Proof of apsects-Dwadamsha-Shri KN Rao -Satya ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Satya ji

 

You should kindly understand,why i have ignored bhaskar jis mails.

Is it somehing new?Did i ever deny Raoji using charts,This is a

pain.For eg.Surya Lagna and Chandar Lagna were brough in when we

were talking about vargas.What is this?.Navamsehesha of a Bhava lord

was brought in to prove Bhavas in Navamsha Chakra!!!.Did i ignore.

I had responded with patience.Anyone who goes to his site can see

that he uses,charts.Then do we have to say it is Day.It is Day.I

just said those are superflous info.It is just my view.If you don't

like you can ingore.

 

In many mails ,i have categorically stated that only DV SubbuRao has

categorically stated that aspects and bhavas are not needed.I have

clearly said that,Raoji cosniders only Karakamsha from Rashi chart.

 

In many mails ,even when Raoji was present, i have expressed my

views.It is a known fact that,i have agreed that Raoji uses them.Why

do you have to repeat this again.Thus it means shri Bhaskar has not

read amy mails and brings these as if i don't know it?what a

pity.Does he think i am not reading Raojis articles.

 

I am not at all asking anyone to accepet MY views.I am presenting

various angles as they are present.

 

Whether one wants to follow Parashari system or experimentation is

purely a personal choice.

 

If you want personal choices or preferences,i will stop this thread

now.But if anyone says,it is mentioned in classics,aspects can be

found according to parashara etc.It is not and i will present my

case.

 

Respect

Pradeep , " Satya Sai Kolachina "

<skolachi wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Bhaskar,

>

> You realized something I realized long time ago. That is why I am

> really not interested to participate. I do not understand what

these

> one-sided argument astrologers are thinking. It is the same reason

> that Sri PVR Narasimha Rao left at the same stage, which youd

would

> realize if you have read the past threads from archive.

>

> Just like Sri Pradeep was quoting as if he is master of all the

> classics (for a moment let us accept the same); when he talks

about

> Sri KN Rao, he should read ALL PUBLICATIONS, ARTCILES AND BOOKS

> published by Sri KN Rao uptil now and then talk about what he uses

> and what he does not use to make predictions. Here the books

> published by Sri KN Rao are THE PRAMAANA; there is no question

about

> it. Through his books he is talking to rest of us, as it is not

> humanly possible to communicate his views on a one-on-one basis.

> Prima Faci, we have to accept his books as PRAMAANA.

>

> It is a mere waste of time. Did you not notice, that Sri Pradeep

is

> conveniently avoiding your questions posed in the past couple of

> mails?

>

> He talks about those classics, as pramana, for which there is not

> proof that they are the original classics, say BPHS itself. But he

> refuses Sri KN Rao's books as PRAMAANA for the views of Sri Rao

> himself. This is absolutely ridiculous. In every book of his, Sri

Rao

> made extensive use of amsa charts; there is no question about it.

>

> If the thought of 'Making us accept his opinion' is removed from

his

> mind, the debate would be entirely different.

>

> Best regards,

> Satya Sai Kolachina

>

>

> , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> wrote:

> >

> > One more proof by Shri KN Rao

> > of aspects being used in Divisional Charts-

> >

> > It is really funny. One should be well

> > read to enter into debates and

> > discussions. Only few are well read here

> > who may not be entirely present in this

> > debate., but come for short intervals

> > or do not come at all.

> >

> > Unfortunatly I am not finding

> > the right candidate with whom I can really

> > enjoy debating.No spark. Only one sided

> > game is being played here. There is no simple,

> > ample or even sample proof coming from any,

> > trying to defend their misplaced theories.

> > they are just talking on mundane matters.

> >

> > Anyway heres one more reference-

> >

> > Book named -

> > " Succesful Predictive Techniques of

> > Hindu Astrology " by KN Rao.

> >

> > Page 76 -

> > ---- But Saturn is placed in the 3rd in the birth horoscope

> > and also not merely in the 3rd in dwadamsha but with ketu

> > and is aspected by Mars from the 12th House-------

> >

> > ( The Dwadamsha Chart is given on the above page and

> > one may see this aspect in the Divisional Chart)

> >

> > Now hope no one calls this proof too, as a joke, myth or

> > Bhrama, mithya or Untruth.

> >

> > regards,

> > bhaskar.

> >

>