Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as asked by Bhaskar ji.

[Guest guest]

Dear Sateesh ji,

 

Its okay...dont take it otherwise.

 

Do you have any opinion on usage of navamsa.

 

Regards

 

Tarun

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras

wrote:

>

>

> I'm not interested in Bhaskar's chart - you must have meant this

for " Satish " . Please address it to the correct person to avoid

confusion.

>

> Thanks - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

>

> -

> Tarun

>

> Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:27 AM

> Sateesh / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

asked by Bhaskar ji.

>

>

>

>

> Sateesh and Raja,

>

> If yuo want to point Bhaskar ji's chart then please provide a

reading

> of Vimsamsa use and detailed explanation of method adopted.

>

> He too asked you about vimsamsa but you are just stuck on Rashi

chart.

>

> Instead of providing the practical approach of methodology you are

> following just pointing negatives / positive of chart.

>

> SO please explain Bhaskar ji's chart according to the usage of

> Vimsamsa which is called as D-20. if you want to attack bhaskar

ji's

> chart.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Tarun,

 

No problem - it was not directed specifically at you, as many people on the

thread were doing the same. So I wrote it clearly for all, not just you.

 

I tend to use Navamsa chart to see further strength/weakness of those planets in

Rasi.

 

For example, in my chart - Mars is Exalted in Rasi, but Neecha in Navamsa!

 

My Mars AD (Sub-period of Rahu-Mars) that ran from May 2006 to June 2007 was

very good. So I feel Rasi has more weight, and Navamsa less.

 

But I am still open on how much/little Navamsa placements/Lordships give - I am

not yet decided whether or not one can treat them in the Exact same fashion as

Rasi placements/Lordships.

 

In short, Rasi is the Number 1 chart in my eyes - then Navamsa as a supplement

only - then all other Divisionals (whether you want to call them Divisionals, or

Divisional " charts " ) are of lower order than Navamsa.

 

That said, I am open to changing my view on this as time progresses, so will

wait and see how I feel in say 5 years :-) .

 

Cheers - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Tarun

 

Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:45 PM

Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as asked by

Bhaskar ji.

 

 

Dear Sateesh ji,

 

Its okay...dont take it otherwise.

 

Do you have any opinion on usage of navamsa.

 

Regards

 

Tarun

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras

wrote:

>

>

> I'm not interested in Bhaskar's chart - you must have meant this

for " Satish " . Please address it to the correct person to avoid

confusion.

>

> Thanks - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

>

> -

> Tarun

>

> Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:27 AM

> Sateesh / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

asked by Bhaskar ji.

>

>

>

>

> Sateesh and Raja,

>

> If yuo want to point Bhaskar ji's chart then please provide a

reading

> of Vimsamsa use and detailed explanation of method adopted.

>

> He too asked you about vimsamsa but you are just stuck on Rashi

chart.

>

> Instead of providing the practical approach of methodology you are

> following just pointing negatives / positive of chart.

>

> SO please explain Bhaskar ji's chart according to the usage of

> Vimsamsa which is called as D-20. if you want to attack bhaskar

ji's

> chart.

>

> Regards,

>

Recent Activity

a.. 37New Members

Visit Your Group

Finance

It's Now Personal

 

Guides, news,

 

advice & more.

 

Mail

You're invited!

 

Try the all-new

 

Mail Beta

 

Y! Messenger

Group get-together

 

Host a free online

 

conference on IM.

..

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sateeshji,

 

//I tend to use Navamsa chart to see further strength/weakness of

those planets in Rasi. //

 

Thats what we all are supposed to do exactly.

 

//But I am still open on how much/little Navamsa placements/Lordships

give - I am not yet decided whether or not one can treat them in the

Exact same fashion as Rasi placements/Lordships. //

 

We are all open for this. The rasi chart is the tree (If I am allowed

to say this)and Navamsha is the (Branches and fruits accruing, if I am

allowed to say this). My own way of looking at these charts - If I

find the Navamsha Lagna and the placements of the planets,Lordships

etc, stronger in the Navamsha (Chart), then it would make me think

that the Rasi Chart is strong, and reinforce and accentuate this

thinking, because the Navamsha(Chart) is strong. If vice-versa, then

my thinking also becomes contrary on the Rasi chart. This thking

may be wrong or right, I do not care much about,but at least I find it

practical.

 

//In short, Rasi is the Number 1 chart in my eyes - then Navamsa as a

supplement only - then all other Divisionals (whether you want to call

them Divisionals, or Divisional " charts " ) are of lower order than

Navamsa. //

 

Boss, this is also agreed by me.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras wrote:

>

>

> Dear Tarun,

>

> No problem - it was not directed specifically at you, as many people

on the thread were doing the same. So I wrote it clearly for all, not

just you.

>

> I tend to use Navamsa chart to see further strength/weakness of

those planets in Rasi.

>

> For example, in my chart - Mars is Exalted in Rasi, but Neecha in

Navamsa!

>

> My Mars AD (Sub-period of Rahu-Mars) that ran from May 2006 to June

2007 was very good. So I feel Rasi has more weight, and Navamsa less.

>

> But I am still open on how much/little Navamsa placements/Lordships

give - I am not yet decided whether or not one can treat them in the

Exact same fashion as Rasi placements/Lordships.

>

> In short, Rasi is the Number 1 chart in my eyes - then Navamsa as a

supplement only - then all other Divisionals (whether you want to call

them Divisionals, or Divisional " charts " ) are of lower order than Navamsa.

>

> That said, I am open to changing my view on this as time progresses,

so will wait and see how I feel in say 5 years :-) .

>

> Cheers - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Tarun

>

> Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:45 PM

> Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

asked by Bhaskar ji.

>

>

> Dear Sateesh ji,

>

> Its okay...dont take it otherwise.

>

> Do you have any opinion on usage of navamsa.

>

> Regards

>

> Tarun

>

> , " Sateesh Batas " <makaras@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I'm not interested in Bhaskar's chart - you must have meant this

> for " Satish " . Please address it to the correct person to avoid

> confusion.

> >

> > Thanks - Sateesh.

> >

> > ========

> >

> >

> > -

> > Tarun

> >

> > Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:27 AM

> > Sateesh / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

> asked by Bhaskar ji.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sateesh and Raja,

> >

> > If yuo want to point Bhaskar ji's chart then please provide a

> reading

> > of Vimsamsa use and detailed explanation of method adopted.

> >

> > He too asked you about vimsamsa but you are just stuck on Rashi

> chart.

> >

> > Instead of providing the practical approach of methodology you are

> > following just pointing negatives / positive of chart.

> >

> > SO please explain Bhaskar ji's chart according to the usage of

> > Vimsamsa which is called as D-20. if you want to attack bhaskar

> ji's

> > chart.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> Recent Activity

> a.. 37New Members

> Visit Your Group

> Finance

> It's Now Personal

>

> Guides, news,

>

> advice & more.

>

> Mail

> You're invited!

>

> Try the all-new

>

> Mail Beta

>

> Y! Messenger

> Group get-together

>

> Host a free online

>

> conference on IM.

> .

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sateesh ji

 

I also sincerely apologize to you, if my mails inferred your name. In

fact - those queries / conversation / references were for Shri Satish ji.

 

I will take extra care in future.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras wrote:

>

>

> Dear Tarun,

>

> No problem - it was not directed specifically at you, as many people

on the thread were doing the same. So I wrote it clearly for all, not

just you.

>

> I tend to use Navamsa chart to see further strength/weakness of

those planets in Rasi.

>

> For example, in my chart - Mars is Exalted in Rasi, but Neecha in

Navamsa!

>

> My Mars AD (Sub-period of Rahu-Mars) that ran from May 2006 to June

2007 was very good. So I feel Rasi has more weight, and Navamsa less.

>

> But I am still open on how much/little Navamsa placements/Lordships

give - I am not yet decided whether or not one can treat them in the

Exact same fashion as Rasi placements/Lordships.

>

> In short, Rasi is the Number 1 chart in my eyes - then Navamsa as a

supplement only - then all other Divisionals (whether you want to call

them Divisionals, or Divisional " charts " ) are of lower order than Navamsa.

>

> That said, I am open to changing my view on this as time progresses,

so will wait and see how I feel in say 5 years :-) .

>

> Cheers - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Tarun

>

> Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:45 PM

> Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

asked by Bhaskar ji.

>

>

> Dear Sateesh ji,

>

> Its okay...dont take it otherwise.

>

> Do you have any opinion on usage of navamsa.

>

> Regards

>

> Tarun

>

> , " Sateesh Batas " <makaras@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I'm not interested in Bhaskar's chart - you must have meant this

> for " Satish " . Please address it to the correct person to avoid

> confusion.

> >

> > Thanks - Sateesh.

> >

> > ========

> >

> >

> > -

> > Tarun

> >

> > Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:27 AM

> > Sateesh / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

> asked by Bhaskar ji.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sateesh and Raja,

> >

> > If yuo want to point Bhaskar ji's chart then please provide a

> reading

> > of Vimsamsa use and detailed explanation of method adopted.

> >

> > He too asked you about vimsamsa but you are just stuck on Rashi

> chart.

> >

> > Instead of providing the practical approach of methodology you are

> > following just pointing negatives / positive of chart.

> >

> > SO please explain Bhaskar ji's chart according to the usage of

> > Vimsamsa which is called as D-20. if you want to attack bhaskar

> ji's

> > chart.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> Recent Activity

> a.. 37New Members

> Visit Your Group

> Finance

> It's Now Personal

>

> Guides, news,

>

> advice & more.

>

> Mail

> You're invited!

>

> Try the all-new

>

> Mail Beta

>

> Y! Messenger

> Group get-together

>

> Host a free online

>

> conference on IM.

> .

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla,

 

Many thanks, and no problem - it's an easy mistake to make

 

- and as per my message to Tarun it was not directed just at you or just at him,

but to many on the List.

 

In real life also, I have to point out to everyone when I verbally tell them my

name, and they write it down as " Satish " :-) .

 

Cheers - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prafulla Gang

 

Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:56 PM

Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as asked by

Bhaskar ji.

 

 

Dear Sateesh ji

 

I also sincerely apologize to you, if my mails inferred your name. In

fact - those queries / conversation / references were for Shri Satish ji.

 

I will take extra care in future.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

Recent Activity

a.. 37New Members

Visit Your Group

Finance

It's Now Personal

 

Guides, news,

 

advice & more.

 

Mail

Get it all!

 

With the all-new

 

Mail Beta

 

Y! Messenger

Files to share?

 

Send up to 1GB of

 

files in an IM.

..

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sateesh

 

Many thanks for your kind note. With you, I was hopeful of your kind

understanding to my apology note, for our long association on SA List.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras wrote:

>

>

> Dear Prafulla,

>

> Many thanks, and no problem - it's an easy mistake to make

>

> - and as per my message to Tarun it was not directed just at you or

just at him, but to many on the List.

>

> In real life also, I have to point out to everyone when I verbally

tell them my name, and they write it down as " Satish " :-) .

>

> Cheers - Sateesh.

>

> ========

>

> -

> Prafulla Gang

>

> Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:56 PM

> Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as

asked by Bhaskar ji.

>

>

> Dear Sateesh ji

>

> I also sincerely apologize to you, if my mails inferred your name. In

> fact - those queries / conversation / references were for Shri

Satish ji.

>

> I will take extra care in future.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> Recent Activity

> a.. 37New Members

> Visit Your Group

> Finance

> It's Now Personal

>

> Guides, news,

>

> advice & more.

>

> Mail

> Get it all!

>

> With the all-new

>

> Mail Beta

>

> Y! Messenger

> Files to share?

>

> Send up to 1GB of

>

> files in an IM.

> .

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Welcome, dear Prafulla.

 

Best - Sateesh.

 

========

 

-

Prafulla Gang

 

Saturday, July 14, 2007 4:27 PM

Re: Satish / Raja --- Explain Vimshamsa as asked by

Bhaskar ji.

 

 

Dear Sateesh

 

Many thanks for your kind note. With you, I was hopeful of your kind

understanding to my apology note, for our long association on SA List.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " Sateesh Batas " <makaras wrote:

>

>

> Dear Prafulla,

>

> Many thanks, and no problem - it's an easy mistake to make

>

> - and as per my message to Tarun it was not directed just at you or

just at him, but to many on the List.

>

> In real life also, I have to point out to everyone when I verbally

tell them my name, and they write it down as " Satish " :-) .

>

> Cheers - Sateesh.

 

Recent Activity

a.. 37New Members

Visit Your Group

Finance

It's Now Personal

 

Guides, news,

 

advice & more.

 

Mail

Drag & drop

 

With the all-new

 

Mail Beta

 

Y! Messenger

Instant hello

 

Chat in real-time

 

with your friends.

..