Chandrashekar ji -- Please share SJC Views

[Guest guest]

Dear shri Chandrasekhar ji,

 

As you are SJC guru - you must be guiding your sishya with SJC

Parampara ..so I am surprised on your silence, when Pradeep ji quoted

Sanjay ji.

Since others have posted about - Santhanam and KN Rao - I request

Shri Chandrasekhar ji- SJC Guru to clarify the role and interpretation

of D charts and aspects as SJC Guru./ SJC parampara.

 

 

Regards,

 

Tarun

[Guest guest]

Dear Tarun,

 

Let me correct you. I am no longer connected with SJC for personal

reasons. But let nobody think that I do not respect Sanjay Rath for his

astrological knowledge.

 

Having said that, I have always said that I would look at planetary

aspects in navamsha if some yoga in a classic specifically mentions it

and in D-Charts, in general I would look at the rashi aspects. This has

been my position when I was with SJC and remains my position even today.

 

Let me also tell what I tell my shishyas, here. I tell them to first

learn to interpret the Rasi charts correctly, by themselves, then to

understand the strength of grahas from Navamshas. Having perfected that

technique, only then should they try their hand at interpretation of the

other D-Charts. It is no use justifying a prediction gone wrong by using

arcane principles that one does not use while interpreting the chart in

the first place. There are too many drishties, argalas, padas,

Karakamshas and D-charts to justify anything.

 

I remember one conference that I attended when a wrong chart, in place

of the chart of one of the respected sages, was presented and though the

chart was making it evident that it does not belong to a Sanyaasi, even

the great names in astrology were trying to justify the chart, till I

asked whether the chart really belonged to the sage as no Pravrajya yoga

was evident in the chart. Those who were present at that conference will

certainly understand which chart I am speaking about.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

 

Tarun wrote:

>

>

> Dear shri Chandrasekhar ji,

>

> As you are SJC guru - you must be guiding your sishya with SJC

> Parampara ..so I am surprised on your silence, when Pradeep ji quoted

> Sanjay ji.

> Since others have posted about - Santhanam and KN Rao - I request

> Shri Chandrasekhar ji- SJC Guru to clarify the role and interpretation

> of D charts and aspects as SJC Guru./ SJC parampara.

>

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

>

> ------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/896 - Release 7/11/2007 4:09

PM

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Chandrashekhar ji Namste

 

 

> I remember one conference that I attended when a wrong chart, in

place

> of the chart of one of the respected sages, was presented and

though the

> chart was making it evident that it does not belong to a Sanyaasi,

even

> the great names in astrology were trying to justify the chart, till

I

> asked whether the chart really belonged to the sage as no Pravrajya

yoga

> was evident in the chart. Those who were present at that conference

will

> certainly understand which chart I am speaking about.

 

 

Yes. It was in Mumbai Conference and happned with Kasturi's paper

presentaion I think. Since I was on last row I dont know who pointed

out that but it was one of the ackward moment in the conference.But

these things happen if we see it in larger prespective.

 

Thanks a lot for your Time and Sapce.

 

Prabodh Vekhande

Jai jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar

 

 

 

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Tarun,

>

> Let me correct you. I am no longer connected with SJC for personal

> reasons. But let nobody think that I do not respect Sanjay Rath for

his

> astrological knowledge.

>

> Having said that, I have always said that I would look at planetary

> aspects in navamsha if some yoga in a classic specifically mentions

it

> and in D-Charts, in general I would look at the rashi aspects. This

has

> been my position when I was with SJC and remains my position even

today.

>

> Let me also tell what I tell my shishyas, here. I tell them to

first

> learn to interpret the Rasi charts correctly, by themselves, then

to

> understand the strength of grahas from Navamshas. Having perfected

that

> technique, only then should they try their hand at interpretation

of the

> other D-Charts. It is no use justifying a prediction gone wrong by

using

> arcane principles that one does not use while interpreting the

chart in

> the first place. There are too many drishties, argalas, padas,

> Karakamshas and D-charts to justify anything.

>

> I remember one conference that I attended when a wrong chart, in

place

> of the chart of one of the respected sages, was presented and

though the

> chart was making it evident that it does not belong to a Sanyaasi,

even

> the great names in astrology were trying to justify the chart, till

I

> asked whether the chart really belonged to the sage as no Pravrajya

yoga

> was evident in the chart. Those who were present at that conference

will

> certainly understand which chart I am speaking about.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

>

> Tarun wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear shri Chandrasekhar ji,

> >

> > As you are SJC guru - you must be guiding your sishya with SJC

> > Parampara ..so I am surprised on your silence, when Pradeep ji

quoted

> > Sanjay ji.

> > Since others have posted about - Santhanam and KN Rao - I request

> > Shri Chandrasekhar ji- SJC Guru to clarify the role and

interpretation

> > of D charts and aspects as SJC Guru./ SJC parampara.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Tarun

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/896 - Release Date:

7/11/2007 4:09 PM

> >

>

>

>