Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Respected members If i ever think that i will get support from everyone regarding the debated point,then i am the biggest fool. My purpose is only to gather the attention of students regarding the subtlities underlying basics. Now as ufficient attention has been drawn,with another couple of mails to Chandrashekhar ji the paper work can be started. For any person with scientific bent of mind - can read 1)Grahasphuta drishti kadhanadhyaya - Graha drishti is based on Longitudinal distance. 2)Opposition in Vargas does not retain longitudinal position 3)Late Santhanam's view in BPHS 4)Read article from Mr.Bose where things have been explained beyond doubt.Ms.Savithri and Inderjit ji responded after wards. Thus i respect the view of every individual in thsi group and cannot and should not force them. All those who have a scientific bent of mind can study the basics and decide for themselves. The paper will be presented in such a way(Ofcourse within own limitations) that even a layman should be able to understand the astronomical subtitlities and garaha drishti rules as per BPHS. Thanks Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Pradeep ji It is your prerogative and scheduling to suit the whitepaper. But if I may suggest to include: a. the predictive fallacy if one use varga chakra as independent chart (of course not the primary one) b. how astrologers using varga chakra - with combinations / bhavas / aspects are missing the " basics " - again through showing predictive fallacies c. other d charts - other than d9 If I may suggest - let the paper be read by interested members, and let there not be any misquotes / selective quotes in that paper - so let there be no debate. I am sure by drawing the attention - you have achieved your purpose and let members make their own judgements without being pointed at their knowledge of basics. regards / Prafulla regards / Prafulla , " vijayadas_pradeep " <vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Respected members > > If i ever think that i will get support from everyone regarding the > debated point,then i am the biggest fool. > > My purpose is only to gather the attention of students regarding the > subtlities underlying basics. > > Now as ufficient attention has been drawn,with another couple of > mails to Chandrashekhar ji the paper work can be started. > > For any person with scientific bent of mind - can read > > 1)Grahasphuta drishti kadhanadhyaya - Graha drishti is based on > Longitudinal distance. > > 2)Opposition in Vargas does not retain longitudinal position > > 3)Late Santhanam's view in BPHS > > 4)Read article from Mr.Bose where things have been explained beyond > doubt.Ms.Savithri and Inderjit ji responded after wards. > > Thus i respect the view of every individual in thsi group and cannot > and should not force them. > > All those who have a scientific bent of mind can study the basics > and decide for themselves. > > The paper will be presented in such a way(Ofcourse within own > limitations) that even a layman should be able to understand the > astronomical subtitlities and garaha drishti rules as per BPHS. > > Thanks > Pradeep > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.