra. Aslo I use it as a

> > > tertiary factor not the main factor or secondary

> > > factor.

> > >

> > > 2. Divisions are made like they all make them, first

> > > navamsha in chara rashi is of rashi itself, etc. No

> > > difference there.

> > >

> > > 3. Lagnamsha in a particular division is like a lagna

> > > of that domain. Meaning lagna navanmsha and the lord

> > > of it has a say in matters related to the domain of

> > > navansha, i.e. marriage for example. Lagna dashamshga

> > > will have a say on matters related to career. I do not

> > > use 10th house in dashamsha to look for career related

> > > matters as I do not think there is a 10th house in

> > > dashamsha. There are no houses in amshas.

> > >

> > > As for twins or similar horoscopes, yes the amshas

> > > will change but thats it they are amsha not houses,

> > > not yogas, not aspects.

> > >

> > > There was question on other systems. The answer was

> > > asked in YES or NO. Unfortunately how can one answer

> > > in YES and NO such a complex issue.

> > >

> > >

> > > Lets also ask how many good predictions all the

> > > celebrated astrologers have made in past two years

> > > that came true. Please do not say someone predicted

> > > Federer will win wimbledon ? I mean if this is the

> > > best jyotish can do there is nothing more to say. When

> > > predictions go wrong people just keep quiet and when

> > > even commonsense predictions ( federer will win) come

> > > true they are posted all over the internet.

> > >

> > > Satish

> > > --- Tarun <tarun.virgo@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear Pradeep ji,

> > > >

> > > > Donot misunderstand this mail,

> > > >

> > > > I would like to ask you that -

> > > >

> > > > 1. Do you use Navamsa, or other Divisions.

> > > >

> > > > 2. How do you make Divisions ?

> > > >

> > > > 3. What is the use of Lagna or first house in

> > > > divisions.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Please donot put this mail in folder for whitepaper.

> > > >

> > > > Eagerly waiting for your reply.

> > > >

> > > > Warm Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Tarun

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

___________________

> > _______________

> > > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life,

your

> > story. Play Sims Stories at Games.

> > > http://sims./

> > >

> >

>