Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Genearal points- Summary - regarding the debate

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Respected members

 

If i ever think that i will get support from everyone regarding the

debated point,then i am the biggest fool.

 

My purpose is only to gather the attention of students regarding the

subtlities underlying basics.

 

Now as ufficient attention has been drawn,with another couple of

mails to Chandrashekhar ji the paper work can be started.

 

For any person with scientific bent of mind - can read

 

1)Grahasphuta drishti kadhanadhyaya - Graha drishti is based on

Longitudinal distance.

 

2)Opposition in Vargas does not retain longitudinal position

 

3)Late Santhanam's view in BPHS

 

4)Read article from Mr.Bose where things have been explained beyond

doubt.Ms.Savithri and Inderjit ji responded after wards.

 

Thus i respect the view of every individual in thsi group and cannot

and should not force them.

 

All those who have a scientific bent of mind can study the basics

and decide for themselves.

 

The paper will be presented in such a way(Ofcourse within own

limitations) that even a layman should be able to understand the

astronomical subtitlities and garaha drishti rules as per BPHS.

 

Thanks

Pradeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Pradeep ji

 

It is your prerogative and scheduling to suit the whitepaper. But if I

may suggest to include:

 

a. the predictive fallacy if one use varga chakra as independent chart

(of course not the primary one)

 

b. how astrologers using varga chakra - with combinations / bhavas /

aspects are missing the " basics " - again through showing predictive

fallacies

 

c. other d charts - other than d9

 

If I may suggest - let the paper be read by interested members, and

let there not be any misquotes / selective quotes in that paper - so

let there be no debate.

 

I am sure by drawing the attention - you have achieved your purpose

and let members make their own judgements without being pointed at

their knowledge of basics.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Respected members

>

> If i ever think that i will get support from everyone regarding the

> debated point,then i am the biggest fool.

>

> My purpose is only to gather the attention of students regarding the

> subtlities underlying basics.

>

> Now as ufficient attention has been drawn,with another couple of

> mails to Chandrashekhar ji the paper work can be started.

>

> For any person with scientific bent of mind - can read

>

> 1)Grahasphuta drishti kadhanadhyaya - Graha drishti is based on

> Longitudinal distance.

>

> 2)Opposition in Vargas does not retain longitudinal position

>

> 3)Late Santhanam's view in BPHS

>

> 4)Read article from Mr.Bose where things have been explained beyond

> doubt.Ms.Savithri and Inderjit ji responded after wards.

>

> Thus i respect the view of every individual in thsi group and cannot

> and should not force them.

>

> All those who have a scientific bent of mind can study the basics

> and decide for themselves.

>

> The paper will be presented in such a way(Ofcourse within own

> limitations) that even a layman should be able to understand the

> astronomical subtitlities and garaha drishti rules as per BPHS.

>

> Thanks

> Pradeep

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...