SHRI SANTHANAMJI - PROOF OF ASPECTS ???/Only if you want

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla ji

 

It is not my choice at all.That is where you are missing on

something.Guru and Moon in 1/7 (navamsha arrangement)are not

apecting.

 

Shri Santhanam understands this,and hence he said categorically in

Devakeralam as well as BPHS.Do you think Late Santhanam haven't seen

1/7 in navamsha arrangements?Why is he saying aspects are not

possible?

 

If you wnat i will explain it to you with a chart.Onyl if you want.

 

Regds

Pradeep

, " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep ji

>

> I wanted to conclude the thread - pending your case studies. But

for

> the clarification purpose:

>

> The example quoted in my earlier submission on Smt Menaka Gandhi's

> chart -

> Guru and moon in 1/7 - are they not aspecting each other?

>

> if you want to reject that - it is your choice !!

>

> If i had not read in TOA - I will not comment.

>

> But as I have observed on the thread: You have moved from

existence

> of D charts to aspects in D charts.

>

> Well - Good luck

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Prafulla ji

> >

> > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell with

> > certainty

> > > that -

> > > a. He considered D charts

> > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> >

> > If you say that he uses aspects,then he might have used them

when

> > you were there,and to the bigger world ,he gave another advise

as

> > categorically,in crystal clear english that aspects should not

be

> > considered in navamsha or other charts.

> >

> > For your info,he is not at all mentioning about aspects in the

TOA

> > articles.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> > , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > >

> > > Many thanks for sharing references.

> > >

> > > I had opportunity to spend some time with Late Santhanam ji,

and I

> > > distinctly remember him referring mutual aspects of guru and

venus

> > in

> > > D9 chakra as good combination for marital life.

> > >

> > > Members may try this principle in the case studies - and vouch

for

> > its

> > > working.

> > >

> > > I referred two case studies from his TOA articles as well -

stating

> > > his approach on D9 chakra.

> > >

> > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell with

> > certainty

> > > that -

> > > a. He considered D charts

> > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > , " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Discoveries and Lessons In Practical Vedic astrology

> > > > by R. Santhanam -Part 1

> > > >

> > > > Page 56

> > > >

> > > > ------In the navamsha Diagram we find two favourable

> > > > combinations for early marriage.Venus in the 7th from

> > > > the ascendant and jupiter in the 7th from the Moon

> > > >

> > > > (Now what can one infer above, if not 7th aspect, then what?)

> > > >

> > > > page 421

> > > >

> > > > ------The moon is in Scorpio navamsha from where the

> > > > 10th is occupied by both mercury and saturn ,indicating

> > > > shoe related Profession.

> > > >

> > > > ( The above combination is shown in the Navamsha

> > > > Diagram given on that Page. I ak the readers if he is not

> > > > talking here of the 3td aspect of saturn, then what ?)

> > > >

> > > > Also by the way, Diagram is also known as Chart,

> > > > for those who may not know.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep ji

 

LOL

 

unfortunately he is not alive today to clarify - what he has

understood !! Perhaps - the case studies and notes taken in my

conversation are the only reference i have to quote. So i have nothing

further to offer - except the fact that - he considered 1/7 -

opposition of planets - as aspect even in d9.

 

So you agree with Santhanam ji that - D charts exists and to be read

like rasi chart for combinations etc. if not then why is referring to

1/7 position or even bhava in navamsa chakra.

 

I am happy to see - atleast your accepting that D charts exists. Now

your contention seems only on aspects in D chakras. You can not have

selective reference to Late santhanam's reference to D chakras.

 

 

regards / Prafulla

 

 

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Prafulla ji

>

> It is not my choice at all.That is where you are missing on

> something.Guru and Moon in 1/7 (navamsha arrangement)are not

> apecting.

>

> Shri Santhanam understands this,and hence he said categorically in

> Devakeralam as well as BPHS.Do you think Late Santhanam haven't seen

> 1/7 in navamsha arrangements?Why is he saying aspects are not

> possible?

>

> If you wnat i will explain it to you with a chart.Onyl if you want.

>

> Regds

> Pradeep

> , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Pradeep ji

> >

> > I wanted to conclude the thread - pending your case studies. But

> for

> > the clarification purpose:

> >

> > The example quoted in my earlier submission on Smt Menaka Gandhi's

> > chart -

> > Guru and moon in 1/7 - are they not aspecting each other?

> >

> > if you want to reject that - it is your choice !!

> >

> > If i had not read in TOA - I will not comment.

> >

> > But as I have observed on the thread: You have moved from

> existence

> > of D charts to aspects in D charts.

> >

> > Well - Good luck

> >

> > regards / Prafulla

> >

> > , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Prafulla ji

> > >

> > > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell with

> > > certainty

> > > > that -

> > > > a. He considered D charts

> > > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> > >

> > > If you say that he uses aspects,then he might have used them

> when

> > > you were there,and to the bigger world ,he gave another advise

> as

> > > categorically,in crystal clear english that aspects should not

> be

> > > considered in navamsha or other charts.

> > >

> > > For your info,he is not at all mentioning about aspects in the

> TOA

> > > articles.

> > >

> > > Regds

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > >

> > > , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > > >

> > > > Many thanks for sharing references.

> > > >

> > > > I had opportunity to spend some time with Late Santhanam ji,

> and I

> > > > distinctly remember him referring mutual aspects of guru and

> venus

> > > in

> > > > D9 chakra as good combination for marital life.

> > > >

> > > > Members may try this principle in the case studies - and vouch

> for

> > > its

> > > > working.

> > > >

> > > > I referred two case studies from his TOA articles as well -

> stating

> > > > his approach on D9 chakra.

> > > >

> > > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell with

> > > certainty

> > > > that -

> > > > a. He considered D charts

> > > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> > > >

> > > > regards / Prafulla

> > > >

> > > > , " Bhaskar "

> <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Discoveries and Lessons In Practical Vedic astrology

> > > > > by R. Santhanam -Part 1

> > > > >

> > > > > Page 56

> > > > >

> > > > > ------In the navamsha Diagram we find two favourable

> > > > > combinations for early marriage.Venus in the 7th from

> > > > > the ascendant and jupiter in the 7th from the Moon

> > > > >

> > > > > (Now what can one infer above, if not 7th aspect, then what?)

> > > > >

> > > > > page 421

> > > > >

> > > > > ------The moon is in Scorpio navamsha from where the

> > > > > 10th is occupied by both mercury and saturn ,indicating

> > > > > shoe related Profession.

> > > > >

> > > > > ( The above combination is shown in the Navamsha

> > > > > Diagram given on that Page. I ak the readers if he is not

> > > > > talking here of the 3td aspect of saturn, then what ?)

> > > > >

> > > > > Also by the way, Diagram is also known as Chart,

> > > > > for those who may not know.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla ji

 

The question was would you like to know ,why aspects are impossible

and what you see as 1/7 in navamsha arrangement is not an aspect.

 

If you want,i can explain with the relevant chapter from BPHS and

also with a chart.

 

Then you will understand ,why late santhanam has said,aspects cannot

be seen from navamsha or other charts.

 

Now i do not agree with Late Santhanam that D-Charts exist.As the

respected gentleman considered them as a chart ,he couldnt expalin

Lagnashadvargake shloka.

 

But when i follow the explanations written 1000's of years ago,i

canm see them without any trouble.Sage was talking about lagnas

shadvargas -not six varga charts.

 

Regds

Pradeep

 

, " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep ji

>

> LOL

>

> unfortunately he is not alive today to clarify - what he has

> understood !! Perhaps - the case studies and notes taken in my

> conversation are the only reference i have to quote. So i have

nothing

> further to offer - except the fact that - he considered 1/7 -

> opposition of planets - as aspect even in d9.

>

> So you agree with Santhanam ji that - D charts exists and to be

read

> like rasi chart for combinations etc. if not then why is referring

to

> 1/7 position or even bhava in navamsa chakra.

>

> I am happy to see - atleast your accepting that D charts exists.

Now

> your contention seems only on aspects in D chakras. You can not

have

> selective reference to Late santhanam's reference to D chakras.

>

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

>

>

> , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Prafulla ji

> >

> > It is not my choice at all.That is where you are missing on

> > something.Guru and Moon in 1/7 (navamsha arrangement)are not

> > apecting.

> >

> > Shri Santhanam understands this,and hence he said categorically

in

> > Devakeralam as well as BPHS.Do you think Late Santhanam haven't

seen

> > 1/7 in navamsha arrangements?Why is he saying aspects are not

> > possible?

> >

> > If you wnat i will explain it to you with a chart.Onyl if you

want.

> >

> > Regds

> > Pradeep

> > , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Pradeep ji

> > >

> > > I wanted to conclude the thread - pending your case studies.

But

> > for

> > > the clarification purpose:

> > >

> > > The example quoted in my earlier submission on Smt Menaka

Gandhi's

> > > chart -

> > > Guru and moon in 1/7 - are they not aspecting each other?

> > >

> > > if you want to reject that - it is your choice !!

> > >

> > > If i had not read in TOA - I will not comment.

> > >

> > > But as I have observed on the thread: You have moved from

> > existence

> > > of D charts to aspects in D charts.

> > >

> > > Well - Good luck

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > , " vijayadas_pradeep "

> > > <vijayadas_pradeep@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prafulla ji

> > > >

> > > > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell

with

> > > > certainty

> > > > > that -

> > > > > a. He considered D charts

> > > > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> > > >

> > > > If you say that he uses aspects,then he might have used them

> > when

> > > > you were there,and to the bigger world ,he gave another

advise

> > as

> > > > categorically,in crystal clear english that aspects should

not

> > be

> > > > considered in navamsha or other charts.

> > > >

> > > > For your info,he is not at all mentioning about aspects in

the

> > TOA

> > > > articles.

> > > >

> > > > Regds

> > > > Pradeep

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , " Prafulla Gang "

<jyotish@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji

> > > > >

> > > > > Many thanks for sharing references.

> > > > >

> > > > > I had opportunity to spend some time with Late Santhanam

ji,

> > and I

> > > > > distinctly remember him referring mutual aspects of guru

and

> > venus

> > > > in

> > > > > D9 chakra as good combination for marital life.

> > > > >

> > > > > Members may try this principle in the case studies - and

vouch

> > for

> > > > its

> > > > > working.

> > > > >

> > > > > I referred two case studies from his TOA articles as well -

 

> > stating

> > > > > his approach on D9 chakra.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have personally seen him reading charts and can tell

with

> > > > certainty

> > > > > that -

> > > > > a. He considered D charts

> > > > > b. He used combinations and aspects in D charts

> > > > >

> > > > > regards / Prafulla

> > > > >

> > > > > , " Bhaskar "

> > <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Discoveries and Lessons In Practical Vedic astrology

> > > > > > by R. Santhanam -Part 1

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Page 56

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ------In the navamsha Diagram we find two favourable

> > > > > > combinations for early marriage.Venus in the 7th from

> > > > > > the ascendant and jupiter in the 7th from the Moon

> > > > > >

> > > > > > (Now what can one infer above, if not 7th aspect, then

what?)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > page 421

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ------The moon is in Scorpio navamsha from where the

> > > > > > 10th is occupied by both mercury and saturn ,indicating

> > > > > > shoe related Profession.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ( The above combination is shown in the Navamsha

> > > > > > Diagram given on that Page. I ak the readers if he is

not

> > > > > > talking here of the 3td aspect of saturn, then what ?)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Also by the way, Diagram is also known as Chart,

> > > > > > for those who may not know.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>