Guest guest Posted July 10, 2007 Report Share Posted July 10, 2007 Dear all, Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is taught to me also from various books. Does that not prove that the navamsha is an important chart ?Because wife is an important family member and one to cook food when we come home, and one to wait for us if we do not come home (In most cases). regards, Bhaskar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2007 Report Share Posted July 10, 2007 Dear Sri Bhaskar, Navamsa is VERY important chart. Not only the spouse, it gives detail in other aspects also; as stated earlier, it either strengthens or weakens the position of planets in the Rasi chart. Best regards, Satya S Kolachina , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear all, > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > taught to me also from various books. > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > important chart ?Because wife is an important > family member and one to cook food when > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > do not come home (In most cases). > > regards, > Bhaskar. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2007 Report Share Posted July 10, 2007 Bhaskar, YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, Navamsha, NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does not mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses house/mother from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is trying to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not confuse the two for this debate. Satish --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > Dear all, > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > taught to me also from various books. > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > important chart ?Because wife is an important > family member and one to cook food when > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > do not come home (In most cases). > > regards, > Bhaskar. > > > ______________________________\ ____ Shape in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2007 Report Share Posted July 10, 2007 Dear Satish, I am a bit confused in this discussion as I haven't been able to read all the mails carefully just glanced at the same due to lack of time. As per KAS, we do the following for finding delay. We take house in Rasi, so say Sa in 5th house in rasi will delay marriage. For Navamsa there is special consideration of Saturn only that Saturn in 5th house will delay marriage. This is tested in many charts. Here also Sa is aspecting ABC house of navamsa. But say if Saturn were in 2nd house with navamsa rising, then we do not take delay as we do not take HOUSE LORD in Navamsa. In short we do not consider the lord of house of navamsa. So Saturn can only delay marriage if its in 5th house in navamsa as it will aspect ABC house. On another note, Ashtakavarga is also casted in D chart so that is distribution of bindus based on the relative position of the planet in the respective divisional chart. We also check the aspect of lords Rasi's A, B or C in navamsa so say if 2nd 11th and 7th lord of Rasi is aspected in Navamsa by Saturn then also its delay, but at the same time we do not take the lords of house of navamsa. Another note. Say, Sun is in vasudha nadi in Aires then its power as per KAS is different as compared to say if Sun were to be in Vasudha nadi in libra, and here 16 d charts are taken into account. So say Sun from 0 to 30 mins in aries would be in vasudha nadi as compared to sun say 0 to 30 mins in libra so the powers would definitely be different. For twin, if there is slight change in birth time, or latitude or longitude then lagna nadi's maybe be different of lagna or/and 7 planets and all 12 houses of bhav chalits as well. So no two twin can have same nadis or in short d charts and the bhav chalit cusps. Pemmaraju Rayadu and myself had this discussion on KAS list some time back on KAS list. Another note. For profession, we take 10th lords from lagna sun and moon and see them in navamsa (SD), so we would see where saturn is in navamsa, so lets say its in navamsa of libra so its lord is Venus so Venus would be one of the career giving planets and then we see its position in Rasi so say if Venus was in 9th house then the profession giving planet would be venus and linked to 9th house. That is what we use to find profession as per KAS. Another note. When we find the power of a house in d chart then we just use A+B+C and no 4:10 or aspect power's as per the worksheet. That is only seen in Rasi. But for navamsa, we do say that if ve and sa are in 1:7 then they cease to become SD. So certain aspects are seen. From navamsa we find the SD but for finding the power of the D-Chart i.e. D9 then we just add A+B+C power of SAV and not 4:10 or aspect like we do for rasi. I am unable to follow the difference. I know that u understand KAS so I am asking you, if u can let me know what is the difference in how we approach a chart in KAS v/s this discussion. Cheers !!! Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca , SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > > Bhaskar, > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, Navamsha, > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does not > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses house/mother > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is trying > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > confuse the two for this debate. > > Satish > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > taught to me also from various books. > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > family member and one to cook food when > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > Shape in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Dear Satishji, Okay, considering that Your argument put is right, the Navamsha chart still shows the Rashi of the amsha of the various planets, including Spouse, and one moves back to the Rashi chart after seeing the amsha Lord. Am i getting this right ? Okay so a person would know this only from the Navamsha chart, is this not ? When we derive the pointer of the amsa Lord from the navamsha Chart (IN navamsha divisional chart),then does this not make the navamsha chart still important in any case ? To reach the Rashi in reference, in the Rashi chart ? A person who has now reached his PHd level, would still respect his school/College teacher when he crosses him,the Phd level has been reached only from the consistent efforts of this school/college teacher, so he is a important factor in the whole issue. regards, Bhaskar, , SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > > Bhaskar, > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, Navamsha, > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does not > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses house/mother > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is trying > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > confuse the two for this debate. > > Satish > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > taught to me also from various books. > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > family member and one to cook food when > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > Shape in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Dear Ash, The contention - is the view of Shri Pradeep (now I read view of Shri Satish also) that - a. There is No Navamsha chart b. Hence there can not be any houses / aspects / combinations etc in Navamsa chart So in their opinion - if any predictive technique - if they are considering bhavas / aspects / combinations etc in Navamsa chart - they are making a mistake (as in Shri pradeep's opinion - it is not what BPHS intended to convey). regards / Prafulla , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73 wrote: > > Dear Satish, > > I am a bit confused in this discussion as I haven't been able to read > all the mails carefully just glanced at the same due to lack of time. > > As per KAS, we do the following for finding delay. > > We take house in Rasi, so say Sa in 5th house in rasi will delay marriage. > > For Navamsa there is special consideration of Saturn only that Saturn > in 5th house will delay marriage. This is tested in many charts. > Here also Sa is aspecting ABC house of navamsa. > > But say if Saturn were in 2nd house with navamsa rising, then we do > not take delay as we do not take HOUSE LORD in Navamsa. In short we > do not consider the lord of house of navamsa. > > So Saturn can only delay marriage if its in 5th house in navamsa as it > will aspect ABC house. > > On another note, Ashtakavarga is also casted in D chart so that is > distribution of bindus based on the relative position of the planet in > the respective divisional chart. > > We also check the aspect of lords Rasi's A, B or C in navamsa so say > if 2nd 11th and 7th lord of Rasi is aspected in Navamsa by Saturn then > also its delay, but at the same time we do not take the lords of house > of navamsa. > > Another note. > > Say, Sun is in vasudha nadi in Aires then its power as per KAS is > different as compared to say if Sun were to be in Vasudha nadi in > libra, and here 16 d charts are taken into account. > > So say Sun from 0 to 30 mins in aries would be in vasudha nadi as > compared to sun say 0 to 30 mins in libra so the powers would > definitely be different. > > For twin, if there is slight change in birth time, or latitude or > longitude then lagna nadi's maybe be different of lagna or/and 7 > planets and all 12 houses of bhav chalits as well. So no two twin can > have same nadis or in short d charts and the bhav chalit cusps. > Pemmaraju Rayadu and myself had this discussion on KAS list some time > back on KAS list. > > Another note. > > For profession, we take 10th lords from lagna sun and moon and see > them in navamsa (SD), so we would see where saturn is in navamsa, so > lets say its in navamsa of libra so its lord is Venus so Venus would > be one of the career giving planets and then we see its position in > Rasi so say if Venus was in 9th house then the profession giving > planet would be venus and linked to 9th house. That is what we use to > find profession as per KAS. > > Another note. > > When we find the power of a house in d chart then we just use A+B+C > and no 4:10 or aspect power's as per the worksheet. That is only seen > in Rasi. > > But for navamsa, we do say that if ve and sa are in 1:7 then they > cease to become SD. So certain aspects are seen. > > From navamsa we find the SD but for finding the power of the D-Chart > i.e. D9 then we just add A+B+C power of SAV and not 4:10 or aspect > like we do for rasi. > > I am unable to follow the difference. > > I know that u understand KAS so I am asking you, if u can let me know > what is the difference in how we approach a chart in KAS v/s this > discussion. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > , SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, Navamsha, > > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does not > > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses house/mother > > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is trying > > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > > confuse the two for this debate. > > > > Satish > > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > > taught to me also from various books. > > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > > family member and one to cook food when > > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > > Shape in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel > today! http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Dear Prafulla ji Now the important part.They all happen within the same 12 Rashis,but different kinds of relationships. Thus if one can combine these amshas(mainly navamsha) and read from bhavas in Rashi chakra useful delineations can be made. Regds Pradeep , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish wrote: > > > Dear Ash, > > The contention - is the view of Shri Pradeep (now I read view of Shri > Satish also) that - > > a. There is No Navamsha chart > b. Hence there can not be any houses / aspects / combinations etc in > Navamsa chart > > So in their opinion - if any predictive technique - if they are > considering bhavas / aspects / combinations etc in Navamsa chart - > they are making a mistake (as in Shri pradeep's opinion - it is not > what BPHS intended to convey). > > regards / Prafulla > > , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@> wrote: > > > > Dear Satish, > > > > I am a bit confused in this discussion as I haven't been able to read > > all the mails carefully just glanced at the same due to lack of time. > > > > As per KAS, we do the following for finding delay. > > > > We take house in Rasi, so say Sa in 5th house in rasi will delay > marriage. > > > > For Navamsa there is special consideration of Saturn only that Saturn > > in 5th house will delay marriage. This is tested in many charts. > > Here also Sa is aspecting ABC house of navamsa. > > > > But say if Saturn were in 2nd house with navamsa rising, then we do > > not take delay as we do not take HOUSE LORD in Navamsa. In short we > > do not consider the lord of house of navamsa. > > > > So Saturn can only delay marriage if its in 5th house in navamsa as it > > will aspect ABC house. > > > > On another note, Ashtakavarga is also casted in D chart so that is > > distribution of bindus based on the relative position of the planet in > > the respective divisional chart. > > > > We also check the aspect of lords Rasi's A, B or C in navamsa so say > > if 2nd 11th and 7th lord of Rasi is aspected in Navamsa by Saturn then > > also its delay, but at the same time we do not take the lords of house > > of navamsa. > > > > Another note. > > > > Say, Sun is in vasudha nadi in Aires then its power as per KAS is > > different as compared to say if Sun were to be in Vasudha nadi in > > libra, and here 16 d charts are taken into account. > > > > So say Sun from 0 to 30 mins in aries would be in vasudha nadi as > > compared to sun say 0 to 30 mins in libra so the powers would > > definitely be different. > > > > For twin, if there is slight change in birth time, or latitude or > > longitude then lagna nadi's maybe be different of lagna or/and 7 > > planets and all 12 houses of bhav chalits as well. So no two twin can > > have same nadis or in short d charts and the bhav chalit cusps. > > Pemmaraju Rayadu and myself had this discussion on KAS list some time > > back on KAS list. > > > > Another note. > > > > For profession, we take 10th lords from lagna sun and moon and see > > them in navamsa (SD), so we would see where saturn is in navamsa, so > > lets say its in navamsa of libra so its lord is Venus so Venus would > > be one of the career giving planets and then we see its position in > > Rasi so say if Venus was in 9th house then the profession giving > > planet would be venus and linked to 9th house. That is what we use to > > find profession as per KAS. > > > > Another note. > > > > When we find the power of a house in d chart then we just use A+B+C > > and no 4:10 or aspect power's as per the worksheet. That is only seen > > in Rasi. > > > > But for navamsa, we do say that if ve and sa are in 1:7 then they > > cease to become SD. So certain aspects are seen. > > > > From navamsa we find the SD but for finding the power of the D- Chart > > i.e. D9 then we just add A+B+C power of SAV and not 4:10 or aspect > > like we do for rasi. > > > > I am unable to follow the difference. > > > > I know that u understand KAS so I am asking you, if u can let me know > > what is the difference in how we approach a chart in KAS v/s this > > discussion. > > > > Cheers !!! > > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > > > > > > > , SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, Navamsha, > > > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does not > > > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses house/mother > > > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is trying > > > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > > > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > > > confuse the two for this debate. > > > > > > Satish > > > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > > > taught to me also from various books. > > > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > > > family member and one to cook food when > > > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________ ______________ > > > Shape in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel > > today! http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp? a=7 > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Baskarji, Yes. the reason I have issue with using the word navansha chart is that " chart " has a connotation that indiacates that it is kundali arrangement with houses etc. Unless we establish it to be so or otherwise. Lets say navansha ( NOT Navansha chart) as chart has houses/bhavas. Satish --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > Dear Satishji, > > Okay, considering that Your argument > put is right, > the Navamsha chart still shows > the Rashi of the amsha of the > various planets, including Spouse, > and one moves back to the Rashi > chart after seeing the amsha Lord. > > Am i getting this right ? > > Okay so a person would know > this only from the Navamsha chart, > is this not ? When we derive the pointer > of the amsa Lord from the navamsha Chart > (IN navamsha divisional chart),then > does this not make the navamsha chart still > important in any case ? To reach the Rashi in > reference, in the Rashi chart ? A person who > has now reached his PHd level, would still > respect his school/College teacher when he crosses > him,the Phd level has been reached only > from the consistent efforts of this school/college > teacher, so he is a important factor in > the whole issue. > > regards, > Bhaskar, > > , SPK > <aquaris_rising wrote: > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, > Navamsha, > > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does > not > > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses > house/mother > > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is > trying > > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > > confuse the two for this debate. > > > > Satish > > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > > taught to me also from various books. > > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > > family member and one to cook food when > > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > > Shape in your own image. Join our Network > Research Panel > today! > http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness./webhosting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Satishji, Okay I understand. For me it has become a habit because normally in all English translations and books, they write Divisional Charts, therefore, it has automatically developed in my system. regards, Bhaskar. , SPK <aquaris_rising wrote: > > Baskarji, > > Yes. the reason I have issue with using the word > navansha chart is that " chart " has a connotation that > indiacates that it is kundali arrangement with houses > etc. Unless we establish it to be so or otherwise. > Lets say navansha ( NOT Navansha chart) as chart has > houses/bhavas. > > Satish > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > Dear Satishji, > > > > Okay, considering that Your argument > > put is right, > > the Navamsha chart still shows > > the Rashi of the amsha of the > > various planets, including Spouse, > > and one moves back to the Rashi > > chart after seeing the amsha Lord. > > > > Am i getting this right ? > > > > Okay so a person would know > > this only from the Navamsha chart, > > is this not ? When we derive the pointer > > of the amsa Lord from the navamsha Chart > > (IN navamsha divisional chart),then > > does this not make the navamsha chart still > > important in any case ? To reach the Rashi in > > reference, in the Rashi chart ? A person who > > has now reached his PHd level, would still > > respect his school/College teacher when he crosses > > him,the Phd level has been reached only > > from the consistent efforts of this school/college > > teacher, so he is a important factor in > > the whole issue. > > > > regards, > > Bhaskar, > > > > , SPK > > <aquaris_rising@> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, > > Navamsha, > > > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does > > not > > > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses > > house/mother > > > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is > > trying > > > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > > > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > > > confuse the two for this debate. > > > > > > Satish > > > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > > > taught to me also from various books. > > > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > > > family member and one to cook food when > > > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > > > Shape in your own image. Join our Network > > Research Panel > > today! > > > http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. > http://smallbusiness./webhosting > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Dear Ash, Yes these are good points. KAS has a mixture of these and I am not sure I am experienced enough to answer from KAS standpoint. You use houses in navansha/Divisions but not house lords. I am not sure what is the basis for using one but not the other. Navansha is a special arragement as it is 9th harmonic. You use navansha dispositior quite extensively and that is in line with a lot that has been discussed here. Also have you checked, what percentage of charts would work if you did not take aspects in navasha or take the navansha position back to rashi and see aspect from there ? Will write more later as the questions you have asked need a lot of thought. I am not sure how to use nadi's to calculate power. if you have info on it please send it to me. Thanks Satish --- ashsam73 <ashsam73 wrote: > Dear Satish, > > I am a bit confused in this discussion as I haven't > been able to read > all the mails carefully just glanced at the same due > to lack of time. > > As per KAS, we do the following for finding delay. > > We take house in Rasi, so say Sa in 5th house in > rasi will delay marriage. > > For Navamsa there is special consideration of Saturn > only that Saturn > in 5th house will delay marriage. This is tested in > many charts. > Here also Sa is aspecting ABC house of navamsa. > > But say if Saturn were in 2nd house with navamsa > rising, then we do > not take delay as we do not take HOUSE LORD in > Navamsa. In short we > do not consider the lord of house of navamsa. > > So Saturn can only delay marriage if its in 5th > house in navamsa as it > will aspect ABC house. > > On another note, Ashtakavarga is also casted in D > chart so that is > distribution of bindus based on the relative > position of the planet in > the respective divisional chart. > > We also check the aspect of lords Rasi's A, B or C > in navamsa so say > if 2nd 11th and 7th lord of Rasi is aspected in > Navamsa by Saturn then > also its delay, but at the same time we do not take > the lords of house > of navamsa. > > Another note. > > Say, Sun is in vasudha nadi in Aires then its power > as per KAS is > different as compared to say if Sun were to be in > Vasudha nadi in > libra, and here 16 d charts are taken into account. > > > So say Sun from 0 to 30 mins in aries would be in > vasudha nadi as > compared to sun say 0 to 30 mins in libra so the > powers would > definitely be different. > > For twin, if there is slight change in birth time, > or latitude or > longitude then lagna nadi's maybe be different of > lagna or/and 7 > planets and all 12 houses of bhav chalits as well. > So no two twin can > have same nadis or in short d charts and the bhav > chalit cusps. > Pemmaraju Rayadu and myself had this discussion on > KAS list some time > back on KAS list. > > Another note. > > For profession, we take 10th lords from lagna sun > and moon and see > them in navamsa (SD), so we would see where saturn > is in navamsa, so > lets say its in navamsa of libra so its lord is > Venus so Venus would > be one of the career giving planets and then we see > its position in > Rasi so say if Venus was in 9th house then the > profession giving > planet would be venus and linked to 9th house. That > is what we use to > find profession as per KAS. > > Another note. > > When we find the power of a house in d chart then we > just use A+B+C > and no 4:10 or aspect power's as per the worksheet. > That is only seen > in Rasi. > > But for navamsa, we do say that if ve and sa are in > 1:7 then they > cease to become SD. So certain aspects are seen. > > From navamsa we find the SD but for finding the > power of the D-Chart > i.e. D9 then we just add A+B+C power of SAV and not > 4:10 or aspect > like we do for rasi. > > I am unable to follow the difference. > > I know that u understand KAS so I am asking you, if > u can let me know > what is the difference in how we approach a chart in > KAS v/s this > discussion. > > Cheers !!! > Ash -> http://www.ashtro.ca > > > > > > , SPK > <aquaris_rising wrote: > > > > Bhaskar, > > > > YES , Navansha should be seen for spouse, > Navamsha, > > NOT navansha chart. When one says navansha it does > not > > mean navansha chart. Do you see spiuses > house/mother > > from 4th house of navansha ? What vijaydas is > trying > > to say for so many times is THERE IS NO HOUSE IN > > NAVANSHA. It is a amsha, not a bhava. So lets not > > confuse the two for this debate. > > > > Satish > > --- Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Yes the navamsha is seen from the spouse, is > > > taught to me also from various books. > > > Does that not prove that the navamsha is an > > > important chart ?Because wife is an important > > > family member and one to cook food when > > > we come home, and one to wait for us if we > > > do not come home (In most cases). > > > > > > regards, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ > > Shape in your own image. Join our Network > Research Panel > today! > http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > > > ______________________________\ ____ Get the toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. http://new.toolbar./toolbar/features/mail/index.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.