End debate and prove yourself--- last solution

[Guest guest]

Dear Members,

 

This is unending debate and final solution is to prove the methodology.

 

Navamsa and other divisional chart plays an importance this is a fact

proved by all the astrologers yet.

 

I please you to give the proof of your theory or end the debate if you

cannot prove it.

 

Regards,

 

Tarun

[Guest guest]

Dear shri Tarun

 

Navamshas and other amshas are important and used extensively over

1000's of years.

Also you would have noticed by now that,many who quoted shlokas as

part of navamsha chakra were under an impression that charts with

bhavas and aspects were needed.

 

But it was not the case.Sages have talked about amshas and when we

use them as they have mentioned,we will arrive at ''correct''

consistent conclusions.

 

Hope the issue is clear.

 

Regds

Pradeep

, " Tarun " <tarun_vst wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

>

> This is unending debate and final solution is to prove the

methodology.

>

> Navamsa and other divisional chart plays an importance this is a

fact

> proved by all the astrologers yet.

>

> I please you to give the proof of your theory or end the debate if

you

> cannot prove it.

>

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Tarun ji

 

Technical debates will always, eventually lead to some conclusion.

Even when all disagrees, it still benefit us.

 

Shri Pradeep did mention few days back that - he will be facilitating

his reading model through the case studies. Let us wait for them and

understandably, it has to fit his schedule.

 

I am sure - many of us will learn from it.

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " Tarun " <tarun_vst wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

>

> This is unending debate and final solution is to prove the methodology.

>

> Navamsa and other divisional chart plays an importance this is a fact

> proved by all the astrologers yet.

>

> I please you to give the proof of your theory or end the debate if you

> cannot prove it.

>

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla ji,

 

yes even i wanted the same thing and so i posted this thread , so

that debate is finished and some helpful discussions can occur so

that we can learn something new and interesting.

 

I hope Pradeep ji will post his case studies and research papers soon.

 

Regards,

 

Tarun

 

 

 

, " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Tarun ji

>

> Technical debates will always, eventually lead to some conclusion.

> Even when all disagrees, it still benefit us.

>

> Shri Pradeep did mention few days back that - he will be

facilitating

> his reading model through the case studies. Let us wait for them and

> understandably, it has to fit his schedule.

>

> I am sure - many of us will learn from it.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> , " Tarun " <tarun_vst@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Members,

> >

> > This is unending debate and final solution is to prove the

methodology.

> >

> > Navamsa and other divisional chart plays an importance this is a

fact

> > proved by all the astrologers yet.

> >

> > I please you to give the proof of your theory or end the debate

if you

> > cannot prove it.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Tarun

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Yes,

 

I agree, a case study should be put up,with the

timing of events matched with the amsa predictions,

or just the Rasi predictions without reference to

amsa and the matter closed. Also check out on

the first shloka I gave initially I think 2 days back,

does it contain the vargas or not, as expounded

by Lord Bhramaji ?

 

we have to move on fast, after this issue is closed

with new topics, as variety is spice of Life.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

, " Tarun " <tarun_vst wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

>

> This is unending debate and final solution is to prove the methodology.

>

> Navamsa and other divisional chart plays an importance this is a fact

> proved by all the astrologers yet.

>

> I please you to give the proof of your theory or end the debate if you

> cannot prove it.

>

> Regards,

>

> Tarun

>